Managing Hip Pain in the Athlete




Hip and groin pain is commonly experienced by athletes. The differential diagnosis should include both intra-articular and extra-articular sources for pain and dysfunction. A comprehensive history and physical examination can guide the evaluation of hip pain and the potential need for further diagnostics. Treatment of athletes with hip disorders includes education, addressing activities of daily living, pain-modulating medications or modalities, exercise and sports modification, and therapeutic exercise. Surgical techniques for prearthritic hip disorders are expanding and can offer appropriate patients a successful return to athletic endeavors when conservative measures are not effective.


Key points








  • Hip and groin pain is commonly experienced by athletes.



  • The differential diagnosis is extensive and should include both intra-articular and extra-articular sources for pain and dysfunction.



  • Evaluation for the underlying disorder can be complicated.



  • A comprehensive history and physical examination can guide the evaluation of hip pain and the potential need for further diagnostics such as imaging or diagnostic hip injection.



  • Treatment of athletes with hip disorders includes education, addressing activities of daily living, pain-modulating medications or modalities, exercise and sports modification, and therapeutic exercise.






Introduction


Hip and groin pain is commonly experienced by athletes of all ages and activity levels. Groin pain accounts for 10% of all visits to sports medicine centers and groin injuries account for up to 6% of all athletic injuries. Hip and groin injuries occur in 5% to 9% of high school athletes. Sports involving increased amounts of acceleration and deceleration, as well as cutting movements, seem to have increased incidences. A study of high school soccer injuries reported that 13.3% of all injuries sustained by girls involved the hip and thigh. Causes of hip and groin pain can often be complicated by the overlapping signs and symptoms of other disorders, as well as the complex anatomy and biomechanics of the hip. Furthermore, many hip and groin injuries have multiple components or coexisting injuries. This article reviews the causes of hip pain in athletes, provides a clinical approach for accurate diagnosis, and discusses treatment options for common hip disorders.




Introduction


Hip and groin pain is commonly experienced by athletes of all ages and activity levels. Groin pain accounts for 10% of all visits to sports medicine centers and groin injuries account for up to 6% of all athletic injuries. Hip and groin injuries occur in 5% to 9% of high school athletes. Sports involving increased amounts of acceleration and deceleration, as well as cutting movements, seem to have increased incidences. A study of high school soccer injuries reported that 13.3% of all injuries sustained by girls involved the hip and thigh. Causes of hip and groin pain can often be complicated by the overlapping signs and symptoms of other disorders, as well as the complex anatomy and biomechanics of the hip. Furthermore, many hip and groin injuries have multiple components or coexisting injuries. This article reviews the causes of hip pain in athletes, provides a clinical approach for accurate diagnosis, and discusses treatment options for common hip disorders.




Differential diagnosis


The differential diagnosis for athletes presenting with hip pain is extensive and can span multiple medical specialties and disciplines. For example, an athlete whose technique of running has altered because of a hip injury may begin to experience pain in other areas, including the pelvic girdle, lumbar spine, and knee. Both musculoskeletal and nonmusculoskeletal sources of hip pain must be considered ( Box 1 ). These nonmusculoskeletal sources may include visceral structures of the abdomen and pelvis.



Box 1





  • Musculoskeletal hip pain disorders:




    • Intra-articular




      • Ligamentum teres tear



      • Hip dislocation/subluxation/capsular injury



      • Fracture/stress fracture



      • Synovitis



      • Infection



      • Osteonecrosis of femoral head



      • Osteochondritis dissecans



      • Legg-Calve-Perthes disease



      • Slipped capital femoral epiphysis



      • Femoroacetabular impingement



      • Developmental hip dysplasia



      • Acetabular labral tear



      • Osteoarthritis




    • Extra-articular




      • Hip



      • Bursitis



      • Muscle strain/tendinopathy/tear: gluteus medius/minimus, piriformis, adductors, rectus femoris, iliopsoas, rectus abdominis, proximal hamstrings, tensor fascia lata



      • Greater trochanteric pain syndrome



      • Snapping hip syndrome




    • Regional musculoskeletal




      • Pubic ramus stress fracture/osteitis pubis



      • Sports hernia/pubalgia



      • Lumbar spine: facet joint pain, lumbosacral radiculopathy



      • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction



      • Peripheral nerve entrapment: genitofemoral, iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, pudendal, superior and inferior gluteal





  • Nonmusculoskeletal hip pain disorders:




    • Gastrointestinal: appendicitis, diverticulitis, lymphadenitis, inflammatory bowel disease, inguinal/femoral hernia



    • Genitourinary: endometriosis, prostatitis, urinary tract infection, pelvic inflammatory disease, ovarian cysts, nephrolithiasis, ectopic pregnancy



    • Pelvic tumor




Differential diagnosis of hip pain


It is important for the sports medicine provider to distinguish between intra-articular versus extra-articular sources of hip pain (see Box 1 ), which is accomplished through a complete evaluation, including a thorough history and physical examination, along with appropriate diagnostic testing.


History


The medical history for a patient presenting with hip pain should include age, onset (and mechanism of injury, if applicable), distribution, quality, severity, progression, exacerbating factors, alleviating factors, and other associated signs/symptoms.


The differential diagnosis for hip pain can vary based on the age of the athlete. In the pediatric and adolescent athlete presenting with hip and groin pain, consideration should be given to apophyseal injuries, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In contrast, older athletes are often affected by osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip.


Hip pain with acute onset has a distinct differential diagnosis from hip pain that is chronic or of insidious onset. A detailed mechanism of injury should be elicited with hip pain of acute onset. For example, sudden forceful muscle contractions (particularly eccentric) often result in muscle strains or tears in adults and apophyseal avulsions in adolescents. The adductor muscles are often involved, particularly in soccer, football, and hockey athletes. Adductor strain is the most common cause of groin pain in athletes. Further, fracture should be considered in athletes with sudden onset of pain associated with a specific event. The event may not have seemed to be significant enough to cause a bony fracture, but athletes with an underlying bone mineralization deficit may become symptomatic with a seemingly benign event.


The distribution of hip pain is wide and variable but should be assessed by the health care provider to assist in making a diagnosis and to reassess following treatment. Anterior groin pain is often associated with intra-articular hip disorders. These disorders include femoral or acetabular fracture, avascular necrosis, OA, synovitis, ligamentum teres tear, and prearthritic hip disorders (isolated acetabular labral tears, developmental hip dysplasia [DDH], and femoroacetabular impingement [FAI] with and without acetabular labral tears). Extra-articular sources associated with anterior groin pain include the pubic rami, iliopsoas, adductor group, and abdominal muscles. Sports hernia typically involves injury to the abdominal muscles, particularly the external oblique muscle and aponeurosis, with possible injury to the adductors. In addition to the muscles and surrounding soft tissues, higher lumbar radiculopathy should also be considered as a source of an athlete’s groin pain.


Lateral hip pain can be associated with intra-articular hip disorders, including all of those listed for anterior distribution of pain. In isolation, lateral hip pain is often associated with extra-articular disorders, including greater trochanteric bursitis or greater trochanteric pain syndrome, which may include gluteus medius or minimus tendinopathy, or pain related to tensor fascia lata/iliotibial band dysfunction. Lumbar spine disorders, particularly those involving the L4 to L5 distribution, can present with lateral hip pain.


Posterior pelvic pain is the area of great overlap between the hip, pelvic girdle, and lumbar spine and is not fully understood. Multiple structures contribute to posterior pelvic pain, including the sacroiliac joints, ischial bursa, and the insertion of the proximal hamstring. The European guidelines for evaluation and treatment of pelvic girdle pain continue to provide a comprehensive resource for understanding the relationships of the pelvic girdle and lumbar spine and include diagnostic and therapeutic evidence-based reviews. Increased tone, fatigue, or dysfunction of the hip abductors, extensors, lateral rotators, and the lumbopelvic fascia are confounding factors. Lumbar spine disorders also commonly present with pain in the posterior pelvis and can range from structural and physiologic changes of the intervertebral disc, facet joint, and central or foraminal canal, ranging from L1 to S1 myotome and dermatome levels. Less understood is the role of the hip in posterior pelvic pain. In a previous descriptive study, 20% of patients successfully treated with hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears in isolation with pain unresponsive to conservative treatment reported posterior pelvic pain as part of the distribution of pain before surgery. In a series of descriptive studies, posterior pelvic pain was reported by patients before surgery in 17.3% of patients with DDH, 29% of patients with FAI, and 38% of patients with isolated acetabular labral tears. Patients with FAI also reported a 23% incidence of low back pain and 12% incidence of posterior thigh pain. Lumbar spine, pelvic girdle, and hip disorders can present with a variety of distributions of pain that overlap across regions. Recognizing this overlap in the distribution of symptoms enables the sports medicine provider to consider an underlying hip disorder in athletes with isolated groin pain as well as in the lumbopelvic region.


Pain quality, severity, progression, exacerbating factors, and alleviating factors provide additional information to narrow the differential diagnosis. Burning pain is often associated with a neuropathic cause. Pain with active contraction or passive stretch of a particular muscle suggests a tendinopathy or muscle strain/tear. Symptoms that are worse with coughing or sneezing and causing an increase in intra-abdominal and intraspinal pain may suggest an intervertebral disc or abdominal or inguinal hernia as a source of pain.


Specific motions or weight bearing associated with snapping, catching, or locking can be associated with extra-articular and intra-articular hip disorders. Snapping hip is commonly associated with hip pain and has been estimated to occur in 5% to 10% of the general population, but is especially seen in athletes such as soccer players, runners, weight lifters, and dancers who perform significant hip flexion and extension movements. It is most commonly associated with snapping of the iliotibial band or the gluteus maximus over the greater trochanter that occurs during return to full extension of the hip. Another common cause of anterior snapping hip is aberrant movement of the iliopsoas tendon snapping over the iliopectineal eminence. This snapping often occurs while climbing stairs, getting out of a car, or rising from a chair. Catching or locking symptoms are also associated with hip pain and can suggest acetabular labral tear or loose body. In patients undergoing surgical treatment of acetabular labral tears, 53% report mechanical symptoms of popping or snapping, whereas 41% report true locking or catching.


Neurologic deficits in strength and sensation imply nerve root damage (radiculopathy) or peripheral nerve entrapment. Affected nerves can include the obturator, pudendal, superior gluteal, inferior gluteal, genitofemoral, iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Past surgical history may often be associated with peripheral nerve entrapments.


Providers should be aware of signs and symptoms that may indicate nonmusculoskeletal sources of hip pain, including various gastrointestinal and genitourinary disorders. Further questioning regarding bowel and bladder function, sexual activity, and menstrual history should be considered.


Physical Examination


The physical examination for hip pain should be guided by each athlete’s history. In general, it should include inspection, range of motion, palpation, a neurologic examination, and provocative hip testing.


Inspection should assess seated and standing postures, transfers, ability to bear weight, and gait. Areas of asymmetry, including muscle atrophy or masses, should be noted. Antalgic and asymmetric movements with transfers and gait should also be noted to help further characterize the underlying disorder. Foot position preference in standing and with ambulation should be noted because it is an initial indicator of pain, bony abnormality, and/or soft tissue adaptation or restriction. Observing a Trendelenburg gait gives the sports medicine provider an initial impression of gluteal weakness that has implications for dysfunctions across regions including the lumbar spine, pelvic girdle, and hip.


Active and passive range of motion of the hip should be performed, assessing for asymmetries from side to side and available end range. Hip range-of-motion parameters are variable in the literature. Age, gender, bony deformity, and soft tissue laxity and restrictions can all influence hip range of motion but are not consistently controlled for in studies assessing active and passive hip range of motion, which likely contributes to the variability of reported normal. Asymptomatic elite female soccer athletes showed variability in hip passive range of motion by age and experience. Specific hip disorders have been found to be associated with patterns of reduced hip range of motion. Patients with FAI have reduced hip flexion and internal rotation, whereas those with hip OA may first experience reduced hip internal rotation and progress to a loss of motion in all planes. Active range of motion of the lumbar spine should be performed to assess whether pain is provoked in a specific direction, which may help determine whether a spine disorder is contributing to the constellation of symptoms associated with a hip disorder.


Palpation of relevant anatomic structures (as described earlier) of the lumbar spine, posterior pelvis, lateral hip, and anterior groin can help identify underlying disorders when pain is provoked or asymmetries are palpated in the bony and soft tissue structures. Dynamic palpation tests can also be used, such as palpation of the inguinal canal during coughing in the setting of a possible inguinal hernia. Abdominal hernia can be assessed by palpation of the abdominal muscle insertion in the midline on the superior pubis insertion during lower abdominal contraction. If an asymmetrical fullness is noted with pain at the time of contraction versus at rest, abdominal hernia becomes a consideration. Palpation of the iliopsoas tendon with concentric and eccentric contraction may elicit the pain and the snap. Likewise, palpation of the iliotibial band during hip flexion and abduction may provoke a painful snap.


Evaluation of strength and length in the muscles about the hip can identify areas of movement system breakdown that may be contributing to the patient’s hip pain. For example, extra-articular muscle imbalances between posterior hip abductors and external rotators in combination with shortened hip flexors and iliotibial band can lead to groin and lateral hip pain.


A neurologic examination consisting of sensory, motor, reflex, and neural tension provocative tests can further assess neurologic involvement in the patient’s hip pain. If any of the neurologic examination tests are positive, regional sources for pain in the pelvis and lumbar spine should be considered.


Several provocative hip tests can help assess intra-articular versus extra-articular hip disorders ( Table 1 ). None are specific enough to be used in isolation but collective assessment can help direct further diagnostic evaluation and treatment. The log roll test, anterior hip impingement, and flexion, abduction, external rotation (FABER)/Patrick test have been shown to have high inter-rater agreement in asymptomatic young adults ( Figs. 1 and 2 ).



Table 1

Provocative tests of the hip






















































Name of Test Purpose Sensitivity/Specificity Description of Test
Anterior hip impingement test To assess hip disorder, impingement, or anterior superior labral tear 0.59–1.00/0.05–0.75 Patient lies supine. Examiner passively flexes hip and knee, internally rotates and adducts hip. A positive test reproduces anterior or lateral hip pain
Patrick test or FABER test To discern between hip, sacroiliac joint, and low back disorders 0.42–0.81/0.18–0.75 Patient lies supine. Examiner places the ankle of the test leg just above the opposite knee in the position shown in Fig. 4 . The opposite ASIS is stabilized with one hand and the other hand applies pressure to the test leg’s knee toward the table. A positive test for sacroiliac joint or low back disorder reproduces posterior pelvic pain
Resisted straight leg raise test or Stinchfield test To assess hip disorder 0.59/0.32 Patient lies supine and actively flexes hip with knee extended to 30° against resistance. A positive test reproduces anterior or lateral hip pain
Log roll test To assess hip disorder Unavailable Patient lies supine with hips and knees extended. Examiner passively internally and externally rotates test leg while stabilizing knee and ankle so that motion occurs at the hip. A positive test reproduces anterior or lateral hip pain
Posterior hip impingement test To assess hip disorder, posterior labral test 0.97/0.11 Patient lies prone with hip and knee extended. Examiner passively extends, adducts, and externally rotates hip. A positive test reproduces anterior hip or posterior pelvic pain
Ober test To assess iliotibial band posterior fiber length 0.41/0.95 Patient lies on side. Lower leg is flexed at the hip and knee. Examiner passively extends the patient’s upper leg with the knee flexed at 90°. While supporting the knee, the examiner slowly lowers the leg. If the iliotibial band is shortened, the leg remains abducted and does not fall to the table
To assess iliotibial band anterior fiber length 0.41/0.95 Patient lies on side. Lower leg is flexed at the hip and knee. Examiner passively flexes the patient’s upper limb hip with the knee flexed at 90°. While supporting the knee, the examiner slowly lowers the leg. If the iliotibial band is shortened, the leg remains abducted and does not fall to the table
Thomas test To assess hip flexor contracture 0.89/0.92 Patient sits at the edge of table. Patient flexes 1 knee to chest and rolls onto back while allowing test leg to remain extended at the hip off the edge of the table. If the hip does not fully extend, this indicates hip flexion contracture. If the leg abducts, this indicates iliotibial band tightness
Trendelenburg sign To assess hip abductor strength 0.23–0.97/0.77–0.96 Patient is standing. Examiner places hands on top of the iliac crests and monitors. Patient stands on the affected leg in a single-leg stance. Test/sign is positive if pelvis droops on the unaffected side, which indicates hip abductor weakness on the side of the stance leg

Abbreviation: FABER, flexion, abduction, external rotation.



Fig. 1


Log roll test.



Fig. 2


Anterior hip impingement test.




Diagnostic imaging


Many hip disorders are diagnosed by history and physical examination. However, imaging can confirm a diagnosis and reveal or rule out other possible structural entities. Plain radiographs are typically the first-line imaging method to assess hip pain. They are useful for detecting osseous abnormalities, including fractures, OA, and intra-articular bodies. Radiographic views that best evaluate the hip include anteroposterior (AP) pelvis, false-profile, Dunn, frog-lateral, and cross-table lateral views. In general, the AP pelvis ( Fig. 3 ) and false-profile views provide the most information regarding acetabular morphology, and the lateral and Dunn ( Fig. 4 ) views provide the most information regarding the proximal femur.




Fig. 3


FABER/Patrick test.



Fig. 4


Resisted straight leg test.


Radiographs remain the best way to assess bony hip structure. There are several measurements used to describe bony structure and hip deformity ( Box 2 ). Examiners should be aware that these measurements can be adequately assessed only with standardized, high-quality radiographs with proper positioning of the patient. Examples of measurements including the alpha angle, femoral head and neck offset ratio, and cross-over sign are shown in Figs. 5–8 . Hip expert examiners from different practices have not shown high inter-rater reliability for these common measurements, but inexperienced examiners trained by one expert showed good inter-rater reliability. The cutoff points for normal range of measurements and deformity have varied in the past but a recent consensus review by an international group of hip experts suggested the current range of cutoffs for FAI and hip OA (see Box 2 ). Using this range of cutoffs for specific measurements, an estimated 8% to 13% of asymptomatic male patients and 2% to 7% of asymptomatic female patients have measurements on hip radiographs consistent with FAI. As a result, the determination of hip deformity does not uniformly determine the athlete’s source of pain and dysfunction. OA found on plain radiographs of the hip has important implications on counseling and management of the athlete with intra-articular hip pain. The Tonnis grade or Kellgren-Lawrence scale are commonly used to describe the extent of OA based on the presence and degree of joint space narrowing, osteophytes, sclerosis, and subchondral cysts. It is important to delineate the extent of degenerative change in an athlete’s hip. Athletes with a Tonnis grade 2 or higher are poor candidates for hip preservation surgery.


Apr 17, 2017 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Managing Hip Pain in the Athlete

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access