Symptoms
Examination
Etiology
Treatment options
Recurrent CTS
Numbness completely resolved then recurs
Findings range from normal to (+) Tinel’s, Phalen’s, carpal compression test, or expanded two-point discrimination
Most common: no obvious abnormality other that adjacent, compressive scar. Other reasons: tenosynovitis, masses, incomplete release
• Revision CTR
• Neurolysis
• Interposition graft
• Synovial flap
• Muscle flap
• Hypothenar
• Fat pad flap
• Vein wrap
Failed (persistent) CTS
Symptoms persist
Key finding: normal or unchanged two-point discrimination
Advanced age, diabetes, intrinsic nerve disease, concurrent compression, e.g., cervical, radiculopathy, incomplete release of TCL
• Observation if symptoms reoccurred to advanced age patients or medical comorbidities
• Revision CTR for incomplete release of TCL
Failed (worsened) CTS
Noticed by the patient in the immediate postoperative period
Tinel’s over incision. Expanded or absent two-point discrimination
Suspected nerve injury
• Neurolysis
• Nerve repair
• Interposition
• Graft
The patient returning to the clinic after CTR complaining of symptoms consistent with median nerve compression can be difficult to assess. The patient’s perception of symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively can be vague and inconsistent. A thorough history must be taken to evaluate for any new or undiagnosed disorders, such as hyperthyroidism, hypertension, or diabetes [22]. In a retrospective review of 2357 patients treated with CTR, 48 patients required secondary surgery for recurrent symptoms, and among these patients, hypertension and diabetes were found to be significantly associated with carpal tunnel recurrence [23]. It is important to delineate what the patient’s symptoms were before the primary CTR. The most common presenting symptom in primary CTS is intermittent impaired sensation in the median nerve distribution. Pains in the hand and wrist are the next most common symptoms, with nighttime paresthesias and weakness as other common complaints [24].
In those cases in which patients return for their first postoperative visit and report that they are “not any better,” specific questioning as to which symptoms persist is crucial to identifying the cause and treatment for these persistent symptoms. Many will report that they still have numbness, but their night pain and dysesthesias have resolved. This suggests complete release of the ligament and no immediate intervention is necessary. With observation, this numbness will continue to improve in most patients. It is helpful to perform Semmes-Weinstein or two-point discrimination testing at this point as this can be a sensitive method to monitor progressive nerve recovery [25].
It is important to distinguish persistent or recurrent pain from persistent or recurrent numbness. There are many reasons for these symptoms, including arthritis in adjacent joints and scar-related pain. An increase in numbness suggests nerve compromise. It is helpful to ask the patient whether the main complaint before the operation was numbness or pain. Nerve decompression for numbness is predictable, decompression for pain is not. Preoperative nerve studies and the operative report can help define the original problem and the extent of the surgical release. The incision should be inspected and a Tinel’s sign test performed proximal to, along, and distal to the scar from the release. Worsened or absent Semmes-Weinstein monofilament or two-point discrimination as compared to preoperative measurement is consistent with intraoperative nerve injury. Objective measures , such as grip strength or sensory testing, should be used when possible to quantify deficits in the affected hand. Provocative maneuvers, such as Phalen’s test, and carpal tunnel compression test can be performed and compared with the contralateral side and with any preoperative findings.
The use of cortisone injections has been advocated in the diagnosis of recurrent CTS. In a retrospective series of 28 wrists in 23 patients, Beck et al. [26] studied whether the result of cortisone injection predicted the outcome of revision CTR. Of the 23 wrists that had relief from injection, 20 had symptom improvement with surgery. The sensitivity and positive predictive value for injection alone predicted outcome of revision CTR in 87%. The results of injection as a predictor of successful revision CTR showed a positive trend, although they did not achieve statistical significance. The authors concluded that relief from injection as a diagnostic test for predicting successful revision CTR was found to have both a high sensitivity and a positive predictive value. Coupled with the components of the physical examination, injection seems to provide a good screening test to establish surgical success with revision CTR. The specificity of the test was lower, at 40%.
Even with careful preoperative evaluation and precise surgical release, revision CTR remains less successful than primary CTR [5]. Consequently, the treating surgeon must combine a thorough history, diligent examination, and information from adjunct tests to estimate the likelihood of success with revision CTR.
The Role of Diagnostic Tools
Supportive accessory studies take a secondary role in the management of failed or recurrent CTS. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) with electromyography (EMG) can help support a diagnosis though should not be relied on to determine the diagnosis. Electrodiagnostic studies are not always helpful in diagnosing recurrent CTS because electrical changes can persist even after successful releases [27, 28]. The use of these studies in the context of recurrent CTS can be useful if the patient had preoperative studies done. If the repeated NCS are worse or show signs of denervation of the thenar muscles, surgery may be indicated [3]. Unfortunately, worsened electrical studies don’t predict the success of revision surgery [24].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reveal extrinsic compression from a mass or bony excrescence. Stutz and colleagues [10] reported on 4 cases, out of 200 revision CTR surgeries, where a mass was found in the carpal tunnel (2 ganglions, 1 lipoma, and 1 fibroma). In our opinion, MRI is not accurate enough for diagnosis of recurrent compression or nerve injury. The AAOS guidelines recommend against the use of MRI in the routine evaluation of patients with CTS.
In a retrospective study of 34 patients who presented with CTS and underwent CTR, Karabay et al. [29] assessed the usefulness of ultrasonography for determining the potential causes of ongoing symptoms following CTR. An abnormal finding was detected by ultrasonography in 25 (74.5%) patients. The most common pathological findings were median nerve swelling (70.6%), incomplete transection of the TCL (23.5%), and perineural fibrosis (17.6%). The authors concluded that in the majority of the patients, the pathology related to the ongoing symptoms was detected by ultrasonography, suggesting that ultrasonography could be used as a complementary imaging method for identifying the causes of failure following CTR.
In a prospective study of 36 patients, Karabay et al. [30] sonographically evaluated the anatomy of the TCL after open CTR, in order to establish new ultrasonographic criteria for the completeness of TCL release. Patients were evaluated with physical examination and ultrasonography before and after the operation. All patients’ symptoms resolved after surgery. TCL was found to be diffusely thickened and to have lost its smooth form after surgery. Postoperative TCL thickness showed a statistically significant increase when compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05). The authors concluded that sonography is a capable imaging method for assessment of the TCL after open CTR. In addition, ultrasound may be considered as a complementary tool to exclude diagnosis of incomplete transection of TCL in patients with persistent symptoms.
High-definition ultrasound has improved in its ability to delineate peripheral nerves and the surrounding tissues. It has been increasingly used to localize the anatomical causes of nerve compression in patients with persistent or recurrent CTS [31].
Nonoperative Care
In most cases of recurrent CTS, conservative measures will not provide adequate relief [32]. Scar modification, splinting, and other exercises to promote nerve and tendon glide can be instituted. Nonoperative treatment of recurrent CTS may provide symptomatic relief for a small number of patients but fail to benefit most patients in the long term, as reported by Strickland et al. [33]. Given our limited ability to control scar formation, revision decompression and neurolysis of the median nerve for treatment of perineural fibrosis are frequently disappointing [14, 15]. Wadstroem et al. evaluated the causes of unsatisfactory results after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome in a retrospective analysis of 40 patients. Their most common pathological finding was fibrosis and adhesions in the carpal canal. In 30% of patients, other neuropathies were present, and bilateral operations had been performed in 55%. We offer revision surgery to patients with worsening numbness immediately after their first operation, patients with recurrent numbness after a previously successful operation, and a select subgroup of patients with persistent numbness after surgery.
Re-operative Strategies
Principles of Revision Nerve Surgery
We use nerve autograft for complete or partial nerve lacerations that cannot be sutured together without tension. Our choice of nerve graft includes medial antebrachial cutaneous (MABC) nerve and sural nerve. Before surgery, be sure to obtain consent to harvest nerve graft or to use a nerve conduit. Loupe magnification or a dissecting microscope is advocated.
The incision is planned so that it extends into normal tissue at least 2 cm on either end. The median nerve is recognized in the distal forearm straight beneath the palmaris longus tendon. The nerve is traced toward the carpal canal working on the anterior, ulnar margin of the nerve. As the scarred region comes nearer, care is taken to recognize the plane between the nerve and the scar. The existence of perineural fat forms a natural plane except in those occasions when the nerve has been lacerated. If you lose the plane between nerve and scar, proceed with the dissection distal to the carpal tunnel starting in normal tissue. Start on the anterior margin of the third common digital nerve and trace that nerve to the anterior, ulnar margin of the median nerve proper. When there is no clear plane between the nerve and scar, you can infer the line of dissection from the distal and proximal anterior, ulnar margins of the nerve. Dissect just ulnar to this line keeping a cuff of synovial tissue on the nerve. Once the nerve is released from scar, check the nerve for signs of injury such as disruption of fascicles or proximal neuroma (Fig. 16.3a). Identify the motor branch and common digital nerve. Adequate exposure of the median nerve and carpal tunnel is required. The revision CTR begins by extending the previous incision into normal tissue to allow proximal or distal identification of the median nerve to first facilitate exploration.
Dissection of the median nerve from proximal to distal should be performed along the ulnar border of the nerve to avoid damage to the motor branch. If dense scar is encountered during the proximal to distal dissection, stop and find the nerve in normal tissue distal to the densely scarred area. Alternate the exposure from proximal to distal and then distal to proximal until the nerve has been safely mobilized.
Repeat Simple Decompression
Unfortunately, given our limited ability to control scar formation, revision decompression and neurolysis of the median nerve for treatment of perineural fibrosis frequently yield unsatisfactory results [14, 15].
In patients with a significant interval between primary CTR and recurrent symptoms, Mosier et al. [22] treated recurrence of symptoms with simple repeat CTR. They define a “significant interval” as more than 1 year with resolution of carpal tunnel symptoms during this time. Beck et al. [26] demonstrated good relief with repeat decompression at many time intervals.
Revision Decompression with Interposition of Local or Remote Flaps
Interposition of a biologic barrier between the nerve and surrounding tissues may discourage scarring and provide a nutrient bed for axonal regeneration [34]. The advantage of local flaps like the ADQ, pronator quadratus, hypothenar fat flap [35], and palmaris brevis muscle flap [36, 37] is the ease with which they can be used. Unfortunately, length limitations may restrict their utility. Our preference is to use a hypothenar fat flap when possible (Fig. 16.1). After simpler techniques have been ruled out as options, it may be necessary to employ more complex free tissue transfers [12].
Fig. 16.1
Hypothenar fat pad flap. This patient had failed CTR and presented with a very sensitive median nerve. The hypothenar fat was mobilized to cover the scarred median nerve. (a) Extended approach. (b) Nerve exposure along the ulnar margin of the median nerve. (c) Identification of the superficial palmar arch. (d) Mobilization of fat flap. (e) Secure flap underneath TCL and suturing it to the radial leaflet of TCL. (f) Inset flap
When the surgeon feels that the local tissue environment is fibrotic and/or avascular, several procedures may be performed to help protect the nerve from recurrent scarring, including autologous and synthetic nerve wraps and vascularized soft tissue coverage. Other factors to consider are also ease by which the tissue can be obtained and the comorbidities associated with its harvest. There are generally two categories of these procedures, as explained by Abzug et al. [38]:
- 1.
Flaps that provide neovascularization, such as hypothenar fat pad flaps and synovial flaps, can help to improve nerve regeneration and gliding
- 2.
Interposition materials, such as vein grafts and synthetic implants, help prevent scar formation by providing a mechanical barrier
Vascularized Flaps
Hypothenar Fat Pad Flap
The hypothenar fat pad flap interposes adipose tissue from the hypothenar eminence between the median nerve, the remnant of the TCL and surrounding scar. First described by Cramer [35] and refined by Strickland et al. [33], the hypothenar eminence includes a generous layer of adipose tissue of sufficient width and thickness to provide coverage for the median nerve within the carpal canal. Dissections of the hypothenar fat pad have demonstrated arterial branches to the fat pad arising from the medial side of the ulnar artery in Guyon’s canal and more distally from branches of the ulnar artery to the small finger and fourth web space. These transverse and somewhat tortuous branches occurr approximately every 1 cm beginning at the distal wrist flexion crease. Additional arterial branches to the fat pad arise from arterial branches to the hypothenar muscles and palmaris brevis muscles [33].
Once sufficient mobilization of the fat pad has been accomplished, it is transposed over the median nerve and sutured to the undersurface of the radial leaflet of the TCL [33] (see Fig. 16.1).
In a retrospective series of 58 patients with 62 hands, Strickland et al. [33] showed excellent results in relieving recurrent symptoms with use of the hypothenar fat pad flap at an average follow-up of 33 months, with 37 of the 43 patients returning to their pre-surgery employment. Subjectively, the vast majority of patients had improvement of proximally referred pain, hypersensitivity, and nocturnal symptoms. There was also significant improvement in the Phalen’s and Tinel’s signs, and relief of dysesthesia and paresthesia was seen in 89% of patients. This relief was not immediate and in some cases took as long as 2.5 years to achieve. Two-point discrimination remained normal in 35 patients, improved from an expanded range to normal (<6 mm) in 21 patients, and remained expanded in 5 patients.
In a retrospective study of 28 patients, Craft et al. [34] showed significant improvement in the average two-point discrimination tests, the grip tests, and in the number of cases with positive Tinel’s sign. Pain resolved in 83% of patients and numbness resolved in 42% of patients. The subjective complaint of “tingling” disappeared in 50% of patients.
Fusetti et al. reported on 20 patients who were treated with a hypothenar fat pad flap. Sixteen patients had adherence of the median nerve to the radial leaf of the divided TCL. The remaining four patients had an unidentifiable plane between the epineurium and the remains of the TCL. Subjectively, 18 of the 20 patients had complete resolution of their hyperesthesia and allodynia by 6 months after surgery. One patient had no improvement and would not recommend the procedure, while the remaining 19 patients stated that they would recommend the procedure. Seventeen of the 20 patients had resolution of provocative signs, including Phalen’s, Durkan’s, and Tinel’s. Seven of the nine workers’ compensation patients returned to work [39].
Wichelhaus et al. [40] conducted a retrospective study of 18 patients with recurrent CTS due to fibrotic adhesions of the median nerve, with scar formation of 3 to 5 cm in length. The hypothenar fat pad flap was used in all the cases, as it covered the entire length of the scarred nerve. Pain disappeared after the surgery in 14 patients, and the Tinel’s sign disappeared in 16 patients. Hand function, grip strength, and pinch strength improved in all patients, as well as two-point discrimination recorded from the fingertips. Fifteen of the 18 patients would elect to have the operation done again if necessary. None of the patients reported hypothenar pain, none deteriorated after surgery, and all of the patients reported complete resolution of nighttime symptoms.
Synovial Flap
A vascularized synovial flap can be used to supply interposition and neovascularization to a scarred median nerve. This technique has the advantage of being able to be performed over the same incision without the requirement for expanded additional dissection. The synovial flap, raised off of the superficial flexor tendons deep to the median nerve, is a barrier to scar formation. The surgical technique is described in Figs. 16.2 and 16.3.
Fig. 16.2
(a) Synovial flap being elevated off of the FDS tendons. (b) Synovial flap before interposition placement on the median nerve
Fig. 16.3
Synovial flap technique. (a) Median nerve re-released. The dissection was extended approximately 2 cm on either end of the original incision into normal tissue. (b) The synovial flap raised from ulnar to radial side off the superficial flexors. (c) The synovial flap raised to the level of the median nerve. The distal border is at the level of the superficial arch. The proximal border is at the level of the wrist crease. (d) The synovial flap wrapped loosely about the median nerve
To make a synovial flap, raise a flap of synovium from the superficial flexors starting on the ulnar aspect of the carpal canal (Fig. 16.3b). Continue raising the flap from the level of the superficial arch to the wrist crease. At the proximal and distal margins of the flap, cut transversely to allow the flap to be mobilized. Continue to raise the flap to the margin of the median nerve (Fig. 16.3c). The flap is then draped over the nerve and sewn to the inner surface of the radial remnant of the TCL (Fig. 16.3d). The wrist is immobilized for 10 to 14 days post-surgery. If there is an associated nerve injury that was repaired or grafted during the procedure, the wrist is immobilized for 4 weeks. Splints and casts are kept low in the palm to permit full and prompt finger motion. Scars are treated with massage and elastomer.