First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis


Study

# of feet

Study type

Joint preparation technique

Fixation

Functional improvement

Union rate

Bennett GL and Sabetta J [45]

233

Prospective

Cup-and-cone manual

Dorsal locking plate

AOFAS: 51 ➔ 84

3/233 (98.7%)

Brodsky et al. [3]

60

Retrospective

Cup-and-cone manual

Parallel 3.5 mm cortical screws

98% return to preoperative occupation

Not quoted

Coughlin MJ and Abdo RV [44]

58

Retrospective

Cup-and-cone reamers

Dorsal plate

54/58 (93.1%) “excellent” or “good” satisfaction

57/58 (98.3%)

Doty et al. [4]

51

Prospective

Cup-and-cone reamers

Dorsal plate + lag crew

AOFAS: 45 ➔ 77

VAS: 6.6 ➔ 1.6

50/51 (98%)

Ellington et al. [5]

155

Retrospective

Cup-and-cone reamers

Dorsal plate + lag screw

83.1% patients “good” satisfaction or higher

94/107 patients (87.9%)

Goucher NR and Coughlin MJ [6]

53

Prospective

Cup-and-cone reamers

Dorsal plate + lag screw

AOFAS: 51 ➔ 82

VAS: 6.3 ➔ <1

48/49 (98%) excellent or good final outcome

49/53 (92.5%)

Hyer et al. [9]

45

Retrospective

Cup-and-cone reamers

Dorsal locked plate + lag screw

Not quoted

42/45 (93%)

Kumar et al. [7]

46

Retrospective

Cup-and-cone reamers

Dorsal plate + lag screw

Patient satisfaction = 100%

98%

Van Doeselaar et al. [14]

62

Prospective

Planar excision

Crossed lag screws

Significantly decreased foot function index (less pain and disability)

95%

Wassink S and van den Oever M [8]

109

Retrospective

Planar excision

Single lag screw

74/89 (83%) patients completely pain-free or mild pain

105/109 (96.3%)





Case Example


The patient is a 48-year-old woman who initially presented with a 2-year history of left foot pain secondary to hallux MTP joint arthritis and second toe hammertoe deformity. She had been treated with custom orthotics in the past, but was still having daily pain and difficulty with shoewear with a negative impact on her quality of life. Her examination was significant for stiffness at the first MTP joint, with pain throughout the entire arc of motion. In addition, she had a fixed hammertoe deformity of the second toe along with tenderness and instability at the second MTP joint. Initial weight-bearing radiographs demonstrated global first MTP joint space narrowing with a large dorsal osteophyte (Fig. 9.1). One can also appreciate the fixed second hammertoe deformity with subluxation at the second MTP joint. The patient elected to proceed with first MTP joint fusion and second toe distal metatarsal shortening osteotomy with hammertoe correction.

A426848_1_En_9_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.1
(a, b) Preoperative AP and lateral radiographs

The standard dorsomedial approach described above was used (Fig. 9.2). Circumferential release was performed, and the proximal phalanx plantarflexed fully for preparation of the metatarsal head. A 0.062 inch K-wire was placed down the metatarsal shaft (Fig. 9.3) and central position confirmed with fluoroscopy (Fig. 9.4). A barrel-shaped starting reamer (Fig. 9.5) was then used to remove osteophytes and excessive bone to produce a smooth distal circumferential surface of the distal first metatarsal (Fig. 9.6). The articular surface of the metatarsal head was reamed with the concave reamer. Another 0.062 inch K-wire was then placed in the central position of the proximal phalanx (confirmed with fluoroscopy) and reamed with the convex reamer (Fig. 9.7). Both reamed surfaces were fenestrated using a 2.0 mm K-wire, which concluded the joint preparation portion of this procedure (Fig. 9.8). Wires from our preferred cannulated screw system were then inserted to the level of the joint, one anterograde through the proximal phalanx prepared surface and the other retrograde through the metatarsal head prepared surface (Fig. 9.9). The toe was positioned using the lid of one of the trays as a guide (Fig. 9.10), and the wires were driven across the joint. Fluoroscopic imaging confirmed a satisfactory position of the wires, and after measuring the appropriate-sized screws were inserted. Acceptable toe position was again confirmed at the conclusion of the case (Figs. 9.11 and 9.12). A 2-week postoperative AP radiograph of the foot is shown in Fig. 9.13.

A426848_1_En_9_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.2
Incision mark for standard dorsomedial approach


A426848_1_En_9_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.3
(a) Exposed metatarsal head and (b) K-wire in central metatarsal shaft


A426848_1_En_9_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.4
(a, b) Central position of K-wire confirmed on fluoroscopy


A426848_1_En_9_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.5
(a, b) “Barrel” reamer


A426848_1_En_9_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.6
Metatarsal head after removal of circumferential osteophytes


A426848_1_En_9_Fig7_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.7
Reaming proximal phalanx articular surface


A426848_1_En_9_Fig8_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.8
Fully prepared proximal phalanx articular surface


A426848_1_En_9_Fig9_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.9
Positioning wires for cannulated screws


A426848_1_En_9_Fig10_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.10
Confirming appropriate clinical position of great toe


A426848_1_En_9_Fig11_HTML.jpg


Figs. 9.11 and 9.12
Final clinical position of great toe

Feb 8, 2018 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access