TABLE 54.1
Management of the Throwing Shoulder With a SLAP Tear
Introduction
Procedure
Patient History
Patient Examination
Imaging
Treatment Options: Nonoperative and Operative
1
Morgan et al.
Arthroscopy 1998
Repair of SLAP
37 pitchers in 102 throwers
87% returned to previous level of play
2
Bradley et al.
AJSM 2008
Posterior capsulolabral repair throwers vs. nonthrowers
27 throwers
89% good and excellent, but 55% returned to previous level
3
Kim et al.
JBJS 2002
SLAP Repair
18 overhead athletes
only 22% overheads returned to same level
4
Andrews et al.
JOSPT 2003
Repair +/- Thermal in throwers
130 athletes (105 pitchers)
87% returned to play
Better results with thermal and repair than repair alone
5
Ide et al.
AJSM 2005
SLAP repair
19 pitchers
63% returned to previous level
Results worse in baseball than other overhead athletes
6
Neuman et al.
AJSM 2011
SLAP Repair
30 overhead athletes
ASES: 88, KJOC: 74
3.5-yr retro review survey
7
Brockmeier et al.
JBJS(Am) 2009
SLAP Repair
28 overhead athletes in larger series
71% return to throw
Traumatic return to play higher (92%) than insidious (64%)
8
Cohen et al.
Sports Health 2011
SLAP repairs from larger group of pitchers
22 pro pitchers
32% return to play
9
Neri et al.
AJSM 2011
SLAP repair
23 elite throwers
57% returned to preinjury level, worse with RC tear
KJOC score better than ASES in predicting outcome
10
Park et al.
AJSM 2013
SLAP repair
24 elite overhead athletes
78% return to preinjury level
Only 38% return in baseball players
Surgical Anatomy
Surgical Indications
Surgical Technique Setup
Positioning
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Management of the Throwing Shoulder With a SLAP Tear
Chapter 54
John M. Tokish, Michael J. Kissenberth, and Jared C. Bentley
Pathology involving the superior labrum presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the arthroscopic surgeon. First described by Andrews and colleagues in 1985, Snyder later classified lesions of the superior labrum into four types and coined the term SLAP tear (superior labral tear anterior–posterior). Since that time, other authors have expanded this classification to the current inclusion of ten different types. Concomitantly, the incidence of surgically treated tears has increased up to 5.5-fold. An area that is anatomically variable, biomechanically controversial, and increasingly recognized has become a source of much controversy in terms of management. With extremely variable rates of return to preinjury function, ranging from 22% to 64%, this is particularly true in the throwing shoulder. Proper treatment of overhead athletes requires a thorough understanding of the adaptive and pathologic biomechanics and goals of rehabilitative treatment strategies.
The disabled throwing shoulder, with a suspected pathologic SLAP lesion, is initially subjected to appropriate rehabilitation. Isolated lesions refractory to nonoperative measures are offered surgical treatment after extensive counseling regarding natural history and expectations. Arthroscopic anatomic SLAP repair is the mainstay of surgical treatment in the young competitive thrower and remains the gold standard. Controversies remain, including the role of tenodesis, anterior repair, and simultaneously addressing concomitant pathology.