Fractures in Children and Adolescents


Bone segment
 
Fracture type

Acceptable malposition <5 years

Acceptable malposition 5–10 years

Acceptable malposition >10 years

Treatment recommendation if inacceptable

Clavicle

Shaft

Any

Any, if closed

Any, if closed

Any, if closed and not multiple segment

ESIN as an exception in older children and multiple segment fx

Humerus

Proximal

Metaphyseal or Salter II

Any if not shortened

<45°

<30°

Closed reduction and ESIN

Shaft

Any

<30°

<20°

<20°

Closed reduction and ESIN

Forearm

Proximal/shaft

Monteggia-like

Radial head in line and ulna stable

Radial head in line and ulna stable

Radial head in line and ulna stable

Tension band wiring olecranon

Monteggia

ESIN of ulna shaft

Shaft

Greenstick/stable

<15°

None

None

ESIN of radius + ulna

Shaft

Unstable

<10°

None

None

ESIN of radius + ulna

Tibia

Shaft

Unstable (tib + fib) or multisegment or open

Ap 20°

Ap 10°

Ap 10°

ESIN of tibia, consider end caps

Antecurvation recurtation

Antecurvation recurtation

Antecurvation recurtation

Femur

Proximal

Sub/intertrochanteric

<20° if stable

<10° if stable

None

ESIN of femur, consider end caps

Shaft

Transverse/short

<20° if stable

<10° if stable

<5° if stable

ESIN of femur

Oblique

Shaft

Oblique/spiral

None

None

None

ESIN of femur, consider end caps



Metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures of the long bones that can potentially be treated by intramedullary nailing represent about one fifth of all fractures in children. Table 24.2 depicts the distribution of these fractures according to their anatomical region. Two thirds are located in the upper extremity while one third affects the lower extremity.


Table 24.2
Overview of indication, technical difficulty and frequency of fractures of different body regions that can be treated by ESIN in children




















































 
Indication

Difficulty

Frequency

Shaft fractures

Humerus

±

++


Forearm

+++


+++

Femur

+++

++

++

Tibia

±

+

+

Metaphyseal fractures

Humerus proximal

++

+

++

Radius proximal

++

+

+

Femur distal

+

+++


Active rehabilitation for upper extremity shaft fractures in children is usually not required since joints are not affected and immobilization is not necessary or only for a short interval. In lower extremity fractures children benefit from physiotherapeutical support to learn walking with crutches safely and to return to a normal gait pattern faster after immobilization.



24.2 Specific Instruments and Implants



24.2.1 Why Age-Specific Implants?


Fractures of the growing bone require fixation techniques, which preclude any injury to the growth plate regions. This requirement is perfectly met for shaft fractures by Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails (ESIN) which are positioned between both metaphyseal regions. The rate of operative fracture treatment in children has increased considerably after the introduction of suitable implants. A variety of ESIN has been developed during the past decades. All nails are made from (pre)bendable material (stainless steel or titanium alloy) and have a curved tip. Nail diameters of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 mm are available. Once introduced, 3-point fixation results in an elastic stable construct. Most fixations will need two nails per bone and do not provide rigid fixation. Rapid bone healing in children overcomes this period of relative instability within a few weeks.


24.2.2 ESIN Instrumentarium


The currently most advanced instrumentarium is the DePuy Synthes ESIN instrumentarium® that has a specific T- shaped handle, a specific clamp for nail removal and a cutting device that produces dull clean nail ends which do not irritate the surrounding soft tissues. The advantages of this instrumentarium are particularly evident in difficult fracture patterns and in the introduction of nails with a large diameter (>3 mm). For a simple forearm shaft fractures however, any T-hand piece and a standard nail cutter may be sufficient.


24.2.3 Locking Mechanisms for ESIN Nails


To increase stability of the bone-implant construct, different systems for interlocking of the nails were suggested. One of the earliest locking devices was a screw which was placed through a hole in the nail end. This technique however required special nails manufactured in different length. Alternatively, indirect locking is possible by the so-called miss the nail technique where a screw is placed between two nails at their crossing in the medullary canal. More recently, special end caps were introduced that can be applied to any standard ESIN, independent of its length and diameter [1]. A hollow titanium cap is placed over the nail end and screwed into the cortical bone to avoid backing out of the nail. This technique requires very exact shortening of the nail to 0.5–1 cm above the cortical surface. This interlocking is especially useful in lower extremity fractures of older, heavier children.


24.2.4 Adolescent Lateral Femur Nail


While 4 mm ESIN with end caps may be stable enough even for highly unstable fracture types in the femur up to an age of about 14 years or up to a weight of 50 kg, more stability is needed in adolescents. For this age group, adult femur nails may be too thick to fit into the medullary canal. Therefore, the adolescent lateral femur nail (ALFN, DePuy Synthes®) was introduced [2]. Application and operative technique for this nail is expected to gain higher acceptance with (adult) orthopedic surgeons than among pediatric surgeons. Reports of the use of this nail are rather scarce until now since the implant is suitable only for a narrow age group.


24.3 Clavicle


Representing 5–15 %, clavicle fractures belong to the most common pediatric fractures. They involve the medial, middle or lateral third. Fractures in the middle third are the most frequent. They generally occur below the age of ten as the result of a fall on the shoulder or a direct impact during sports activities. In children, the fracture is often not displaced because of the thick periosteal tube. Treatment can be conservative. Shortening or side-to-side malposition will be corrected by remodelling within a year. In adolescents however, spontaneous correction of pronounced malposition and/or shortening may not be sufficient. In open fractures and fractures with impending skin perforation, open reduction and internal fixation is recommended. Besides plate osteosynthesis, intramedullary splinting by ESIN is a valid alternative (Fig. 24.1a, b) [35].

A330398_1_En_24_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.1
In a soccer game, a 13 year old boy suffers a completely displaced midshaft clavicula fracture with impending skin perforation. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior view. (b) Postoperative anteroposterior view. Intramedullary fixation with ESIN after closed reduction was performed


24.3.1 Operative Technique


A 1–2 cm long incision is made at the medial aspect of the clavicle, 1 cm lateral to the sternoclavicular joint. A 2 mm ESIN nail is inserted with slight rotatory movements from medial to lateral after closed reduction of the fracture. Limited open reduction is performed when attempts to closed reduction are unsuccessful. Intraoperative image intensification control assures that there is no perforation of the nail out of the clavicle in any direction. In order to avoid soft tissue irritation at the nail end or nail migration, it is recommended to impact the nail tip firmly into the lateral clavicle and to use an end cap. Postoperatively, mobilization as tolerated is allowed. Abduction above 90° and weight bearing are avoided until fracture healing. Control radiolographs are taken after 4 weeks. Uneventful bone healing can also be assumed by the presence of pressure-indolent callus. ESIN removal is usually possible after 4 months.


24.4 Humerus


Humerus shaft fractures occur in the context of a birth trauma or in adolescents. Birth trauma related injuries do not need surgical treatment, they heal with complete remodelling even in case of larger displacement. In adolescents, the remodelling potential of humerus shaft fractures is clearly smaller than that of proximal humerus fractures [6]. Nevertheless, certain malpositions can be tolerated thanks to the large functional compensation potential of the shoulder joint. Side to side displacements and shortenings up to 2 cm are acceptable. However, axis deviations over 10° should not be tolerated as these lead to cosmetic impairment. When an indication for operative treatment exists, closed fracture reduction followed by ESIN is performed. Retrograde ESIN is carried out in proximal and shaft fractures, antegrade ESIN in distal shaft fractures. Retrograde ESIN is used much more often than antegrade ESIN, as distal shaft fractures very seldom occur [7].


24.4.1 Operative Technique


A monolateral, ascending technique is mostly chosen in fractures of the proximal humerus and the humeral shaft. Alternatively, a bilateral, radial and ulnar approach may be used. The ulnar approach bears the risk of damaging the ulnar nerve. When using a monolateral approach, a 3–4 cm incision is made 1 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle. The anterior aspect of the distal, lateral humerus should be exposed to visualise the nail insertion points. The position of the radial nerve has to be taken into account, so that the insertion points are not chosen too cranial. Two elastic nails are always inserted. The largest possible nail diameter should be selected. The minimal nail diameter is one third of the diameter of the medullary canal at the isthmus. One elastic nail has to be prebent in an S-shape, the other in a standard C-shape. The tip of the S-shaped nail should reach the surgical neck medially; the tip of the C-shaped nail should be directed towards the greater tubercle. Great care must be taken to avoid perforation of the cortex by any nail tip. Rotational alignment must be controlled during placement of the nail. It is recommended to proceed with the medial S-shaped nail first. The lateral nail should be advanced subsequently. The apex of the bending of both nails should be at the fracture level (Fig. 24.2a–c). In case of unstable or comminuted fractures, the use of end caps is recommended.

A330398_1_En_24_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.2
A 10-year old boy suffered a segmental fracture of the left humerus. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral view. (b) Postoperative anteroposterior view. Two elastic nails were inserted through a distal monolateral approach. (c) Uneventful healing. Anteroposterior view after hardware removal

When a radial and ulnar approach is used, both nails are prebent in C-shape. The same recommendations as depicted above are followed (Fig. 24.3a–c).

A330398_1_En_24_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.3
An 11-year old girl sustained a midshaft spiral humerus fracture after a fall from a horse. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior view after closed reduction and provisional splinting.(b) Postoperative anteroposterior view. Two elastic nails were inserted through a distal radial and ulnar approach. (c) Uneventful healing. Anteroposterior view after hardware removal

In case of antegrade nailing, the entry portals of both nails are situated at the proximal lateral humerus below the insertion of the deltoid muscle. The end points of both nails are the medial and lateral condyles respectively.


24.5 Proximal Forearm



24.5.1 Radial Neck Fractures


Pure epiphyseal separations represent one-third, fracture-separations two-thirds of all radial neck fractures in infancy. Because of the large correction potential, relatively large malpositions can be treated without reduction. In children younger than 10 years, tilting of 45° is considered acceptable, whereas in older children 20° of tilting is the limit. Functional therapy should be started as early as possible and the time for immobilisation should be kept as short as needed for pain therapy. There is a risk of post-traumatic necrosis and deformation of the radial head because the radial head epiphysis receives its blood supply from distal only. In case the malposition of the radial head exceeds the above mentioned limits, surgical reduction and fixation is indicated. An attempt to closed reduction by direct manipulation of the radial head should be done first in order not to endanger its blood supply. Closed reduction can also be tried with the help of an elastic nail, which is introduced retrograde through the distal radial styloid process. If several attempts are not successful, a limited open reduction is inevitable. The reduced head can finally be fixed with this retrograde elastic nail [8, 9].


24.5.2 Operative Technique


The child is lying in a supine position in the operation room and the arm is placed on a radiolucent side table. The nail’s diameter is 2 or 2.5 mm. A longitudinal skin incision is made over the styloid process. An open dissection is recommended to protect the tendons and superficial branch of the radial nerve. The nail’s insertion point is located about 1–2 cm proximal to the growth plate. An entry portal is created very carefully with the help of an awl. The nail’s tip is pushed forward to the radial head under fluoroscopic control. In cases of severe tilting, direct pressure on the radial head can be applied by the operator’s thumb. If unsuccessful, a K-wire is used percutaneously to reduce the head. The curved tip of the elastic nail can also be used as a reduction aid. By rotating this tip, the dislocated head is brought into its anatomical position. After reduction, the elastic nail is pushed further into the radial head. The stability of the retention should be controlled under fluoroscopy (Fig. 24.4a–c).

A330398_1_En_24_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.4
A 9-year old girl sustained a radial head fracture-separation after a fall from a trampoline. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior view of the left elbow shows a 90° tilting of the radial head. (b) Intraoperative view. A K-wire is used percutaneously for reduction of the radial head. (c) Postoperative view showing a perfect alignment and stabilization with retrograde elastic nail


24.5.3 Monteggia Lesion


Isolated dislocations of the radial head are extremely rare after trauma. Usually, there is an accompanying pathology of the ulna, known as Monteggia lesion. A dislocation of the radial head can easily be missed if there is only a slight bowing of the ulna. With reduction of the ulna fracture or correction of the bowing, reduction of the radial head is easily obtained. The ulna is stabilized with an antegrade ESIN (Fig. 24.5a–f). The operation is performed in supine position and the arm placed on a radiolucent side table. The entry point of the nail is located about 2 cm distal to the proximal apophysis. Therefore, a 3 cm longitudinal incision is made at the dorsoradial side of the proximal ulna. The diameter of the nail is 2 or 2.5 mm, similar as in elastic nailing of the radius [10].

A330398_1_En_24_Fig5a_HTML.jpgA330398_1_En_24_Fig5b_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.5
A 7-year old girl suffered a Monteggia lesion. (a, b) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral views show an ulna fracture with severe angulation and a radial head dislocation. (c, d) Intraoperative anteroposterior and lateral views after closed reduction of the ulna fracture and of the radial head. In both views, the axis of the medullary canal of the radius points towards the center of the capitellum humeri (e, f) Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral views. The broken ulna has been stabilized with one antegrade elastic nail


24.6 Forearm


Treatment of lower arm fractures in childhood depends on the type of the radius and/or ulna fracture and on their locations. The majority of fractures occur in the distal third of the forearm and often require only conservative treatment because of excellent remodelling. However, the ability of axial correction decreases in fractures near to the centre of the shaft [11].

About two-thirds of forearm fractures are greenstick fractures. Although these lesions look harmless, bone healing at the tip of the bow is delayed and re-fracture rate increased. Moreover, pronation-supination is restricted because of remaining axis deviations [12]. Therefore, greenstick fractures should be converted into complete fractures and their axis deviations corrected. Radius and/or ulna are stabilized by ESIN (Fig. 24.6a–f).

A330398_1_En_24_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.6
A 10-year old boy suffered a Greenstick fracture of the radius and bowing of the ulna after a fight. (a, b) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral views. (c, d) Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral views. The greenstick fracture of the radius was converted into a complete fracture and the bowing of the ulna adjusted. Radius and ulna were stabilized by ESIN. (e, f) Uneventful healing. Anteroposterior and lateral views after hardware removal

Complete fractures of the lower arm mostly occur in children older than 10 years of age. In order to exclude Monteggia- and Galeazzi injuries, an x-ray of the complete lower arm together with the elbow and wrist is obligatory. Side-to-side deviations and axis deviations <10° in both planes can be left to spontaneous correction and are treated in an upper arm cast for 3–4 weeks. In all other cases, a closed reduction followed by stabilisation with ESIN should be performed (Fig. 24.7a–f). Metal removal should not be done before the end of week 12 [13].

A330398_1_En_24_Fig7_HTML.jpg


Fig. 24.7
An 11-year old girl suffered a complete forearm fracture during sport activities. (a, b) Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral views including elbow and wrist joint. (c, d) Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral views. Radius and ulna were stabilized by ESIN. (e, f) Uneventful healing. Anteroposterior and lateral views after hardware removal


24.6.1 Operative Technique


The child is lying in a supine position in the operation room and the arm is placed on a radiolucent side table. The diameter of both nails is 2 or 2.5 mm. Closed reduction is attempted. The percutaneous use of pointed reduction forceps, which are attached to each fracture fragment, may be helpful. Open reduction is necessary if muscles or tendons are intercalated between the fracture fragments.

Since closed reduction of the ulna is mostly easier, ulna nailing is done first. The entry point of the ulnar nail is located about 2 cm distal to the proximal apophysis. Therefore, a 3 cm longitudinal incision is made at the dorsoradial side of the proximal ulna. The nail is advanced to the fracture and passed beyond under fluoroscopic control. For radial nailing, a longitudinal skin incision is made over the styloid process. An open dissection is recommended to protect the tendons and superficial branch of the radial nerve. The nail’s insertion point is located about 1–2 cm proximal to the growth plate. The nail’s tip is pushed forward to the fracture and passes the fracture gap under fluoroscopic control. Both nails should have an as long as possible trajectory in the medullary canal. Any cortical perforation should be avoided or corrected.

In all above mentioned procedures, the nail ends are bent slightly in a direction opposite to the cortical surface, which is easily performed with the beveled impactor. The nails are subsequently cut near to the cortical surface, using the special cutting device, to avoid damage to the surrounding soft tissues, skin irritation or skin perforation. The nail ends remaining outside of the bone should be long enough to enable unproblematic metal removal.


24.7 Femur Shaft Fractures



24.7.1 Indications for and Limitations of ESIN


Most shaft fractures of the femur, even long spiral fractures or comminuted multiple segment fractures, can be stabilized adequately with ESIN to allow for healing in anatomical position.


24.7.1.1 Age Limits


Children of 3 years and younger can be treated by vertical extension with adhesive tape. Vertical extension achieves adequate healing within 3–4 weeks but requires parental collaboration after a short period of hospitalization (2–3 days) where instructions for home care are given. In some exceptional cases where compliance of the parents for this treatment is lacking or children are very tall or heavy for their age, even in children below the age of three nailing becomes a therapeutic option. Nailing in this age group should remain the second choice, since extension avoids two operations. Children of more than 14 years or 50 kg should be evaluated carefully as to the use of a more stable implant such as the adolescent lateral femur nail (ALFN, see below) or the adult nail.


24.7.1.2 Experience Limits


The unexperienced surgeon should not start to learn the ESIN technique by treating difficult fractures e.g. femoral fractures with elastic stable nails. Especially the strong muscle forces acting on the bone fragments do not forgive any technical shortcomings. A lack of experience may therefore be a good reason to use an external fixator instead, especially if a more difficult fracture type is present.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Fractures in Children and Adolescents

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access