Direct nerve root stimulation-L5
Threshold (mA)
Normal root threshold
1
First stimulation medial to pedicle
5–13
Lateral exposure and decompression of L5 root
3–8
Discectomy, sacral dome osteotomy
3–8
Reduction and inter-body graft placement
3–8
After compression
2–7
Fig. 27.1
After completion of L5 nerve root decompression, a stimulation probe directly stimulates nerve root to establish triggering threshold
Conclusions
IONM is extremely valuable in the prevention of neurological injury during spine procedures. It is important to understand the spectrum of modalities available for neuro-monitoring—including SSEPs, MEPs, sEMG, and tEMG—and their limitations. With spondylolisthesis, utilizing all modalities including tEMG and direct nerve root stimulation helps maximize the diagnostic value of IOM during spinal procedures and mitigating the risk for neurologic injury.
References
1.
Nash Jr CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH. Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin` Orthop Relat Res. 1977;126:100–5.PubMed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Thuet ED, Winscher JC, Padberg AM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Dobbs MB, Schootman M, Luhmann SJ. Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a 23-year experience of 3436 surgical cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(20):1880–6.CrossRef
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Chiappa K, Hill R. Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials methodology. In: Chiappa K, editor. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Calancie B, Molano MR. Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what’s wrong with the “presence-or-absence” approach? Spine. 2008;33:406–14.CrossRefPubMed