Physical Examination of the Hip and Pelvis


Motion

Flexion

Extension

Abduction

Adduction

Internal rotation

External rotation

Range in degrees

110–120

0–15

30–50

30

30–40

40–60



The majority of the range-of-motion testing can easily be performed with the patient supine. One can assess internal and external rotation by having the patient lying with his or her legs slightly separated and passively rolling the entire lower extremity as if performing a log roll. An alternate method involves flexing the patient at the knee and rotating the leg around the vertical axis of the femur (Figs. 2.1 and 2.2). This method may make measurements easier, but it is important to remember that pivoting the ankle in one direction causes the hip to rotate in the opposite plane. For example, moving the ankle laterally, while using this method, causes internal rotation at the hip. Abduction (Fig. 2.3) and adduction (Fig. 2.4) are performed by anchoring the patient’s pelvis with one hand while moving one leg at a time through the transverse plane with the other. When the hip begins to rotate (despite the added support provided by the examiner) the full range of motion in that plane has been reached. Hip flexion should be tested in the supine position by having the patient draw both knees to his or her chest, as flexion at the knee eliminates hamstring tightness as a potential limiting factor for this exam. Extension , on the other hand, is best performed with the patient in the prone position by raising the selected thigh from the exam table (Fig. 2.5).

A140994_2_En_2_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.1
Internal rotation


A140994_2_En_2_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.2
External rotation


A140994_2_En_2_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.3
Abduction


A140994_2_En_2_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.4
Adduction


A140994_2_En_2_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.5
Extension



2.5.2 Palpation


Palpation constitutes another significant portion of the exam. The musculature, tendinous origins and insertions, bony prominences (e.g., the greater trochanter), bony articulations (including the SI joint (Fig. 2.6) and pubic symphysis), bursae, and apophyses all must be palpated to the extent possible. The examiner must be attentive to any snapping or popping throughout the range of motion. While this usually indicates benign tendinous friction over a bony prominence, it can at times indicate an intra-articular lesion or free-floating loose body [13]. This information may be obtained by palpating the portion of the joint being assessed with the free hand while performing the range-of-motion testing as detailed above.

A140994_2_En_2_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.6
SI (sacroiliac) joint palpation


2.5.3 Neurologic Testing


The hip and pelvis channel numerous nerves from the back to the groin and lower extremity. Accordingly, a thorough neurologic exam is essential even when neurological involvement is not suspected. Strength testing of the lower extremity must include each of the major muscle complexes that mobilize the hip and knee. As described previously, these muscle complexes can be divided into four cardinal muscle groups: the flexors (e.g., iliopsoas and rectus femoris), the extensors (e.g., gluteus maximus and hamstrings), the abductors (e.g., gluteus medius and gluteus minimus), and the adductors (e.g., adductor longus, adductor brevis, adductor magnus, pectineus, and gracilis.) Strength should then be graded on a scale from 1 to 5 (Table 2.2).


Table 2.2
Strength testing values

























Strength test value

Meaning of the value

1/5

No signs of muscle firing

2/5

Visible twitching or fibrillations of the contracted muscle group without any movement

3/5

Active movement when gravity is eliminated

4/5

Active muscle activity against resistance with decreased strength

5/5

Indicating normal strength

After palpating the muscle bellies and tendinous junctions of the individual muscles, the examiner may proceed to test the strength of each muscle grouping. In order to test the flexor group , the examiner places his or her hand over the seated patient’s thigh and asks the patient to push upward against his or her hand while offering resistance. Similarly, to test the hip extensors, the patient is placed in a prone position and instructed to raise his or her thigh from the exam table as resistance is applied from behind the knee. Abduction and adduction may be assessed from the supine position with knees extended. The patient is instructed to separate the legs as the examiner offers resistance from the lateral malleoli and then to squeeze the legs together as resistance is applied to the medial malleoli. These latter tests may also be performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the hips neutral. In this scenario, the patient is instructed to abduct the upper thigh to 30° and strength testing proceeds as above for the elevated leg (Fig. 2.7) . The authors suggest that this technique may offer a greater degree of sensitivity to subtle deficits of strength (SOR-C).

A140994_2_En_2_Fig7_HTML.jpg


Fig. 2.7
Abduction strength testing


2.5.4 Special Tests


One may employ a number of special tests to narrow the differential diagnosis after history, range-of-motion testing, neurologic testing, and palpation have been completed. Despite variability in sensitivity and specificity (Tables 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, and 2.8), as well as significant crossover, such tests can be helpful when employed within the context of the previously obtained information.


Table 2.3
Physical exam tests for muscle/tendon pathology
































Test/lead author (year published)

Pathology

SN/SPa

1. Trendelenburg’s Sign

Bird (2001) [14]

Gluteal tear/tendinopathy

73/77

Woodley (2008) [15]

Gluteal tear/tendinopathy

23/94

Lequesne (2008) [16]

Gluteal tear/tendinopathy

97/96

2. Ely’s Test

Marks (2003) [17]

Flexion contracture (rectus femoris spastisity)—pedatric CP patients only

56–59/64–85


a SN sensitivity, SP specificity



Table 2.4
Physical exam tests for intra-articular pathology






















































Test/lead author

Pathology

SN/SPa

1. FABER (Jansen or Patrick’s test)

Martin (2008) [18]

Labral tear, FAI, arthritis, dysplasia

60/18

Troelsen (2009) [19]

Labral tear

42/75

Maslowski (2010) [20]

Labral tear, FAI, arthritis, avascular necrosis

81/25

2. Impingement (FADIR)

Reiman (2015) [21]

Labral tear, FAI, arthritis, chondral defects

94/8

Reiman (2015) [21]

Labral tear, FAI, arthritis, chondral defects

99/7

3. Stinchfield (resisted straight leg raise)

Maslowski (2010) [20]

Labral tear, FAI, arthritis, avascular necrosis

59/32

4. Scour (quadrant) test

Maslowski (2010) [20]

Labral tear, FAI, arthritis, avascular necrosis

50/29

5. Thomas test

McCarthy (1995) [22]

Labral tear, arthritis, loose bodies

89/92


a SN sensitivity, SP specificity



Table 2.5
Physical exam tests for osteoarthritis of the hip
























Test/lead author

Pathology

SN/SPa

1. Trendelenburg’s sign

Youdas (2010) [23]

Osteoarthrisis

55/70

2. FABER (Jansen or Patrick’s test)

Sutlive (2008) [24]

Osteoarthritis

57/71


a SN sensitivity, SP specificity



Table 2.6
Physical exam tests for femoral shaft fracture




































Test/lead author

Pathology

SN/SPa

1. Fulcrum test

Johnson (1994) [25]

Femoral shaft fracture

93/75

Kang (2005) [26]

Femoral shaft fracture

88/13

2. Patellar pubic percussion test

Bache (1984) [27]

Femoral neck fracture

91/82

Adams (1997) [28]

Femoral Fx at the neck or proximal/ trochanteric Fx

94/95

Tiru (2002) [29]

Femoral neck fracture

96/86


a SN sensitivity, SP specificity



Table 2.7
Physical exam tests for neurologic disease


































Test/lead author

Pathology

SN/SPa

1. Straight leg raise

Vroomen (1999) [30]

Ipsilateral lumbar herniated disk disease

85/52

Vroomen (1999) [30]

Contralateral lumbar herniated disk disease

30/84

2. Piriformis (FAIR) test

Fishman (1982) [31]

Sciatic nerve impingement

88/83

3. Lateral pelvic compression test

Nouraei (2007) [32]

Meralgia parasthetica

95/93.3


a SN sensitivity, SP specificity



Table 2.8
Physical exam tests for pelvic disorders






























































Test/lead author

Pathology

SN/SPa

1. Suppine to sit (long sitting test)

Bemis (1987) [33]

Pelvic dysfunction, pelvic malrotation

17/38

2. Standing flexion test

Levangie (1999) [34]

SI joint dysfunction

17/79

3. Gillet test

Dreyfuss (1996) [35]

SI joint dysfunction

43/68

Levangie (1999) [34]

SI joint dysfunction

8/93

4. Gaenslen sign

Russel (1981) [36]

SI joint dysfunction

21/72

Dreyfus (1996) [35]

SI joint dysfunction

68/35

van der Wurff (2000) [37]

SI joint dysfunction

71/26

5. Compression test

Russel (1981) [36]

SI joint dysfunction

7/90

Ozgocmen (2008) [38]

Rt sided sacroiliitis

22/83

Ozgocmen (2008) [38]

Lt sided sacroiliitis

27/93


a SN sensitivity, SP specificity

Trendelenburg’s sign is a test used to determine whether the patient has adequate hip abductor strength, particularly of the gluteus medius. To perform this test the patient is instructed to stand on both feet and slowly raise one foot off of the ground without additional support. If the patient has adequate abductor strength, then the iliac crest of the raised leg should remain parallel with or elevated slightly in relation to the contralateral side (Fig. 2.8). In addition, the patient should maintain an upright posture without significant tilt of the upper trunk, which would indicate a compensatory mechanism to help the patient maintain his or her balance (Fig. 2.9). A positive Trendelenburg sign is defined as either a compensatory tilt of the torso (vide supra) or a drop of the contralateral iliac crest (Fig. 2.10), indicating that the ipsilateral hip abductors are unable to contract with adequate force to maintain a level pelvis. Instability of the pelvis from other etiologies may also create a positive Trendelenburg’s sign resulting from increased tensile forces on the bony structures of the hip. Therefore, diagnoses causing pelvic instability, such as Legg–Calve–Perthes disease or acetabular fractures of any etiology, may be considered as alternate causes of a positive test [39].
Aug 10, 2017 | Posted by in SPORT MEDICINE | Comments Off on Physical Examination of the Hip and Pelvis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access