Inguinal Pathology



Fig. 20.1
Athletic pubalgia: a representation of the important pain generators in AP and the direction of forces they apply to the pubic joint



Physical exam in these patients will elicit tenderness to palpation in the areas of injury, but correlation to the area of reported pain is important as athletes frequently have concomitant soft tissue and/or hip injuries that fall outside the realm of AP [3]. Muscular palpation can also be combined with a series of resistance tests targeted at the muscles that cross the pubic joint [2, 11, 12]. A positive test results in pain in the area of the muscle at which activity is restricted. At this time, it is imperative to also conduct a formal hernia evaluation, as well as an evaluation of the femoroacetabular joint to rule out coexisting pathologies [9, 10, 13]. Diagnostic injections can be a useful adjunct to physical exam with respect to identifying the primary pain-generating muscles as well as defining associated pathology of the hip joint [3]. Fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound-guided anesthetic injections are used in the diagnosis of femoroacetabular disease [3]. Persistent pain despite injection is suggestive of AP, and the origins/insertions of commonly implicated muscles can also be anesthetized for confirmation [3].



Diagnostic Imaging


Over the past 10 years, significant advancements in medical technology have made diagnostic imaging an invaluable complement to physical examination in the evaluation of AP [8]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be 98 % sensitive and 89–100 % specific in diagnosing AP syndromes involving the RA and adductor tendon origins [7]. MRI has become a critical adjunct, and current studies are examining the use of specific MRI-based protocols in conjunction with clinical injury grading scales [8, 14] (Table 20.1). MRI is also useful in ruling out and/or identifying coexisting pathology involving the femoroacetabular joint [1]. Incidental intra-articular hip pathology is common in athletes, which underscores the importance of correlating clinical and radiographic findings [15]. Conventional X-rays are of limited use in the diagnosis of AP; however, they do assist in ruling out other pathologies that may present similarly, including osteitis pubis, pelvic avulsion fractures, apophyseal injury/inflammation, and/or degenerative hip disease [3].


Table 20.1
AP MRI grading



















Grade

MRI Findings

I

Single or multiple small identifiable soft tissue tears

II

Partial soft tissue avulsion or detachment

III

Complete soft tissue avulsion or detachment


From Meyers et al. [8]


Surgical and Postoperative Management


The initial treatment of AP includes a trial of nonoperative management. Such interventions are targeted toward restoring core stability and posture while normalizing the forces transmitted across the pubic joint by the musculature of the hip and pelvis [3]. At this time, patients are advised to refrain from activity resulting in deep hip flexion, lower extremity hyperabduction, and any heavy strength training [3]. Nevertheless, studies on nonoperative management are not promising, and surgical intervention is usually required to obtain acceptable outcomes [3].

Surgical management of AP is centered on restoring the balance of forces that cross the pubic joint. These procedures are designed to tighten and/or broaden soft tissue attachments that are acting on and causing instability of the pubic joint [1]. Frequently, surgery is also performed on the side contralateral to the region of pain to help restore a balance of forces above and below the pubic joint and on either side of the pubic symphysis [1]. To date, there have been over 20 different types of surgical procedures performed alone or in combination on over 15 different musculoskeletal structures implicated in AP [1]. Repair techniques reported in the literature include open, laparoscopic, and “minimally” open. Some surgeons reinforce their repairs with mesh, and some advocate for contralateral muscular releases and/or neurectomies [1, 2, 1623]. Regardless of the type of repair performed, on average, these procedures result in an 80–100 % return-to-play rate, and prospective studies report rates as high as 95 % [1, 2, 11, 1724]. Not only are these procedures successful in restoring functionality, but return-to-play times average as early as 3 months postoperatively [1]. In order to maximize outcomes, surgery is frequently complemented by postoperative core stabilization programs, designed to maintain the rebalanced forces across the pubic joint [1]. Postoperative complications are infrequent and are usually limited to minor bruising or clinically insignificant hematoma formation. The most common indication for reoperation in certain studies was the development of pain on the contralateral side, which supports the decision to perform a bilateral repair at the time of the first operation [1].



Inguinal Neuralgia


The groin is a complex area of musculoskeletal anatomy, but it is also an area rich in neural innervation derived from the lumbar plexus. The ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and the genitofemoral nerves are a few of the major nervous structures in the region and they are all subject to entrapment. These entrapment syndromes also commonly present with refractory groin pain. Inguinal neuralgia is frequently regarded as a postoperative complication and the overall incidence remains unknown [25]. They are most commonly seen after herniorrhaphy, but also have been reported after appendectomy, abdominoplasty, iliac bone graft harvest, blunt trauma, and many gynecological procedures involving Pfannenstiel or paramedian incisions [26].


Pathophysiology


The inguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves can be injured anywhere along their course (Fig. 20.2); however, the point of injury is usually associated with the inciting operation. The mechanisms of injury may involve partial or complete section, stretch, contusion, crush, or electrocoagulation [26]. Secondary damage may also occur from scar and/or neuroma formation or irritation by an adjacent inflammatory process, i.e., suture granuloma [27]. The procedure that most commonly results in postoperative inguinal neuralgia is the inguinal hernia repair, and the two most commonly affected nerves are the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric [26]. The ilioinguinal nerve is most at risk for entrapment as it courses immediately beneath the external oblique fascia [25]. Here, it is subject to inclusion by suture, adherence to incorporated mesh, or encasement by scar [25]. The iliohypogastric nerve is also at risk for mesh adherence due to its close proximity, and both nerves are subject to stretching during transposition at the time of hernia sac dissection [25, 28]. Low Pfannenstiel incisions are also implicated in inguinal neuralgia for some of the same reasons [26]. The genitofemoral nerve is less commonly involved but may also be injured by suture inclusion, mesh adherence, or excessive tightening of the internal ring during herniorrhaphy [25]. Although these patterns of injury are likely responsible for the associated neuralgia, postoperative histological examination of the excised nerve segments frequently shows normal nervous architecture [25]. Occasionally, microscopic examination will reveal perineural fibrosis, cicatricial neuroma formation, and/or evidence of foreign bodies, i.e., suture material [25, 26].

A332102_1_En_20_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 20.2
Lumbar plexus: a diagram showing the course of the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and GFN and where they exit on the anterior abdominal wall/pelvis


Clinical Presentation


Entrapments of these nerves present similarly with chronic, disabling postoperative pain that is out of proportion to findings on clinical exam [26]. The pain is usually characterized as burning and constant with associated hyperesthesia [26]. It is exacerbated by forcible stretching of the hip joint, twisting of the torso, and movements that increase intra-abdominal pressure [25, 26]. Some patients even adopt a position of hip flexion with a slight forward truncal bend to alleviate the symptoms [26]. The time of presentation varies from immediately post-op to months or even years after surgery [25, 29]. Radiation of pain, however, is what helps to distinguish which nerves are involved. The pain from inguinal neuralgia will frequently radiate along the associated area of innervation (Fig. 20.3); however, neuroanatomic variability can complicate the diagnosis [30]. Pain from ilioinguinal or iliohypogastric neuralgia may be localized to the area of a hernia repair or radiate down to the medial thigh [26, 30]. Perceived deep pelvic pain, rectal, and even proximal vaginal pain may be referred from entrapment of the iliohypogastric nerve [31]. The genitofemoral nerve innervates the testicle and labia and thus may have associated pain in those areas [30]. Pain with deep pressure at the external ring or palpation of the spermatic cord/round ligament against the pubic bone may also elicit pain consistent with genitofemoral neuralgia [30]. Obviously, the differential diagnosis of groin/pelvic pain is vast, and additional imaging modalities are frequently employed to rule out other causes [29, 32]. Nevertheless, groin pain 1–2 months post-op should be further investigated for consideration of inguinal neuralgia.

A332102_1_En_20_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 20.3
Inguinal nerve sensory distribution: areas of sensory distribution of the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and GFN


Diagnosis


The diagnosis of inguinal neuralgia relies heavily on history and physical, with special attention to be paid to the presenting symptoms mentioned previously [25]. The diagnostic triad of nerve entrapment or postoperative neuroma formation is as follows: (1) burning or lancinating pain near the precipitating operation’s incision site that radiates is the sensory distribution of that particular nerve, (2) clear evidence of impaired sensory perception in the involved nerve territory, and (3) pain that is relieved by infiltration with anesthetic [3335]. Inguinal neuralgia can also be reproduced and confirmed in some patients by truncal hyperextension and torso rotation in either direction [25]. As per the triad, subcutaneous anesthetic nerve blocks result in at least temporary relief for most patients [26]. These blocks can be used to target the culprit nerves; however, anatomic variation and cross innervation may complicate the diagnostic process [25]. The inguinal and iliohypogastric nerves can usually be blocked with local anesthetic superomedially to the anterior superior iliac spine [25]. Pain not relieved by this block may suggest genitofemoral neuralgia, which some surgeons confirm with a paravertebral block at L1/L2 [36]. Few studies report the use of electromyography, mainly to assess denervation of the pyramidalis muscle, which is specific for ilioinguinal nerve injury [26]. However, the utility of electromyography is still a matter of debate [3739].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 8, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Inguinal Pathology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access