Foot and Ankle Fractures



Foot and Ankle Fractures


Brian E. Abell

J. Richard Lee Evanson



ANKLE FRACTURES



  • The true incidence of ankle fractures in the general population is unknown, as it changes with increased participation in athletics and trends in fashion footwear. There is also a great deal of interobserver reliability when it comes to classifying these fractures.


  • A great deal of research has been conducted to determine the incidence of age-related fractures, particularly in the elderly population. Barrett et al. (1) analyzed Medicare data in 1999 and found that ankle fractures were the fourth most common fracture in the elderly population (65-90 years of age). The study also demonstrated that elderly blacks were less likely than whites to fracture the ankle.


  • The most current data suggest that 8.3 per 1,000 Medicare patients will sustain an ankle fracture (11). Among Finnish patients older than 70 years of age, the number of ankle fractures has increased threefold from 1970 to 2000, with a larger number of fractures classified as unstable (19).


Physical Examination



  • The examination of the ankle should begin with a thorough visual inspection noting abnormal swelling, redness, or deformities. The physician should also palpate the ankle to determine the extent of any swelling, identify any abnormal bony prominences or incongruities, determine specific areas of point tenderness or extreme pain, and evaluate the neurovascular status of the patient.


  • The neurovascular examination should include an assessment of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses. Additionally, the physician should evaluate the capillary refill, light touch, and two-point discrimination distal to the ankle.


  • Gross deformity of the ankle is a likely indicator of dislocation, which should be reduced and splinted prior to radiographic examination or further evaluation.


  • The physician will then evaluate the range of motion of the ankle. The normal range of ankle motion is 30 degrees of dorsiflexion and 45 degrees of plantarflexion. The range of motion necessary for ankle functionality or ambulation is 10 degrees of dorsiflexion and 20 degrees of plantarflexion (21).


  • It is important to evaluate the stability of the ankle when suspecting a fracture. The squeeze test is performed to rule out disruption of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The squeeze test is performed by squeezing the leg, approximating the tibia and fibula, at or slightly above the level of the belly of the gastrocnemius. An indicator of syndesmotic disruption is pain at the distal tibiofibular articulation when the squeeze test is performed (18). The physician should also perform an anterior drawer test to evaluate the laxity of the complex ligamentous support network of the ankle. Pain with dorsiflexion and external rotation should also be noted because this may represent posterior bony injury or tendinous disruption.


Radiographic Examination



  • The Ottawa ankle rules are a valuable guideline in determining the need for radiographic examination in a patient suspected to have an ankle fracture. Radiographic examination is required if the patient is unable to bear weight, if the patient has pain with palpation within 6 cm proximal or distal to the talar articulation, or if the patient has bony tenderness at the posterior edge or tip of either malleolus (34).


  • The ankle is best examined radiographically with an anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and mortise view. Three-view radiographs demonstrate greater reliability when compared to various combinations of two-view radiographs (4). Abnormal radiographic findings are greater than 2 mm of talar tilt (difference in lateral and medial joint spaces in AP view), misalignment of the talar dome under the tibia in AP or lateral views, and a demonstrated tibiofibular overlap of less than 10 mm in the AP view or the mortise view (25). Stress radiographs may be valuable but are difficult to standardize. Patients are most tolerant of the gravity stress test whereby a mortise view of the ankle is obtained with the patient lying on their injured side and their distal tibia and injured ankle off of the table unsupported (32). Although normative data are not adequately reported in the literature, the Telos stress device is being used to standardize the amount of stress about the ankle during routine radiographic stress examinations.


  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is best suited for the examination of the integrity of the ankle ligaments, and a bone scan is often helpful to rule out osteochondral lesions in patients with chronic ankle injuries.



Classification



  • There are three primary classification systems used to define ankle fractures. The Danis-Weber classification is based solely on the fibula and the location of the fracture in relation to the ankle mortise (10). The Lauge-Hansen classification describes the ankle fracture according to foot position and movement of the foot in relation to the leg (supination-adduction, supination-external rotation, pronation-abduction, pronation-eversion, and pronation-dorsiflexion). The most common mechanism of ankle fracture is of the supination-external rotation variety (22). Lastly, the AO classification is based on the level of the fibula fracture, medial malleolar involvement, and syndesmotic disruption (16). A summary of the aforementioned classifications can be found in Table 66.1.



FOOT FRACTURES



  • The foot comprises a total of 26 bones. The hindfoot consists of the talus and calcaneus, whereas the midfoot includes the navicular, cuboid, and cuneiforms, and their articulations with the proximal metatarsals. The metatarsals and phalanges make up the forefoot.


  • Most foot injuries involve innocuous sprains; however, a small percentage of them involve significant injuries with subtle radiographic findings. The rarity of these injuries limits physician familiarity and accounts for frequent misdiagnosis (36). Foot injuries involving the talus are the most often misdiagnosed (20).


FRACTURES OF THE TALUS



  • Fractures of the talus are the second most common tarsal bone injury, with an incidence ranging from 0.1% to 0.85% of all fractures (30).


  • The talus has five articulating surfaces as 60% of the talus is covered with articular cartilage. There are no muscle or tendinous attachments. Blood supply to the talus is tenuous, and fractures can easily disrupt the blood supply, resulting in osteonecrosis (15).


  • Talus fractures can occur at the talar head, neck, body, or lateral or posterior processes. An os trigonum remains a separate ossicle in 14% of normal feet and can sometimes be mistaken for an acute fracture posterior to the lateral tubercle of the talus (2).


Physical Examination



  • Patients with fractures of the talus may present with swelling and ecchymosis of the hindfoot or midfoot. Pain with palpation or with motion of the hindfoot should raise suspicion for the presence of a fracture.


Radiographic Examination



  • Physicians evaluating talus fractures should obtain three-view radiographs of both the foot and ankle. The Canale view can provide an optimal view of the talar neck (6). This is performed with the foot placed flat on the cassette and the ankle in equinus and pronated 15 degrees with the beam directed 15 degrees cephalad from the vertical (Fig. 66.1).






    Figure 66.1: The correct position of the foot for x-ray evaluation of the talar neck is shown. From Bucholz RW, MD and Heckman JD, MD. Rockwood & Green’s Fractures in Adults, 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.


  • Computed tomography (CT) is indicated when displacement cannot be ruled out with plain radiographs. A CT will assist with characterization of fracture patterns, displacement, and articular involvement. The role of bone scans or MRI is limited to the evaluation of occult fractures or cartilage lesions.

May 22, 2016 | Posted by in SPORT MEDICINE | Comments Off on Foot and Ankle Fractures

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access