Increasing Follow-Up: Changing Age Patterns

, Paul D. Siney1 and Patricia A. Fleming1



(1)
The John Charnley Research Institute Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, Lancashire, UK

 



The terms “young” patient and “long-term” results are frequently used. Although the age of patients, at surgery, and the length of follow-up are stated, the correlation between the two has not been established. As a result any comparison between published series is largely subjective.

What has not been considered, and has not been documented, is that increasing follow-up must out of necessity, identify ever younger patients that have undergone the operation.

Patients’ mean age, both at the primary operation and the follow-up was recorded from November 1962 and December 2014 in 25752 primary LFAs (Tables 44.1 and 44.2, and Fig. 44.1).


Table 44.1
Mean age and age range at time of LFA









































Follow up (years)

Age at LFA (mean)

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Operation

64.8

13

96

10

55.9

13

86

20

48.9

14

75

30

43.0

17

63

35

38.4

24

59



Table 44.2
Mean age and age range at time of follow-up










Follow up (years)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 27, 2016 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Increasing Follow-Up: Changing Age Patterns

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access