Medical management of arthritis

5 Medical management of arthritis



Cases relevant to this chapter


20, 26–27, 68, 70, 72–73, 75–77, 79–87, 90–91, 93–94, 96–97




Analgesics




Practical use of analgesics


Simple analgesics can be used in all patients with inflammatory arthritis to control pain (Table 5.1); they are an adjunct to other therapy. The available drugs include paracetamol, weak and strong opioids, tramadol, and combinations of paracetamol and a weak opioid. There is some evidence from clinical trials that analgesics reduce pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the amount of data is very limited. However, almost all rheumatologists recommend using them.


Table 5.1 An analgesic ladder for arthritis



















Step Pain Level Treatment
One Mild Paracetamol
Two Moderate Paracetamol plus mild opioid or opioid-like drug (e.g. codeine or tramadol)
Three Severe Paracetamol plus stronger opioid (e.g. dihydrocodeine or morphine)








Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs








Adverse reactions to NSAIDs


These are the main limiting factors to the use of NSAIDs. Overall, NSAIDs are one of the commonest classes of drugs causing adverse events. Risks increase with age and NSAIDs must be used carefully in the elderly. Minor adverse effects such as dyspepsia and headache are commonplace, and rashes also occur. Renal, gastrointestinal and cardiac side-effects cause more problems. Central nervous system side-effects, such as drowsiness and confusion, are often underestimated. Haematological side-effects are unusual. NSAIDs can exacerbate pre-existing asthma.


Renal adverse events are one area of concern. As prostaglandins regulate kidney function, NSAIDs can cause dose-dependent renal side-effects, especially in patients with pre-existing renal disease. Common problems are peripheral oedema, hypertension, and reduced effects of diuretics and anti-hypertensive drugs. When renal blood flow is reduced, for example by cardiac failure or diuretic use, the added inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis by NSAIDs further impairs blood flow, and this can cause overt renal failure, particularly in the elderly. Other renal problems seen occasionally include acute renal failure, hyperkalaemia, and interstitial nephritis and papillary necrosis.


Gastrointestinal toxicity is the main problem with NSAIDs. The range of adverse effects includes dyspepsia, gastric erosions, peptic ulceration, bleeding, perforation, haematemesis or melaena, small bowel inflammation, occult blood loss and anaemia. The most serious problems are perforations, ulcers and bleeds. Many patients who have serious gastrointestinal complications do not have prior dyspepsia. In the absence of warning signs there is no way to ascertain whether a patient is on the point of developing serious problems.


If NSAID use is unavoidable, some protective strategy is needed, particularly in those patients at greatest risk. There are several potential options. One choice is to co-prescribe a proton pump inhibitor, such as omeprazole. This is effective and acceptable to patients. H2-receptor antagonists also help, but are less effective than proton pump inhibitors. Alternatively, the patient could be co-prescribed a prostaglandin analogue, such as misoprostol. This is also effective, but causes added side-effects, such as diarrhoea, and is less well tolerated than proton pump inhibitors. The final option is to use one of the newer COX2 drugs.


Coxibs undoubtedly have less gastrointestinal toxicity and decrease the risk of gastric ulcers. However, their overall toxicity may not be reduced compared with conventional NSAIDs as one form of toxicity may be replaced by another. The risk of NSAID-induced complications is increased particularly in patients with a previous clinical history of gastroduodenal ulcer, gastrointestinal bleeding or gastroduodenal perforation. The use of even a COX2-selective agent should, therefore, be considered especially carefully in this situation.


Cardiovascular adverse events, including myocardial infarction, cardiac failure and stroke, are an increasing concern. They are thought to be more common when NSAIDs are used continuously long-term. They are also more common in patients with pre-existing cardiac disease and associated cardiac risk factors. Some of the increased risk, particularly for cardiac failure, is due to fluid retention. However, there are other mechanisms involved. Initially these cardiovascular toxicities were thought to be a specific problem with coxibs, but it is now accepted that they can occur with most NSAIDs. Some NSAIDs, particularly naproxen, appear to have a relatively low excess risk of cardiovascular disease.


The choice between conventional NSAIDs and coxibs is complex. Coxibs are most valuable in patients most at risk of serious upper gastrointestinal side-effects, who do not have cardiac risk factors. Patients at ‘high risk’ of developing serious gastrointestinal adverse events include those of 65 years of age and over, those using concomitant medications known to increase the likelihood of upper gastrointestinal adverse events, those with serious co-morbidity, and those requiring the prolonged use of maximum recommended doses of standard NSAIDs. However, these patients are also at high risk of cardiovascular and renal adverse effects, so that the best choice may to be to avoid NSAIDs altogether.


< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 12, 2016 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Medical management of arthritis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access