Illustrating occupational needs of refugees

Chapter 16. Illustrating occupational needs of refugees

Clarissa Wilson






It isn’t for the moment that you are struck that you need courage, but for the long uphill climb back to sanity and faith and security.

Anne Morrow Lindbergh

No one chooses to be a refugee (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights 2007). Refugees are ordinary people with long stories (Fine 1991). Escaping danger is the first of many challenges. To survive, they must navigate a new culture, language, set of life skills and, sometimes, occupational deprivation (Whiteford 2005). Amid occupational chaos, refugees adapt to lost life roles, new life roles and drastically changed life roles (Driver & Beltran 1998). Consider Nada’s story:



Nada escapes after her husband was killed. She arrives in a crowded refugee camp and still has flashbacks to the dangerous journey. Daily camp existence is precarious. The perpetual limbo of not knowing, not being able to influence when it ends is grinding. The disabling effects of occupational deprivation while being ‘warehoused’ for 12 years accumulate. Her child can’t remember anything else. Once finally safe in a settlement country, she has new roles as a head of house, language student and money manager. She has lost roles in community, family and religious activities. She has drastically changed roles as a provider of food, health and parenting.
Refugees are not inherently disabled or diseased (Schwartzman et al 2006). Nada will intuitively press on towards occupational performance and well-being (Wilcock, 1993 and Lentin, 2002). Yet healing and community reintegration may stall with mounting occupational problems. Personal and occupational problems (e.g. trauma and new life skills) are likely to be compounded and perhaps overshadowed by environmental problems (e.g. politics of poverty, restrictive visas, cultural accessibility of services, community discrimination, etc.) (Whiteford, 2000 and Drexler, 2005). Nada soon finds herself trapped and treading water in an occupational void of disruption, dysfunction and deprivation. These occupational problems perpetuate ‘refugee-ism’ long past the initial trauma, haunting and undermining her recovery.

Perhaps settled refugees or church groups could help. Perhaps professionals such as trauma counsellors could help. But what happens when the primary issues are occupational in nature (Yerxa 1993)? What happens when community and professional intuition is not enough? When navigating the variables to create and enable occupational opportunities is so complex that the helping community and professionals are equally stuck?

Occupational therapists have long enabled life skills for new life roles through redesigning and recycling occupations after lost life roles. Occupational therapists have long been facilitating the person, occupation and environment to promote occupational performance and well-being (Polatajko 2001). Our mandate of creating and enabling occupational opportunities is not limited to disability or disease (Gray 1998). Our profession exists to enable occupationally well people and occupationally just societies (Kronenberg et al 2005). Occupational Opportunities for Refugees and Asylum Seekers (OOFRAS) exists to help our profession uphold its mandate with refugees (Smith 2005).


Illustrating occupational opportunities for refugees and asylum seekers





Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.

Margaret Mead

Following Gail Whiteford’s paper on the occupational deprivation of refugees and asylum seekers at the 2003 OT Australia conference in Melbourne, I asked: ‘How has the profession responded to these occupational needs?’. Other than individual, isolated and ad hoc initiatives, there was no visible professional response. Questions are political, always personal and quite possibly costly (Peavey 1997). You pay the price of responding to something you may prefer to un-know, or you pay the price of bearing your personal and professional incongruence.

So, I wrote a position paper outlining occupation as a human right, even for refugees (Wilson 2003). Vigorous conversations ensued. I was told that the profession did have an obligation to respond but was ‘not ready’. In all likelihood, it would not respond even if the Department of Immigration directly asked for occupational therapists.

Follow-up conversations with occupational therapists refined these impressions. Occupational therapists felt overwhelmed – what can one therapist do? Some felt lost – where and how to begin? Others felt unprepared – what do I need to know? And they felt alone – where can I go for support? So OOFRAS was born to inspire, empower and equip occupational therapists for refugee initiatives.

OOFRAS is an extraordinary community comprised of ordinary occupational therapists and students. It is not a product, a process, a programme, or a place – but a people. We work together to see the occupational needs of refugees and asylum seekers addressed. OOFRAS is visible as the sum of a global infrastructure and local initiatives. Globally, the collaborative operates through the website (Occupational Opportunities for Refugees and Asylum Seekers 2007). Local networks, refugee initiatives and OOFRAS groups emerge according to local interest, intention, availability, skill and experience.

The coordination team is comprised of five Australian occupational therapists who voluntarily serve and lead the collaborative: Sally Datson, Jessica Leggatt, Crissy Hubbard, Linda Rylands and Clarissa Wilson. There are no official resources, assets or funding. Our resources are relationships. Our assets are divine synergy and the willingness to give things a go. Our funding is of the ‘just enough, just in time’ variety. We set things like the website, scholarship, printed resources, fundraising and student projects in motion, trusting that the funding will somehow follow. And it has.

OOFRAS focuses on capacity building within two domains: individual occupational therapists and the occupational therapy profession. Our ‘inspire, empower, equip, initiate’ anthem guides how we provide ideas, knowledge, skills and initiative opportunities to individuals at different stages of readiness. Our ‘research, education, capacity building, systemic advocacy, direct services’ anthem guides initiatives to build a robust field of practice to support individual action (Wilson 2006).



Illustrating political engagement





Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little.

Edmund Burke

Like other grand notions, ‘politics’ sounds ethereal, sophisticated and almost glamorous. Who, me? No, not for the likes of the ordinary, the mundane, the practical, the plebs like me with bills to pay (Griffin 2001).

Jun 4, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Illustrating occupational needs of refugees

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access