Author and year
Patient-reported outcome score
Single-bundle
Double-bundle
Significance
Kondo et al. (2008) [36]
Lysholm
96.5 ± 5.8
97.3 ± 3.3
p > 0.05
Siebold et al. (2008) [26]
Lysholm
93 ± 6
90 ± 9
p = 0.22
IKDC
90 ± 10
88 ± 10
p = 0.42
Streich et al. (2008) [27]
Lysholm
91.5 ± 6.3
91.8 ± 7.3
p > 0.05
IKDC
88.6 ± 6.5
89.5 ± 6.4
p > 0.05
Aglietti et al. (2010) [20]
IKDC
78 ± 15
83 ± 15
p = 0.05
Park et al. (2010) [24]
IKDC
69.8 ± 19.8
76.8 ± 15.3
p = 0.14
Sastre et al. (2010) [25]
IKDC
81 ± 6
80 ± 8
p = 0.52
Volpi et al. (2010) [17]
Lysholm
95
99.5
p = 0.38
Araki et al. (2011) [21]
Lysholm
96 ± 3.6
95 ± 6.3
p > 0.05
Misonoo et al. (2012) [22]
Lysholm
93.1 ± 3.5
93.8 ± 2.6
p > 0.05
Suomalainen et al. (2012) [28]
Lysholm
86 ± 13
90 ± 9
p > 0.05
Mohtadi et al. (2015) [1]
IKDC
84.6 ± 13.8
84.2 ± 11.8
p = 0.82
ACL-QOL
82.5 ± 17.7
82.4 ± 17.5
p = 0.59
References
1.
Mohtadi N, Chan D, Barber R, Oddone Paolucci E (2015) A randomized clinical trial comparing patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and double-bundle ACL reconstructions: patient-reported and clinical outcomes at a minimal 2-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med: Off J Can Acad Sport Med 25:321–331Crossref
2.
3.
Johnston DR, Baker A, Rose C, Scotland TR, Maffulli N (2003) Long-term outcome of MacIntosh reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency using fascia lata. J Orthop Sci: Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc 8:789–795Crossref
4.
Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH (2015) Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg: Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 31:1412–1417Crossref
5.
Yamamoto Y, Hsu WH, Woo SL, Van Scyoc AH, Takakura Y, Debski RE (2004) Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 32:1825–1832CrossrefPubMed