1 Massage in context
Complementary or orthodox?
Is massage a complementary or an orthodox therapy? Certainly there is ample evidence that massage has been used, at least since the early twentieth century, as part of mainstream medicine for orthopaedic rehabilitation. In England in 1895 the Society of Trained Masseuses was founded to increase the status of massage and of the professionals who practised the technique under the supervision of medical doctors. In 1907, Araminta Ross, the principal of the Dublin School of Massage, wrote The Masseuse’s Pocket Book, a small textbook describing the various strokes of massage and how they are to be used for various medical conditions. British-trained physiotherapists (physical therapists) have practised massage as a ‘core skill’ since the inception of physiotherapy as a profession. Despite this history, in many areas of medicine, in the UK massage is now regarded as a complementary therapy. In palliative care, for example, it is a therapy usually administered by massage/complementary therapists who often train specifically for that purpose (MacDonald 1999). The answer to the question may lie in the definition of complementary therapy: ‘[it] is diagnosis, treatment and/or prevention which complements mainstream medicine by contributing to a common whole, by satisfying a demand not met by orthodoxy, or by diversifying the conceptual frameworks of medicine’ (Ernst et al 1995). This definition was adopted by the Cochrane Collaboration (Ernst et al 1998). Perhaps it is not the technique or the therapy which is either mainstream or complementary, but the context in which it is used and the perceived status of the therapist using it—in other words, the system of medicine in which it resides and the approach of the individual therapist. Medical systems are embedded in a cultural framework which has an overriding influence on the scientific perspective. For example, there are many similarities among Chinese, Thai and Japanese traditional medicines; therapies which have been regarded as mainstream in the East for centuries are looked upon as complementary in the West because they do not easily or immediately fit into the Western cultural medical framework.