Questions to Ask Your Medical Oncology Colleagues




© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
R. Lor Randall (ed.)Metastatic Bone Disease10.1007/978-1-4614-5662-9_20


20. Questions to Ask Your Medical Oncology Colleagues



Noah Federman1, Amanda Loftin2 and Nicholas M. Bernthal 


(1)
Pediatrics, Joint Appointment in Orthopaedics, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine and Mattel Children’s Hospital at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

(2)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 1250 16th Street, Suite 3145, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA

 



 

Nicholas M. Bernthal



Keywords
OncologyChemotherapyRadiationMultidisciplinaryCommunicationMedical oncologyTumor board



Introduction


Oncology is the ultimate team sport. Diagnosis requires the collaboration of clinicians, pathologists, and radiologists. Treatment is multimodal, often requiring input from medical, surgical, and radiation experts. Improved patient outcomes are seen when multidisciplinary teams coordinate care and individual providers do not work in isolation [1, 2]. Misaligned priorities among specialists and between providers and patient are the most common source of suboptimal care. The solution to this problem is often simple: better communication.

Tumor boards are often used to facilitate this communication. Providers from different sub-specialties are brought together to coordinate a consensus treatment plan, and optimally, to continue to refine this treatment plan throughout the patient’s clinical course [3]. However, as tumor boards are often disease-specific, orthopedic surgeons often are far better at communicating with sarcoma medical oncologists with whom they regularly meet than medical oncologists from other fields. While the orthopedic oncologist would ideally attend breast, lung, thyroid, renal, and prostate tumor boards (among others) to ensure communication with these respective medical oncologists, this is often not practical and therefore alternative methods of communication must be employed when treating metastatic disease. Additionally, while the bulk of sarcoma care is provided by orthopedic oncologists, much of the surgical treatment for metastatic disease is performed by general orthopedic providers. These providers often do not have the same access to medical oncologists that orthopedic oncologists enjoy, leading to additional challenges to interdisciplinary care and good communication.

This chapter will address one aspect of this essential communication between providers: questions the orthopedic surgeon may want to ask his or her medical oncology colleagues. The chapter focuses on questions surrounding the treatment of metastatic lesions, and not questions relating to making the diagnosis, as this is covered in other chapters. Nonetheless, one cannot overstate the importance of good communication in formulating a diagnosis, as proper care is predicated on appropriate tissue diagnosis. No surgical plan should be made without a confirmation of tissue diagnosis with the medical oncology team, and if the diagnosis is in question, a discussion of biopsy prior to surgery should be thoroughly vetted.

This chapter lists a set of questions and topics that the orthopedic surgeon may want to raise with the medical oncologist prior to surgery. This chapter is not intended to be comprehensive, but hopefully will provide a framework from which the orthopedic surgeon can approach the medical oncologist. Most importantly, an open chain of communication, with regular updates and real-time flow of information is essential as patient health, expectations, and treatment priorities are often fluid.


The Patient


Orthopedic surgeons often meet patients with metastatic disease in times of crises. The patient has often just fractured through a pathologic lesion or developed debilitating pain, and the goal of care is often rapid return to function and pain relief. It is critical, however, that the orthopedic surgeon takes the necessary time to understand the larger framework in which this metastatic lesion exists. Specific questions for the medical oncologist about the patient are an efficient means to gaining this perspective.


Life Expectancy


What is the patient’s life expectancy?

Assuming the diagnosis is well-established and the patient is under the care of a medical oncologist, that provider is often best suited to shed light on the overall health and life expectancy of the patient. While medical oncologists often shy away from “committing” to a mean or median survival, a gestalt or estimation of life expectancy is critical for assessing the risk-benefit ratio for a procedure [4]. While a dogma exists that fracture fixation should not be performed on someone with a life expectancy less than 1 month and an arthroplasty should not be performed on someone with less than 6 months [5], the authors believe that life expectancy should be used as one criterion of many, not as an absolute. Recent literature has shown significant quality of life benefits of orthopedic interventions in patients with short life expectancies [6]. Additionally, orthopedic surgeons often underestimate the symptom relief a surgery will achieve in palliative situations and therefore miscalculate a risk–benefit ratio in patients with short life expectancies [7].

Often definitive estimates of life expectancy are not provided to the patient and family because of their desires, or the discomfort of the discussion for the medical provider. While one need not be specific with a patient or family that does not want this information, it is critical to share the overall prognosis with a patient and family that is considering surgery [6, 7]. Paternalistic medicine of protecting patients from this information has given way to collaborative medicine in which the physician’s role is to educate and guide a patient and family through difficult decisions so that they exercise their right to determine how they want to live [8, 9]. Nowhere is this more critical than in metastatic disease where quality of life and dignity in death are of the utmost importance.

Finally, life expectancy may influence the operating surgeon’s choice among surgical options. If options of fixation versus arthroplasty are being considered, for example, a shorter life expectancy may push a surgeon toward a palliative fixation procedure if recovery from arthroplasty is more significant. This rationale, however, must be employed with extreme caution, as life expectancy is an estimation and is often wrong [5]. The surgeon has done a disservice to the patient, for whom he has selected a “short-term” palliation procedure that the patient has outlived, requiring a second, revision procedure. Therefore, it is the authors’ practice to use life expectancy as a major consideration for whether surgery should be performed but a minor consideration in selecting the appropriate surgical procedure to perform.


Medical “Fitness”


Can this patient tolerate this surgery?

We in orthopedics pride ourselves as problem solvers. We hone in on an issue and fix it. It is one of the most gratifying aspects of the field. The danger, however, with this focused (at best) or myopic (at worst) approach is that it can often gloss over other medical problems that can render our “fix” irrelevant.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Questions to Ask Your Medical Oncology Colleagues

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access