Fever in the Hospitalized Patient (Case 51)

Chapter 59
Fever in the Hospitalized Patient (Case 51)


Patricia D. Brown MD


Case: A 56-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with 3 days of productive cough, fever, and chills. A chest radiograph revealed an extensive area of consolidation in the left lower lobe; because of hypoxia on presentation, he was admitted to the hospital for management of community-acquired pneumonia. The patient has no history of chronic medical illness but does have a 40-pack-year smoking history and a long-standing history of heavy alcohol use, drinking one pint of whiskey every few days for over 20 years. The patient was initially started on ceftriaxone and azithromycin; two sets of blood cultures obtained on admission grew Streptococcus pneumoniae, sensitive to penicillin. His antibiotics were changed to IV penicillin, and over the next 72 hours he slowly improved with resolution of fever and hypoxia, decreased cough, and good oral intake. The plan was to discharge him to home on hospital day 4 to complete a course of oral antibiotics; however, the patient developed a fever of 39.7°C.


Differential Diagnosis























Hospital-Acquired Infections


Complications/Inadequate Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia


Noninfectious Causes of Fever


Urinary tract infection (UTI)


Drug-resistant pathogen


(Sterile) IV-site phlebitis


Catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI)


Parapneumonic effusion


Drug fever


Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)


Empyema


DVT/pulmonary embolism


Clostridium difficile infection (CDI)


Alcohol withdrawal


 


Speaking Intelligently



Often the approach in a febrile hospitalized patient will be a directive to “pan-culture” the patient and obtain a chest radiograph. A much better and certainly more cost-effective approach to the problem is to return to the bedside to perform a problem-focused history and physical examination in order to narrow down the potential sources of fever. Additional testing can then be selectively utilized to confirm the clinical diagnosis. The evaluation should begin with an assessment of the patient at the bedside, not with telephone orders for multiple cultures and other diagnostic testing that may be unnecessary.


PATIENT CARE


Clinical Thinking


• The evaluation of a new fever in a hospitalized patient will focus on three broad categories of conditions: (1) a hospital-acquired infection, (2) a complication of the current infection (when present), and (3) noninfectious causes of fever.


• This broad differential diagnosis can be rapidly narrowed by a focused history and careful physical examination; selected diagnostic testing can then be utilized to confirm the diagnosis.


• The differential diagnosis and approach to the evaluation and management of fever in patients with cancer chemotherapy-induced neutropenia are distinct from what is discussed below. Because these patients are at extraordinarily high risk for bacterial infections and poor outcome if appropriate treatment is delayed, broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic therapy is always started after appropriate cultures have been obtained.


History


• A focused history should start with specific questioning regarding new symptoms that may be suggestive of a hospital-acquired infection, including dysuria, urgency, frequency, cough, sputum production, dyspnea, pain at the IV catheter site, and diarrhea.


• A complication of that infection may be heralded by worsening of symptoms that had originally improved in response to therapy.


• Unilateral lower extremity pain and swelling suggests the possibility of DVT.


• Careful review of the medication list will help to determine if any current medications are likely to be associated with drug fever. Drug fever can be a difficult diagnosis to make and is often entertained as a “diagnosis of exclusion” only after other etiologies of fever have been ruled out.


• The presence of rash or peripheral eosinophilia is helpful in implicating a drug reaction as the potential etiology of fever; however, in the majority of cases fever alone is the sole manifestation of an adverse reaction to a medication.


Physical Examination


• Perform a meticulous general physical examination with very careful attention to the skin to look for the presence of rash that may be present with drug fever and careful examination of the IV catheter insertion site to look for erythema, induration, or tenderness.


• Inspect sites of earlier IV catheter insertion, and palpate the proximal extent of the veins to look for evidence of superficial phlebitis.


• Upper extremity DVT can occur in patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) and should be considered in patients who develop ipsilateral swelling of the extremity in the presence of a CVC.


• Carefully examine the lungs to look for evidence of the development of pleural effusion that suggests parapneumonic effusion or empyema.


• Alcohol withdrawal can occur 3 to 4 days after admission. In addition to fever, there should be other signs of autonomic hyperactivity, including hypertension and clinical findings of diaphoresis, restlessness, and tremors.


Tests for Consideration













• For almost all patients with a new fever that develops during hospitalization, one should obtain two sets of blood cultures to exclude the possibility of BSI.


$15


• The history and physical examination should guide other diagnostic testing. Patients with diarrhea should have a stool sample submitted for C. difficile toxin assay; clinicians should follow the “3-day rule,” which reminds us that when diarrhea develops more than 3 days after hospital admission, the potential etiologies are relatively few and testing for community-associated pathogens with routine stool culture and examination for ova and parasites is of very low diagnostic yield.


$16


• Patients with symptoms suggestive of UTI or those who are or were catheterized or underwent some other form of urinary tract instrumentation during the admission should have a urinalysis with microscopic examination followed by urine culture if pyuria is detected. Clinicians should be very cautious regarding the interpretation of findings from a urine sample obtained from patients with indwelling bladder catheters.
Even with short-term catheter use, 10% to 30% of patients will develop colonization of the urinary tract with bacteria.

It can be very difficult to distinguish symptomatic infection from asymptomatic bacteriuria in this setting; therefore, even in the presence of a positive urine culture, the diagnosis of symptomatic UTI as the etiology of fever should be considered only when other sources of infection have been excluded by careful clinical assessment.


$19



IMAGING CONSIDERATIONS













HAP should be considered if new or worsening cough, dyspnea, or hypoxia occurs in association with fever; hypoxia would also raise the possibility of venous thromboembolic disease. A chest radiograph will document the presence of new or worsening infiltrates; thoracentesis should be performed if there is a pleural effusion to exclude the possibility of empyema.


$45


If pulmonary embolism is a diagnostic consideration, spiral CT or ventilation–perfusion scanning can be utilized.


$334, $316


Clinical suspicion for DVT can be evaluated by duplex ultrasonography.


$107


 






Clinical Entities Medical Knowledge




















Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection



Like the vast majority of all UTIs, hospital-acquired infections are ascending infections due to pathogens that colonize the periurethral area and distal urethral meatus, and then gain entry to the urinary tract via the ascending route. Instrumentation of the urinary tract facilitates ascending infection. Infection may be confined to the bladder (cystitis) or ascend to involve the kidney (pyelonephritis).


MB


Like all UTIs, the most common cause of health care–associated UTI is Escherichia coli. Depending on the length of hospitalization and prior antibiotic exposure, other pathogens that should be considered include other Enterobacteriaceae (Klebsiella, Enterobacter) and nosocomial gram-negative organisms such as Serratia, Providencia, Citrobacter, and Pseudomonas. Enterococcus species, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), may also cause UTI in the hospital.


TP


In noncatheterized patients the clinical presentation will be the same as that for community-acquired UTI; suprapubic tenderness, fever, leukocytosis, and/or other signs of systemic toxicity may be the only clinical findings in patients who have indwelling urinary catheters.


Dx


The diagnosis of UTI should begin with a urinalysis (preferably with microscopic examination) to detect the presence of pyuria, followed by urine culture to confirm the microbiologic diagnosis. Patients with hospital-acquired UTI are at increased risk of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, so a urine culture with susceptibility testing should always be obtained, even if the urinalysis findings are strongly suggestive of UTI. As discussed above, the differentiation of asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic UTI can be challenging, especially in patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Fever, leukocytosis, and other signs of systemic toxicity are suggestive of pyelonephritis rather than simple cystitis, and blood cultures should always be obtained to exclude concomitant bacteremia. Whether cystitis or pyelonephritis, hospital-acquired UTIs are always considered complicated infections.


Tx


Increasing rates of resistance among E. coli in both the community and the health-care setting to TMP-SMX have been well described, raising concern regarding the appropriateness of this agent for empirical therapy of UTI in the hospital. Pending further information from susceptibility testing, fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin) may be a better initial empirical choice in this setting. TMP-SMX may still be a reasonable initial empirical choice in patients who have been hospitalized for a short duration and have not received prior antibiotic therapy during the hospitalization; nitrofurantoin may be considered in patients with only cystitis. Patients with signs of sepsis require initial parenteral therapy; third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) are reasonable initial empirical therapeutics; however, a Gram stain of the urine should be obtained to exclude the possibility of enterococcal infection, for which the treatment of choice would be ampicillin. Patients at risk for Pseudomonas infection, as well as those with signs of severe sepsis, should receive agents that provide broader coverage including coverage for Pseudomonas (cefepime, piperacillin–tazobactam); empirical coverage should be informed by local resistance data.


Patients with only cystitis should receive a total of 7 days of antibiotic therapy; those with pyelonephritis should be treated for 14 days. Antibiotic therapy should always be reviewed once susceptibility data become available, and the most narrow-spectrum agent to which the organism is susceptible and that achieves adequate concentrations in the urinary tract should be chosen for continued therapy. See Cecil Essentials 106.


 





















Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection



Both peripheral and central venous catheters are associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection. Infection can originate from organisms that colonize the skin at the catheter insertion site or from organisms that may colonize the catheter hub and or lumen at the junction of the catheter and the infusion tubing. Contamination of the infusate is a rare cause of catheter-related BSI but should be suspected in settings where multiple infections due to a single organism occur during a short time period. Catheters in the femoral vein are associated with the highest risk of infection, followed by those in the internal jugular vein, with subclavian vein catheters having the lowest risk of infection.


MB


Coagulase-negative staphylococci are the most common cause of catheter-related BSI, followed by Staphylococcus aureus. Enterococci and Candida species are increasing in incidence as a cause of catheter-related BSI; gram-negative organisms may also cause catheter-related BSI, particularly those associated with femoral vein CVCs.


TP


Fever may be the only symptom of catheter-related BSI, and the IV catheter should most certainly be considered as a likely source of infection in a patient for whom no other source of fever is readily apparent by history and physical examination. Local signs of phlebitis, inflammation, or tenderness at the catheter insertion site are extremely helpful in implicating the IV catheter as the source of infection; however, the IV catheter may still be the source of fever even if these local signs are absent.


Dx


Clinicians caring for patients with new fever and an IV catheter should always obtain blood cultures as part of the evaluation for a potential source of fever. It is necessary always to obtain two sets of blood cultures (from two separate venipuncture sites), especially since coagulase-negative staphylococci are the most common cause of catheter-related BSI and are the most common contaminant in blood cultures. For patients with a CVC, one set of cultures should be obtained from the catheter and one from a peripheral venipuncture. CVCs that are removed because of the possibility of infection should have qualitative culture of the catheter tip; the presence of >15 colony-forming units (utilizing the roll-plate technique) in the presence of a blood culture positive for the same organisms is strong evidence that the catheter was the source of the bacteremia, provided that no other source of infection is apparent on clinical examination.


Tx


Peripheral catheters that have been in place for >48–72 hours and those with obvious signs of infection should be promptly removed. Patients with CVCs who have obvious signs of tenderness or inflammation of the insertion site, as well as those with signs of severe sepsis or septic shock, should have their catheter removed as quickly as possible. The decision regarding the need for empirical antibiotic therapy, pending the results of blood cultures, will have to be individualized based on the severity of illness of the patient. A patient with fever who is otherwise hemodynamically stable (and who does not have neutropenia) can be observed without antibiotic therapy pending the results of blood cultures. Patients with catheter-related BSI due to coagulase-negative staphylococci can be treated with a short course (5–7 days) of antibiotic therapy. Patients with bacteremia due to S. aureus require a minimum of 14 days of parenteral antibiotic therapy, provided that the bacteremia clears promptly with removal of the catheter; a longer course of therapy (4–6 weeks) will be required in patients with persistent bacteremia, which is frequently due to septic thrombophlebitis. Catheter-related BSI due to gram-negative pathogens and enterococci can generally be managed with 7–10 days of antibiotic therapy; 14 days of therapy are recommended for patients with line-related candidemia, provided that the cultures clear promptly after catheter removal and funduscopic examination does not reveal any evidence of retinitis or endophthalmitis. Salvage of tunneled CVCs is possible in certain situations; specific recommendations are outlined in the guidelines referenced on the Student Consult site. See Cecil Essentials 106.


 





















Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia



Like community-acquired pneumonias, the majority of HAPs are due to microaspiration of organisms that colonize the upper airways. In patients who are intubated (ventilator-associated pneumonia [VAP]), upper airway secretions may pool around the cuff of the endotracheal tube and are then aspirated during manipulation of the tube for suctioning or during positioning of the patient. HAP may also occur when the lungs are seeded hematogenously by BSI that originates from another site.


MB


Pathogens that commonly cause community-acquired pneumonia may occur in patients with early-onset (within the first 4 days of hospitalization) HAP. Aerobic gram-negative bacilli (including Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and S. aureus must be considered possible pathogens in those patients with onset of infection after 4 days of hospitalization as well as those with risk factors for drug-resistant pathogens. These risk factors include the following: previous antimicrobial therapy, a known high frequency of resistant pathogens in the unit on which the patient is hospitalized, and immunosuppressive therapy or disease.


TP


Fever, cough with sputum production, and worsening dyspnea are typical presenting features in patients with HAP. The clinical presentation may be more subtle in patients who are severely ill or debilitated, and in those with VAP. Focal findings on auscultation of the chest are helpful if present, but the absence of these findings is insufficient to exclude the possibility of pneumonia in patients with fever and respiratory symptoms.


Dx


The diagnosis of HAP should always be confirmed by a chest radiograph that shows a new or worsening infiltrate. Radiographic interpretation may be challenging in patients with preexisting radiographic abnormalities such as pulmonary edema. Efforts should be made to obtain a sputum sample for Gram stain and culture before the institution of empirical antibiotic therapy; a sputum specimen should always be obtained via endotracheal suction from patients who are intubated, as a negative sputum Gram stain in a patient with no recent change in antibiotic therapy virtually excludes the diagnosis of VAP. Blood cultures should also be obtained in all patients in an attempt to confirm a microbial etiology of the infection, although blood cultures are positive in a minority of patients with HAP.


Tx


Initial empirical antibiotic therapy must be selected based on the likelihood of resistant pathogens. For patients with early-onset pneumonia and no risk for drug-resistant pathogens, ceftriaxone plus a macrolide (such as azithromycin) or a respiratory fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) can be used as initial therapy; those with late-onset infections or risk for drug-resistant pathogens will require more broad-spectrum coverage with an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam (cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, or meropenem), in addition to an aminoglycoside or anti-pseudomonal fluoroquinolone, plus vancomycin or linezolid. Therapy should be reassessed based on culture results, and the narrowest spectrum agent that will still be effective should be continued. Seven days of therapy are sufficient for the majority of patients with HAP; 14 days of therapy are recommended for infections due to Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter. See Cecil Essentials 22.


 





















Clostridium difficile Infection



C. difficile is found among the normal colonic flora in <5% of healthy individuals in the community, but >20% of individuals who are hospitalized may become colonized with this organism. When the normal colonic flora are disrupted by the use of antimicrobial therapy, toxogenic strains of C. difficile may multiply and produce two exotoxins, toxin A and toxin B. These toxins are highly cytotoxic via the disruption of the cytoskeleton of colonic mucosal cells, leading to mucosal injury and inflammation.


MB


C. difficile is an anaerobic gram-positive bacillus. The organism forms spores that are resistant to antimicrobial therapy and frequently contaminate environmental surfaces, where they may serve as a source of nosocomial transmission. A new strain of C. difficile (the B1/Nap1 strain) has recently been recognized and appears to be responsible for epidemics of severe disease reported both in the United States and in other areas of the world.


TP


The most common clinical presentation of CDI is diarrhea that is typically large in volume and watery without associated blood or mucus. A small proportion of patients (≤5%) may actually present with constipation, rather than diarrhea. Patients may have associated abdominal cramping and lower abdominal pain. The spectrum of illness can range from mild diarrhea that spontaneously resolves with cessation of the antimicrobial therapy to severe disease accompanied by toxic megacolon and septic shock, often necessitating total colectomy. Leukemoid reactions, acute renal failure, severe hypoalbuminemia, and need for ICU admission are characteristic of the new epidemic strain.


Dx


The diagnosis of CDI must be considered in patients with diarrhea that occurs in association with antibiotic therapy, either current or recent (within the preceding 3 months). CDI has also been reported in association with certain antineoplastic agents. Virtually any antibiotic may predispose patients to CDI, and disease has been described after even a single dose of antibiotics given for perioperative prophylaxis. The diagnosis is confirmed by demonstration of the cytotoxin, rather than by culture, since patients may be colonized with the pathogen without disease. Traditional tissue culture–based cytotoxin assays are expensive and require special technical expertise; therefore, enzyme immunoassay techniques are most commonly used to demonstrate toxin A and/or B and confirm the diagnosis. Available assays are only about 75% sensitive, and a repeat assay may have to be performed in patients for whom there is a high index of clinical suspicion for CDI. Newer assays (glutamate dehydrogenase and polymerase chain reaction) appear to be more sensitive. The diagnosis may also be made by endoscopy that reveals pseudomembranes, characteristic raised yellowish lesions with skip areas of normal colonic mucosa.


Tx


The implicated antibiotic therapy should be discontinued if possible. Oral metronidazole is the preferred therapy, and oral vancomycin is an alternative; however, many experts now believe that vancomycin may be superior to metronidazole for the treatment of patients with severe CDI. Antiperistaltic agents must be avoided, as they may result in increasing the exposure of the gut mucosa to the toxin and increase the severity of disease. Whichever therapy is chosen, relapse of disease occurs in ~20% of cases. These relapses generally respond to a repeat course of antibiotic therapy; however, in a few patients repeated relapses may occur. Patients with severe CDI may require intensive care, and colectomy may be required in selected cases. See Cecil Essentials 103.


 



image


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 3, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Fever in the Hospitalized Patient (Case 51)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access