Seper Ekhtiari MD MSc1 and Waleed Kishta MD PhD1 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Nonoperative management is the first‐line treatment for most joints affected by OA, including the 1st MTP joint. It is important to understand which nonoperative treatment modality, if any, is most effective. Success rates of over 50% have been reported previously in the literature for nonoperative management of 1st MTP OA, also known as hallux rigidus.1 Many different nonoperative treatments exist, including nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intra‐articular injections, orthotics, and shoe modifications.2 Given that none of these treatments will reverse or cure the disease, it is important to understand what the typical and best‐case scenarios are for each of these modalities. This will help clinicians to have honest and value‐based discussions with their patients about nonoperative management. A single systematic review of levels I–IV evidence (level IV) summarizes the vast majority of evidence on nonoperative treatment of 1st MTP OA. King et al. reviewed 11 studies on this topic, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT), two level II studies, and one level IV study.3 The review included a total of 1600 patients. The modalities included in this review were intra‐articular injections, manipulation and physical therapy, and orthotics and footwear modifications. There is no clinical evidence for the use of oral NSAIDs in 1st MTP OA; in fact, a recent review on this topic extrapolated from hip and knee OA evidence.4 The systematic review by King et al. found that, overall, the evidence was consistent in supporting the efficacy of physical therapy and footwear modification/orthoses, but more mixed when it came to intra‐articular injection in terms of treating 1st MTP OA.3 In terms of modification in footwear, insoles, and orthotics, there was only level III and IV evidence available. Success of orthoses was found to be 55% in a large study of 772 patients.1 Similarly, 63% of patients in a longitudinal case series with over 14 years of follow‐up reported that they were satisfied with footwear modification as a first‐line therapy and would make the same decision again given the opportunity.5 Overall, King et al. made a Grade C recommendation (poor level evidence with consistent findings) for the use of orthotics or footwear modifications in the treatment of 1st MTP OA.3 Physical therapy is another mainstay in the treatment of most forms of OA. King et al. found two studies looking at the treatment of 1st MTP OA with physical therapy and/or manipulation.3 A downgraded RCT (level II) which used birthdates to randomize patients to physical therapy or control groups found that the intervention group had significantly better range of motion (42.7° ± 7.8° vs 14.4° ± 8.0°, p <0.001), flexor hallucis longus strength (3.5 ± 1.0 kg vs 0.7 ± 0.4 kg, p <0.001), and pain reduction (6.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.6 ± 1.1 kg, p <0.001).6 A small retrospective case series (level IV) found that duration of pain relief after manipulation was dependent on radiographic OA grade according to the Karasick and Wapner classification (Grades 1–3, 1 being least severe). Patients with Grade 1 OA had symptom relief for a median of six months, compared to only three months for Grade 2 and no relief for Grade 3.7 Overall, King et al. also assigned a Grade C recommendation (poor level evidence with consistent findings) for physical therapy/manipulation.3 There were six studies looking at various types of injectable therapies for 1st MTP OA. King et al. found that the higher‐quality evidence available for injection therapy (levels II and III) suggested either no benefit for injection, or a benefit that lasted three months or less.3 In their meta‐analysis of hyaluronic acid injection studies specifically, they did find that the standardized mean difference (SMD) showed a benefit for both rest pain (SMD = −0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.77 to −0.28) and walking pain (SMD = −0.44; 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.05) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 10.2%). Interestingly, despite the results of this meta‐analysis, King et al. made a Grade B recommendation (fair evidence with consistent findings) against injection as an effective treatment for hallux rigidus.3
67
Osteoarthritis of the 1st Metatarsophalangeal Joint
Clinical scenario
Top three questions
Question 1: In patients with 1st MTP joint osteoarthritis (OA), do any nonoperative treatment modalities result in better functional outcomes compared to other nonoperative treatment modalities?
Rationale
Clinical comment
Available literature and quality of the evidence
Findings
Resolution of clinical scenario