Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Cartilaginous Lesions



Fig. 3.1
Sagittal and transversal MRI scan of an osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: MRI is useful to confirm the diagnosis



OLT may evolve to osteoarthritis as chondral tissue has poor healing abilities; therefore, the damage may be irreversible and lead to chronic symptoms [1, 2]. OLT provides not only a local osteochondral disruption, but it also alters the biomechanics of the surrounding cartilage, predisposing to arthritis. In a work by Choi, in line with the classical theory of Berndt Hardy, a critical size defect was traced at 150 mm2 OLT, with good healing for defects with lower area [5, 6].

No clear indications exist for OLT treatment: there is a lack of evidence to point out the better treatment strategy for OLT in adults [2, 3]. The aims of the treatments are to provide a stable, smooth joint osteochondral surface, restore function, and prevent the degenerative evolution [13, 6].

A useful guideline is given by Giannini’s classification, focused on arthroscopic/MRI findings and corresponding treatments, considering the area and the depth of the lesions [7].

Acute lesions are divided into two groups, considering the dimensions of the fragment. Debridement and excision are advised in case of acute lesions with fragment dimensions inferior to 1 cm, whereas fragment fixation performed with bioresorbable screws is performed in case of larger OLT [8].

In case of chronic lesions with no chondral disruption (type 0 according to Giannini), retrograde drilling could be effective to treat the modest subchondral bone involvement. The rationale consists in a stimulation of the repair depending on subchondral bone marrow cells [2, 3, 8].

Microfractures are preferred in larger OLT, inferior to 1.5 cm2. The technique can be easily performed arthroscopically, penetrating the subchondral bone every 3–4 mm, using a dedicated pick [9, 10]. Thanks to bone marrow stimulation, this procedure allows a good and rapid restoration of the osteochondral layer, but it generates fibrocartilage, with lower biomechanical properties and durability [9, 10]. Moreover, microfractures demonstrated to achieve lower scores in large and medial OLT [9].

Due to previous described limits, regenerative techniques were developed to supply hyaline cartilage restoration, treating larger defects as well. To date, mosaicplasty or osteochondral autograft, autologous chondrocytes implantation, and bone marrow-derived cells transplantation are the most used techniques [1012].

Osteochondral autograft, obtained from non-weight-bearing areas of the knee and, possibly, ankle, is implanted to restore the proper osteochondral layer [11, 12]. It has been used for lesions >1.5 cm2 with reported good results [12]. Nevertheless, it carries out several drawbacks, such as the need of a malleolar osteotomy and donor site pathology, technically demanding challenges in the reconstruction of a smooth continuous articular surface [11].

In order to avoid these drawbacks, procedures including cellular supplying like ACI or BMDCT were introduced, marking a milestone in regenerative medicine.



3.2 Autologous Chondrocytes Implantation: Open-Field Procedure



3.2.1 Preliminary Considerations


Similarly to mosaicplasty, the best approach to large osteochondral lesions would be regeneration with hyaline cartilage, possibly avoiding the deleterious effects of donor site morbidity [7, 11, 1315]. Some clinical and animal experiments reported encouraging results injecting cultured autologous chondrocytes into the defect under a periosteal flap, achieving defect healing with hyaline-type cartilage [13]. ACI was first described in the knee joint, with excellent intermediate results; the application was then extended to the ankle, despite the many biomechanical differences between the two joints [11, 13].


3.2.2 Surgical Technique


Cartilage harvesting is the first step required in ACI [13]. Using arthroscopical standard portals, a small sample of cartilage (15–25 mg cartilage tissue) is harvested from the ipsilateral knee for cell culturing. In order to minimize the harvest site pathology, after the first cases performed in this way, ankle arthroscopy was performed to identify a different cell source. The osteochondral detached fragment in the ankle was proven to be a good source of viable cells for ACI [13, 15].

Alternatively, cartilage may be harvested directly from the lesion margins of the affected ankle in the first step arthroscopy [15]. A direct evaluation and accurate measurement of the osteochondral damage is performed at the same time.

Cartilage is sent to a specialized laboratory for cell expansion, and it is available for implantation 4 weeks later [13, 15]. In the meanwhile, after few days of crutches and joint protection, patients are allowed to weight-bear progressively, basing on pain.

The possible surgical approach to the OLT is transmalleolar, medial, or lateral, depending on the location of the defect [13]. The lesion is exposed and the damaged cartilage and bone are debrided. The lesion is accurately measured, in order to shape and size the periosteal flap to be implanted. A periosteal flap is harvested either from the proximal or distal tibia and fixed over the cartilaginous gap with reabsorbable 6-0 suture threads. The suture is sealed with fibrin glue. The chondrocytes in liquid media are then transplanted through a hole deliberately left open and finally sutured and sealed with fibrin glue. The malleolar osteotomy is finally repaired [13].


3.2.3 Results


The clinical results were excellent at 10-year follow-up. The MRI outcomes showed a smooth cartilaginous layer, with hyaline-like features at biochemical evaluation using T2 mapping. The procedures achieved clinical and radiological scores which were not inferior to ACI in knee defects [13]. Nevertheless, the technical difficulties of open ACI required some improvements towards a simpler procedure [11, 13, 15].


3.3 Autologous Chondrocytes Implantation: Arthroscopic Procedure



3.3.1 Preliminary Considerations


The surgical technique was deeply influenced by the introduction of tissue engineering and a specific instrumentation for an arthroscopic procedure [15, 16]. These developments allowed to perform the procedure arthroscopically, decreasing patients’ morbidity and technical drawbacks [15, 16]. The chondrocytes are harvested and loaded on a biodegradable scaffold based on the benzylic ester of hyaluronic acid (HYAFF 11, Fidia Advanced Biopolymers, Italy). The scaffold is a 3D support for cell adhesion and proliferation thanks to a network of 10–15 μm thick fibers with interstices of variable sizes. This peculiar constitution permitted an optimal physical support to allow cell-to-cell contact, cluster formation, and extracellular matrix deposition [15, 16].


3.3.2 Surgical Technique


The surgical technique is completely performed arthroscopically [15, 16]. In the first step, the harvesting of chondrocytes is executed, performing a standard ankle arthroscopy. Then after culturing the chondrocytes in the hyaluronic membrane, a second standard arthroscopy is performed [15, 16]. The lesion is debrided, and after sizing and shaping the biomaterial basing on the lesion, the membrane is delivered. A custom-made-specific instrumentation was developed for this purpose (CITIEFFE, Calderara di Reno, Italy) [15]. This consists of an 8 mm diameter and 111 mm-long stainless steel cannula with a window on one side and a positioner specifically designed to slide inside the cannula delivering the scaffold directly to the site of lesion [15].

In cases with an osteochondral defect deeper than 5 mm (IIA lesions), a bone graft using cancellous bone harvested from the distal tibia is performed before biomaterial positioning [15, 16].


3.3.3 Results


Autologous chondrocytes implantation (ACI) has been intensively applied for OLT with successful clinical outcomes (90 %) [1416]. Although no clear superiority has been established, ACI is considered one of the most reliable techniques in regenerative procedures [14]. The clinical results are described as excellent in many case series, at midterm and long-term follow-ups [14, 15]. The hyaline regeneration was confirmed by histological and radiological outcomes [16]. Nevertheless, the high costs, the need of a specialized laboratory phase, and most of all two surgical steps, and the lack of the bone regeneration are the most significant limits of this technique [16, 17].


3.4 Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Transplantation



3.4.1 Preliminary Considerations


Bone marrow-derived cells transplantation (BMDCT) represents the third generation of regenerative technique for bony and chondral layer, based on mesenchymal stem cells [17, 18]. This technique may be performed one step, in a same surgical session, or with more steps, with cells culture and enrichment [17]. In our experience, we have been performing the one-step technique, developed to overcome the two surgical steps and reduce the costs of ACI [17, 18]. Moreover, the osteogenic lineage differentiation of bone marrow-derived cells allows large bony lesion regeneration [18].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 26, 2016 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Cartilaginous Lesions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access