Olecranon and Ulna

A330398_1_En_13_Fig1b_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_13_Fig1c_HTML.jpg



Fig. 13.1
A 61-years old male suffers a grade II open olecranon fracture after a fall from the stairs. (a, b) Grade II open olecranon fracture. Anteroposterior and lateral view. (c) Open reduction. (d) Positioning the start guide wire in line with the medullary canal (e) Introduction of the distal part of the Oleon-nail and drilling for distal locking bolt. (f, g) Final intra-operative result. Anteroposterior and lateral view show anatomical reduction (h) Functional result on day one. Full range of motion was allowed immediately. (i, j) Anteroposterior and lateral view 6 months after injury The fracture has healed uneventfully. Elbow motion was unrestricted. Mayo Elbow Performance Score: 100 points; DASH-score: 9 points



Intramedullary nailing should not be used when the fracture is located too proximal or distal to allow adequate fixation, when there is comminution of the articular surface, when interlocking options of the nail do not allow proper fixation of the coronoid process or when there is an active infection.



13.2.2 Indications in Ulna Shaft Fractures


Intramedullary nailing is suitable for fractures of the ulnar diaphysis, especially in the presence of severe comminution. The procedure can also be performed in multifocal ulna fractures and in fractures with severe soft tissue injury or poor soft tissue coverage (Fig. 13.2a–e). Nailing is also a good option in polytraumatized patients, in high-contact sports athletes and in patients, in whom there are concerns about excess scarring.

A330398_1_En_13_Fig2a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_13_Fig2b_HTML.jpg


Fig. 13.2
A 37-years old male patient suffered a grade IIIb open Monteggia fracture-dislocation when his arm was trapped in a roller. (a) Intraoperative view shows severe soft tissue damage due to degloving of the forearm. (b, c) Primary temporary stabilisation of the ulna with a titanium elastic nail (d) Definitive stabilization with the Foresight ulnar nail 52 days after trauma. Anteroposterior and lateral view 3 months after nailing. (e) Functional and aesthetic result 3 months after nailing. Mayo Elbow Performance Score: 100 points. A severe limitation of finger function remains

Nailing is contraindicated in patients with an active infection, when the ulna shaft has an intramedullary canal of less than 3 mm when the physes are still open.



13.3 Operative Technique



13.3.1 Anatomy


The ulna often is considered as a straight bone, around which the radius winds during pro- and supination. However, the anatomy of the ulna is much more complex. The ulna has cartilage coverage in three distinct parts, as it is involved in three different articulations. Proximally there is the semilunar notch, a large depression formed by the olecranon and coronoid process, which articulates to the trochlear part of the distal humerus. Laterally on the coronoid process there is a narrow, oblong, articular depression called the radial notch. It receives the circumferential articular surface of the head of the radius. The head of the ulna is an articular, rounded structure, which articulates laterally to the ulnar notch of the distal radius and distally to the triangular fibrocartilagineous complex. Posteromedial to the ulnar head, the styloid process is a small non-articular eminence.

In the proximal part of the ulna, three bends can be identified. According to Puchwein et al. [13] the mean dorsal hook angle measures 95.3° ± 9.0° with a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the edge point of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm. The authors describe a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° and a mean anterior angulation of 6.2° ± 2.7°. The mean varus angulation point and mean anterior angulation points were measured at 75.0 ± 7.9 mm and 44.4 ± 7.4 mm respectively. Grechening et al. [14] describe a varus angulation of 17.5° and an anterior angulation of 4.5°. Windisch et al.[15] record a varus angulation of 17.7° and a mean apex point at 85.4 mm.

Based upon these data, each nail design has to take these angulations into account. A straight nail will not reduce the anatomical axes of the proximal ulna.

The shape of the medullary canal does not correlate with the shape of the posterior border of the ulna. Windisch et al. [16] did demonstrate that the point of varus angulation of the posterior border and the point of varus angulation of the medullary cavity differs from 1 to 60 mm in the majority of specimen. The point of varus angulation of the posterior border was found to be more distal in most cases. Distal to this point of angulation, the medullary canal has a straight trajectory. The varus angle of the medullary cavity ranges from 4° to 13.5° (mean 8.95°), the diameter of the medullary cavity from 4 to 10.5 mm (mean 6.96 mm).

Keener et al. [17] analyzed the anatomy of the insertion of the triceps tendon, as they recognized that triceps splitting approaches can result in insufficiency of the extensor mechanism. They described a distinct lateral tendon expansion continuous with the anconeus fascia (mean width, 16.8 mm). The mean width of the proper triceps tendon was 23.7 mm. The mean maximum olecranon width was 26.9 mm. The ratio of the triceps tendon width to the olecranon width averaged 0.88. The mean thickness of the central tendon insertion was 6.8 mm. The medial part of the triceps tendon showed a distinct, rolled medial edge and an insertion consistently confluent with the central tendon. The triceps footprint insertion was dome shaped. The mean insertional width and length of the tendon was 20.9 and 13.4 mm respectively. The mean distance from the olecranon tip to the tendon was 14.8 mm. The tendon width, thickness, and insertional dimensions correlated with the olecranon width. Based upon their observations, the authors advocate splitting the central tendon 3–5 mm lateral to the midline. This would provide a larger medial tendon flap for secure triceps repair while not compromising the wider, reinforced lateral triceps tendon.


13.3.2 Preparation


The patient can be installed prone, supine or in a lateral decubitus position. It is important to be able to flex the elbow at 90° and to get a true anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic view. After sterile draping, the fracture is reduced either in a closed or in an open way. Reduction is held with K-wires or reduction clamps. If K-wires are used it is important that their position does not interfere with the trajectory of the nail.


13.3.2.1 Entry Portal


The insertion point is in line with the medullary canal of the proximal ulna. In the lateral projection this will be about 1.5 cm above the dorsal edge of the ulna. This is more proximal than the actual insertion of the proper tendon. The tendon is split over a length of 1 cm, 3 mm lateral to the midline. As the tendon is split proximal to its insertion, loose connective tissue is found between the tendon fibers and the bone. A K-wire is inserted centrally in the anteroposterior view, and in line with the medullary canal in the lateral view. The K-wire is inserted following the medullary canal, i.e. in approximately 10° of varus angle relative to axis of the distal fragment.


13.3.2.2 Reaming and Nail Insertion


The proximal part of the ulna is reamed with the entry reamer to an appropriate diameter to seat the proximal nail end. More distally the medullary canal is opened with hand reamers in 0.5 mm increments to a minimum diameter of 4 mm, or larger when possible. The diameter of the long ulna nail should correspond with the diameter of the medullary canal. Any straight nail has to be bent to follow the anatomical shape of the ulnar canal in diaphyseal nailing (Fig. 13.3a–o). In short nails, the nail is either anatomically shaped or underdimensioned, so that a straight nail fits into the proximal medullary canal without pushing the fracture fragments into malalignment.

A330398_1_En_13_Fig3a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_13_Fig3b_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_13_Fig3c_HTML.jpg


Fig. 13.3
A 35-years old male patient suffers a grade II open Monteggia fracture-dislocation due to a fall from horseback. (a, b) Proximal diaphyseal fracture of the ulna with associated dislocation of the radial head (Monteggia fracture-dislocation). Anteroposterior and lateral view. (c, d) Determining the entry point in line with the medullary canal in both the anteroposterior and lateral view (e, f) Drilling of the proximal ulna using a 6 mm cannulated drill. (g, h) Reaming the medullary canal using hand reamers with increasing diameter. (i) Introducing the straight nail does not result in an anatomical fracture reduction nor in reduction of the radial head (j, k). Bending of the nail results in an anatomic fracture reduction and reduction of the radial head. (l, m) Proximal and distal locking. Clinical images demonstrating the minimal invasive approach. (n, o) Postoperative lateral and anteroposterior radiographs of the elbow and the forearm respectively. Perfect reduction of the radial head

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Olecranon and Ulna

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access