Sports Hernia: A Comparison of the Different Surgical Techniques




© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Raul Zini, Piero Volpi and Gian Nicola Bisciotti (eds.)Groin Pain Syndrome10.1007/978-3-319-41624-3_13


13. Sports Hernia: A Comparison of the Different Surgical Techniques



Francesco Di Marzo 


(1)
Department of General Surgery, Versilia Hospital – Azienda Usl Toscana Nord Ovest, Lido di Camaiore, Italy

 



 

Francesco Di Marzo



Multidisciplinary evaluation (orthopedist, radiologist, surgeon, physiotherapist, sport physiologist) is mandatory to make diagnosis with confidence and to manage the whole treatment pathway (from first physical examination to “return to play”), avoiding recurrence, failure, and partial resolution [1, 2].

The level of evidence for operative treatment of sports hernia is poorly known, and a recent literature review shows a low level of study quality [3].

Surgery offers a wide range of procedural options and is part of the groin pain syndrome treatment, but considering it as the final step is a conceptual error.

This overview focuses on current surgical techniques, analyzing anatomical and step-by-step technical aspects.

Classification of current techniques is extremely important to define common points and to evaluate any difference:

Open technique without mesh positioning



  • Open all-suture repair


  • Minimal repair technique

Open technique with anterior onlay mesh positioning



  • Open with anterior mesh repair and combined adductor release if needed

Laparoscopic technique with posterior mesh positioning



  • Transabdominal preperitoneal


  • Totally extraperitoneal


  • Laparoscopic inguinal ligament release

At a glance, it’s easy to establish two different ways in classifying all the procedures; the first is to consider how to approach the transversalis fascia:

1. Open technique through a skin/subcutaneous/aponeurosis incision

2. Videolaparoscopic/endoscopic technique through multiple micro-incisions, trocar positioning, and peritoneal flap creation (TAPP) or extraperitoneal space dissection (TEP)

The second takes into account the type of repair:

1. Primary tissue repair with suture

2. Mesh repair

The surgical strategy in laparoscopic technique is strictly tied to the use of a mesh in order to ensure a complete support to musculotendinous architecture of posterior wall without any correlation to nerves or inflammatory tissue (in the pubic area).

The open technique seems to be more flexible, allowing to choose a primary or a mesh repair combined with selective neurectomy if needed.


13.1 Open All-Suture Repair



13.1.1 Anatomical Background


The rectus abdominis and adductor longus pull against the “pubic joint” with consequent weakness of posterior wall of the inguinal canal caused by force impairment (adductor’s strength overcomes rectus), without any nerve entrapment [4, 5]. Sports hernia is treated as a muscular problem with a reinforcement of distal insertion of rectus abdominis and inguinal canal posterior wall, broadening the insertional surface area (including the rectus, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis via the conjoint tendon) [6].


13.1.2 Surgical Technique


The procedure is like a standard open inguinal hernia repair from skin incision to spermatic cord isolation and dissection exposing the posterior wall of inguinal canal.

The exploration of conjoint tendon, rectus abdominis insertion, and transversalis fascia is crucial to identify any defect (injury or medial/cranial retraction of rectus abdominis tendinous portion, conjoint tendon’s tears, bulging of transversalis fascia).

Exposition of pubic tubercle and Cooper’s ligament is necessary to provide a good reconstruction in which the first two stitches are crucial:


  1. 1.


    From lateral tendinous edge of the rectus abdominis to the roughed periosteum of pubic tubercle

     

  2. 2.


    From rectus edge (a little bit proximal to the first stitch) to the tubercle and the upper part of Cooper’s ligament

     

The next stitch bites Cooper’s ligament, lateral edge of the pubic tubercle, and reflected part of the ilioinguinal ligament. Additional sutures are placed as a Bassini repair to bring the conjoined tendon down to the ilioinguinal ligament (reflected part).

The rest of the procedure is, again, like a standard inguinal hernia repair.

In selected cases, an adductor tendon release is combined (contracted or overdeveloped adductor musculature).


13.1.3 Results


Litwin et al. reported good efficacy of the open, all-suture repair technique after evaluating 153 patients over a 6-year period from 2007 through January 2013.

Patient-reported outcome measure was used and showed positive results: physical health scores were improved by 15.5%, mental health scores were improved by 7.8%, and Tegner activity level scores were improved by 37.8%. A low rate of ipsilateral revision surgery and/or hip arthroscopy was reported [6].


13.2 Minimal Repair Technique



13.2.1 Anatomical Background


Muscles and aponeurosis of groin region interact as sliding planes [7].

Transversalis fascia weakness in the inguinal canal posterior wall with “bulging” creates a compression of genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve. The nerve distribution to the inner thigh or scrotum explains the irritation symptoms in such area [7].

Impaired force interaction between the rectus abdominis and adductor (due to overuse, typical of pro sport athletes) causes a chronic pro-inflammatory state in the pubic area, acting directly and mechanically on sensory nerves.

Realignment of muscles, inguinal canal posterior wall reinforcement, and simultaneous nerve decompression are the three main steps of the procedure.


13.2.2 Surgical Technique [7]


The minimal repair technique was developed by Dr. Ulrike Muschaweck, and it was first presented 14 years ago.

A 4-cm incision is made parallel to the inguinal ligament, more medial than for a standard inguinal hernia repair. A sharp incision is performed, and electrocautery dissects through the subcutaneous tissue and Scarpa’s fascia. The external inguinal ring is identified and evaluated (looking for edema or fiber enlargement/attenuation). After the division of external oblique fibers, the ilioinguinal nerve is identified and preserved. The spermatic cord is retracted to expose the floor of the inguinal canal and transversalis fascia (an eventual hernia sac should be identified and treated).

It’s important to use a Valsalva maneuver (direct or indirect) to clearly define a “bulging” in the floor. Careful evaluation of the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve in this area can then be performed.

A lateral to medial incision of the transversalis is carried out, and a running suture (2/0 polypropylene) medial to lateral is performed between the iliopubic tract and the edge of the upper transversalis fascia; this first suture leaves a flap for the return suture. The running suture is continued to the lateral edge of the rectus muscle and anchored to it; then the flap is incorporated in the running suture laterally to the initial knot (imbricated suture line).

The final result is a complete obliteration of the bulging area.

The evaluation of the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve in this area is mandatory; in case of inflammation or any other sign of involvement, it is excised.

To protect the ilioinguinal nerve from mechanical irritation, a collar made with internal oblique muscle fibers is prepared and placed around the nerve.

The rest of the procedure is, again, like a standard inguinal hernia repair.


13.2.3 Results


Both open techniques without mesh positioning were associated with equivalent results. The minimal repair technique has a short postoperative rehabilitation time which allows athletes to return to play very quickly (4.5 vs. 16.5 weeks) [7].


13.3 Open with Anterior Mesh Repair and Combined Adductor Release If Needed



13.3.1 Anatomical Background


Inguinal floor repair and stabilization with mesh (tension-free repair) avoid excessive tension (as in suture repair along the suture line) and its sequelae (postoperative chronic pain, recurrence) [8]. Alternative strategies are necessary in particular cases: young not completely grown male athletes, young female athletes (open primary tissue repair), and prior sports hernia or inguinal hernia open repair (laparoscopic approach) [9].

The choice to combine an adductor release procedure is related to tension reduction at its proximal insertion.


13.3.2 Surgical Technique


A standard incision and dissection through the subcutaneous tissue and Scarpa’s fascia as for an inguinal hernia repair are performed. The external inguinal ring is identified, and the two pillars are evaluated (tension, dilation, fiber attenuation). After the division of external oblique fibers, the ilioinguinal nerve is identified and preserved. The spermatic cord is retracted to expose the floor of the inguinal canal and transversalis fascia (an eventual hernia sac should be identified and treated).

The floor is reconstructed by suturing a lightweight polypropylene mesh to the transversalis fascia and rectus sheath with single nonabsorbable stitches. The lateral edge is sutured to the inguinal ligament with a running polypropylene suture, the mesh is split, and the two ends are sutured together to the inguinal ligament. As in Lichtenstein repair, a deep inguinal ring reconstruction with the two tails of the mesh is performed: the goal is not the ring reconstruction itself but to allow a linear and clear adhesion of the mesh to the floor.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 11, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Sports Hernia: A Comparison of the Different Surgical Techniques

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access