Principles of Tendon Transfers



Principles of Tendon Transfers


David M. Brogan, MD, MSc

Stephanie Kannas, OTD, OTR/L, CHT, CLT-LANA

Sanjeev Kakar, MD, MRCS


Dr. Brogan or an immediate family member has received nonincome support (such as equipment or services), commercially derived honoraria, or other non-research–related funding (such as paid travel) from Arthrex and Axogen. Dr. Kakar or an immediate family member serves as a paid consultant to AM Surgical, Arthrex, and Skeletal Dynamics. Dr. Toomey or an immediate family member serves as a paid consultant to Celleration.



Introduction

Tendon transfers are a reconstructive tool to restore function in the setting of impaired intrinsic and/or extrinsic muscles affecting the hand and wrist. In patients with radial nerve dysfunction, the goal of tendon transfer surgery is the restoration of active wrist, thumb, and finger extension. Although the flexor musculature for the fingers is unaffected, these patients lose grip strength, as they are unable to effectively stabilize their wrist in extension during finger flexion. Therefore, they have poor transmission of flexor power to their fingers. Sensory disturbance is not routinely of functional consequence to these patients, unless they develop a symptomatic neuroma. This chapter presents the general principles of tendon transfers and details transfers for radial nerve palsies as a representative example.


Relevant Anatomy

The radial nerve originates from the posterior cord of the brachial plexus and constitutes the largest terminal branch of the plexus. It travels along the posterior wall of the axilla and through the triangular space, continuing deep to the long and lateral head of the triceps as it spirals around the posterior-lateral humerus. The radial nerve pierces the lateral intermuscular septum at a relatively constant distance proximal to the lateral epicondyle (known as the lateral nerve height), thereby entering the anterior compartment of the arm between the brachioradialis and brachialis. This height can be determined as a function of the trans-epicondylar distance (TED). The TED is the distance between the lateral and medial epicondyle; the ratio of lateral nerve height to TED averages 1.7. The nerve then crosses the elbow and continues deep to the brachioradialis, splitting into the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). The SBRN provides sensory innervation to the radial aspect of the forearm and hand, while the PIN travels deep to the supinator (the radial tunnel) to innervate the extensors of the wrist and fingers (Table 31.1).


High Versus Low Palsy

Radial nerve palsies may occur from a variety of causes: a penetrating wound, a closed or open fracture of the humerus, or iatrogenic injuries during surgical procedures around the distal humerus and elbow. Regardless of the cause, it is important to distinguish the level of the radial nerve injury (high vs. low), as this will dictate remaining function and availability of possible donor muscles and tendons. A low injury is typically classified as a lesion distal to the elbow, namely the PIN, whereas a high injury involves the proper radial nerve proximal to its bifurcation. A low injury or isolated PIN lesion will result in lack of finger metacarpophalangeal (MCP) extension and radial deviation with wrist extension, due to loss of extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) with persistent activity of extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) ± extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB). Thumb retropulsion and interphalangeal hyperextension are lost secondary to losing the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) function. A high lesion will also lose all wrist extension (ECRB and ECRL) and brachioradialis. Extension at the proximal and distal interphalangeal (PIP and DIP) joints will remain intact following any radial nerve paralysis, as these joints are extended by the lumbrical and interosseous muscles, which are innervated by the median and ulnar nerves.


Principles of Tendon Transfer Surgery

There are several basic requirements that must be met when planning tendon transfer surgery. These include (1) supple joints; (2) soft-tissue equilibrium; (3) similar excursion
between donor and target muscles; (4) adequate strength; (5) expendable donor muscles and tendons; (6) similar straight line of pull between transferred tendons; (7) synergy; (8) one tendon for one function; and (9) the fact that all fractures must be healed. Each of these will be examined in more detail, as it is imperative that the surgeon address these conditions prior to proceeding in order to maximize postoperative function.








Table 31.1 MUSCLES INNERVATED BY THE RADIAL NERVE AND ITS BRANCHES






























































Nerve Muscle Function
Radial N. Long, Lateral and Medial Head of Triceps Elbow Extension
Radial N. Brachioradialis Elbow Flexion
Distal to the Elbow (in order of innervation)
Radial N. Brachioradialis Elbow Flexion
Radial N. vs. PIN ECRL Wrist Extension
Radial N. vs. PIN ECRB Wrist Extension
PIN Supinator Supination
PIN EDC MCP Extension*
PIN ECU Wrist Extension*
PIN EDM MCP Extension*
PIN APL Thumb CMC extension*
PIN EPB Thumb MCP extension*
PIN EPL Thumb IP extension*
PIN EIP MCP Extension*
APL = abductor pollicis longus, EDC = extensor digitorum communis, EDM = extensor digiti minimi, ECRB = extensor carpi radialis brevis, ECRL = extensor carpi radialis longus, ECU = extensor carpi ulnaris, EIP = extensor indicus proprius, EPB = extensor pollicis brevis, EPL = extensor pollicis longus, PIN = posterior interosseous nerve.
* = Affected with low nerve palsy.
(Adapted from Mazurek MT, Shin AY: Upper extremity peripheral nerve anatomy: current concepts and applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;383:7–20.)


Supple Joints

Supple joints may be obtained by passive range of motion (PROM) exercises, capsular release and splinting (to be covered later). Postoperative ROM will not exceed passive preoperative ROM; therefore, maintaining a supple joint with full PROM after nerve palsy is crucial to restoration of maximal motion.


Soft Tissue Equilibrium

The condition of the soft tissues through which the tendon will glide is critically important to the success of any procedure. All wounds must be mature and appropriately soft to maximize tendon movement—a scarred or infected tissue bed must be allowed to heal or consideration should be given to the use of a flap to resurface the bed and its gliding surface.


Excursion

The surgeon must consider the strength and excursion of the donor tendon/muscle to ensure that it will meet the demands of its recipient. The work capacity of a muscle is related to the force exerted by the muscle multiplied by the distance over which it moves (excursion). To restore full function, the excursion of a donor should be similar to the recipient, or the ROM of the affected joint will be altered. The excursion of a muscle is related to the average length of the resting muscle fibers, and can be thought of as the amplitude over which the tendon can affect motion. Wrist flexors and extensors have an average excursion ranging from 15 to 33 mm, finger extensors and the EPL average 50 mm of excursion, and finger flexors are generally thought to have an average excursion of 70 mm. A useful aid to remember this is the 3–5–7 rule (the excursion in cm for tendons of the wrist, finger extensors, and finger flexors, respectively). On the basis of excursion alone, wrist flexors may be a poor substitute for finger extensors, but excursion can be relatively increased by releasing any fascial attachments and by taking a tendon that crosses one joint and transferring it so that it crosses two joints. In that manner, wrist flexion will, in effect, amplify the excursion of a wrist flexor transferred to provide digit extension.


Strength

Assuming that excursion is appropriately matched between donor and recipient, consideration must also be given to a donor muscle’s strength. The work capacity of a muscle is proportional to its mass, and while the absolute values of muscle strengths vary considerably from one person to the next, the
ratio of strength between muscles in the same limb is relatively constant. The strengths of various tendons in the forearm have been measured and are listed in Table 31.2.








Table 31.2 COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL DONOR AND RECIPIENT MUSCLE STRENGTHS FOR TENDON TRANSFER



















Muscles/Groups Relative Strength
Brachioradialis, FCU 2
FCR, wrist extensors, digital flexors, PT 1
Digital extensors 0.5
Palmaris, abductor pollicis longus 0.1
FCR = flexor carpi radialis, FCU = flexor carpi ulnaris muscle, PT = pronator teres.
(Data from Youm Y, Thambyrajah K, Flatt AE: Tendon excursion of wrist movers. J Hand Surg 1984;9A:202–209.)


Expendable Donor Tendons

When a possible donor is well matched in terms of its strength and excursion, it must have redundant functionality to be an ideal candidate for transfer. Tendon transfers seek to restore balance to the extremity; therefore, redundant functionality of donor muscles is essential to allow sacrifice of a tendon without developing a new functional deficit. Examples of this include the use of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) or flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) assuming the other to function, or pronator teres (PT) if a functioning pronator quadratus exists.


Line of Pull

A straight line of pull is crucial to maximize the length tension relationship of the muscle. The maximum work capacity of the muscle will be realized when the direction of contraction and muscle shortening is in line with the vector required to pull the recipient tendon. Still, this is not always possible; fixed, smooth structures can be utilized as pulleys when needed to alter the line of pull of the tendon. An example of this is the extensor indicis proprius (EIP) transfer to restore thumb opposition in either a high or low median nerve palsy. By being transferred around the ulnar side of the wrist, the line of pull is directed to restore thumb opposition as the tendon is transferred into the abductor pollicis brevis insertion.


Synergy

Synergy is the inherent nature for certain muscles and tendon units to work concurrently; an example of this is finger extension with wrist flexion, which naturally allows the hand to release its grip when the wrist is flexed. Transferring a wrist flexor to a finger extensor takes advantage of this natural synergy. Another example of synergy is the enhancement of finger flexion (grip strength) with wrist extension–wrist extension places the finger flexors at their optimal length–tension relationship, which yields maximum grip.


One Tendon for One Function

Function can be maximized by utilizing one tendon for one function. Attempting to restore multiple functions of a joint by a single transfer will likely yield disappointing results. An example that violates this rule would be attempting the use of the FCU for restoration of both wrist and finger extension.

Oct 13, 2018 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Principles of Tendon Transfers

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access