Fig. 20.1
(a and b) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. (Published with kind permission of © James Higgins, 2015. All Rights Reserved.)
CT scan images demonstrated with greater clarity the small dimensions of the small proximal pole segment and a humpback flexion deformity at the nonunion site (Fig. 20.2). The lunate is positioned in a neutral posture .
Fig. 20.2
(a and b) Preoperative coronal and sagittal CT scans revealing a small proximal pole fragment and humpback deformity. (Published with kind permission of © James Higgins, 2015. All Rights Reserved.)
Diagnosis
Recalcitrant proximal pole scaphoid nonunion following failure of a previous vascularized bone graft procedure from the distal radius.
Management Options
Given the failure of a previous well-performed treatment with a vascularized distal radius bone graft, revision vascularized bone grafting from the radius does not offer any advantages in achieving scaphoid healing. The very small proximal pole fragment presents a particular challenge in achieving fixation with subsequent nonunion surgery particularly given the osseous changes from the previous screw fixation .
Options for reconstruction of the scaphoid include revision ORIF with a vascularized corticocancellous bone flap from another site such as the medial femoral condyle (MFC), or proximal pole excision and replacement with vascularized osteochondral reconstruction from the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) . Options for salvage procedures would include scaphoid excision and midcarpal fusion or proximal row carpectomy .
Management Chosen
Due to the patient’s young age and lack of arthritic changes, the patient was deemed a candidate for revision ORIF of the scaphoid nonunion. Because of the failure of previous vascularized corticocancellous grafting, the small size of the proximal pole fragment, and the poor quality of the proximal pole fragment after previous screw fixation, the patient was felt to be an ideal candidate for proximal pole scaphoid excision and medial femoral trochlea vascularized osteochondral reconstruction.
Surgical Technique
The MFT osteochondral flap, provides a convex cartilaginous segment of bone with an arc of curvature very similar to that of the greater curvature of the proximal scaphoid. A segment of osteochondral bone is harvested in continuity with the transverse branch of the descending geniculate artery. The source vessel is the same as the conventional MFC corticoperiosteal flap (Fig. 20.3). However, the MFT’s terminal branch (transverse branch) is distinct from the longitudinal branch typically used for the MFC flap. The osteochondral segment is harvested to mimic the deficit created after resection of the proximal pole fragment and additional portions of the proximal scaphoid beyond the nonunion site (Fig. 20.4).
Fig. 20.3
Diagram of the vascular tree of the descending geniculate artery. Note the course of the transverse branch and its relationship to the proximal trochlea. Also demonstrated is the area of typical harvest and its orientation in the reconstructed scaphoid. (Published with kind permission of © The Curtis National Hand Center. All Rights Reserved.)
Fig. 20.4
The harvested osteochondral graft with pedicle. (Published with kind permission of © James Higgins, 2015. All Rights Reserved.)
This resection of additional scaphoid distal to the nonunion site converts the proximal pole nonunion conceptually into a waist-level osteosynthesis site. During resection of the proximal scaphoid, cartilage on the lesser curvature that articulates with the midcarpal joint is preserved. Additionally, the distal-most segments of the dorsal and volar scapholunate interosseous ligament are likewise preserved if possible. Preservation of the thin cartilage layer and distal scapholunate ligament is facilitated by maintaining the capsular integrity of the midcarpal joint. The resection is completed with the goal of opening only the radicarpal joint. The only cartilage-bearing surface of the medial femoral trochlea flap is oriented to articulate solely with the scaphoid fossa of the radius (Fig. 20.5).
Fig. 20.5
Intraoperative fluoroscopic view of the scaphoid after generous resection of the nonunion fragment and an additional portion of native scaphoid distal to the nonunion site. Note the preservation of the convex cartilage segment that articulates with the midcarpal joint. By preparing the scaphoid resection in this manner, the proximal pole nonunion is converted to a less-challenging waist-level osteosynthesis site. Additionally, this preparation allows the only cartilage-bearing surface of the MFT osteochondral segment to articulate with the scaphoid fossa, while preserved native scaphoid cartilage articulates with the midcarpal joint. (Published with kind permission of © James Higgins, 2015. All Rights Reserved.)