Nonunion

A330398_1_En_25_Fig1b_HTML.jpg



Fig. 25.1
Twenty year old male patient, femoral shaft nonunion 6 months after osteosynthesis with a statically locked nail. Dehiscence and fracture gap are visible in the anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs of proximal two thirds of left femur. (c) Removal of two proximal locking screws (static holes). (d) The distal screws are not removed. Removal of distal screws would result in torsional instability. Compression of fracture by insertion of compression screw (note bending of proximal and distal interlocking screws) Postoperative anteroposterior (e) and lateral (f) views of left femur. Anteroposterior (g) and lateral (h) views of left femur after 4 months show bony healing







25.5 Nonunion of Femur and Tibia



25.5.1 Nonunion of the Femur



25.5.1.1 Femoral Shaft Nonunion


Depending on the type of pseudarthrosis, the type of previous surgeries and the existing implants, surgical treatment options may include metal removal, axial realignment, proximal dynamization of a statically locked intramedullary nail, intramedullary reaming and implantation of a larger diameter nail, and bone graft augmentation. In hypertrophic nonunion, nailing can be performed leaving the nonunion site closed. In athrophic nonunion, the nonunion site has to be cleared, high stability and biology restored.

In femoral shaft nonunion following primary plate osteosynthesis, conversion of treatment concept is indicated. Treatment consists in plate removal, resection of the nonunion site, and stabilization by antegrade intramedullary nailing. Bone graft application is utilized to stimulate the biological environment and promote bone healing (Fig. 25.2a–j).

A330398_1_En_25_Fig2a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig2b_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.2
(ad) Atrophic nonunion of the femoral shaft and plate breakage 7 months after plate osteosynthesis. Anteroposterior (a, b) and lateral (c, d) views of the proximal and distal left femur. (e, f) Revision surgery with plate removal, debridement of nonunion, antegrade intramedullary nailing using a T2 femur compression nail with a diameter of 11 mm. Proximal single dynamic and distal double static interlocking. Anteroposterior view of both lower extremities (e) and lateral view of the left femur (f). (g, h) Anteroposterior (g) and lateral (h) view of the left femur 4 months after revision showing progressive bone healing (i, j) Anteroposterior (i) and lateral (j) view of the left femur 12 months after revision showing abundant callus formation

In femoral shaft nonunion following intramedullary nailing, closed exchange nailing with reaming and a larger diameter nail will be the treatment of choice. Only in cases of larger bone defects, additional bone grafting may be considered (Fig. 25.3a–h).

A330398_1_En_25_Fig3a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig3b_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig3c_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.3
(a, b) Twenty-four year old female patient with hypertrophic nonunion following antegrade nailing of a femoral shaft fracture. The thin 9 mm diameter nail is unstable; distal interlocking screws had been removed for dynamization of the nail, resulting in additional rotational instability. Anteroposterior and lateral view of the left femur. (c, d) Exchange nailing and insertion of a T2 femur compression nail with a diameter of 12 mm (e, f) Proximal single dynamic and distal double static interlocking. Postoperative anteroposterior (e) and lateral view (f). (g, h) Uneventful bony healing 3 months following exchange nailing. Anteroposterior (g) and lateral view (h)


Surgical Technique as Preferred by the Authors

The patient is placed in a lateral position on a radiolucent operation table. Alternatively, a fracture table can be utilized with the patient in supine position. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is administered only after bacterial swaps from the extracted nail and reaming material have been taken.

As a first step, the extraction device is inserted into the nail tip and interlocking screws are removed. Nail extraction is done cautiously to prevent contact of the extracted nail with the skin in order to avoid secondary contamination.

Following nail removal, a guide wire is gently bent at the tip and is inserted into the intramedullary canal. Care is taken to precisely position the guide wire into the center of the femoral intercondylar region assessed by anteroposterior and lateral radiologic views. By this cautious procedure, perfect axis alignment of the femoral shaft can be expected after successful femoral nailing. Obviously, a correct insertion point of the nail is also very important. A new insertion point has to be chosen in case the previous one was malpositioned. A poller screw which is placed in the entry path of the previous nail prevents the new nail to slip back into the old wrong nail path (see also Fig. 19.​41). Sequential reaming is performed using incremental increase of drill bits with the goal of inserting a nail which has a diameter of 2 mm more than the initial nail diameter, or at least 12 mm. Therefore, in the isthmal region the intramedullary canal is over-reamed with 2 mm more than the determined, final nail diameter. It is ensured that the new nail has good cortical contact and a snug fit and that any fracture gap or dehiscence is avoided.

For exchange nailing, we utilize a compression nail offering the possibility of interfragmentary compression. Distal interlocking screws are inserted first. Consecutively, the proximal interlocking, placed in the dynamic hole, is put under compression by tightening the compression screw, which is inserted proximally in the nail. Before proximal interlocking and compression are performed, we assess femoral torsion radiologically. The femoral condyles are assessed in the lateral view where both condyles project precisely over each other. The C-arm is fixed in all directions and then moved horizontally and centered over the region of the femoral head. Torsion of the femur is considered acceptable if the femoral head projects anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft with two thirds of its circumference. Intraoperative radiological assessment of torsion with the above described method is easier in the lateral than in the supine position. The operative procedure ends with anteroposterior and lateral views of the femur including the adjacent knee and hip joint.

Postoperatively, patients receive physiotherapy and are mobilized out of bed immediately. Weight bearing as tolerated is permitted. Sequential radiologic follow-up studies are done at regular intervals at 6 and 12 weeks as well as 6 months postoperatively.


Results

In 50 femoral shaft nonunions following intramedullary nailing, reamed exchange nailing was performed at our Trauma Center. We found a hypertrophic nonunion in 83 %. In 85 %, exchange nailing was done as a closed procedure. In 89 %, only one procedure was required. Healing was achieved in 95 % of patients. The median time to healing was 4.3 months.

In 2009, Shroeder et al. reported an 86 % union rate in a group of 42 patients with femoral shaft nonunion after previous intramedullary nail osteosynthesis. Only 14 % required additional procedures [21]. Similar excellent results had already been published in the 1980s by Kempf et al. and Webb et al. [31, 22].

However, two studies reported disappointing results of bone healing following closed nonunion treatment with a success rate of 73 and 58 % respectively [32, 33]. The authors concluded that the treatment of femoral shaft nonunion should include open resection of nonunion tissue and insertion of an auxiliary plate at the nonunion site to increase rotational stability. We are of a different opinion. The results of our study suggest, that open nonunion treatment is not required. The disappointing results in the studies of Banaszkiewicz and Weresh may be attributed to the lack of systematic microbiological analysis. Even in the absence of macroscopic evidence of infection, low grade infection may contribute to treatment failure. We therefore routinely harvest bacterial samples from the reaming graft as well as obtained intraoperative material for culturing in thioglycolate culture medium [21].


Delayed Bone Healing or Persistent Nonunion Following Exchange Nailing

Delayed bone healing or persistent nonunion following exchange nailing may require repeated stimulation by performing a second exchange nailing procedure including additional reaming of the intramedullary canal, distributing intramedullary reaming graft, and insertion of an even thicker and more stable nail, e.g. nail diameter up to 14 or 15 mm.


Conclusion

Reamed exchange nailing can be considered as the treatment of choice for nonunion of femoral shaft fractures. A single and closed operative procedure leads to bone healing in most cases. Limited correction of axis deviation is possible without opening the nonunion site. Additional surgical damage to the soft tissues is avoided and there is a lower operative morbidity. The increased stability of a thicker nail results in high postoperative patient comfort and a low pain sensation and allows for early unrestricted weight bearing and active rehabilitation.


25.5.1.2 Nonunion of the Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Region


Predisposing factors for acute fixation failure of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures include insufficient reduction of the primary proximal femur fracture, poor bone quality, unfavorable and unstable fracture patterns, or suboptimal position of fixation devices [34]. Specifically, varus and flexion of the proximal femoral fragment results in shear forces which prevent uneventful fracture healing [35, 36]. Secondary loss of reduction caused by unstable nail fixation due to the insertion of an undersized nail, or by an insufficient nailing technique producing fracture gap or fracture dehiscence, increases shear forces and impairs bone healing. Cephalomedullary implants such as the Gamma nail or the PFN, will fail, cut out or break if the implant capacity to withstand bending forces is exhausted.

Treatment of nonunion or acute fixation failure of a proximal femur fracture is challenging due to deformity, fracture comminution, bone loss and broken hardware. High tensile and compressive stresses across the proximal region require stable fixation of the fracture or nonunion.

When the primary stabilization was performed with an intramedullary device, the treatment of choice is exchange nailing. In some cases, improved positioning of the sliding hip screw into the femoral neck and head realizes better purchase in the proximal fragment. New generation intramedullary nails provide the option to block the sliding hip screw by insertion of a set screw into the nail. If the set screw is completely tightened down, the sliding hip screw is blocked and unable to slide. This set screw position will result in locked and stable fixation of the proximal fragment.

In cases of malalignment, open reduction and correction of axis deviation is performed first. An auxiliary plate, which is applied prior to nailing, may be helpful to secure the correct reduction. A conventional plate is applied to the lateral cortex and is fixed with bicortical screws using a miss-a nail technique. Alternatively, an angular stable plate with mono- or bicortical locking screws is used (Fig. 25.4a–e). If an open approach is performed, cancellous bone grafting is done.

A330398_1_En_25_Fig4a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig4b_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.4
(a) Seventy-five year old female patient. Anteroposterior view of the pelvis. Breakage of the cephalomedullary nail 8 months after primary fracture treatment of an unstable trochanteric fracture. Significant varus deviation of the proximal fragment. (b, c) Revision surgery consisted of resection of the nonunion, open reduction and stabilization with an auxiliary locking plate with bicortical screws in the miss-a-nail-technique; and insertion of a long Gamma Nail. Intraoperative anteroposterior and lateral view of the right hip (d, e) Anteroposterior and lateral view of the right hip showing bone healing after 6 months

Revision internal fixation and bone graft augmentation for proximal femur nonunion consistently result in high rate of fracture union and functional improvement [37].


25.5.1.3 Nonunions of the Distal Femur


The incidence of distal femur nonunion is ranging from 5 to 12 % and is observed following closed reduction and stabilization with retrograde intramedullary nails as well as with locking plates using an open or MIPO surgical approach (Fig. 25.5a–j) [38, 39].

A330398_1_En_25_Fig5a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig5b_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig5c_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.5
(a) Fifty year old male patient. Distal femur shaft nonunion after LISS plating of a distal shaft and Gamma nailing of a proximal femur fracture. Uneventful healing of trochanteric fracture. Correct reduction of distal fracture, and correct position of the LISS plate. Note the perfectly parallel orientation of the central locking screws of the LISS plate. Nonunion presumably caused by stress shielding of the strong LISS plate. (bd) Assessment and confirmation of distal nonunion using coronal, sagittal and transverse CT scan analysis (e, f) Removal of implants, debridement and resection of nonunion, re- osteosynthesis using the identical lateral entry point which had been used for the Gamma nail and insertion of a 13 mm diameter greater trochanter entry nail (GTN, Stryker Corp.). Postoperative anteroposterior (e) and lateral (f) radiographic views of the right femur. (g, h) Anteroposterior (g) and lateral (h) radiographic views of the right femur 4 months after nailing showing bony healing. (i, j) Anteroposterior (i) and lateral (j) radiographic views of the right femur 1 year after nailing

Nonunion following retrograde nailing is mainly caused by the risk factors described above. A thin retrograde nail with a diameter size that is not canal filling and locking screws with a diameter of 4 mm or less will not provide enough stability. A short nail, which does not pass the isthmus will not sufficiently neutralize bending, shear and rotational forces acting on the distal fragment.


Distal Femur Shaft Nonunion

A distal femur shaft nonunion following retrograde nailing may be treated with exchange antegrade intramedullary nailing. If the distal femur segment is long enough to anchor 3 distal interlocking screws, then insertion of a strong antegrade nail with interfragmentary compression is a valid treatment option (Fig. 25.6a–q).

A330398_1_En_25_Fig6a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig6b_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig6c_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_25_Fig6d_HTML.jpg


Fig. 25.6
(ad) Forty-three year old male patient. Hypertrophic nonunion 5 months after retrograde nailing of a distal femur shaft fracture. Anteroposterior (a, b) and lateral (c, d) views of the left femur (ej) Exchange nailing and insertion of a T2 Femur compression nail with a diameter of 12 mm with dynamic interlocking proximally and double static interlocking distally. Different intraoperative views (kn) Anteroposterior (k, l) and lateral (m, n) views 2 months after exchange nailing. (o, p) Anteroposterior (o) and lateral (p) views 2 months after exchange nailing. (q) Anteroposterior view of both lower extremities 18 months after exchange nailing

Obviously, closed exchange nailing and the central position of the nail in the intramedullary canal are offering a biological stimulus and the biomechanical advantages of providing central load transmission and optimal resistance to axial forces. The closed reduction technique is preserving the soft tissue envelope around the nonunion area.


Metaphyseal Nonunion

For the treatment of metaphyseal femoral nonunion following retrograde intramedullary nailing, exchange nailing and reinsertion of another retrograde nail, even with an increased nail diameter has resulted in relatively high failure rates and persistent nonunion. Therefore, retrograde exchange nailing cannot be recommended as a standard concept, but conversion to a stable locked plate fixation preferred. For biological augmentation, cancellous bone autografts and bone morphogenic proteins BMP-7 or BMP-2 are utilized [17, 18].


25.5.1.4 Nonunion in Segmental Femur Fracture


Segmental fractures of the femur can be treated using so-called rendez -vous osteosynthetic procedures with overlapping implants or alternatively using an “all in one device”. Typically, the segmental femur fracture presents with a non-displaced proximal fracture and a shaft fracture. Treatment options include anterograde intramedullary nailing of the shaft fracture and lag screw stabilization of a femoral neck fracture using the miss- a- nail technique. This procedure can be performed only as a single step procedure which may not be applicable in polytrauma patients, for whom the concept of damage control orthopedics is recommended. These patients can be treated by application of an external fixator for the shaft fracture followed by primary and definitive osteosynthesis of the proximal fracture using a DHS device on the day of injury.

After successful resuscitation of the patient in the course of several days, the shaft fracture can be treated by conversion to retrograde intramedullary nailing with a rendez- vous maneouver of simultaneously using the distal screws of the DHS for both plate fixation and proximal interlocking of the nail. This staged concept offers high stability, reliable bone healing and low rate of shaft nonunion.

Alternatively, segmental femur fractures can be treated using an “all in one device”, e.g. a long cephalomedullary nail. The disadvantage of this treatment concept is the relatively unstable implant. Regularly, thin cephalomedullary nails are inserted which do not exert a snug fit in the intramedullary canal. Specifically, the intermediate fragment is not sufficiently stabilized. The so-called “floating fragment” is extending from the greater trochanter to the shaft fracture, and is not stabilized neither proximally nor distally. Due to missing interlocking screws in this intermediate fragment, rotational forces are not neutralized and thus, fracture treatment with all in one device are burdened with a high rate of nonunion typically at the level of the femoral shaft fracture whereas healing of the proximal fracture occurs is the rule.

The treatment concept for these femoral shaft nonunions includes early removal of the cephalomedullary implant, e.g. after confirmation of fracture healing of the proximal fracture at 6 months, followed by exchange nailing using a standard anterograde compression nail.


25.5.2 Nonunion of the Tibia



25.5.2.1 Pathogenesis


Injury- and treatment-related factors contribute to the development of tibial nonunion. Injury-related factors include the severity of the injury such as the degree of fracture comminution and bone loss, degree of soft tissue injury, open fracture, and fracture localization in the distal third. The subcutaneous position of the tibia provides less soft tissue coverage and renders the tibia susceptible for open fractures. Complications of treatment, such as infection or compartment syndrome, adversely affect fracture healing [40, 41]. Treatment related factors include delay of treatment in open fractures, iatrogenic injury of the soft tissue envelope i.e. excessive periosteal stripping, distraction across the fracture site, inadequate immobilization or fixation, angular and rotational deformity, and the splinting effect of an intact fibula.


25.5.2.2 Surgical Treatment of Tibial Shaft Nonunion


Successful management of tibia shaft nonunion includes the following components: removal of unstable, broken, or infected hardware; eradication of infection if applicable, bone stabilization, fibular osteotomy if required to prevent splinting effect of an intact fibula and to allow for compression of nonunion, and the use of biologic bone stimulation. Bony alignment and stability are essential. For stabilization, plate fixation or intramedullary nailing can be used. The choice of implant and procedure are dependent on the type and localization of the nonunion.


Reamed Intramedullary Nailing

Reamed intramedullary nailing is an excellent method of treatment for aseptic tibia nonunion after unreamed nailing or plating in closed, and grade I or II open fractures, which is localized in the middle three fifths of the tibia [42]. This technique has the advantage of providing high stability, maintenance of alignment; and enables early weight bearing and quick rehabilitation. The reaming debris serves as internal bone grafting and renders an open resection of the nonunion site dispensable.

In hypertrophic nonunion, e.g. following nailing of a tibia shaft fracture using an unreamed and unstable nail with thin interlocking bolts, closed exchange nailing can be performed by insertion of a stronger reamed intramedullary nail, preferentially with compression. The procedure of exchange nailing can be performed with the patient in supine position using a normal or a fracture table. The fracture table allows for distraction, and may facilitate reduction and axis alignment. If axis deviation of the tibial nonunion requires correction, a limited open approach and correction osteotomy may be required.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Nonunion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access