Recovery of Diaphragm Function Through Functional Electrical Stimulation: Diaphragm Pacing



Fig. 12.1
(a) The laparoscopic dissector is placed against the right diaphragm, an electrical burst from the clinical station externally will allow contraction if the phrenic nerve is intact, and subsequent mapping will show ideal location for implantation; (b) the diaphragm has a diffuse but weak contraction which will improve with diaphragm conditioning



The area of electrode placement is chosen based on location of larger contraction with strong preference for the posterior diaphragm to facilitate posterior lung lobe ventilation that will decrease atelectasis. Two electrodes are then implanted into the right and left diaphragm muscle. Placement of two electrodes in each diaphragm provides redundancy and synergy for maximal muscle recruitment. The electrodes are implanted using an implant instrument (Fig. 12.2 a, b). The electrode is threaded through the instrument to the tip of the needle. The needle at the end of the instrument is skived into the muscle, and the polypropylene barb on the end of the electrode releases upon withdrawal of the needle. The four electrodes and an anode are then tunneled subcutaneously to an appropriate exit site. A chest x-ray is taken at the end of the case to assess for the presence of a capnothorax that may result from carbon dioxide tracking from the abdominal cavity into the pleural space from the diaphragm. Small capnothoraxes resolve spontaneously where a larger one may need to be aspirated [5].

A332102_1_En_12_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 12.2
(a) The implant instrument houses the diaphragm pacing electrode which is a double helix of 14 stainless steel wires that are Teflon coated. The needle of the implant instrument enters the diaphragm muscle and a polypropylene barb allows the electrode to be fixated. (b) Two electrodes in the left diaphragm

The implanted intramuscular electrodes are connected to a four-channel external pulse generator (EPG) (Fig. 12.3). This stimulator provides capacitively coupled charge-balanced biphasic stimulation to each subcutaneous electrode. The EPG is programmed with patient-specific parameters of pulse amplitude, pulse duration, inspiratory time, pulse rate, and respiratory rate by a clinician. DP users simply connect and turn the device on and/or off. The maximal settings for patient safety are 25 mA for amplitude, 200 for pulse width, and 20 for Hz. Patients should never exceed these parameters [5]. The goal for patient settings is to use the highest settings within the safety parameters that do not cause any patient discomfort.

A332102_1_En_12_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 12.3
The four implanted electrodes along with a subcutaneously placed ground electrode are placed in a block that connects to the external pulse generator that is programmed to provide diaphragm conditioning and subsequent ventilation

Once implanted, the device can be utilized immediately to begin diaphragm conditioning. Each patient should have a customized conditioning program that entails initiation of DP use which gradually increases over time. Patients often begin with 30 min of DP use several times daily and increase usage every 3–5 days [3, 5]. DP conditioning will convert the atrophied muscle fibers from fast-fatigable type 2B muscle fibers to slow-twitch type 1.



Results of Diaphragm Pacing


The initial FDA multicenter clinical trial of DP in SCI dependent on tracheostomy MV showed 100 % of implanted patients were able to breathe for four consecutive hours with DP alone. Over 50 % of patients utilized DP for over 24 h of continuous use. The patients ranged in age from 18 years to 74 years (36 years old average). There were 37 males with the majority of injuries resulting from motor vehicle accidents followed by sports injuries. Patients were on PMV from 3 months to 27 years prior to DP implant with the average time of injury to implant being 5.6 years. This trial reports no pneumonia deaths.

Another study done with DP in SCI but focused on SCI patients who had a permanent internal cardiac pacemaker was completed in 2010. The study included 20 SCI patients who had both cardiac pacemaker and DP. This study also showed all patients were able to achieve tidal volumes to meet their basic metabolic needs with 71 % able to replace MV with DP full time. The internal cardiac pacemakers were interrogated at the time of DP implant with DP being set at maximal stimulation settings and the cardiac pacemakers being set at their most sensitive. No device interactions were noted [6].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 8, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Recovery of Diaphragm Function Through Functional Electrical Stimulation: Diaphragm Pacing

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access