Sebastián Drago Perez MD1,2 and Cristian Ortiz Mateluna MD3 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile 2Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile 3Foot and Ankle Center, Orthopedic Department, Clínica Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile Percutaneous surgery for HV is performed through the smallest possible incision, usually punctate incisions. Performing percutaneous surgery requires a combination of tactile sensation, clinical appearance, and fluoroscopic imaging to evaluate the correction achieved. The patient could have smaller wounds, and faster recovery, with percutaneous surgery, but given that it is technically more difficult, it is unclear which choice is optimal. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exist on this topic, comparing percutaneous versus open surgery for HV. Radwan et al. randomized 53 patients (64 feet) with mild to moderate HV. Interventions were percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy (modified Bosch osteotomy) (29 feet), and distal chevron osteotomy (31 feet).1 Operative time was seven minutes shorter in the percutaneous group. There was no difference in time to union, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), range of motion of the 1st MTP, pain, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Scores (AOFAS). They did not evaluate recurrence ( I). Kaufmann et al. performed an RCT comparing open chevron (OC) versus percutaneous V‐shaped osteotomy (PVO).2 There were 22 and 25 cases, respectively. There was no difference in pre‐ and postoperative HVA, IMA, or range of motion between the groups. There was significantly better patient satisfaction in the PVO osteotomy at 12 weeks’ postsurgery. At six weeks and nine months, patient satisfaction did not show any significant differences. One patient of each group reported poor satisfaction. Complications in the OC group were two hardware removals and one case of hallux varus that did not need revision surgery. Complications in the PVO group consisted in 12 cases of soft tissue irritation, caused by the Kirschner wire (K‐wire) which was removed. Recurrence occurred in three feet of the OC group and one foot of the PVO group; these were mild and did not require revision (level I). Lam et al. reported an RCT of 51 patients undergoing surgical correction of HV, comparing scarf‐akin (SCA) osteotomies versus percutaneous modified chevron‐akin (PECA) osteotomy.3 There were 26 subjects (27 feet) and 25 subjects (33 feet), respectively. Operative time was four minutes shorter in the PECA group, pre‐ and postoperative IMA and HVA were not significantly different between groups. The AOFAS scores did not show any significant differences between the two groups. In the SCA group, there were two subjects who developed mild second metatarsalgia postoperatively. This was managed successfully with orthotics, with no revision required. In the PECA group, six required screw removal. This complication was almost completely eliminated when the authors started using the internal oblique view to confirm that the screw was fully engaged in the bone at the time of screw insertion (level I). Two other studies are consistent with these findings.1,3 Chevron and SC are the most performed osteotomies for the treatment of HV. Both have good outcomes, but SC osteotomy can present a complication called troughing that occurs as the cortex of the dorsal half of the first metatarsal shaft collapses and wedges into the softer cancellous bone, leading to pronation and lesser metatarsal overload. The most common complication in the HV treatment is recurrence. Preventing complications is a key goal in the HV surgery. Multiple RCTs have compared chevron and SC osteotomies attempting to answer this question. Elshazly et al. performed an RCT on patients with HV and IMA between 10° and 20°.4
68
Hallux Valgus
Clinical scenario
Top three questions
Question 1: In adult patients with HV, does percutaneous correction result in quicker recovery versus open surgery?
Rationale
Clinical comment
Available literature and quality of evidence
Findings
Resolution of the clinical scenario
Question 2: In adult patients with HV, does long chevron (LC) osteotomy result in fewer complications versus scarf (SC) osteotomy ?
Rationale
Clinical comment
Available literature and quality of evidence
Findings
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel