Evidence for Sports Massage Benefit

Chapter 3


Evidence for Sports Massage Benefit



Outline





This chapter will present research evidence for the benefits of massage therapy and will expose the inaccurate information. Massage outcome potential will be explained, and evidence related to benefit presented. First we will look at the evidence for massage in general, which is the foundation of massage for athletes. Then we will look at athletic and fitness massage research specifically, as well as evidence for adjunct methods such as hydrotherapy, Kinesio taping, and so forth.


Massage and bodywork can be described as a manual application to the body that influences multiple body responses. Research has shown that massage has validity in influencing body structure and function. It is the body’s ability to respond and to adapt to the stimuli and mechanical forces applied during massage that achieves the desired benefits.


As massage research continues to evolve, our understanding of why the methods provide benefit continues to increase. In addition, research has validated many of the outcomes that in the past were based on opinion and experience. At the same time, the increase in quality research has exposed misconceptions and has confirmed or refuted previous thinking. Three claims of massage benefit that were considered important when working with athletes—improved circulation, removal of lactic acid, and increased muscle strength after massage—have proved to be false. Research has also changed our understanding of training protocols and concepts of recovery. Our understanding of stretching has improved, as has our ability to determine whether it supports or harms performance or has no demonstrable effect. Even the use of ice and cold applications for recovery is under scrutiny. If you want to work effectively with this population and be respected by other professionals who work with athletes, it is necessary to remain current with the research by conducting ongoing searches in databases such as PubMed. This chapter references research primarily from 2005 until today. However, important findings will occur after publication. Some of these findings may even challenge the information presented here. That is okay. A professional remains open to change and to new information. Unfortunately, some aspects of massage delivery and outcome remain in the “it seems to works but we don’t know why” category. When this is the situation, it is necessary to be cautious when making claims that cannot be validated. However, just because a scientific explanation cannot be found for the benefit of a particular approach does not mean it should be discarded and not used. Instead, careful examination of the approach should determine the potential for harm. If concern for harm and detriment is minimal, the method can be incorporated into massage with explanation and intention. For example, the anatomy and physiology interphase for energy-based bodywork methods remains elusive. Compassionate intentional presence and near and/or light touch have little potential for harm. Therefore, respectful integration of an energy-based bodywork method into massage application can be justified. To enhance understanding of the overlap of massage/bodywork in the context of sport and fitness, a very mechanistic approach is presented in this text. However, it is important to remember that touch is a multidimensional experience, encompassing the body/mind/spirit experience of both client and therapist and the interplay of these three realms in the therapeutic relationship.


Typically, the application of massage and bodywork is described in terms of methods and modalities instead of physiologic response. To better understand the relationship of massage application to scientifically based evidence and to the synergistic interface with sport performance, it is necessary to move beyond the classic description of massage in terms such as effleurage or gliding strokes, petrissage or kneading, compression, friction, vibration, rocking, shaking (oscillation), tapotement or percussion, and joint movement. Bodywork methods such as reflexology, shiatsu, Rolfing, Trager, and so forth also do not describe the mechanisms of benefits and outcomes. Instead, to support future research, massage application needs to be described by the type of mechanical force applied, what stimulus the mechanical force causes to specific receptors, tissue type, or physiologic function. Variations in depth of pressure, drag on the tissue, speed of application, direction of movement, frequency of application, duration of application, and rhythm allow for extensive application options based on treatment plan outcomes.



Evidence for Massage



Objective




The terms bodywork and massage encompass a huge array of methods and philosophies. This chapter does not intend to teach the application of these methods and styles because excellent instructional texts already exist (see the recommended reading list at the end of the book). The focus of this chapter is to describe the underlying theme of all methods and their relationship to sport and fitness goals, measurable outcomes, and physiologic pleasurable mechanisms, as well as research currently being conducted to support these results (Bialosky et al., 2009). Additionally, logical explanations will be presented for some massage results even though research has not totally proved the response correlation. Many different types of scientific research methods are available. Some provide better evidence than others. Also, some evidence is based on clinical experience and expert opinion. The massage therapy profession is now being challenged to function in an evidence-based and informed manner (Box 3-1).



Box 3-1


Quality of Evidence


The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a multidisciplinary team of primary care experts who work as part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and use a systematic evidence-based approach to focus on preventive services in the clinical setting. The USPSTF specifically bases its recommendations on a balanced look at the benefits and potentials for harm as follows.


The USPSTF grades the quality of overall evidence for a service on a 3-point scale (good, fair, or poor):




Strength of Recommendations


The USPSTF grades its recommendations according to one of five classifications (A, B, C, D, I), reflecting the strength of evidence and the magnitude of net benefit (benefit minus harm).



The USPSTF strongly recommends that clinicians provide [the service] to eligible patients. The USPSTF found good evidence that [the service] improves important health outcomes and concludes that benefits substantially outweigh harms.


The USPSTF recommends that clinicians provide [the service] to eligible patients. The USPSTF found at least fair evidence that [the service] improves important health outcomes and concludes that benefits outweigh harms.


The USPSTF makes no recommendation for or against routine provision of [the service]. The USPSTF found at least fair evidence that [the service] can improve health outcomes but concluded that the balance of benefits and harms is too close to justify a general recommendation.


The USPSTF recommends against routinely providing [the service] to asymptomatic patients. The USPSTF found at least fair evidence that [the service] is ineffective, or that harms outweigh benefits.


The USPSTF concludes that evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routinely providing [the service]. Evidence that the [service] is effective is lacking, of poor quality, or conflicting, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.


From U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ratings: Grade definitions: guide to clinical preventive services, ed 3, Periodic updates, Rockville, Md, 2000-2003, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.



How the Body Responds to Massage


Massage effects appear to be determined by a combination of reflexive and mechanical responses to forces imposed on the body by massage (Box 3-2) (Figures 3-1 and 3-2).



Box 3-2   Mechanical Forces Produced by Massage


image Log on to your Evolve website to view videos 3-1 through 3-6 on these mechanical forces produced by massage.


Forces created by massage include tension loading, compression loading, bending loading, shear loading, rotation or torsion loading, and combined loading.










image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


FIGURE 3-2 Examples of mechanical force loading during massage.



A, Tension loading occurs when tissue is elongated. Gliding massage methods and stretching can create tension forces in tissues.


B, Tension forces occur as tissues are stretched.


C, Compression loading occurs when force moves into tissues at a 90-degree angle. In this example, a forearm is used to create compression force in tissues of the shoulder with the client in a side-lying position.


D, Forearm used to compress calf with client in side-lying position.


E, Bending loading. In this example, the hands are used to bend tissues of the calf around the thumbs.


F, Using force compression to displace tissues of the calf, creating a bending force.


G, Example of shear loading. The tissues of the calf are pushed down.


H, Then the same tissues as in part G are pulled up. The back-and-forth movement creates the shear force.


I, Torsion forces twist tissue around a fixed point. In this example, thigh tissues are twisted around the femur.


J, Rotational or torsion forces in massage are generated by kneading. Move tissues by pushing one hand forward and around the fixed point while pulling the other hand back and around.


K, Example of combined loading when two or more mechanical forces are generated. Bending force caused by grasping and lifting.


L, Then client creates the tension force and the wrist is moved.


M, In this example of combined loading, compressive force is created as the therapist presses down on arm tissues and then moves the forearm back and forth to add torsion, bend, and shear forces.


Reflex response results from stimulation of the nervous system to activate feedback loops with the therapeutic intent of adjusting neuromuscular, neurotransmitter, endocrine, or autonomic nervous system (ANS) homeostatic mechanisms. For example, light stimulation of the skin usually results in a tickle or itch response and is arousing and stimulating. Our current understanding is that the effects of massage occur through the interrelationships of the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (and their reflex patterns and multiple pathways), the ANS, and neuroendocrine control. Current consensus is that massage produces effects through a combination of neural, chemical, mechanical, and psychological factors that are important in supporting athletic performance and a fitness lifestyle.


In general terms, the total sensory input to the CNS affects overall tension throughout the body. This is why nonphysical emotional and mental stress can lead to physical symptoms such as headaches, digestive problems, and muscular discomfort. Massage works on many levels, which aim to reduce the symptoms that cause negative sensory input and to increase positive sensory input. This accounts for the general well-being that clients usually feel after treatment.


Massage can affect the nervous system in several ways. It stimulates nerve receptors in the tissues that control tissue tension. On a sensory level, the responses of mechanoreceptors to touch, pressure, warmth, and so on are stimulated. Generally, a reflex effect leads to further relaxation of the tissues and a reduction in pain.


Tension in the soft tissues can cause overactivity in the sympathetic nervous system. By releasing this tension, massage can restore balance and stimulate the parasympathetic system, resulting in a positive effect on minor and sometimes major medical conditions, such as high blood pressure, migraine, insomnia, and digestive disorders.


Mechanical responses to massage most often result from tissue deformation and the response of the intricate facial system. Structure can be thought of as anatomy, and function as physiology. Some massage applications can shift structure, primarily through influence on the connective tissues of the body. Massage always has a physiologic result because of required adaptation to the presence of the massage practitioner, the sensory stimulation of various touch receptors, and the client’s perception of the therapeutic interaction. Therefore, massage can achieve primarily physiologic responses of the body, and massage results cannot be isolated as strictly structural outcomes. This is an important concept in understanding the synergistic and multidisciplinary use of various methods to support the athlete.


It is reasonable that massage application is likely to influence the adaptive, restorative, and healing capacities of the body. Anatomic and physiologic outcomes include the following:



Each of these common outcomes for massage supports rehabilitation, fitness, and performance recovery.



Sport/Fitness and Rehabilitation Outcomes



Objective




Research often attempts to answer the question, “Does this (medicine, surgery, exercise, machine, food, and so forth) affect this outcome?” Before the evidence is explored, the outcomes need to be defined. The main outcomes of massage for sport and fitness are increased body stamina, stability, mobility, flexibility, and agility; reduced soft tissue tension and binding; normalized fluid (blood and lymph) movement; management of pain; reduction of suffering; support of healing mechanisms; alteration of mood; improved physical and mental performance; and experiences of pleasure. All of these outcomes can be appropriately applied to athlete care or rehabilitation after pathology, especially within the context of a multidisciplinary system.


These outcomes can be classified as four goal patterns for sport and fitness:



The question is, “Is the evidence that supports massage as an intervention to achieve these outcomes as good as or better than that for other types of interventions, and can massage be supportive in conjunction with other approaches to care?”



Performance Enhancement/Recovery


As was previously discussed, fitness and performance are not the same. Optimal performance is most often achieved when fitness is attended to first. Performance motivation and activity exceed fitness requirements by pushing the body to achieve activities that are outside the fitness parameters. Performance therefore becomes a strain on the system. Balancing fitness and performance is tricky with athletes. It is important for those whose goals are fitness oriented to not exceed the beneficial physical outcomes by getting caught up in performance demands that lead to increased strain on adaptive capacity.


Continual performance demand interferes with fitness and compromises health. Normal function and performance are not the same. A person who is learning to walk again after an accident exerts effort and has similar physical manifestations and demands on the body as an athlete does when seeking to decrease his or her 40-yard dash time. However, one is seeking to regain normal function, and the other is striving for peak performance. Performance is more than normal function.


The sports massage therapist needs to consider how the massage application supports the following client goals:



All people who engage in exercise may strive for excellence at some performance level. The elderly person who is beginning a cardiac rehabilitation program, the professional athlete striving for success in competition, and the child learning to walk—anyone who uses the body in a precise way—are all concerned about the ability to carry out an action with skill. Their motivations may vary but the desired outcome is the same—increased proficiency when performing the activity. Physical performance involves training, practice, and demand on the body. When desired performance levels are achieved and practiced, they become automatic.


Performance enhancement requires increasing demand on the body through practice. Maintaining performance involves attention to demand on the body and reinforcement. Each individual has a range of peak performance with the triad of body/mind/spirit function in his or her optimal range. As discussed in Chapter 8, this is called “the zone.” Peak performance is difficult to maintain for extended periods of time. Recovery is necessary to restore depleted energy and regenerate damaged soft tissue. Most athletes train at levels below peak performance with the desired outcome of reaching that peak during competition. This process is compromised if ongoing competition is extended over periods of time. This is common among professional athletes, especially in team sports such as baseball, basketball, football, hockey, and soccer.


Massage application can support performance by facilitating recovery and removing impediments to training.





Palliative Care


Palliative care includes comfort, support, nurturance, and pleasure, which are essential in the care of the athlete. Attention to warm environment, atmosphere, and ambience is part of the caring experience. Patience, flexibility, and commitment are included in the process. Competing athletes are tired, disappointed, and in pain much of the time. Periods of exhilaration and disappointment occur within complex life experiences. The losing athlete needs more support than the winning one. The older athlete needs more care than the young one. When exercising for fitness, weight loss, and rehabilitation, similar stresses occur. Reducing suffering and offering pleasurable sensation are invaluable in reducing the psychological and physical responses to these stresses.


In both training and rehabilitation, plateaus are reached. The satisfaction of seeing ongoing changes is diminished, and palliative care may be able to support the athlete during these periods. Diminished performance due to fatigue and other pressures can be comforted temporarily by nurturing touch. Sometimes there is just too much aching and pain to endure any longer; in this case, palliative massage is the most beneficial technique.


An example is seen in the case of rookie football players in the second week of training camp. They are tired, stressed, sore, and a bit difficult. Their adaptive capacity is maxed out at the moment, and yet they are driven to perform. The best massage approach is palliative care, not performance enhancement.


In the next section, we will consider whether research findings and clinical evidence support the benefit of massage for these outcomes.



General Massage Benefits and Safety



Objective




Benefits and safety are the most important factors to consider for any client population. In the sport and fitness world, we have the ability to use research evidence to justify general massage as the foundational approach for this population.


Research findings are mixed regarding the efficacy of massage. Generally, massage as the primary treatment for various conditions was not found to be a definitive treatment on its own, but studies were supportive of many other interventions used in enhancing effects or managing side effects of other treatments. This means that typically massage would be a beneficial part of a fitness program but should not be expected to provide optimal outcomes when it is the only therapeutic intervention used.


The “why massage works” remains elusive, but recurring findings suggest possible physiologic mechanisms for massage benefit. One study by Field and her associates (2005) is particularly relevant for this text because it deals with serotonin, which is associated with body pain modulation mechanisms. In other studies, Diego et al. (2004, 2009) speaks to how massage needs to be applied with sufficient nonpainful compressive force to stimulate an anti-arousal response, and that massage that is considered light tends to stimulate the sympathetic ANS response (Field et al., 2010).



Pressure Depth


Pressure-based massage produces different physiologic changes than are produced by light touch (Sefton et al., 2011; Rapaport et al., 2010). Application of moderate pressure massage appears necessary to influence hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function (Rapaport et al., 2010; Field et al., 2010) and diastolic blood pressure (Moraska et al., 2010). Light or moderate pressure massage (or a combination) may reduce the sensitivity of spinal nociceptive reflexes (Sefton et al., 2011; Roberts, 2011).


Light pressure gliding stroke–based massage has been shown to lower heart rate and systolic blood pressure and to decrease the deterioration of natural killer cell activity; however, no effects were identified for cortisol levels and diastolic blood pressure (Hillier et al., 2010; Billhult et al., 2009). Pressure levels used during massage are an important concept for athletes seeking restorative benefits from massage. It appears that moderate to light pressure can affect generalized restorative function, and deep aggressive massage application is not necessary to achieve these benefits.


The study “Massage Reduces Pain Perception and Hyperalgesia in Experimental Muscle Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial” (Frey Law et al., 2008) suggests that massage is capable of reducing myalgia symptoms by approximately 25% to 50% (extent of effect varies with the assessment technique used to measure pain). The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of massage on pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and perceived pain. Researchers used delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) as a model of myalgia (muscle pain). This condition is a major issue for athletes and those attempting to integrate an exercise program into their lifestyle.


The way Frey Law and associates conducted the research was to randomly assign participants to a no treatment control, superficial touch, or deep tissue massage group. A specific type of wrist exercise was performed at visit 1 to cause DOMS 48 hours later at visit 2. Pain, assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and pressure needed to cause pain were measured at baseline, after exercise, before treatment, and after treatment.


Results of the study showed that deep massage decreased pain (48.4% DOMS reversal) during muscle stretch. Mechanical hyperalgesia (increased pain response to pressure) was reduced (27.5% reversal) in both the deep massage and superficial touch groups when compared with the control group. The control group did not receive any massage and experienced an increased pain perception of 38.4%. Resting pain did not vary between treatment groups.


If we analyze the Frey et al. study, we can consider that both deep and light pressure massage reduced the sensation of pain, and deep pressure massage helped reduce pain when accompanied by stretching of sore muscles. However, the sensation of pain when there was no activity was not reduced by massage. Now if we think about how this information is used during massage practice, it might be seen as follows.




Adverse Effect



Objective




Massage is not always the best technique for managing symptoms. According to Hanley et al. (2003), despite very strong patient preference for therapeutic massage, it did not show any benefit over a relaxation tape used to control postsurgery pain. Massage was effective in reducing anxiety but was no more effective than relaxing in a quiet room (Sherman et al., 2010).


Although these studies indicate that massage is effective for anxiety management, it is no more effective than other relaxation interventions. Key, however, is that people liked massage, which is an important factor in compliance with treatment. Muller-Oerlinghausen et al. (2004) concluded that slow-stroke massage is suitable as an intervention for depression, along with other treatment, and is readily accepted by very ill patients. A reduction in distress has been noted among oncology patients in response to massage, regardless of gender, age, ethnicity, or cancer type.


The athletic population often undergoes surgery to repair muscle skeletal injury. During the healing and rehabilitation process, it is common for depression and anxiety to occur based on the change in daily life schedule, as well as concern for future performance ability. Massage and other forms of relaxation intervention can be helpful.



Potential for Harm


When any treatment is assessed, safety is a primary concern (i.e., do no harm). If harm is possible, then the benefits of receiving massage must exceed the potential for harm. A summary of a review of massage safety by Ernst et al. (2006) concludes that massage is generally safe. Massage is not entirely risk free, and we need to be aware of potential harm. However, serious adverse effects are rare. Most adverse effects resulting from massage were associated with aggressive types of massage or massage delivered by untrained individuals. Also, these effects were associated most often with massage techniques other than “Swedish” (classic) massage. These findings are extremely important for those working with athletes. In general, over the years, “sport massage” has incorporated aggressive methods.


Another situation in which adverse effects may occur is when massage interferes with various types of implants such as stents, ports, prostheses, and so forth. Haskal (2008), in the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, reported a case where a stent placed in the lower limb as treatment for peripheral artery disease migrated to the right atrium after 3 years. Open heart surgery was required to remove the embedded stent fragments. The mechanism attributed with dislodging and moving the stent was deep tissue massage of the thigh. Although this outcome is rare, it is important to pay attention to adverse effects caused by massage. Athletes may have had various surgeries to repair injuries. Often various stabilizing devices such as pins and screws are used. Care needs to be taken to avoid compressing tissues into these areas to prevent potential damage to tissues as they are pushed into the stabilizing devices. Also, the “deep tissue” approach is often used with athletes without considering the potential for damage. Moderate to heavy pressure applied with a small contact such as at the tip of the elbow or with a massage implement such as a hand-held pressure device is more likely to cause tissue damage than pressure applied with a broad contact such as the forearm. Aggressive stretching procedures provide other opportunities for structural damage.


Benefits of stretching in general are being questioned (see later in chapter). A physiologic and safe range of motion has been determined for joints. Any stretching beyond this motion increases the potential for harm. In a cross-sectional study of 100 clients, 10% of massage clients experienced some minor discomfort after the massage session; however, 23% experienced unexpected, nonmusculoskeletal positive side effects. Most negative symptoms started within 12 hours after the massage and lasted for no longer than 36 hours. Most of the positive benefits began to be noted immediately after massage and lasted longer than 48 hours. No major side effects occurred during this study (Cambron et al., 2007). Soreness after massage can affect performance for an athlete. Based on findings of this study, it may be prudent for the athlete to avoid massage a day and a half before competition; however, because the benefits last for at least 2 days, the athlete should still experience positive results from massage.



In My Experience


I worked with two NBA basketball players while they were playing for the world championship. I flew into the location 3 days before the game that would decide which team would be the champions that year. It had been a long, hard season for both teams, and many players were playing with injuries. The two individuals I was working with were injury-free at the time but were tired. I had adjusted the intensity of the massage to be more general and limited the amount of specific work. This approach worked well for the first 2 days I was there; however, on the day before the game, I could tell that their fatigue had increased, and one of the players told me it felt like he was getting sick. I was there, and the guys wanted a massage. Again I adjusted the massage to primarily support sleep. On the day of the game, the sick player woke up with a headache and neck stiffness. Both wanted a massage. I moved into palliative mode for both and allowed the massage to evolve into a nap. After the nap, I used some simple methods to loosen up the sick player’s neck. The game was played later that day. I was concerned about the effects of massage on the day of the game. Even though I had worked with both individuals for 3 years, I remained concerned about providing massage on the day of the game. My clients’ team lost the game by a very narrow margin. It was a really hard-fought game. Both guys informed me that the massage helped, and I was relieved. One of the other players on the team had received a massage the night before the game from a local massage therapist whom he did not know but who was recommended by the hotel concierge. The massage included some trigger point application and stretching. He missed a couple of very important shots during the game. Later, one of my clients told me that the individual had woken up really stiff on the morning of the game. One of the staff members who work with the team in the training room was really upset about the condition of the player and blamed the massage. He asked me what I thought. I was not there to observe the nature of the work, nor did I actually speak with the player. However, I did explain what is considered appropriate massage before competition. Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?




Neuroendocrine Regulation



Objective




Neuroendocrine substances carry messages that regulate physiologic functions. Neuroendocrine regulation is a continuous, ever-changing chemical mix that fluctuates with each external and internal demand on the body to respond, adapt, or maintain a functional degree of homeostasis. The immune system produces and responds to these communication substances. Substances that make up this “chemical soup” remain the same, but the proportion and ratio change with each regulating function or message transmission. The “flavor” of the soup, which is determined by the ratio of the chemical mix, affects such factors as mood, attentiveness, arousal, passiveness, vigilance, calm, ability to sleep, receptivity to touch, response to touch, anger, pessimism, optimism, connectedness, loneliness, depression, desire, hunger, love, and commitment.



Mood


Massage therapy appears to have a beneficial effect on anxiety levels; this is important for the management of performance anxiety experienced by many athletes. The therapeutic relationship established between massage therapist and client is similar to that seen in psychotherapy, a treatment that relies on communication and the therapeutic relationship to produce effects. It is possible that massage effects are related to the therapeutic relationship (Moyer et al., 2004). Excessive sympathetic output causes most of the stress-related diseases and dysfunctions, including headache, gastrointestinal difficulties, high blood pressure, anxiety, muscle tension and aches, and sexual dysfunction.


Long-term stress (i.e., stress that cannot be resolved by fleeing or fighting) may trigger the release of cortisol, a cortisone manufactured by the body. Long-term high blood levels of cortisol cause side effects similar to those of the drug cortisone, including fluid retention, hypertension, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, breakdown of connective tissue, peptic ulcer, impaired wound healing, vertigo, headache, reduced ability to deal with stress, hypersensitivity, weight gain, nausea, fatigue, and psychological disturbances.


Because of its generalized effect on the ANS and associated functions, massage can cause changes in mood and excitement levels and can induce the relaxation/restoration response. Massage seems to be a gentle modulator, producing feelings of general well-being and comfort. The pleasure aspect of massage supports these outcomes. This is especially important for sport recovery. The emotional arousal often found in rehabilitation situations is also favorably influenced.


Initially, massage stimulates sympathetic functions. The increase in autonomic, sympathetic arousal is followed by a decrease if the massage is slowed; arousal is sustained with sufficient pleasurable pressure lasting about 45 to 50 minutes. Pressure levels must be relatively deep but not painful. Slow, repetitive stroking, broad-based compression, rhythmic oscillation, and movement all initiate relaxation responses. Sufficient pressure applied with a compressive force to the tissues supports serotonin functions and vagal nerve tone. Compression and a fast-paced massage style stimulate sympathetic responses and may lift depression temporarily.



Pain Modulation


Point holding, such as acupressure or reflexology, releases the body’s own painkillers and mood-altering chemicals from the entire endorphin class. These chemicals stimulate the parasympathetic responses of relaxation, restoration, and contentment. These methods of massage depend on the creation of moderate, controlled pain to relieve pain. It takes a larger pain or stress stimulus to generate the endorphin response than the perception of existing pain. When release of substance P triggers pain, enkephalins are released and suppress the pain signal. A negative feedback system activates the release of serotonin and endogenous opiates, which inhibit pain. Therapeutic massage methods can be used to create a controlled, noxious (pain) stimulation that triggers this cycle. Clients often refer to this noxious stimulation as “good pain.”


Altering the muscles so that they are more or less tense, or changing the consistency of the connective tissue, affects the ANS through the feedback loop, which in turn affects the powerful body/mind phenomenon.


Research now indicates that most problems in behavior, mood, and perception of stress and pain, as well as other so-called mental/emotional dysfunction, are caused by dysregulation or failure of certain biochemical agents. These behaviors, symptoms, and emotional and physical states often are the result of normal chemical mixes that occur at inappropriate times. Athletes are particularly sensitive to neurochemical influences. Highs and lows, wins and losses, pain, and so forth place increased demands on the system.


The effects of neurotransmitters released during massage may explain and validate the use of sensory stimulation methods for treating chronic pain, anxiety, and depression. Much of the research on massage, especially that done at the Touch Research Institute of the University of Miami School of Medicine, revolves around shifts in the proportion and ratio of the composition of the body’s “chemical soup” brought about by massage.

< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 22, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Evidence for Sports Massage Benefit

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access