Review of Radiation Therapy for Palmar and Plantar Fibromatosis (Dupuytren and Ledderhose Disease)


1. Proliferating mitogenic fibroblasts/myofibroblasts are radiosensitive cells (Rodemann et al. 1991; Rodemann and Bamberg 1995; Rubin et al. 1999)

2. Production of free radicals impair proliferative activity of fibroblasts (Murrell and Francis 1994)

3. Radiation exposure interferes with growth factors PDGF and TGFβ (Terek et al. 1995; Tomasek and Rayan 1995; Rayan et al. 1996; Tomasek et al. 1987)

4. Radiation exposure reduces activated monocytes and macrophages interacting with the inflammatory process and myofibroblast proliferation (Rubin et al. 1999)

5. Clinical experiences with similar radiosensitive target cells/mechanisms:(Seegenschmiedt et al. 2004)

 (a) Intravascular hyperproliferation after arterial stenting (Crocker 1999; Tripuraneni et al. 1999);

 (b) Keloid relapses after surgical excision (Suit and Spiro 1999; Kutzner et al. 2003)

 (c) Relapses of recurrent pterygium (Smitt and Donaldson 1999)

 (d) Growing experience with radiotherapy of Dupuytren Disease since the early 1950s (Finney 1955)



Generally, the effects of ionizing radiation affect the tissue growth factor beta (TGFβ) and the proliferating fibroblasts and myofibroblasts at various stages in their disease process not only in the early phase (myofibroblast type I) but also in the later phase of the disease (myofibroblast types II and III). Figure 46.1 illustrates how large single doses of radiotherapy in the range of 8–10 Gy (ED) or fractionated lower-dose radiotherapy in the range of five times of 2–3 Gy (FD) transform the proliferating cell population into the nonproliferating postmitotic fibroblasts (PMF). The antiproliferative effect is highest in the earlier disease stages and lowest in the later stages.

A352582_1_En_46_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 46.1
Effects of radiation dose and radiation concept on proliferation of myofibroblasts (MF) are transformed from type I to type III myofibroblasts into nonproliferating myofibroblasts (PMF). Single high doses of radiotherapy (ED) are more effective than fractionated radiotherapy (FD). Earlier onset of radiotherapy (E) is more effective than later (L) (Figure reprinted from Warwick (2015))



46.3 Clinical Rationale for Radiotherapy


The course of DD comprises three disease phases which reveal different radiation sensitivities:



  • The radiosensitive hyperproliferative phase (with increased number of fibroblasts, nodules, and early cord formation)


  • The lesser radiosensitive involutional phase (with increased number of myofibroblasts in diseased fiber bundles leading to cords and contractures)


  • The radio-insensitive residual phase (with collagenous fibers dominating the connective tissue)

Unlike in aggressive fibromatoses, for DD and LD no invasion of voluntary muscles occurs. DD and LD may slowly progress and stabilize for years, but rarely regress spontaneously. Without therapy the average progression rate is about 50 % within a period of 5 years (Millesi 1981). In LD, the slowly growing nodules and cords are rarely detected in the early phase, until dysfunction (walking difficulties, pain, tension, or pressure sensation) leads the patient to medical attention. In addition, the occurrence of concomitant knuckle pads and Peyronie disease in males supports the diagnosis (Donato and Morrison 1996).

The clinical course of DD and LD is dependent on the individual patient’s disposition (Strickland et al. 1990). Spontaneous regression of DD is quite rare; moreover, slow progression may be interrupted by phases of stagnation; other cases rapidly progress within a very short time causing contracture-induced dislocation of digital joints in DD and walking difficulties in LD. Special subtypes are differentiated according to their characteristic clinical course, e.g., depending on comorbidities, like diabetes mellitus, or depending on the age at the disease onset or depending on the time course or uni- or bilateral affliction (McFarlane et al. 1990).

Radiotherapy provides a primary approach to the afflicted areas in the early stage of the disease, when other preventive or prophylactic methods are still unavailable.


46.4 Indications for Radiotherapy


Over the past decades, the use of radiotherapy (RT) has been more and more limited to the early and still proliferative phases of the disease where surgery plays no role and radiosensitive targets are still available. This excludes patients with “dormant disease” (which may last for years) and those with more advanced disease starting from a finger extension deficit of more than 30°; thus, only patients with “early progressive disease” who are usually characterized by multiple progressive nodules, fresh formation of a few cords, and/or presence of only a minor functional deficit (10–30°) may qualify for the implementation of radiotherapy to prevent further disease progression. Patients with “late progressive disease” with major functional deficits (>30°) do not anymore qualify for the use of RT. Typical clinical examples are shown in Figs. 46.2 and 46.3.

A352582_1_En_46_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 46.2
Indication of radiotherapy for bilateral stage N bilateral Dupuytren Disease of stage N in a 67-year-old male; the dotted lines in the hand palm depict the region noted by the patient, while additional findings of nodules and cords have been detected after physical exam. The black outline shows the treatment area for radiotherapy


A352582_1_En_46_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 46.3
Indication of radiotherapy for bilateral stage II Dupuytren Disease, stage II, postoperative in the right hand, and stage N in the left hand of a 63-year-old male; the right hand had three surgical procedures in the area of the ring and little fingers over the past 10 years; due to progression of nodules and cords in the unaffected left hand and the index and middle finger of the right hand, radiotherapy was applied to the not operated areas of the right hand and the untreated but progressive areas of the left hand (D1–D4). The black outline shows the treatment area for radiotherapy of the right hand palm

The indication for RT strictly follows the clinical staging, which is based on the amount of extension deficit of finger movement for DD (Tubiana et al. 1966) and the functional impairment due to involvement of the skin or the deep structures of the foot in LD (Sammarco 2001) (Tables 46.2 and 46.3).


Table 46.2
Classification of Dupuytren Disease (DD) and RT indication





































































Stage

D1 (thumb)

D2–D5 (other fingers)

Points

RT indication

0

Neither nodule

nor loss of abduction

No extension deficit

No nodular or cord lesion

=0

No RT indication; no other treatments

N

Nodule without loss of abduction

Nodule without flexion contracture

=0.5

Early RT indication

N/1

Nodule without loss of abduction

Extension deficit of all finger joints equivalent 10° (-30°)

=0.5

Late RT indication

I

Abduction angle range 45–30°

Extension deficit of all finger joints equivalent 11–45°

=1

Surgical methods minimally invasive; collagenase, etc.

II

Abduction angle range 29–15°

Extension deficit of all finger joints equivalent 46–90°

=2

Minimally invasive and invasive procedures; collagenase, etc.

III

Abduction angle range 14–0°

Extension deficit of all finger joints equivalent 91–135°

=3

Minimally invasive and invasive procedures; collagenase, etc.

IV

Not defined

Extension deficit of all finger joints reaches more than 135°

=4
 

R

Any status progression after previous surgical therapy
 
Possible postoperative RT indication under clinical investigation
 
Maximum: 3 points

Maximum: 5 × 4 points

=23

Tubiana score



Table 46.3
Classification of Ledderhose Disease (LD) and RT indication












































Stage

Stage

Definition

RT indication

I

Unifocal disease

One nodule/cord or circumscribed region involved w/o skin adherence or extension to the flexor sheath (plantar fascia)

No RT indication

II

Multifocal disease

Several nodules/cords or regions involved w/o adherence to skin or extension to flexor sheath (plantar fascia)

Early RT indication

III

Stage II plus deep extension in ONE direction (skin or foot muscle)

Several nodules/cords or regions involved with deep extension to EITHER skin (= III A) OR flexor sheath (plantar fascia) (= III B)

Early RT indication

IV

Stage II plus deed extension in BOTH directions (skin and foot muscle)

Several nodules/cords or several regions involved; with deep extension to skin (III A) AND flexor sheath (plantar fascia) (III B), i.e., stage III C

Late RT indication

R/post op

Recurrent stage, postoperative stage

Any status progression after previous surgical therapy

Individual RT indication under clinical investigation

Specific signs gait and pain

Symptoms and functions

Nodules (N), cords (C), pain symptoms (P), other symptoms (S), walking disorder (W), dysfunction (D)

Other parameters salvage after failing multiple therapies


46.5 Justification for Early Treatment


Despite decades of clinical and experimental research up to now, no cure is available for both DD and LD. All noninvasive and invasive treatments, including options like local injections with collagenase, application of systemic medication, performance of minimally invasive surgery including percutaneous needle fasciotomy, or open, radical open surgery, aim to prevent progression or to improve the impaired functional status. Moreover, in the very early DD and LD stages, a “wait and see” policy is always advised, as no conservative treatment has been proven effective. About two thirds of detected DD and LD cases will never progress to a stage where surgery is a final treatment option. Glucocorticoid injections may lead to regression but can also induce severe complications like atrophy at the injection site or rupture of tendons and have no long-term impact on disease progression (Ketchum and Donahue 2000). Without any therapy the clinical progression of DD is observed in about 50 % of patients after 6 years (Millesi 1981). This development is to be stopped by the early intervention using ionizing radiation. The gold standard for advanced DD and LD remains surgery, with the major goal of improving the finger function by reducing the contractures and thus restoring a disabled hand or foot function.

While hand or foot surgery is usually justified to improve a severe functional deficit (usually at stages I–II), RT always aims to prevent the progressive symptoms (formation of new nodules and cords; reduction of symptoms like pressure, itching, and sometimes pain) and to avoid future finger deviation and functional impairment (e.g., grip and spreading or holding functions of the fingers). However the implementation of radiotherapy implies the presence of radiosensitive target cells or biological mechanisms within the disease process for a successful interaction. Radiotherapy is effective for prevention of disease progression in early stages of DD (Keilholz et al. 1996; Adamietz et al 2001; Seegenschmiedt et al. 2001; Seegenschmiedt et al. 2012a) and LD (Seegenschmiedt and Attassi 2003; Grenfell and Borg 2014; Heyd et al. 2010; Seegenschmiedt et al. 2012b) with mild acute or late side effects.

There is a good radiobiological rationale for the long-term efficacy of the use of ionizing radiation on proliferating fibroblasts and myofibroblasts because they are radiosensitive cells; ionizing radiation effectively impairs their proliferative activity by induction of free radicals which leads to a reduced cell density (Murrell et al. 1990; Murrell and Francis 1994); this can stabilize the disease as long as the proliferation dominates in early DD/LD stages N and I. However, in the later stages, the disease is already characterized by repair and contraction of fibrous tissue: ionizing radiation is ineffective in these tissues. The major rationale is to use RT in early sensitive stages to avoid disease progression with later dysfunction that might require hand surgery.

A careful physical examination of both hands and feet is needed and if possible with frequent follow-up to demonstrate any changes within a period of 3–6 months to establish whether the disease is progressing.

Figure 46.4 shows a 52-year-old male with progressive development of nodules and cords within one year follow-up and decision to provide radiotherapy for early stage N Dupuytren Disease.

A352582_1_En_46_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 46.4
Early stage without treatment and follow-up with treatment decision for radiotherapy. Right: left and right hand at first clinical visit 09/2013; Left: progression and treatment decision 12/2014

Table 46.4 summarizes the different treatment indications depending on the disease stage and reveals the specific indication for radiotherapy in contrast to other therapies. There is much less choice of treatment for the early stages than in later stages of DD. Radiotherapy should be only indicated in progressive disease, when nodules and cords start to grow toward the situation where an initial angulation deficit occurs. Generally there are alternative conservative and surgical options available (Mafi et al. 2012). Actually we lack clinical studies, to answer whether radiotherapy may prevent early relapses after surgery for DD, while for LD some clinical studies suggest a possibly successful treatment option.


Table 46.4
Differentiation of treatment indications dependent on disease stage





















































Modified Dupuytren Tubiana stage (extension deficit angle; hand function)

N


Progressive nodes and cords; no deficit

N/I

0–10°

Minor angulation deficit

I

10–45°

Increasing angulation deficit

II

46–90°

Disabling angulation deficit

III–IV

>90°

Major angulation deficit

Wait and see policy

Dormant stage without progress
       

Radiotherapy

Progress of nodes and cords in 3–6 months

Progress of minimal function deficit

Progress up to 30° deficit
 
possible postoperative use

Minimally invasive surgery/needle fasciotomy



Progress beyond 30° deficit

Progress beyond 45° deficit

(+)

Collagenase injection



Progress beyond 30° deficit

Progress beyond 45° deficit

(+)

Open hand surgery



(+)

Complex situation

Extensive disease


46.6 Documentation and Treatment Planning


Prior to the onset of RT, it is important to document the exact disease record including the family history, the professional activities, the additional disorders (like diabetes, etc.), and the course of disease in the specific situation. All details are documented in a questionnaire and special data format. All findings from the physical examination are documented together with a photograph of all involved extremities.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Review of Radiation Therapy for Palmar and Plantar Fibromatosis (Dupuytren and Ledderhose Disease)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access