Minimally Invasive First Metatarsophalangeal Fusion
Christopher P. Miller
Philip B. Kaiser
♦ INTRODUCTION
Hallux rigidus is a common condition encountered by foot and ankle surgeons. It was originally described in 1887 as condition affecting the great toe causing stiffness and pain.1 The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is one of the most common joints affected by degenerative changes with almost 8% of adults reporting symptomatic hallux rigidus in their lifetime and radiographic evidence of arthritis present in at least 27% of adults over 50 years.2,3,4
Drs. Coughlin and Shurnas described their classification system of hallux rigidus and recommended that, when nonoperative treatment fails, mild grade 1 and 2 cases can be treated with cheilectomy and arthrodesis considered for higher grades.5 However, recently, there has been realization that the radiographic imaging and classification grades do not necessarily correlate with patient’s symptoms and treatment options.6,7
In general, patients with severe arthritis of the joint with limited motion and pain in the mid arc of motion typically correlate to grades 3 and 4 on the Coughlin classification.5 Open arthrodesis has been the traditional gold standard treatment for these patients with excellent longterm reported outcomes and function.8,9,10 Minimally invasive (MIS) surgical techniques offer a new approach to treat forefoot pathologies with the potential to limit postoperative wound complications and pain.11 The first reported minimal incision first MTP joint fusion was in 1999 as case report of a successful arthroscopic-assisted MTP joint fusion.12 Since then, the role of arthroscopy in foot and ankle conditions as well as the authors’ understanding of the anatomy, safe zone, and portal placement has expanded, and the first MTP joint arthroscopy and minimally invasive forefoot surgery have become much more common.12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23
As foot and ankle surgeons gain MIS experience with bunion correction, cheilectomy, and metatarsal osteotomies, these skills are readily applicable to joint fusions. Hallux rigidus, one the most commonly treated degenerative foot and ankle conditions, coupled with the relatively simple anatomy of the first MTP joint allow the benefits of MIS to be applied to one of the most commonly performed foot surgeries. This chapter will describe the technique of MIS fusion of the hallux MTP joint. Results from early case series demonstrate 93% to 97% fusion rates with low complications, indicating that this is a promising surgery that could benefit many pati ents.12,14,16,22,24,25,26
♦ INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for the treatment of advanced arthritis of the first MTP joint. Additionally, certain patient factors including poor bone quality, soft-tissue compromise, concomitant coronal or sagittal plane deformities, bony erosions, or in the setting of neuromuscular disorders make fusion of the hallux MTP joint a good option when nonoperative care does not relieve pain.8
Patients, regardless of initial symptoms or radiographs, should be offered nonoperative treatments such as shoe modifications, carbon fiber inserts, rocker bottom shoes, and possible steroid injections. However, if this fails, surgery may be considered. As described in the prior chapter, MIS cheilectomy may work well when the pain from hallux rigidus is primarily with toe dorsiflexion or shoe wear impinging on the arthritic spur.5 However, if there is pain at the mid arc of motion or a positive grind test on examination, then a cheilectomy is less likely to achieve adequate long-term pain relief, and therefore, a fusion may be preferred.
The indications for an MIS or open first MTP fusion are largely equivalent. Beyond surgeon preference and experience, an MIS approach may be favored in certain conditions such as in the presence of significant scar tissue or adherent skin that could lead to poor wound healing if approached with a traditional open technique. With the percutaneous technique, a plate and screw construct is not possible; however, screw-only constructs have been shown to allow for early, protected, weight bearing without increased risk of nonunion.27
Relative contraindications of MIS fusion compared to open include severe angular deformity requiring open ligament releases to achieve reduction and/or poor bone quality as in the setting of severe osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis. In these cases, the surgeon should give consideration to an open approach since a dorsal plate with lag screw has been shown to be the strongest construct biomechanically.28
Contraindications to MIS procedures would include revision fusion for nonunion, cases with significant bone loss requiring bone block arthrodesis, conversion of arthroplasty or other implant to fusion, as well as cases with active infection or vascular compromise sufficient to preclude healing of the wounds.
Dorsal spurring is not a contraindication as this can be treated with an MIS cheilectomy at the time of fusion. In the authors’ practice, the MIS first MTP fusion has become the workhorse procedure for more than 90% of cases.
♦ PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Patients often present with pain and stiffness at the first MTP joint with or without deformity. There may be a history of trauma, but typically, there is no inciting event that the patient recalls. Usually, the pain is worse with actions involving toe dorsiflexion and loading across the MTP joint, such as the push-off phase of gait. Similarly, stairs, running, and plank position during activities such as yoga or push-ups may cause discomfort.8,10,29
When there is a large dorsal osteophyte, there may be tenderness due to impingement in shoes. The dorsal medial cutaneous nerve will course over the spur and may be a source of additional pain if stretched over the spur with plantarflexion of the toe, and there is often evidence of neuritis with a positive Tinel sign at the site.30 The patient may also report lateral foot discomfort due to abnormal gait patterns in an effort to off-load the painful hallux MTP joint. Finally, evaluating the pain with range of motion is one of the most important deciding factors. If the patient has pain at the mid arc of motion or with axial loading of the joint in the mid position, this likely indicates a loss of cartilage in the central joint, and in those cases, a fusion as opposed to a cheilectomy will be more beneficial as discussed above.





