ORIF and Radial Head Replacement for Radial Head Fractures
Kevin Chan, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Joey G. Pipicelli, PhD Student, MScOT, CH
Shrikant J. Chinchalkar, MThO, BScOT, OTR, CHT
George S. Athwal, MD, FRCSC
Dr. Athwal or an immediate family member has received royalties from IMASCAP and Wright Medical Technology; serves as a paid consultant to DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company, Smith & Nephew, and Wright Medical Technology; has received research or institutional support from DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company, Exactech, Smith & Nephew, Tornier, and Zimmer; and serves as a board member, owner, officer, or committee member of the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Chan, Dr. Chinchalkar, and Dr. Pipicelli.
Introduction
Fractures of the radial head are the most common adult fracture around the elbow. The radial head acts as a stabilizer against valgus, axial, and posterolateral forces. Surgery aims to restore joint congruity and stability with either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or radial head arthroplasty. This permits early, stable postoperative elbow range of motion (ROM) and forearm rotation to prevent stiffness and long-term disability. The specific rehabilitation regime after surgery depends heavily on the associated osseous and/or ligamentous injuries.
Open Reduction Internal Fixation
Indications
Surgical indications for radial head fractures is an area of controversy. In general, ORIF is offered to patients with radial head fractures that are displaced ≥2 to 3 mm and involve >30% of the articular surface, even if they do not impede forearm rotation. Radial head fractures that cause a mechanical block to motion should be fixed, regardless of their size. Fixation is also indicated during the surgical treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations to provide additional stability. The radial head is described as a secondary elbow stabilizer; however, when injuries occur to the primary stabilizers (medial collateral ligament [MCL] and lateral collateral ligament [LCL] and ulnohumeral articulation), its importance is elevated. Isolated nondisplaced and minimally displaced radial head fractures generally do not cause any mechanical blocks to rotation, thus can be treated nonoperatively.
Contraindications
A relative contraindication to ORIF is a comminuted radial head fracture with more than three displaced articular fragments. Although ORIF can be attempted, radial head arthroplasty is often preferred in these cases.
Procedure
The patient is typically positioned supine, with the affected arm placed over the chest or extended on an arm table. A “universal posterior” or lateral skin incision can be used, depending on surgeon preference and associated injuries. Deep dissection can be performed laterally through different intervals, depending on the status of the LCL. In cases of an isolated radial head fracture, we recommend a common extensor tendon-splitting approach, since it protects the LCL and provides a more direct exposure for fixation of partial articular radial head fractures, which are typically located in the anterolateral quadrant with the forearm in neutral rotation (Figure 22.1). If the LCL is ruptured, a classic Kocher approach (extensor carpi ulnaris-anconeus interval) may be preferable. The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is at risk with lateral exposures of the elbow; it can be protected by avoiding excessive distal dissection and placing the forearm in a pronated position.
Displaced fracture fragments should be carefully reduced and secured using small headless or countersunk headed interfragmentary screws. An obliquely oriented screw inserted from the radial head into the radial neck is a described technique to avoid placement of plates for fractures involving the entire articular surface or extending into the radial neck. Plate-and-screw constructs are avoided if possible because they are associated with postoperative stiffness, need for subsequent hardware removal, and disruption of periosteal vascularization of the radial head. However, if a plate is considered necessary for additional stability, it should be contoured to the patient’s anatomy and placed on the nonarticular portion of the radial head.
Repair of associated injuries is carried out as indicated, including collateral ligaments or other bony structures, such
as the coronoid. All injuries, repaired or not, should be documented and communicated to collaborating therapists, since this will influence postoperative rehabilitation. Specifically, the status of the MCL (repaired or not) and the status of the LCL (solid repair or poor-quality repair) should be documented. The wound is then closed in layers. The elbow is typically immobilized and elevated after surgery for a brief period to decrease swelling and pain prior to therapy.
as the coronoid. All injuries, repaired or not, should be documented and communicated to collaborating therapists, since this will influence postoperative rehabilitation. Specifically, the status of the MCL (repaired or not) and the status of the LCL (solid repair or poor-quality repair) should be documented. The wound is then closed in layers. The elbow is typically immobilized and elevated after surgery for a brief period to decrease swelling and pain prior to therapy.
Complications
Elbow stiffness is a common complication after ORIF of the radial head. Possible etiologies include prominent hardware, capsular scarring and adhesions, heterotopic ossification (HO), prolonged immobilization, or noncompliance with postoperative rehabilitation. Physical examination should assess whether the end ROM is firm or soft. The latter finding may be managed successfully with therapy using stretching and static-progressive splinting. However, firm endpoints should be investigated to determine the cause. Mature capsular scarring and adhesions may require open or arthroscopic capsular releases.
Other less common complications may include infection, ulnar nerve or PIN injury, malunions, nonunions, and persistent elbow instability.
Radial Head Arthroplasty
Indications
Radial head arthroplasty is indicated for comminuted, displaced fractures for which stable internal fixation cannot be achieved. For complete articular radial head fractures, there is some evidence that arthroplasty is superior to ORIF.
Procedure
Patient positioning and surgical approach are similar to ORIF. Arthroplasty is typically performed using metallic implants. Although the specific technique will vary depending on the prosthesis used, optimal sizing of all implants is critical to avoiding complications, such as pain, postoperative stiffness, and arthrosis. Articular fragments should be retained and reassembled to help determine the appropriate implant diameter and length. The diameter can be chosen based on the minimum outer diameter of the native radial head. The use of the lesser sigmoid notch for implant diameter sizing may be unreliable. An alternative method is to use the ipsilateral capitellar dimensions on preoperative radiographs to estimate radial head diameter. Similarly, implant length can be approximated using the excised radial head. When the prosthesis is inserted, its articular surface should be even with the proximal edge of the lesser sigmoid notch. Contralateral elbow radiographs can further aid in identifying over- or under-lengthening of the radial head prosthesis. Inappropriate length can be difficult to diagnose using radiographs of the injured elbow only. Local landmarks have been shown to be inaccurate, including the lateral ulnohumeral joint space, which can be nonparallel on anteroposterior radiographs in normal patients due to anatomic variability. The medial ulnohumeral joint space is also unreliable because it may not demonstrate widening on anteroposterior radiographs until significant over-lengthening has occurred.
Once a trial implant is inserted, the elbow is placed through ROM, with stability testing and fluoroscopic assessment. The tracking of the radial head implant on the capitellum is observed to ensure that it is congruent. As in the case of ORIF, the associated injuries are repaired, if required, and documented.
Complications
Possible complications after radial head replacement include infection, loosening, radial head “over-lengthening” or “overstuffing,” radiocapitellar arthritis, instability, HO and fractured components. In a retrospective review of 47 failed metallic radial head arthroplasties, 31 (66%) were caused by aseptic loosening. Other causes included stiffness, instability, and deep infection. Prophylaxis against HO remains controversial. In the authors’ opinion, prophylaxis may be unnecessary in isolated radial head fractures with minimal soft-tissue trauma.
Postoperative Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation following elbow trauma can be a challenging proposition for the surgeon and therapist, as well as the patient. The elbow is a notoriously unforgiving joint. The literature on postoperative therapy following radial head fractures managed by ORIF or radial head arthroplasty is limited. A comprehensive understanding of the specific anatomy and supporting structures is essential to facilitate communication between the surgeon and therapist. This will allow for the implementation of a systematic rehabilitation program that encourages early mobilization within a safe arc of motion while maintaining joint stability.
Authors’ Preferred Protocol
Key Information Required for Therapists from Surgeons
Prior to initiating postoperative rehabilitation, the therapist must be aware of the following:
Type of procedure performed
Rigidity of the bony fixation
Status of the soft-tissue structures surrounding the elbow, including ligaments, nerves, muscles, and joint capsule
Presence of any radiographic abnormalities, such as a drop sign (≥4 mm in ulnohumeral joint space seen on unstressed lateral radiographs of the elbow)
These important details allow the therapist to create a custom-tailored rehabilitation program (Figure 22.2). Ideally,
patients should be seen in specialized outpatient therapy 48 to 72 hours following surgery.
patients should be seen in specialized outpatient therapy 48 to 72 hours following surgery.
Postoperative Positioning and Immobilization
Isolated radial head fractures managed with a lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL)–sparing approach can be placed in a sling or a collar and cuff (Figure 22.3) with the elbow maintained at 80° to 90° of flexion. These are used for comfort during the day and in between exercise sessions.
Patients with associated ligamentous injuries or fractures should be placed in a posterior elbow resting orthotic, with the elbow positioned in approximately 80° to 90° of flexion. The forearm rotation should be specific to the injury pattern to provide optimal ligament protection:
If the LCL was repaired and the MCL was intact, the elbow is positioned with the forearm in pronation.
With associated MCL injuries, but a robust LCL repair, the elbow may be positioned in supination.
If both the MCL and LCL are disrupted, the elbow should be positioned in an orthosis, with the forearm in neutral rotation.
Early Mobilization
Although the optimal time for initiation of ROM after radial head fracture is unknown, the stability of fixation is critically important. We usually advocate that patients begin controlled active and passive mobilization 2 to 5 days postoperatively. Modifications to the exercise regime are made in cases with associated injuries:
Figure 22.3 Photograph of a collar and cuff for positioning the elbow between 80° and 90° of flexion following elbow trauma. |
If the LCL was repaired and the MCL was intact, active elbow extension and flexion are to be performed with the forearm in full pronation exclusively until 6 weeks post-repair to ensure that adequate ligamentous healing has occurred. Active forearm rotation exercises are to be performed with the elbow in >90° of flexion to protect the LCL complex.
If the LCL repair is stable and robust, but the integrity of the MCL is in question, positioning the patient in full supination may be considered. In such cases, active elbow extension/flexion exercises are performed with the forearm in supination. Active forearm rotation exercises are to be performed with the elbow in >90° of flexion to protect both the LCL and MCL.
If the LCL repair is not robust and the MCL is deficient, the patient should be positioned in neutral rotation to protect both the MCL and LCL. Elbow flexion and extension exercises are to be performed with the forearm in the neutral position exclusively. Initially, terminal extension is limited to 30° to 45° and advanced by 10° increments on a weekly basis. Forearm rotation exercises are performed with the elbow in >90° of flexion.Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree