Non-arthroplasty Treatments for PTA in the Lower Extremity


Nonoperative

 NSAIDs

 Physical therapy

 Aquatic therapy

Operative

 Hip arthrodesis






PTA Knee: Nonoperative


Let us assume for a moment that the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee can be translated to treatment of PTA of the knee. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Evidence-Based Guidelines for osteoarthritis of the knee recommended strengthening, low-impact aerobic exercise, neuromuscular education, and weight loss [12]. A systematic review of 60 randomized control trials of 8,218 patients on exercise interventions for knee osteoarthritis noted the best clinical improvements were observed with an exercise program which integrated strengthening, flexibility, and aerobic activities [13].

Many orthopedic surgeons use intra-articular corticosteroid injections. A Cochrane review performed by Bellamy et al. evaluating the efficacy of intra-articular corticosteroids identified 28 trials involving 1,973 patients ([14], Art. No. CD005328). Intra-articular corticosteroids at 1 week after injection were found to be more effective than placebo for pain reduction, but the results after 4 weeks and 24 weeks after injection were much less favorable.

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections (viscosupplementation) are an option when intra-articular injections of corticosteroids fail. Adverse side effects associated with HA injections include benign local skin/soft tissue reactions. A Cochrane review performed by Bellamy et al. evaluated the efficacy of viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis ([15], Art. No. CD005321). Seventy-six trials were analyzed supporting the use of viscosupplementation over placebo with improvements in pain from 28 to 54 % at 5–13 weeks postinjection and 9 to 32 % for function. In comparison with corticosteroids, longer-term benefits were observed with viscosupplementation ([15], Art. No. CD005321). Housman et al. investigated the efficacy of intra-articular hylastan compared to intra-articular corticosteroids via a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial with follow-up of 6 months [16]. Both hylastan and corticosteroids significantly reduced pain scores. All secondary outcomes were similar including responder rates, global assessments, and walking pain. In addition, Cheng et al. performed a literature review which supported the use of intra-articular corticosteroids and noted significant pain relief and improved function up to 1 year postinjection [17]. Nonetheless, intra-articular HA injections may provide longer pain relief than intra-articular corticosteroid injections.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is another injectable option. The clinical outcomes of PRP intra-articular knee injections with 6 months follow-up were investigated by Raeissadat et al. and demonstrated significant improvements in both physical and mental domains of the SF-36 and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires [18]. Khoshbin et al. performed a systematic review of six level I and II studies investigating PRP in knee osteoarthritis consisting of 577 patients identifying PRP as significantly better than HA or normal saline injections with pooled results using the WOMAC Index Scale [19]. No significant difference was seen for visual analog scale score or overall patient satisfaction. Of note, a higher incidence of nonspecific adverse events were witnessed with PRP over HA or placebo. This data suggests that PRP injections may be an alternative treatment; however, there is a need for more evidence to better define clinical guidelines.


PTA Knee: Operative


Non-arthroplasty surgical interventions for PTA of the knee with good clinical outcomes include knee arthroscopy, osteochondral allograft transplantation for localized defects, and distal femoral or proximal tibia osteotomies for deformity correction or single-compartment disease. The AAOS developed appropriate use criteria (AUC) on the non-arthroplasty treatment of knee osteoarthrosis and four “appropriate” treatment recommendations: self-management, prescribed physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen [20]. There were 3 “maybe appropriate” recommendations: arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or loose body removal, hinged knee brace and/or unloading brace, and intra-articular steroids [20]. Although osteoarthrosis is not the same entity as PTA, these recommendations are compelling.


Knee Arthroscopy


Knee arthroscopy for osteoarthrosis has fallen out of favor. Moseley et al. reported the results of a controlled trial involving patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and noted that the outcomes after arthroscopic lavage or arthroscopic debridement were no better than a placebo (sham) procedure [21]. Katz et al. conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for symptomatic patients with a meniscal tear and osteoarthrosis resulted in better functional outcome than nonoperative therapy [22]. They found that there was no difference between the two study groups (arthroscopy with postoperative physical therapy versus physical therapy alone). However, 30 % of the patients who were assigned to physical therapy alone underwent surgery within 6 months [22]. They found that arthroscopic surgery for knee osteoarthritis provides no additional benefit compared to “optimized physician and medical therapy” [23]. Nonetheless, osteoarthritis of the knee may not be completely analogous to PTA of the knee. It is possible that knee arthroscopy for PTA may prove to be more efficacious than arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis.


Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation


Patients who suffer from localized pain due to an identifiable cartilaginous defect within a single compartment of the knee have successfully responded to an Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System (OATS) procedure, where a lower weight-bearing portion of normal autologous cartilage and bone are inserted into the defect following debridement. A systematic review of 19 studies of 644 knees with a mean follow-up of 58 months reported an overall satisfaction rate of 86 % and an overall failure rate of 18 % based on varied definitions of failure [24]. Sixty-five percent had little or no radiographic arthritic changes on final follow-up. Favorable outcomes were associated with those patients who had shorter symptom duration, traumatic etiologies, and young patients with focal unipolar defects. A short-term complication rate of 2.3 % was reported. The most common complications included removal of hardware, repeat arthroscopy, and infection [24].


Osteotomy


Residual deformity is common after fractures around the knee joint. Patients with early to moderate PTA, and changes in the mechanical axis and knee orientation, may benefit from osteotomies for deformity correction. An osteotomy may provide years of improved quality of life and delay the need for a total knee arthroplasty. Nonetheless, the AAOS AUC on non-arthroplasty treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (which we believe is analogous to PTA for the sake of the discussion here) noted that “realignment osteotomy is rarely appropriate” [20]. This statement should be interpreted in the context that deformity is less common with osteoarthritis and more common with PTA, where osteotomy clearly has a role.

A retrospective review analyzed 28 patients who underwent an osteotomy for PTA due to an intra-articular or extra-articular malunion with a mean 3.8-year follow-up [25]. On average, the trauma occurred 17.3 years prior to the surgical intervention. Two patients with intra-articular malunions went on to require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for continued pain. Four patients required repeat surgery for infection, stiffness, and pseudoarthrosis. At final follow-up, pain scores were significantly improved. Corrective osteotomies around the knee with post-traumatic coronal plane deformity can relieve pain and improve function. We have summarized the non-arthroplasty options for PTA of the knee in Table 22.2.


Table 22.2
Non-arthroplasty options for knee PTA

























Nonoperative

 Low-impact exercise

 Aquatic therapy

 Intra-articular steroid injection

 Viscosupplementation

 Platelet-rich plasma injection

Operative

 Knee arthroscopy

 Osteochondral autograft transplantation

 Osteotomy


PTA Ankle: Nonoperative


Initial treatments of PTA of the ankle are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, shoe-wear modifications, orthotics, intra-articular injections of corticosteroids, and viscosupplementation. Glazebrook noted that the current literature that supports most nonsurgical treatments for ankle arthritis use lesser quality, level IV studies [26]. He stated that a systematic review was necessary in the future to determine the level of evidence available to guide the recommendations of nonsurgical options for treating ankle arthritis [26].

A series of three HA viscosupplementation injections were performed under fluoroscopic guidance and evaluated at 4 and 12 months postinjection with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score [27]. AOFAS scores were statistically significant at 4 and 12 months, with 73 % of patients reporting satisfaction at an average follow-up of close to 4 years. Five patients required surgical intervention an average of 27 months.

DeGroot et al. performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a single intra-articular HA injection versus an injection of normal saline for knee osteoarthritis [28]. Sixty-four patients were assessed at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postinjection with AOFAS scores. Changes from baseline in both groups were significant, yet the analysis between groups demonstrated no significant differences. This demonstrates the variability present in the literature concerning HA injections as treatment for arthrosis of the ankle. Currently, more clinical trials investigating both corticosteroid and viscosupplementation efficacies are necessary in order to fully support ankle injections for post-traumatic arthrosis.

Mousopoulos et al. noted that corticosteroids or HA joint injections for PTA offer “temporary pain relief with hardly any mid- or long-term benefit” [29]. Johnson et al. noted that evidence-based guidelines for the use of injectable corticosteroids were lacking [30]. These investigators noted that younger orthopedic surgeons (less than 5 years in practice) performed fewer injections than those in practice 6–10 years [30].

Wexler et al. noted that corticosteroid injections are not typically done for ankle arthritis, are generally of limited duration, but can provide excellent temporary pain relief in patients with end-stage disease [31].


PTA Ankle: Operative


Ankle arthrosis after trauma can be treated with a myriad of surgical options. These include arthroscopic debridement, allograft resurfacing, osteotomy, distraction arthroplasty, and tibiotalar arthrodesis.


Arthroscopic Debridement


Arthroscopic debridement is selected for patients with large osteophytes which limit motion. Patients who report pain with extremes of motion or certain activities (i.e., stair climbing, patients with anterior impingement, etc.) are ideal candidates for arthroscopic osteophyte resection and debridement. Relative contraindications include patients who report pain at rest, complete loss of articular joint space, and advanced arthrosis. Rasmussen and Jensen performed arthroscopic ankle debridement for ankle impingement on 105 patients and reported complete pain relief for 65 patients, whereas 28 patients reported a reduction in pain [32]. Complications included four deep infections and one synovial fistula, all of which responded well to repeat arthroscopy and antibiotics [32].


Allograft Resurfacing


Allograft resurfacing with fresh tissue allografts can be used to replace damaged articular surfaces. These allografts are indicated for young, active patients with focal unipolar defects within either the plafond or talar dome and are contraindicated in patients with vascular disease, malalignment greater than 10°, ankle instability, and obesity. Raikin published a prospective review of 15 patients who underwent osteochondral allograft resurfacing with a minimum of 2-year follow-up and score improvements in AOFAS of 45 points with 11 patients reporting good to excellent outcomes [33]. Bipolar fresh osteochondral allografts after 14 months are associated with a significant improvement in AOFAS score and improved ankle range of motion in the frontal plane identified by gait analysis [34].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 27, 2016 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Non-arthroplasty Treatments for PTA in the Lower Extremity

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access