Rehabilitation After Bone Marrow Stimulation



Fig. 14.1
Phase I: extension and flexion exercises against resistance





14.6.2 Phase II: 3–4 Weeks


After these 2 weeks, partial (eggshell) weight-bearing on crutches is allowed, as tolerated. Progression to full weight-bearing is prescribed over a period of 4 weeks. The range of motion exercises against resistance are extended to three to four times a day.


14.6.3 Phase III: 5–6 weeks


During weeks 5 and 6, the patient practises full range of motion against gravity by exercising on a step with both feet simultaneously (Fig. 14.2). After week 6, this exercise can be performed on one leg (Fig. 14.3). The programme can be optionally guided by a physiotherapist.

A321118_1_En_14_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 14.2
Phase III: full range of motion exercises against gravity on a step on both feet


A321118_1_En_14_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 14.3
Phase III: full range of motion exercise against gravity on a step on 1 ft


14.6.4 Phase IV: 7–16 Weeks


Sagittal lunges and exercises can be practised after week 6. Thereafter, patients are allowed to cycle on the home trainer, start walking on the tread mill or use the cross trainer and rowing machine. Balancing and eversion/inversion exercises can be started in this phase. The resumption of sports is detailed in the next chapter ‘Return to Sports’. To summarise, a gradual increase to impact activities can be considered after 3–4 months, whilst return to noncontact sports is mostly achieved after 4–6 months.

Additional modalities, such as CPM, cryotherapy or pulsed electromagnetic fields, could possibly be advantageous for an accelerated and improved outcome, but their exact value has to be further investigated. Any protocol may need to be modified and individualised for each patient taking into consideration patient and lesion factors. High-quality future studies will provide further evidence for creating an optimum rehabilitation protocol after microfracture which will be advantageous to patients and the outcome of surgery.



14.7 Conclusion


A single, ideal rehabilitation programme after bone marrow stimulation for talar osteochondral defects still does not exist. It appears that whilst high shear stresses may lead to failure of the repair at the early postoperative stages, there is evidence that moderate dynamic compression and low shear stresses may be advantageous to the repair tissue and that immobilisation and static compression may have negative effects. Rehabilitation with gradual return to weight-bearing after 4 weeks is suggested. Further high-quality studies are necessary to provide clinical outcome data to support any rehabilitation regimen.


Conflict of Interest

The author has no current conflict of interests with the products presented


References



1.

Ahmad CS, Kwak SD, Ateshian GA, Warden WH, Steadman JR, Mow VC. Effects of patellar tendon adhesion to the anterior tibia on knee mechanics. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:715–24.PubMed


2.

Alexander AH, Lichtman DM. Surgical treatment of transchondral talar-dome fractures (osteochondritis dissecans). Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:646–52.PubMed


3.

Aroen A, Loken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, Engebretsen L. Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:211–5.PubMedCrossRef


4.

Arokoski JP, Jurvelin JS, Vaatainen U, Helminen HJ. Normal and pathological adaptations of articular cartilage to joint loading. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10:186–98.PubMedCrossRef


5.

Baker Jr CL, Morales RW. Arthroscopic treatment of transchondral talar dome fractures: a long-term follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:197–202.PubMedCrossRef


6.

Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Thermann H. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:656–63.PubMedCrossRef


7.

Becher C, Thermann H. Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:583–9.PubMed


8.

Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:988–1020.PubMed


9.

Bonnin M, Bouysset M. Arthroscopy of the ankle: analysis of results and indications on a series of 75 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:744–51.PubMedCrossRef


10.

Brophy RH, Rodeo SA, Barnes RP, Powell JW, Warren RF. Knee articular cartilage injuries in the National Football League: epidemiology and treatment approach by team physicians. J Knee Surg. 2009;22:331–8.PubMedCrossRef


11.

Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:487–504.PubMed


12.

Buckwalter JA, Mow VC, Ratcliffe A. Restoration of injured or degenerated articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:192–201.PubMed


13.

Chin TW, Mitra AK, Lim GH, Tan SK, Tay BK. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesion of the talus. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1996;25:236–40.PubMed

May 22, 2017 | Posted by in SPORT MEDICINE | Comments Off on Rehabilitation After Bone Marrow Stimulation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access