Fractures of the Ulna and Radius

3 Fractures of the Ulna and Radius


Yingze Zhang, Song Liu, and Chenguang Du


Overview of Ulnar and Radial Fractures


image Anatomic Features


The ulna and radius are the bony structures of the forearm that form the elbow joint proximally with the humerus and the wrist joint distally with the carpals. The radius and ulna are joined by the proximal and distal radioulnar joints and by the interosseous membrane (IOM). The radioulnar joints are pivot joints where movements of supination and pronation take place. If one bone shows a fracture with displacement or angulation, usually the other bone will also have a fracture or displacement. Both the radius and ulna are long bones, prismatic in form, and lie roughly parallel to each other when the forearm is supinated. The ulna is relatively straight, while the radius is slightly curved longitudinally ( Fig. 3.1).


image AO Classification and Coding System for Fractures of Ulna and Radius


Based on the AO classification, the ulna/radius should be considered as one unit of bone, with the location coding number “2.” The anatomic delineation of the segments, proximal, shaft, and distal, is performed according to the “Heim’s Square,” with assigned numbers of “21, 22, and 23,” respectively ( Fig. 3.2; Fig. 3.3).


image Epidemiologic Features of Radial/Ulnar Fractures in the China National Fracture Study


A total of 355 patients with 356 radial/ulnar fractures were investigated in the China National Fracture Study (CNFS). The fractures accounted for 20.14% of all patients with fractures and 19.42% of all types of fractures. The population-weighted incidence rate of radial/ulnar fractures was 63 per 100,000 population in 2014. The epidemiologic features of radial/ulnar fractures in the CNFS are as follows:


More females than males


More right-side injuries than left-side injuries


The highest-risk age group is 15–64 years


Distal fracture of the radius/ulna is the most common forearm fracture


Injuries occurred most commonly via slips, trips, or falls





image Radial/Ulnar Fracture by Sex

See Table 3.1 and Fig. 3.4.


Table 3.1 Sex distribution of 355 patients with radial/ulnar fractures in the China National Fracture Study

























Sex


Number of patients


Percentage


Male


153


43.10


Female


202


56.90


Total


355


100.00



image Radial/Ulnar Fracture by Injury Side

See Table 3.2 and Fig. 3.5.


Table 3.2 Injury side distribution of 355 patients with radial/ulnar fractures in the China National Fracture Study





























Injured side


Number of patients


Percentage


Left


169


47.61


Right


185


52.11


Bilateral


1


0.28


Total


355


100.00



image Radial/Ulnar Fracture by Age Group and Sex

See Table 3.3 and Fig. 3.6.



image


image Radial/Ulnar Fracture by Location

See Table 3.4 and Fig. 3.7.



image


image Radial/Ulnar Fracture by Causal Mechanisms

See Table 3.5 and Fig. 3.8.



image


image Clinical Epidemiologic Features of Radial/Ulnar Fractures


A total of 75,850 patients with 76,550 radial/ulnar fractures were treated in 83 hospitals of China over a 2-year period from 2010 to 2011. All cases were reviewed and statistically studied; the fractures accounted for 18.28% of all patients with fractures and 17.73% of all types of fractures, respectively. Among these 75,850 patients, 18,274 were children with 18,334 fractures, and 57,576 were adults with 58,216 fractures. Epidemiologic features of radial/ulnar fractures are as follows:


More males than females


More left sides involved than right sides


The highest-risk age group is 11–15 years; the most affected female age group is 56–60 years, while males between the ages of 11 and 15 years have the highest risk


Distal fracture of the radius/ulna is the most common forearm fracture


image Radial/Ulnar Fractures by Sex

See Table 3.6 and Fig. 3.9.


Table 3.6 Sex distribution of 75,850 patients with radial/ulnar fractures

























Sex


Number of patients


Percentage


Male


41,592


54.83


Female


34,258


45.17


Total


75,850


100.00



image Radial/Ulnar Fractures by Injured Side

See Table 3.7 and Fig. 3.10.


Table 3.7 Injury side distribution of 75,850 patients with radial/ulnar fractures





























Injury side


Number of patients


Percentage


Left


40,576


53.50


Right


34,936


46.06


Bilateral


338


0.45


Total


75,850


100.00



image Radial/Ulnar Fractures by Age Group

See Table 3.8 and Fig. 3.11.



image


image Radial/Ulnar Fractures by Location

Radial/Ulnar Fractures in Adults by Segment Based on AO Classification

See Table 3.9 and Fig. 3.12.


Table 3.9 Segment distribution of 58,216 radial/ulnar fractures in adults based on AO classification





























Segment


Number of fractures


Percentage


21


7,202


12.37


22


7,594


13.04


23


43,420


74.58


Total


58,216


100.00



Radial/Ulnar Fractures in Children by Segment

See Table 3.10 and Fig. 3.13.


Table 3.10 Segment distribution of 18,334 radial/ulnar fractures in children





























Segment


Number of fractures


Percentage


Proximal


3,427


18.69


Diaphysis


6,113


33.34


Distal


8,794


47.97


Total


18,334


100.00



Proximal Radial/Ulnar Fractures (Segment 21)


image Anatomic Features


The bony structures of the proximal part of the radius/ulna consist of the olecranon, coronoid process, radial head, radial neck, and part of the metaphysis. The bony surfaces of the humeroradial joint constitute an enarthrosis or ball and socket joint, between the radial head and the capitulum of the humerus, while the proximal radioulnar joint is a trochoid or pivot joint between the radial head and the ring formed by the radial notch of the ulna and the annular ligament. These two joints play an important role in the complex action of turning the forearm over as in pronation or supination. The humeroradial joint is considered similar to a lateral column that provides stability to the elbow joint during its motion in flexion or extension.




The articular surfaces of the elbow joint are connected by a capsule that is attached to the radial neck, 1.5 cm distal to the humeroradial joint. The radial tuberosity, also known as the bicipital tuberosity, is the main insertion of the biceps brachii muscle.


The olecranon and the coronoid process form a large depression called the semilunar notch that serves as an articulation site with the trochlea of the humerus. The humeroulnar joint is a simple hinge joint that allows for flexion and extension. The tendon of the triceps brachii muscle inserts into the posterior portion of the upper surface of the olecranon, while the ulnar nerve winds along the olecranon or epicondylar groove.


image AO Classification of Proximal Radial/Ulnar Fractures


Based on AO classification, the delineation of the proximal radius/ulna is illustrated by a square whose lateral sides are parallel to the axis of the bone and their length equal to the maximum width of the epiphysis. According to this formula, the proximal radius/ulna is coded as the number 21 ( Fig. 3.14).


On the basis of articular surface involvement, the radial/ulnar fracture is further divided into three types: 21-A: extraarticular fracture; 21-B: partial articular fracture; and 21-C: complex articular fracture ( Fig. 3.15).


image Clinical Epidemiologic Features of the Proximal Radial/Ulnar Fractures (Segment 21)


A total of 7,202 adult proximal radial/ulnar fractures (segment 21) were treated in 83 hospitals of China over a 2-year period from 2010 to 2011. All cases were reviewed and statistically studied; the fractures accounted for 12.37% of all fractures of the radius/ulna in adult. Their epidemiologic features are as follows:


image Fractures of Segment 21 by Sex

See Table 3.11 and Fig. 3.16.


More males than females


The high-risk age group is 21–25 years: the same age group for males, while the most affected female age group is 46–50 years.


The most common fracture type among segment 21 fractures is type 21-B: the same fracture type for both males and females


The most common fracture group among segment 21 fractures is group 21-B1: the same fracture group for both males and females


Table 3.11 Sex distribution of 7,202 fractures of segment 21

























Sex


Number of fractures


Percentage


Male


4,526


62.84


Female


2,676


37.16


Total


7,202


100.00



image Fractures of Segment 21 by Age Group

See Table 3.12 and Fig. 3.17.



image


image Fractures of Segment 21 by Fracture Type

See Table 3.13, Table 3.14, Fig. 3.18, and Fig. 3.19.



image












































































21-A Radius/ulna, proximal, extra-articular fractures


21-A1 Ulna, radius intact


777 fractures


M: 521 (67.05%)


F: 256 (32.95%)


0.21% of total adult fractures


1.33% of adult radius/ulna


10.79% of segment 21


47.09% of type 21-A


21-A1.1 Avulsion of triceps insertion from the olecranon


image


21-A1.2 Metaphyseal simple fracture


image


21-A1.3 metaphyseal multifragmentary fracture


image


21-A2 Radius, ulna intact


806 fractures


M: 412 (52.12%)


F: 394 (48.88%)


0.22% of total adult fractures


1.38% of adult radius/ulna


11.19% of segment 21


48.85% of type 21-A


21-A2.1 Avulsion of biceps insertion from the radial tuberosity


image


21-A2.2 Radial neck simple fracture


image


21-A2.3 Radial neck multifragmentary fracture


image


21-A3 Both bones


67 fractures


M: 39 (58.21%)


F: 28 (41.79%)


0.22% of total adult fractures


0.12% of adult radius/ulna


0.93% of segment 21


4.06% of type 21-A


21-A3.1 Both bones simple fracture


image


21-A3.2 One bone simple fracture, other bone multifragmentary fracture


image


21-A3.3 Both bones multifragmentary


image


21-B Radius/ulna, proximal, partial articular fractures


21-B1 Ulna, radius intact


2,773 fractures


M: 1,809 (65.24%)


F: 964 (34.76%)


0.74% of total adult fractures


4.76% of adult radius/ulna


38.50% of segment 21


52.65% of type 21-B


21-B1.1 Unifocal simple fracture


image


21-B1.2 Bifocal simple fracture


image


21-B1.3 Bifocal multifragmentary


image


21-B2 Radius, ulna intact


2,292 fractures


M: 1,426 (62.22%)


F: 866 (37.78%)


0.61% of total adult fractures


3.94% of adult radius/ulna


31.82% of segment 21


43.52% of type 21-B


21-B2.1 Simple fracture with minimal or no displacement


image


21-B2.2 Multifragmentary without depression


image


21-B2.3 Multifragmentary with depression


image


21-B3 One bone articular, other bone extra-articular


202 fractures


M: 129 (63.86%)


F: 73 (36.14%)


0.05% of total adult fractures


0.35% of adult radius/ulna


2.80% of segment 21


3.84% of type 21-B


21-B3.1 Ulna articular simple, radius extra-articular fracture


image


21-B3.2 Radius articular simple, ulna extra-articular fracture


image


21-B3.3 One bone articular multifragmentary, other bone extra-articular fracture


image


21-C Radius/ulna, proximal, complete articular fractures


21-C1 Both bones, simple fracture


125 fractures


M: 76 (60.80%)


F: 49 (39.20%)


0.03% of total adult fractures


0.21% of adult radius/ulna


1.74% of segment 21


43.86% of type 21-C


21-C1.1 Olecranon and radial head


image


21-C1.2 Coronoid process and radial head


image


21-C2 Both bones, one articular simple, the other articular multifragmentary


90 fractures


M: 66 (73.33%)


F: 24 (26.67%)


0.02% of total adult fractures


0.15% of adult radius/ulna


1.25% of segment 21


31.58% of type 21-C


21-C2.1 Olecranon multifragmentary, radial head simple split


image


21-C2.2 Olecranon simple, radial head multifragmentary


image


21-C2.3 Coronoid process simple, radial head multifragmentary


image


21-C3 Both bones, articular multifragmentary


70 fractures


M: 48 (68.57%)


F: 22 (31.43%)


0.02% of total adult fractures


0.12% of adult radius/ulna


0.97% of segment 21


24.56% of type 21-C


21-C3.1 Three fragments each bone


image


21-C3.2 Ulna more than three fragments, radius three or more fragments


image


21-C3.3 Radius more than three fragments, ulna three or more fragments


image


image Injury Mechanism


image Olecranon Fractures

Olecranon multifragmentary fracture can be caused by direct trauma, as in falls on or blows to the point of the elbow. Such types of fractures also occur during a fall on the semiflexed supinated forearm with the hand striking the ground, and the pull of the triceps muscle leading to a transverse or wedge fracture of the olecranon.


image Fractures of Radial Head or Neck of the Radius

This type of injury is usually from a fall on an outstretched arm with the force of impact transmitted up the hand through the forearm to the radial head, which is forced to the capitellum and often causes fractures in the anterolateral aspect of the radial head or neck of the radius. Multifragmentary fractures or dislocation may occur by high energy trauma.


image Coronoid Fractures

Coronoid fracture, rarely seen in isolation, usually occurs in combination with olecranon fracture; this type of fracture results from an avulsion fracture of the bony structure of the coronoid, by contraction of the joint capsule with the elbow in hyperextension.


image Diagnosis


The insertion of the triceps muscle on the olecranon is usually compromised when olecranon fractures occur. In most cases, patients cannot fully strengthen their arm due to the pain and are unable to overcome any resistance. The movement of supination aggravates the pain from fractures in the radial head or neck of the radius and limits the range of motion.


The radiographic examination should include anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the elbow. If the patient has marked physical signs but inconclusive X-rays, then computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans may be required to clarify the nature and extent of the injury. Note that the individual will be unable to fully extend the forearm when taking the AP view of the elbow, so the beam must be placed perpendicularly to the radial head ( Fig. 3.20).


image Treatment


Olecranon fractures are unstable fractures, usually requiring surgical intervention. Plate fixation, tension band wiring, and other internal fixators can be utilized in stabilizing the fracture, depending on the fracture type. Stable fractures of the radial head or the neck of radius with no displacement can be managed nonsurgically, but with close monitoring of fracture progression within 4 weeks. Minimal invasive internal fixation is preferable for fractures with dislocation or when nonsurgical treatment fails. Based on fracture type, patient’s age, and general condition, various internal fixators can be selected, including screws, absorbable screws, and Kirschner wires (K-wires). Anatomic reduction to the utmost, rigid fixation, and early mobilization are applied even for complex fractures. Excision of the radial head and replacement with a prosthesis should be considered only as a last resort.


Mar 12, 2022 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Fractures of the Ulna and Radius

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access