Fig. 11.1
Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture treated with a sliding hip screw with antirotation screw, followed by retrograde nail fixation of the shaft component
Surgical Technique
When employing this strategy, the patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent flat-top table with a bump under the ipsilateral sacrum and torso. This position will allow an unobstructed lateral view of the femoral neck, which is essential for placement of the sliding hip screw . As with any femoral shaft fracture, radiographic evaluation of the contralateral femur can be performed for comparison of length, alignment, and rotation. The entire limb is prepped and draped from above the iliac crest to the toes. Alternatively, the contralateral side can be prepped into the field for intraoperative clinical comparison.
It is reasonable to attempt an initial closed reduction of the femoral neck. This is best achieved by inserting a 5-mm Schanz pin into the proximal femoral shaft for manipulation. In select cases, a second Schanz pin can be inserted and connected with an external fixator bar in an attempt to optimize control of the proximal segment. If the femoral neck fracture is not displaced or an anatomic reduction of a displaced fracture can be obtained with closed manipulation, percutaneous screws, a sliding hip screw, or a combination of the two can be utilized based on fracture pattern and surgeon preference. All of the treatment principles that apply to reduction and fixation of isolated femoral neck fractures apply in this situation as well. If an anatomic reduction cannot be achieved, an open reduction via a Smith-Peterson or Watson-Jones approach should be performed according to surgeon preference. If a sliding hip screw device is used, the side plate should be overlapping the tip of the retrograde nail. It is recommended to choose at least a three-hole side plate to ensure overlap and allow for at least two or three screws with good purchase anterior or posterior to the nail. Initially, the more distal screw or screws should be inserted as unicortical screws so as not to interfere with femoral nailing. A sliding hip screw combined with a nail has the theoretical advantage of protecting the entire bone as compared to cannulated screws and a retrograde nail, but periprosthetic fractures between these two implants do not seem to be a major clinical problem [8, 34].
Once satisfactory femoral neck fracture reduction and fixation has been achieved, the surgeon can move on to retrograde nailing of the femoral shaft. The surgical technique is the same as for retrograde nailing of an isolated femoral shaft fracture with a few exceptions. The surgeon must be careful not to compromise the femoral neck fracture fixation with aggressive mallet blows to the retrograde nail. To make nail insertion as gentle as possible, the medullary canal can be over reamed by 2 mm. Nail length should also be carefully planned to overlap the side plate of the sliding hip screw without being prominent in the knee. Once the nail has been inserted and interlocked, any unicortical screws in a femoral neck slide plate can be placed bicortically around the nail.
Reconstruction-Type Nailing of Femoral Neck and Shaft Fracture
Rationale
Simultaneous reconstruction nailing of both fractures is attractive for its elegance and efficiency (Fig. 11.2). Theoretically, the surgeon can simultaneously stabilize both injuries with a single device while avoiding trauma to the knee, and some authors have described good results with this technique [6, 11, 38ā40]. However, others have reported an increased incidence of problems with femoral neck reduction and healing as compared to the aforementioned two-implant technique [14, 19, 28, 35, 41]. Some surgeons feel that an antegrade reconstruction nail is best reserved for a minimally or non-displaced femoral neck fracture, particularly one identified intraoperatively [35, 42].
Fig. 11.2
Non-displaced femoral neck fracture with ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture treated initially with external fixator as part of a damage control orthopedic approach, followed by reconstruction nail fixation after stabilization of the patient
Surgical Technique
The patient may be positioned either on a radiolucent flat-top table or an orthopedic fracture table. If a radiolucent flat-top table is selected, a small trochanteric bump can facilitate access. Prep and drape techniques for contralateral comparison are the same as mentioned above.
Again, an initial attempt at closed reduction can be performed. This can either be done by utilizing the fracture table or by employing a Schanz pin(s) with or without an external fixator bar. If anatomic reduction cannot be obtained closed, an open approach is undertaken to facilitate reduction under direct vision. Once an appropriate reduction has been obtained, it can be stabilized with Kirschner wires strategically placed outside the path of the nail. These wires can even be supplemented with a cannulated screw.
Once the femoral neck has been reduced and provisionally stabilized, attention is turned to the femoral shaft. In the setting of an open femur fracture with a relatively simple pattern, provisional unicortical locked plate fixation of the shaft can be performed at the time of debridement. This can greatly simplify passage of the guidewire and nail with minimal biologic cost if the site has already been exposed for debridement. In the setting of a closed fracture, the usual closed or minimally invasive reduction techniques can be employed.
A trochanteric start reconstruction nail is typically selected for this application, optimizing screw trajectory into the head/neck segment. A starting point is established using conventional techniques and the medullary canal opened. The guidewire must be placed across the femoral shaft fracture site without disrupting the provisional fixation of the neck. Again, the femur should be over-reamed by 2 mm, so the nail can be inserted as gently as possible. As with any cephalomedullary device, the version of the nail must match the version of the femoral neck so that the reconstruction screws can be placed centrally into the femoral head. Partially threaded screws should be used to allow for ongoing compression at the femoral neck [39, 40]. Routine distal interlocking can then be performed.
Alternative Techniques
Rationale
Less commonly employed alternatives to the aforementioned strategies have also been described. One of these is independent screw fixation of the femoral neck after antegrade femoral nailing of the femoral shaft (Fig. 11.3). This technique is most relevant when a femoral neck fracture is identified after medullary nailing has been completed. Under these circumstances, provided the fracture is not displaced or an appropriate reduction can be obtained, cannulated screws can be deployed around the nail to stabilize the femoral neck. This can be challenging as the nail can compromise precise screw placement, and the surgeon must remain sensitive to the importance of screw position in femoral neck fracture fixation [41, 42]. If appropriate reduction and stabilization of the femoral neck cannot be achieved with the nail in place, it should be removed and an alternative strategy employed. Finally, plate fixation of the femoral shaft can be performed after surgical treatment of the femoral neck. Plate fixation avoids the forceful insertion of a nail into the femoral canal below a femoral neck fracture and obviates the need for reaming which is a known source of systemic inflammation and potential pulmonary compromise [43, 44]. It may also be more attractive in very distal fractures where intramedullary nailing may be more technically difficult or biomechanically less appealing. That being said, reamed, locked intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for the vast majority of femoral shaft fractures, with plate fixation serving a limited role given its more invasive nature and inferior biomechanics.
Fig. 11.3
Antegrade fixation of a comminuted femoral shaft fracture in a 28-year-old patient. Postoperative X-rays revealed a displaced femoral neck fracture, which was reduced and stabilized with two cannulated screws, placed around the nail
Surgical Technique
Independent screw fixation of the femoral neck with separate antegrade femoral nailing is most frequently performed when a femoral neck fracture has been identified with the nail already in situ. Under these circumstances, whatever position, prep and drape has been selected for the femoral nailing can also be utilized for the femoral neck fixation. The most important step remains obtaining an anatomic reduction using conventional closed or open reduction techniques. The challenge comes in placing screws that avoid the nail and are appropriately positioned to stabilize the femoral neck fracture femoral neck. If appropriate reduction cannot be achieved or if the nail prevents appropriate femoral neck fracture fixation, all implants should be removed and an alternative strategy employed.
Plate fixation of the femoral shaft following femoral neck fixation can be performed supine on a conventional radiolucent table or a fracture table. Although many surgeons prefer the lateral position when performing plate fixation of isolated femoral shaft fractures, this position is suboptimal for femoral neck fracture reduction and fixation. Depending on the clinical circumstances and femoral shaft fracture pattern, the plate can be deployed in bridge, neutralization, or compression mode. Although there are reports of utilizing a single device such as a compression screw with a long side plate in these circumstances, we believe that separate implants optimally placed for either femoral neck or femoral shaft fracture fixation are preferred.
Complications
The rates of femoral neck-related complications following ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are less than those observed after isolated femoral neck fractures. Rates of femoral neck nonunion after neck-shaft fracture have been reported between 0% and 6.7%, while malunion has been reported in 3.7ā5% [2, 3, 6, 8, 25, 34, 38]. While rates of AVN have been reported to be 0ā22%, the average among studies is approximately 5% [3, 6, 8, 25, 34, 38]. There are several potential explanations for this discrepancy. The natural history of a femoral neck fracture above a femoral shaft fracture may be different because the elements of the femoral neck fracture itself are different. Much of the energy of the injury may be absorbed by the femoral shaft, leading to a lower-energy fractures at the femoral neck and lesser degrees of displacement [11, 13, 16]. Similarly, the location of the fracture seems to be different, with many being extracapsular. Finally, the treatment may be different. It is likely that more of these fractures are treated at designated trauma centers by surgeons with subspecialty training in orthopedic trauma leading to a decrease in complications [45, 46]. Alternatively, there may be differences in fixation strategy and postoperative rehabilitation.
The rates of femoral shaft-related complications following ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are greater than those observed after isolated femoral shaft fracture. Rates of femoral shaft nonunion after neck-shaft fracture are reported between 0% and 23%, and rates of malunion are anywhere from 3.7% to 40% [2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 25, 34]. In contrast, isolated femoral shaft fractures go on to successful healing at a rate of approximately 98% with modern techniques [47, 48]. As mentioned above, this may be due to a number of reasons. The femoral shaft fracture in associated neck-shaft fractures typically has a more comminuted pattern. With an associated neck fracture, the surgeon may be forced to change their preferred implant choice. The rehabilitation protocol may also change, as weight-bearing may be protected after surgery to protect the femoral neck.