Urgent and Emergent Conditions
Failure to recognize certain conditions may lead to irreversible morbidity or mortality. These include septic monoarthritis, systemic sepsis, osteomyelitis, compartment syndrome, cellulitis, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), ischemia or infarction due to embolus, thrombosis or vasospasm, fracture, spinal cord compression, mononeuritis multiplex, and vasculitis
(Table 2-2). The following features of the history and exam, though frequently nonspecific, can be helpful to direct one toward more urgent testing.
1,
2
Inability to Bear Weight
The inability to bear weight on a joint raises suspicion of fracture, a septic joint/prosthesis, or gout. Usually, a history of trauma will prompt workup for fracture; however, in patients with osteoporosis, fractures may occur with minimal trauma. Risk factors for osteoporosis include being postmenopausal, prior or current use of corticosteroids, smoking, low body mass, a personal history of fracture, a family history of hip fracture, inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, excessive alcohol intake, and low vitamin D.3 Furthermore, spontaneous fractures may occur in patients with an underlying tumor or, in rare instances, in patients taking bisphosphonates.
4
Erythema
Erythema of a joint is rarely seen in patients with systemic inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthropathy. The presence of erythema raises suspicion for a septic joint, gout, or cellulitis. When a cellulitis lies over a joint, it can be a challenge to distinguish it from gout or septic arthritis because it may also limit range of motion of the joint owing to pain caused by stretching of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. An obvious portal of entry or an off-center distribution of erythema (relative to the joint space) can be helpful clues to cellulitis, if present. Although gout is often thought of as a condition isolated to joints, tenosynovium and subcutaneous tissue are commonly involved, and when this occurs it can also cause an off-center distribution of erythema on the joint. Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) can be valuable in these situations, as it will show edema in the subcutaneous fat in the case of cellulitis or can show joint/tendon involvement in the cases of gout or septic arthritis.
Constitutional Symptoms
Although many systemic autoimmune conditions and even crystalline arthropathy can present with constitutional symptoms, the presence of fever, malaise, weight loss, and/or an elevated leukocyte count should prompt the clinician to rule out infection. Blood cultures, synovial fluid cultures, and culture of other distant symptomatic sites are necessary. Patients with known underlying conditions that can cause fever such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or systemic vasculitis often take immunosuppressive drugs, increasing the risk of infection. Therefore, when these patients present with a fever, it is difficult to discern whether there is a flare of disease, an infection, or both. Also, it is important to note that corticosteroids will often cause an elevation in the WBC count, confounding a situation where infection needs to be ruled out. Moreover, patients who are on corticosteroids, especially doses greater than 30 mg of prednisone daily (or the equivalent), may not mount a fever even when septic, or they may have reduced symptoms in the setting of an infection. In a patient taking high doses of corticosteroids, any infection has likely been present longer than one might suspect based on their symptoms; therefore, one must have a low threshold to initiate antibiotic therapy as soon as is possible.
Neurologic Symptoms
Weakness, numbness, paresthesia, and a burning quality of pain can all be clues to neurologic involvement such as radiculopathy, myelopathy, compartment syndrome, or mononeuritis multiplex/vasculitis. It is important to keep in mind that pain in a joint will often result in weakness, making assessment of strength challenging. Furthermore, inflammation in a region in which a peripheral nerve passes through (such as the tarsal tunnel or volar wrist) can lead to compression of the nerve and resultant paresthesia or numbness.
Diffuse Edema
Diffuse edema, especially when unilateral, may raise suspicion for the presence of a DVT. The typical presentation of a DVT is that of pain, swelling, and erythema on the lower extremity; however, all of these symptoms need not be present, and there are many other conditions such as venous insufficiency, popliteal cysts, cellulitis, and muscle injury that may present in a similar fashion. Furthermore, arthritis or periarthritis of the ankle, which may be seen in any type of systemic inflammatory arthritis, may present this way. Risk factors for DVT include states that promote hypercoagulability such as recent surgery or injury, pregnancy, malignancy, genetic hypercoagulable states such as Factor V Leiden, and autoimmune conditions such as the antiphospholipid antibody symptoms and granulomatous angiitis.
5 A personal or family history of DVT is also a risk factor. Diagnosis can be made with ultrasound of the lower extremity; the location of the clot often does not correlate with the location of symptoms. Treatment of DVT with anticoagulation is critical to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolus.
Articular versus Periarticular Disorders
Patients who present with a complaint of joint pain often find it difficult to distinguish between a true articular problem and a periarticular disorder. In general, an articular disorder will be associated with pain throughout the range of motion of the joint involved, whereas a periarticular disorder (e.g., tendonitis, bursitis) will be associated with pain through only a segment of the full range of motion. Well-localized tenderness over a tendon or bursa further supports the conclusion of a periarticular disorder. It is not only possible, but rather common for both processes to occur simultaneously during an inflammatory illness. Therefore, the presence of periarticular pain does exclude the existence of a systemic inflammatory disorder. For example, rheumatoid arthritis frequently affects tendons in addition to joints
6 and may in fact be common in early presentation of the disease. In gout, uric acid crystals
may not only deposit in joints and tendons but also disperse to surrounding soft tissue. In spondyloarthropathy, the major target of the autoimmune attack is the enthesis: the attachment of tendons and ligaments to bone.
7 Therefore, patients will often present with both clear synovitis manifested by tenderness and swelling of a joint with pain throughout the range of motion and also localized tenderness over a nearby tendon such as the Achilles, quadriceps, or patellar tendons.
Monoarticular Arthritis versus Oligo-/Polyarticular Arthritis
Septic arthritis, traumatic arthritis, and crystalline arthritis (i.e., gout, pseudogout) are the main entities to consider when a patient presents with monoarticular joint pain. However, it is important to keep in mind that gout and pseudogout can involve more joints in a significant proportion of patients, and can even present, albeit rarely, as a symmetric polyarthritis of the small joints of the hands and feet, mimicking rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, any typically polyarticular process such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy can present as monoarticular disease, especially early in the disease course and especially with onset in the elderly. After working up a monoarticular arthritis for infection, injury, and crystalline disease, it is important to give consideration to systemic inflammatory disease. The failure to recognize a systemic condition that has manifested atypically as a monoarticular arthritis may result in multiple unnecessary procedures, including surgery. Increasingly, MSKUS has been found to be useful in distinguishing between mono- and oligo-/polyarticular disorders and articular versus periarticular disorders.
Use of Ultrasound in Rheumatology
Over the last 10 to 15 years, MSKUS has become an established technique for evaluation and follow-up of patients with rheumatic diseases. Technologic advances, including faster computers and probes that can see greater detail, allow even today’s low-budget machines to detect tiny fluid collections within joints, resolve small defects in bone and cartilage, and provide color maps of the joint, indicating where inflammation is taking place. The advantages of ultrasound over other imaging modalities include the following: portability due to the small size of the machines, noninvasiveness, lack of radiation (allowing for frequent repeat imaging), relative inexpensiveness, the ability to scan multiple joints in a brief period, and the ability to look at the joint while it is in motion (i.e., dynamic imaging). These features make ultrasound particularly well suited not only for the diagnosis of rheumatic disease but also for monitoring the progress of therapy. Therefore, a rheumatologist with a clinical understanding of the patient’s problem can scan and interpret images at the bedside, rather than sending the patient for a second appointment. Treatment decisions can be made immediately, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of medical care. Finally, ultrasound at the bedside has tremendous educational value for the patient as they struggle to understand their own disease process. With only brief explanations, the patients can see real-time images of the inflammatory process damaging their joint, making a concrete notion of what was previously only abstract. This is of great utility to the practitioner when discussing the reasons for medical therapy, which are often immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic drugs with numerous toxicities.
Indeed, a large body of literature supports the above assertions. For example, studies examining the utility of ultrasound in the rheumatology clinic have shown that ultrasound is more accurate than clinical examination at detecting joint fluid and inflammation.
8,
9 In a study of 100 consecutive patients, Karim et al.
10 have shown that use of ultrasound in a busy outpatient rheumatology clinic changed the management plan that was made prior to the performance of ultrasound 56% of the time and that overall diagnosis was changed 5% of the time. Several studies
11,
12,
13 have shown that, in rheumatoid arthritis, baseline power Doppler signal is a strong predictor of joint damage 1 year later.
For several types of inflammatory arthritis, studies have examined the role of performing ultrasound in rheumatic disease patients with the following aims: clarifying the differential diagnosis in early, undifferentiated rheumatic disease, defining the number of joints inflamed and/or damaged, monitoring the success of therapy in established disease, guidance of joint aspirations and injections. Indeed, there have been a growing number of rheumatologists using point-of-care ultrasound to enhance patient care in recent years.
14