Introduction

The healthcare system is a complex bureaucracy, driven not only by policy, budgets and changing technology, but also by the needs of many key stakeholders. Some authorities argue that the existing system of healthcare is not designed to effectively meet the needs and expectations of all stakeholders, particularly the needs of consumers, and that major reform is needed.¹ The areas requiring particular attention relate to service access, efficiency, continuity of care, client participation in care and the coordination of health services.^1,² It is argued that all of these issues could be improved through the effective planning of care, of which more individualised, participative and coordinated treatment could be delivered over universalistic, problem-based, clinician-centred care. In fact, a goal-centred model of care is more likely to facilitate an interdisciplinary, client-centred approach, unlike problem-oriented or disease-oriented care, which place greater emphasis on physician control and measures of success.³ A client-centred approach is also more closely aligned with the core principles of CAM.

Despite the advantages of planning, it is claimed that few clinicians document clear goals in clinical practice, involve clients in the management of their care or fully understand individual concerns, beliefs and preferences. The reasons why practitioners might not engage in the planning of client care may relate to time limitations, system restraints, a lack of skill in developing client-centred goals or lack of awareness of the importance of goal setting.^1,^4,⁵ This is not surprising given that there is a lack of explicit instruction in and consensus on the process of care planning in the literature. To address these issues, this chapter proffers a clear, systematic framework for planning client care, taking into consideration the justification and concerns about the process, with a view to delivering a consistent and unequivocal approach to care planning in CAM practice, to enhance client care, improve clinical outcomes and ameliorate clinic, team and organisational efficiency.

Planning defined

The planning phase of client care, which immediately follows clinical assessment and CAM diagnosis but precedes treatment and client review, is a projected course of action aimed at strategically addressing a client’s presenting problem. A key component of care planning is goal setting, which is fundamental in assisting the client and CAM practitioner in identifying and prioritising strategies that may prevent, reduce or resolve individual problems, or that facilitate or augment client function. These goals, or expected outcomes, also provide an endpoint towards which client care is directed by identifying a desirable psychological, social, physiological or cognitive state that is to be achieved.⁶ Planning is therefore an essential part of delivering healthcare and, as such, is an integral component of DeFCAM.

Rationale for planning

Care planning and goal setting generate several benefits for clients, CAM practitioners and institutions. Fundamentally, planning improves the organisation of client care by establishing common treatment objectives ⁴ that pave a path towards a desired clinical outcome.⁷ These objectives provide an activity with a sense of purpose, relevance, clarity and control,⁸ which in turn improve continuity of care. As demonstrated in a number of studies, continuity of care can lead to improvements in client and clinician satisfaction, clinical outcomes and reduced episodes of care.¹ Adequate planning is fundamental to improving continuity of care, as well as delivering a more consistent approach to care and, as such, would be conducive to interdisciplinary practice. The effective delivery of an integrative health service is a good case in point. If, for example, every individual practitioner in a healthcare team developed goals of care in isolation, then client care would almost certainly be fragmented and with probable overlap or omissions in care; it would be less efficient also. An integrative healthcare team that develops mutually derived goals, on the other hand, would be relatively more efficient and the care more consistent, as clinicians would be working towards common goals of care. This approach also could be associated with improvements in the coordination of client care, as well as enhanced communication between team members^1,⁴ (see chapter 6 for a more detailed discussion of the benefits of interdisciplinary and integrative healthcare). Thus, by directing attention towards relevant activities and away from irrelevant actions,⁹ planning minimises the effect that external and internal factors have on achieving a goal by directing all efforts and resources towards a common goal.

As well as improvements in organisational efficiency, planning also ameliorates practitioner performance by motivating the clinician and integrative healthcare team to perform, by facilitating positive changes in practitioner behaviour, by increasing clinician accountability and autonomy and by rewarding the practitioner and client through the achievement of goals.^1,^4,^5,¹⁰^–¹² CAM practitioners who set goals may also experience less emotional distress and demonstrate improvements in concentration, self-confidence and self-motivation.⁵ These improvements in clinician performance and morale, together with the increased level of client–practitioner interaction associated with goal setting, can significantly enhance the quality of client care.

Planning care and setting goals is particularly important in enabling the effective evaluation of clinical outcomes,^4,¹³ as goals provide well-defined, measurable endpoints of care. The purposeful appraisal of client goals may promptly identify delays in the achievement of expected outcomes and thus effectively determine if a treatment needs to be modified or altered to better meet client needs.¹⁴ Other than providing assurance that client needs have been effectively met, care planning, when used in conjunction with client review, can also provide a means for evaluating the performance of clinicians,^6,¹⁵ the efficacy of selected interventions, the effect of the therapy on client outcomes and, thus, the efficiency of a clinic or institution. In other words, care planning could be used as an effective auditing or quality management tool.¹⁵

One clinical outcome that is positively correlated with goal attainment is quality of life. In a case series study using a within-subjects, repeated measures design, in which 47 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome were required to set three to five individualised goals for a 4-month support and education program, goal attainment was found to be the only predictor of quality of life. This was independent of sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid psychiatric diagnosis, and fatigue and symptom severity.¹⁶ Although other confounding factors, such as available support structures, may have contributed to these findings, the positive association between goal attainment and health-related quality of life continues to be supported across several diverse client populations, including individuals post-myocardial infarction¹⁷ and those following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery.¹⁸

In a community psychiatric nursing service in Sussex, the nursing process was incorporated into departmental documentation with a view to delivering a more organised service. After the integration of the nursing process, it was noted that the turnover rate of patients increased. The reason for this was that the nursing process, in particular the clearly documented treatment objectives, enabled nurses to clearly identify when a client’s problem had resolved and when nursing care was no longer required. The service also observed after the integration of the process an improvement in staff morale and performance, the quality of nursing care and the professionalism of staff.¹⁹ Although the findings of this system evaluation are anecdotal, the integration of the nursing process into perioperative assessment forms within a Cincinnati paediatric burns unit resulted in similar changes, including subjective improvements in staff satisfaction, service efficiency and client care delivery.⁶

Similar improvements in healthcare service delivery have also been observed in spinal rehabilitation, an area that is particularly relevant to practitioners of manipulative therapies. An evaluation of existing practice in a Canadian spinal cord rehabilitation centre, for instance, identified several discrepancies in clinical documentation, a lack of client participation in the planning of care, a lack of interdisciplinary action and the adoption of a discipline-driven, problem-based approach to client care following a series of semistructured interviews.²⁰ These concerns prompted the integration of a Donabedian structure–process–outcome goal-setting framework into all relevant client and interdisciplinary documentation. Despite initial resistance and scepticism towards the changing approach to client care, the difficulty in establishing target dates for each goal and the effort to actively involve clients in the setting and prioritisation of goals, the 12-month evaluation of the new framework (by way of team meeting audits) revealed some positive outcomes for clinicians and clients. By demonstrating a shift towards a more goal-oriented, team-driven approach to client care, staff reported an improvement in the structure and organisation of meetings, increased accountability for the documented actions aligned to each goal and greater clarity over team expectations.²⁰ Clients, through increased participation in the rehabilitation process, demonstrated increased accountability towards achieving goals.

Several clinical studies add further support to the positive correlation between the adoption of goal planning and improved client outcomes, including clients with knee injury,²¹ cerebral palsy,²² sports injury,^23,²⁴ rheumatoid arthritis,²⁵ brain injury,²⁶ spinal cord injury²⁷ and individuals requiring dietary changes.^28,²⁹ While these improvements occurred in orthodox clinical environments, it is envisaged that similar changes to client outcomes would occur in CAM practice, although further research in this area is needed to verify this claim.

Concerns about planning

To this point, the careful planning of client care appears to be a simple and effective strategy that can improve healthcare outcomes. Yet not all authorities share this point of view. Some argue that planning is an innate, unconscious activity that many practitioners already perform ⁸ and that a prescribed planning framework is not necessary for delivering superior client care. However, it is uncertain whether this innate process of planning is administered in a systematic, rationalised and client-centred manner. Given the evidence presented above, it is unlikely that this is the case. To ensure that care is planned in a manner that is purposeful, justified and systematically administered, several key concerns need to be addressed.

The planning of care and the formulation of goals in a participatory manner require a rise in clinician workload and an increase in the time allocated to documentation.^4,²⁷ In view of the increasing demand for CAM services,³⁰ the probable constraints on practitioner time and the need to deliver a financially viable service, it may be difficult for some CAM practitioners to effectively plan client care. Some clinicians may also view the planning of care as restrictive and intrusive to the therapeutic relationship,³¹ though this is only likely if a paternalistic approach to goal setting, in which client collaboration and respect are not usually considered, is adopted.

A qualitative exploratory study of practising nurses across five contrasting hospital wards in Northern Ireland corroborated concerns, through the use of participant observation, focus groups and diaries, that the process of creating and maintaining care plans may be an unnecessary burden on the provision of care. One ward did view care plans favourably. Apart from the fact that care plans were more effectively integrated into practice in the exceptional ward, this positive perception of care plans may have been attributed to the different approach to care planning, where care plans were not only more individualised, but were also created by staff in collaboration with the client.³² This participatory approach to care planning, as highlighted below, is not only pivotal in facilitating client rapport and alleviating anxiety, but in the long-term may also contribute to fewer follow-up consultations, greater patient cost savings and a more competitive health service by expediting the achievement of desired clinical outcomes. Given the time and resources that can be saved though goal setting,³¹ and the many immediate and long-term benefits associated with the planning of care, it would be undesirable if goal setting were depreciated by CAM practitioners or, at worst, completely disregarded.

Planning client care in order to effectively develop mutually derived goals also requires effective communication between the client and CAM practitioner.⁴ Although greater interaction between a client and clinician demands additional time, which may already be constrained, not taking the time to listen to the client and, in effect, not providing an environment that fosters rapport, may compromise the quality of a client’s assessment and the accuracy of the diagnosis and, subsequently, adversely affect the outcome of the prescribed treatment.

Some authorities also argue that planning is limited by the capabilities of the individual and as a result cannot be applied to all clients. Atkinson,³¹ for example, points out that individuals with acute psychotic illness, serious ill health, aphasia, cognitive or sensory impairments and clients from non-English-speaking backgrounds may not be suitable for setting mutually derived goals because client motivation and understanding are fundamental requirements for goal attainment.³³ Nevertheless, these limitations can be easily resolved through the provision of alternative and innovative communication aids and the involvement of family and significant others,³¹ which provides some assurance that care is planned around client needs, capacity and preference.

The planning process

As previously highlighted, DeFCAM provides a systematic approach to the planning and implementation of client care; however, before treatment goals can be developed and a care plan established, client problems need to be prioritised. The choice about which diagnosis to address foremost should be determined by the level of risk that the problem poses to the client, with conditions demonstrating a higher risk of harm demanding a higher priority of care.^34,³⁵ Of course, in keeping with client-centred care, the prioritisation of problems should also take into account client preference and readiness to change. Once diagnoses have been prioritised, the most important diagnosis then can be used to formulate the goals of treatment.

According to Wright,¹³ treatment goals must be SMART – specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-specific – but to achieve this, each goal must address only one problem and one outcome.^5,^34,³⁵ Even though SMART is a useful aid for setting goals, it ignores other essential criteria for goal setting, including the need for goals to be client-centred, adequately documented and mutually derived. A summary of the necessary criteria for setting goals and expected outcomes is illustrated in Figure 5.1. It is also necessary to examine some of these criteria in further detail to highlight the importance of these factors in the planning process.