Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse: Capitolunate Arthrodesis



Fig. 24.1
a Postero-anterior (PA) image demonstrating stage 2 SNAC wrist. b Lateral image of the same patient. DISI deformity noted as well. (Published with kind permission of ©R. Glenn Gaston, 2015. All Rights Reserved). PA Postero-anterior, SNAC scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, DISI dorsal intercalary segmental instability





Diagnosis


Watson and colleagues described the evolution of arthritis in the wrist, but Vender and colleagues established the term scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) [1]. They described the stages as follows: stage I is characterized by arthrosis at the radial styloid–distal scaphoid articulation; stage II is characterized by involvement progressing to scaphocapitate arthrosis followed by stage III which is denoted by degenerative changes in the midcarpal joint—specifically, the capitolunate joint. Notably, the interface between the proximal pole of the fractured scaphoid and the radius is often spared. Based on the patient’s history, physical examination, and diagnostic studies, the patient was diagnosed with stage II SNAC .


Management Options






  • Proximal row carpectomy (PRC): Proximal row carpectomy is a well-described method of managing scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and SNAC wrist. Critical to its success is preservation of the articular surfaces of the lunate fossa and head of the capitate. Midcarpal arthrosis is a relative contraindication for this procedure. If PRC were selected, in that setting it would require either capsular interposition or an osteo-articular transfer system (OATS)-type procedure to be done concomitantly. PRC done for younger and higher demand patients is still controversial with advocates for and against its use in this patient cohort. Stern et al. have reported poorer outcomes in patients under 35 years of age but good results even in longer term studies of patients older than 35 .


  • Midcarpal fusion: There are many described techniques for scaphoid excision and midcarpal fusion including four-corner fusion (lunate, triquetrum, capitate, and hamate), three-corner fusion (fusing all except lunotriquetral (LT) joint), two-column fusion (sparing LT and capitohamate (CH) joints), and isolated capitolunate fusion. In principle, all are identical in that the scaphoid is removed and the midcarpal joint is stabilized with a fusion. Proponents of the four-corner fusion cite a larger surface area for fusion as the main advantage. Studies have shown no difference in fusion rates, range of motion, and functional outcomes between the four-corner and isolated capitolunate techniques [2]. Advantages of an isolated capitolunate (CL) fusion include lower risk of subsequent pisotriquetral (PT) arthritis, less bone graft needs, less surgical time, and equal outcomes and union rates. In principle, the fewer number of joints necessary for fusion to be achieved assuming the other joints are free of degenerative change makes the most sense . Combined, these factors have led us to favor scaphoid excision and isolated capitolunate fusion with triquetral retention .


  • Malerich Arthroplasty: This technique involves removal of the distal pole of the scaphoid (the portion distal to the nonunion) . Long-term studies have shown very good results, and we do like this technique for some patients. The presence of midcarpal arthritis makes this technique less desirable, but it can work well in isolated stylo-scaphoid degeneration (SLAC I). It should be noted that preexisting DISI deformity often worsens after this procedure though it has not been correlated with worse outcomes in studies till date .


  • Denervation/Styloidectomy: We use this procedure selectively in patients not wanting to undergo a larger procedure . Often, older or lower demand individuals do not want larger scale reconstructive procedures, and we will offer arthroscopic radial styloidectomy and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN)/posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) neurectomy.


  • Wrist arthrodesis: For pancarpal arthritis, this is our procedure of choice. We also offer this if the patient has very poor pre-op read-only memory(ROM) (if less than roughly 30° arc of flexion/extension) as salvaging this small amount of motion and assuming the risk of possible additional future surgery does not seem worthwhile. Also patients with gout often present with apparent SLAC wrist that have had attenuation of the scapholunate (SL) over time and intraoperatively are found to have pancarpal arthritic change despite some radiographic joint preservation. These patients are counseled before surgery that midcarpal verses total wrist fusion may be needed depending on surgical findings .


  • Wrist Arthroplasty: There are reports of successful management of wrist osteoarthritis using wrist arthroplasty . At our institution, we have abandoned wrist arthroplasty for osteoarthritis after poor outcomes were achieved, but still use it routinely for rheumatoid arthritis.


Management Chosen


Scaphoid excision and isolated capitolunate fusion with triquetral retention was chosen and is our procedure of choice for the majority of these patients. Critical factors in the decision include patient age/level of demand/comorbidities, preoperative ROM, and stage of disease. In lower demand patients, physiologically older patients, and those at higher risk of nonunion due to comorbidities, PRC is selected more often. Patients with pancarpal arthritis or very limited preoperative ROM are more often recommended total wrist fusion . Patients with very early degenerative changes (stage I), especially those who do not want to undergo a larger procedure, often undergo either Malerich arthroplasty +/− denervation (early SNAC) or arthroscopic radial styloidectomy with denervation (early SLAC). As mentioned above, we prefer isolated CL fusion with triquetral retention over four-corner fusion because of the lessened need for bone graft, lower risk of subsequent PT arthritis, shorter surgery time, and equivalent outcomes [2]. We now maintain the triquetrum as opposed to excising it, given the biomechanical data of increased load across the lunate associated with triquetral excision [3].


Clinical Course and Outcome


The patient underwent scaphoid excision and capitolunate arthrodesis approximately 1 month from the time of his initial evaluation. At his first postoperative visit, his surgical dressing was taken down and his sutures were removed. Active and passive range of motion of the wrist demonstrated smooth flexion, extension, ulnar, and radial deviation. He was placed into a short-arm cast and instructed to work on active range of motion exercises for the digits. He was counseled on smoking cessation. He returned to clinic at 6 weeks. At this visit, the patient admitted to performing repetitive heavy lifting and other vigorous activities with his operative extremity in spite of his ongoing restrictions. Radiographs were obtained and demonstrated intact hardware with a healing arthrodesis of the capitolunate joint (Fig. 24.2). The patient was placed into a removable splint, which he was instructed to use for all activities. A CT scan was ordered 3 months postoperatively to assess the arthrodesis site . The CT scan demonstrated intact hardware with bony bridging across the arthrodesis site between the capitate and lunate (Fig. 24.3). At the time of his final follow-up visit, the patient was no longer requiring narcotic pain medication, was able to perform all activities of daily living with minimal discomfort, and was anxious to return to work without restrictions. On examination, the patient’s incision was well healed without signs of infection, he had full and supple range of motion of his digits, and his wrist range of motion measured 15° of extension, 45° of flexion, 80° of pronation, and 80° of supination. The patient was released to full duty at 4 months postoperatively .
May 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse: Capitolunate Arthrodesis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access