Technique/action
With implementation
Without implementation or against rival procedure
Comments
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
Withholding antibiotic prior to sampling >2 weeks [10]
76.9
N/a
41.2
N/a
80–83
94–100
79–83 (open biopsy)
90–100 (open biopsy)
90
100
80–83 (aspiration alone)
94–100 (aspiration alone)
61–70
89–99
69–93 (PPT culture), 86 (synovial fluid)
81–98 (PPT culture), 100 (synovial fluid)
No longer recommended
86–92
100
46–69
81–100
80% detection rate of organisms and 1% contamination rate vs 66% and 14%, respectively, in conventional media culture
87–92.1
98–99.7
57 (fastidious anaerobic broth)
39 (agar plates)
100 (fastidious anaerobic broth)
100 (agar plates)
62.6–83
97–98.1
39–48.9
99.7–100
0–27
92–100
No longer recommended
28
100
71.4 (Athanasou)
86.6 (Morawietz)
64.2 (Athanasou)
100 (Morawietz)
In the Morawietz analysis, 19% of fresh-frozen specimens were not included due to “unclear results” thus biasing the results
Membrane sample for histology [45]
83
98
42 (synovial capsule/pseudo-capsule)
98 (synovial capsule/pseudo-capsule)
90–94
88–91
84 (SWCC >4200)
93 (SWCC >4200)
References
1.
2.
Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DW, Simpson H, Peto TE, McLardy-Smith P, Berendt AR. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2932–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2992–4.CrossrefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Minassian AM, Newnham R, Kalimeris E, Bejon P, Atkins BL, Bowler IC. Use of an automated blood culture system (BD BACTECTM) for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: easy and fast. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:233.CrossrefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
7.
Meermans G, Haddad FS. Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1410–7.CrossrefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I. The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:582–6.Crossref
9.
Burnett RS, Kelly MA, Hanssen AD, Barrack RL. Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:164–78.PubMed
10.
Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;35:654–63.Crossref
11.
Malekzadeh D, Osmon DR, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Berbari EF. Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2039–45.CrossrefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Baron EJ, Miller JM, Weinstein MP, et al. A Guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2013 recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)(a). Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:e22–e121.CrossrefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Barrack RL, Jennings RW, Wolfe MW, Bertot AJ. The Coventry Award: the value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:8–16.Crossref
15.
16.
Font-Vizcarra L, García S, Martínez-Pastor JC, Sierra JM, Soriano A. Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2238–43.CrossrefPubMedPubMedCentral