Rotator Cuff Disease, Calcific Tendinitis, Adhesive Capsulitis, Throwing Shoulder, and Instability
Kevin J. Cronin, MD, MS
Surena Namdari, MD, MSc, FAAOS
Dr. Namdari or an immediate family member has received royalties from Aevumed, DJ Orthopaedics, Miami Device Solutions/Biederman Motech, and Tigon; is a member of a speakers’ bureau or has made paid presentations on behalf of DJ Orthopaedics and Miami Device Solutions; serves as a paid consultant to or is an employee of ACI Clinical, DJ Orthopaedics, Miami Device Solutions, and Synthes; has stock or stock options held in Actabond, Aevumed, Coracoid Solutions, Force Therapeutics, HealthExl, MD Valuate, Mediflix, Orthophor, Parvizi Surgical Innovations, Rothman Institute, RubiconMD, and Tangen; has received research or institutional support from Arthrex, Inc., DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson, DJ Orthopaedics, Integra, Roche, Wright Medical Technology, Inc., and Zimmer; and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the Philadelphia Orthopaedic Society. Neither Dr. Cronin nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this chapter.
ABSTRACT
Disorders of the shoulder carry a significant disease burden and societal cost. Recent research continues to evolve current treatment algorithms for these common conditions. The role of augmentation and biologics in the management of rotator cuff disease has been extensively explored. Advances in the management of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears such as superior capsular reconstruction and lower trapezius transfer provide more options for this difficult-to-treat population. The optimal treatment for a first-time traumatic, anterior glenohumeral dislocation continues to be defined, and recent research may favor surgical intervention in the young, active male patient. The importance of both glenoid and humeral-sided bone loss and their interplay in recurrent instability has now been firmly established. These advances, and others, have significantly shaped the approach to common shoulder disorders.
Keywords: adhesive capsulitis; calcific tendinitis; rotator cuff disease; shoulder instability; throwing shoulder
Introduction
Chronic shoulder pain is a leading cause of musculoskeletal disability in the United States and affects up to 8% of all adults. A significant number of those affected are of working age, leading to lost productivity and substantial direct and indirect costs to the healthcare system. Disorders of the shoulder may include tendinopathies, instability, arthritis, and pathologic adaptations of the throwing shoulder. Treatment with both nonsurgical and surgical interventions generally results in favorable outcomes.
Rotator Cuff Tears
In the United States alone, more than 4.5 million patient visits due to shoulder pain occur each year.1 Tears of the rotator cuff can occur from traumatic injuries or chronic degeneration. Degenerative tears are more common and increase with age. More than 50% of asymptomatic patients older than 60 years have a full-thickness or partial-thickness rotator cuff tear on MRI.2 Additionally, the size of tears progresses over time although it is difficult to predict which tears progress and how quickly. A 2021 systematic review showed that partial-thickness tears progress to full-thickness tears at a rate of 3% per year with no difference in symptomatic
or asymptomatic tears.3 Full-thickness tears progress over time as well and possibly at an accelerated rate. A study of 34 patients with symptomatic full-thickness tears treated without surgery showed progression in 82% of patients after a minimum follow-up of 6 months4 (Figure 1).
or asymptomatic tears.3 Full-thickness tears progress over time as well and possibly at an accelerated rate. A study of 34 patients with symptomatic full-thickness tears treated without surgery showed progression in 82% of patients after a minimum follow-up of 6 months4 (Figure 1).
Partial-Thickness Tears
There has been renewed interest in the management of partial-thickness tears, which can be bursal or articular sided. A 2020 study compared patients treated with either débridement or takedown and repair for bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Although débridement resulted in better clinical outcome scores at 6 months, there was no difference at final 2-year follow-up. Additionally, there was no difference in retear or tear progression on MRI or ultrasonography between the two groups at 2 years.5 Long-term outcomes for in situ repair are also favorable. A 2019 study evaluated 62 patients with a mean age of 52.3 years 10 years after in situ repair and found improvement in all outcome scores and an 87% rate of return to sport. There were no revisions, and the authors found no difference in outcomes or return to sport between articular-sided or bursal-sided tears.6 More recently, some have advocated for the use of patch augmentation for the management of partial-thickness tears. Thirty-three patients with chronic, degenerative partial-thickness tears were prospectively enrolled and treated with a resorbable, bioinductive collagen patch over the bursal side of a partial-thickness tear without tear débridement or takedown. At 2-year follow-up, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores were significantly improved from baseline. MRI showed that tendon thickness had increased compared with baseline, and one patient progressed to a full-thickness tear.7
Full-Thickness Tears
Although both nonsurgical management with physical therapy and surgical repair have been shown to improve symptoms in rotator cuff tears, recent evidence suggests that surgical repair may be superior over the long term. A 2019 study reported 103 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears less than 3 cm in size randomized to primary repair or physical therapy. At 10-year follow-up, the primary repair group had maintained improvements compared with the nonsurgical group in ASES score, Constant score, visual analog scale pain score, pain-free abduction, and pain-free forward flexion.8
There continues to be significant debate on rotator cuff repair technique; a gold standard configuration does not exist. A 2020 double-blind randomized controlled trial compared transosseous-equivalent double-row and single-row repair of small and large full-thickness rotator cuff tears. These authors found better functional outcomes for those undergoing double-row repair with tears greater than 3 cm but no difference in outcomes between groups with smaller tears.9 The authors postulated this difference in outcomes may be due to a higher retear rate in single-row repairs with larger tears, although no imaging follow-up was performed in these patients. Previous studies have shown a higher healing rate with double-row repairs for larger tears.10 The debate also continues regarding knotted versus knotless repairs. A 2020 systematic review evaluated 552 shoulders from seven studies and found no difference in retear rates or the location of retears in knotless or knotted suture configurations.11
The routine use of acromioplasty during rotator cuff repair has been questioned. A 2021 randomized controlled trial compared patients undergoing rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, there was no difference in patient-reported outcomes, retear rate, or need for revision surgery.12 All acromial morphologies were included and the study was underpowered to detect differences between these groups. The need for acromioplasty remains an individualized decision.
Although outcomes after rotator cuff repair are generally favorable, there has been recent interest in various types of augmentation to improve results and retear rates. A 2019 study randomized patients with degenerative, full-thickness small and medium rotator cuff tears to undergo standard repair or repair with porcine dermal patch augmentation. At 2-year follow-up, those with patch augmentation showed a 97.6% rate of healing compared with 59.5% for the nonaugmented group on MRI. However, there were no clinically significant differences in outcome scores or strength at final follow-up.13 The role of platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair has also been explored. A 2021 meta-analysis evaluated 553 patients in 17 studies, which compared the use of platelet-rich plasma during rotator cuff repair with standard repair. The results for outcome scores were mixed; however, the use of pure platelet-rich plasma did show a slightly reduced retear rate (19.3% versus 25.4%).14 More data are needed to support the routine use of patch or biologic augmentation for rotator cuff repair.
Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear Management
There remains significant controversy in the management of the irreparable rotator cuff tear. Options include débridement, partial repair, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with various graft types (Figure 2), multiple different tendon transfers, and, finally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Débridement remains a viable option in the appropriately selected patient. A 2020 study retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 26 patients undergoing débridement for irreparable tears. These authors saw improvement in ASES and visual analog scale pain score at mean follow-up of 98 months. Six
patients (23%) underwent revision surgery during the follow-up period, and lower preoperative forward elevation was associated with worse postoperative ASES score and revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.15
patients (23%) underwent revision surgery during the follow-up period, and lower preoperative forward elevation was associated with worse postoperative ASES score and revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.15
The SCR was first performed using a fascia lata autograft, and 5-year outcomes were published in 2019.16 The study reported 31 patients after arthroscopic SCR and showed improved clinical outcomes, range of motion, and acromiohumeral distance. Three patients had graft retear and progressed to cuff tear arthropathy. The remaining patients had intact grafts on final follow-up and no progression to cuff tear arthropathy. Graft thickness on MRI did not differ between 1-year and 5-year follow-up.16 A similar study reported 2-year clinical and imaging outcomes after SCR using a thinner dermal allograft. Although all clinical outcomes improved from before surgery, the rate of graft retear was higher (50%) compared with other studies using fascia lata autografts.17 With the available data, it is unclear whether SCR with a dermal allograft provides
outcomes superior to lower cost options such as débridement or partial repair.
outcomes superior to lower cost options such as débridement or partial repair.
Tendon transfers are another option for the irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. The latissimus dorsi transfer has been well studied. A 2020 study of 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 3.4 years showed significant improvements in clinical outcome and pain scores. There was, however, a high complication rate (27%) and a high rate of conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (13.6%). These authors reported a clinical failure rate of 41%. A low acromiohumeral distance and high-grade fatty infiltration preoperatively were risk factors for failure.18 More recently, the arthroscopic-assisted lower trapezius transfer has been explored because of its improved moment arm for active external rotation (Figure 3). A prospective evaluation of 41 patients showed improvement in all clinical outcome scores. At 14-month follow-up, two patients had been converted to reverse shoulder arthroplasty and two patients sustained a traumatic rupture of the graft.19
Although data are limited, a subacromial balloon spacer has also been explored for the management of massive, irreparable tears. A 2021 prospective, nonrandomized study reported 51 patients with a minimum of
1-year follow-up. There was significant improvement in the Constant score with only five patients being dissatisfied with their outcome. Five patients underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and one patient went on to latissimus dorsi transfer during the follow-up period.20
1-year follow-up. There was significant improvement in the Constant score with only five patients being dissatisfied with their outcome. Five patients underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and one patient went on to latissimus dorsi transfer during the follow-up period.20
Calcific Tendinitis
Calcific tendinitis is a painful shoulder condition affecting between 3% and 7% of adults. It is most commonly seen in females aged 30 to 60 years and has an association with diabetes and thyroid disorders.21 The etiology is controversial though the stages of progression—formative, resting, and resorptive—are well accepted22 (Figure 4). The mainstay of treatment is nonsurgical, including activity modification, rest, physical therapy, and anti-inflammatory medications. In refractory cases, more invasive options may be considered such as injections, ultrasound-guided pulse lavage and needling, or extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Surgical intervention remains the last option. Evaluation with plain radiographs is usually sufficient; however, a 2020 MRI study found that 56% of calcium lesions were associated with partial-thickness (93%) or full-thickness (7%) rotator cuff tears, specifically lesions classified as cloudy with soft contour.23 A 2020 randomized controlled trial compared ultrasound-guided needling (UGN) with subacromial corticosteroid injection (CSI) versus high-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy in 82 patients. At 1 year, there were no differences in Constant scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, or visual analog scale for pain; however the UGN group had more radiographic resorption of the calcific lesion and required less additional treatment during the follow-up period.24 The addition of a CSI to the UGN procedure has been shown to improve pain at 6 weeks and function at 3 months versus saline injection control but had no effect on calcium resorption.25 Platelet-rich plasma injection after UGN was found to have no benefit over CSI at 1 and 2 years.26 Although nonsurgical treatment is frequently successful, patients with calcific lesions larger than 1 cm had a 2.8-fold increased likelihood of requiring surgical treatment.27
Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, begins as an inflammatory reaction and synovitis that progresses to fibrotic contracture of the shoulder capsule.28 The pathophysiology is poorly understood but thought to be driven by increased recruitment of inflammatory cytokines. Elevated fasting glucose levels, hypercholesterolemia, thyroid disorder, and increased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein all have been associated with adhesive capsulitis. In a case-control study of 202 patients, serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was independently associated with adhesive capsulitis when controlling for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and
thyroid-stimulating hormone.29 Interestingly, a 2021 report has also suggested a link between severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and adhesive capsulitis.30 In refractory cases, more invasive treatments can be considered. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy has shown benefit in diabetic patients compared with intra-articular CSIs at short-term follow-up.31 More recently, alternative minimally invasive treatments such as collagenase Clostridium histolyticum injections and ultrasound-guided percutaneous sectioning of the coracohumeral ligament have shown early encouraging results, although further study is needed.32,33 Studies have shown that although capsular release and manipulation under anesthesia provide similar functional outcomes, arthroscopic capsular release results in improved range of motion including forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation.34
thyroid-stimulating hormone.29 Interestingly, a 2021 report has also suggested a link between severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and adhesive capsulitis.30 In refractory cases, more invasive treatments can be considered. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy has shown benefit in diabetic patients compared with intra-articular CSIs at short-term follow-up.31 More recently, alternative minimally invasive treatments such as collagenase Clostridium histolyticum injections and ultrasound-guided percutaneous sectioning of the coracohumeral ligament have shown early encouraging results, although further study is needed.32,33 Studies have shown that although capsular release and manipulation under anesthesia provide similar functional outcomes, arthroscopic capsular release results in improved range of motion including forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation.34
Throwing Shoulder
The overhead throwing motion generates substantial force across the glenohumeral joint. The repetitive stress and microtrauma lead to adaptive changes in a thrower’s dominant arm and can lead to various pathologic conditions. These changes include increased external rotation, decreased internal rotation, increased glenoid and humeral head retroversion, and posterior capsular hypertrophy.
Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit
Increased glenohumeral external rotation, with a concomitant decrease in internal rotation, is an essential adaptation for high-level throwers to obtain maximum velocity. However, this decrease in internal rotation significantly alters the kinematics of the shoulder and elbow, which may lead to various pathologic conditions including labral and partial-thickness rotator cuff tearing as well as injury to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL). A 2020 systematic review showed large variations in the definition of what is pathologic glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), but it is most commonly defined as a greater than 15° to 20° difference in passive internal rotation compared with the contralateral, nondominant arm.35 In a study of 26 asymptomatic professional baseball players, those with a loss of greater than 20° were compared against those with normal range of motion. The group with decreased internal rotation showed increased atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, weakness in external rotation, and an overall decrease in arc of motion.36
It is well accepted that posterior capsular hypertrophy and tightness is one of the main drivers of GIRD pathology. This hypertrophy translates the humeral head anterosuperior within the glenoid fossa resulting in internal impingement during hyper external rotation in the late cocking phase of throwing, leading to undersurface rotator cuff tears and labral pathology. Additionally, there has also been recent interest in the effect of GIRD on the stresses across the elbow. A 2019 study matched 108 high school, college, and professional pitchers with MUCL injury to 108 asymptomatic control patients. These authors found a strong relationship between MUCL injury and glenohumeral internal rotation loss, with 60% of those with MUCL injuries having GIRD compared with only 30% of the control group.37
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree




