Discoid Meniscus
Jennifer J. Beck
Benton E. Heyworth
INTRODUCTION
First reported in 1880s, discoid meniscus represents the most common congenital anomaly of the knee. Discoid menisci arise almost exclusively in the lateral compartment of the knee, though there have been sporadic case reports of medial discoid variants as well. Because embryologic studies have demonstrated that the menisci are not discoid in shape at any stage of development, discoid menisci instead represent distinct anatomical variations. Prevalence is reported to be up to 5% in the United States and 15% in Japan. The true incidence is not known, due to a likely high percentage of asymptomatic patients. Up to 20% of cases are bilateral.
Discoid menisci are thicker and inhabit a larger surface area of the tibial plateau than do the normal C-shaped or semilunar lateral meniscus. Moreover, abnormal meniscal tissue composition, inferior vascularity, insufficient or absent capsular attachments, and altered knee kinematics secondary to their abnormal shape cause increased incidence of tears and peripheral instability in discoid menisci. Ultrastructurally, discoid menisci have a decreased number of collagen fibers with a more disorganized course relative to normal menisci. Patients typically present in the first two decades of life. Symptoms include activity-related pain, pain at terminal extension, inability to obtain terminal extension, swelling, and mechanical symptoms, such as snapping, clicking, popping, or locking. Exam findings include effusion, lateral joint line tenderness, and positive McMurray testing of the lateral compartment.
According to one study, children who present with symptoms before age 12 are 4.6× more likely to eventually require surgery on both knees. Additionally, patients with complete or Wrisberg-type discoid menisci are more likely to have bilateral discoid menisci. Females, patients with BMI over 32, and patients with duration of symptoms greater than 6 months were more likely to have articular cartilage lesions at the time of arthroscopy.
INDICATIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
A discoid meniscus that is discovered incidentally in an asymptomatic patient may be treated with observation alone. The knee may adapt over time to the aberrant morphology and continue to function well without intervention.
While observation and conservative management of symptomatic patients is also an option, most authors feel that surgical intervention is warranted for symptomatic patients and patients with intra-substance tears or instability of the discoid meniscus. The presence of these findings may be difficult to definitively ascertain clinically without arthroscopic evaluation. While the symptoms of pain and limited function represent fairly clear indications for surgery, the symptom of mechanical clicking or snapping alone is more controversial, as higher-level comparative studies have not been performed assessing the natural history of the condition with operative versus nonoperative treatment. Considerations such as age, type of variant, and severity/duration of symptoms may be helpful in treatment decision making, though modern series have included a surgical population as young as 2 to 3 years old.
PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
Anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs should be obtained as a standard part of the workup of most presentations of knee pain in children and should therefore precede advanced imaging, even when discoid meniscus is suspected. Radiographs in children with a discoid meniscus may show a widened lateral compartment with flattening/squaring of lateral femoral condyle, tibial plateau concavity, meniscal calcification, or tibial spine hypoplasia. Concomitant OCD lesions of the lateral femoral condyle have been reported. Even when these findings substantially raise the likelihood of the diagnosis of discoid meniscus, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally pursued to provide a definitive diagnosis and a better understanding of the meniscal morphology and possible tearing. In children under 6 to 7 years of age, who frequently require sedation to perform an adequate MRI, ultrasound performed by an experienced technician may represent a feasible lower-cost alternative that also avoids the risks of sedation. Understanding future directions and application of this radiologic modality requires more study. MRI findings associated with discoid menisci include continuity of the anterior and posterior horns on 3 or more consecutive 5-mm sagittal cuts, sometimes referred to as a “bow tie sign.” Intrasubstance tearing may also be visible but has been shown to have a high false-positive rate with discoid menisci.
The Watanabe classification was proposed in 1978, with three types. Type 1 is considered the most common and type 3 the least common. (a) “Complete discoid,” meniscus covers the entire tibial plateau with intact peripheral attachments. (b) “Incomplete discoid,” meniscus covers an abnormally large amount of the tibial plateau, but articular cartilage is still visible and the meniscal attachments are intact. (c) “Wrisberg variant discoid,” complete or incomplete size, but with absent posterior meniscal attachments, other than the Wrisberg ligament (posterior meniscofemoral ligament), which connects the posterior horn to the medial femoral condyle, just posterior to the PCL. In snapping knees with Wrisberg variants, this is the only restraint to translation, allowing the abnormal meniscus to sublux into the intercondylar notch during extension.
SURGICAL PROCEDURE
While historically, the treatment of discoid meniscus was complete meniscectomy, often performed through open arthrotomies, longer-term follow-up studies revealed subsequent degenerative changes in the lateral compartment. Management techniques have therefore moved toward more minimally invasive arthroscopic methods, with an emphasis on three principles: (a) creation and preservation of a near-anatomic peripheral meniscal rim through debridement of any excess central meniscal tissue, which is referred to as “saucerization” or partial meniscectomy; (b) repair of any intrasubstance tears that may originate or extend into the area of the peripheral rim; and (c) stabilization of any deficient or absent meniscocapsular attachments that cause abnormal meniscal mobility or instability. Rather than the historical goal of simply removing the source of any mechanical symptoms, modern techniques are directed toward the goal of a functional, stable residual meniscus that provides sufficient long-term shock absorption, stability for the lateral femoral condyle, and articular cartilage protection.
After creation of a standard inferolateral arthroscopic viewing portal and introduction of the 3.5- mm arthroscope, the inferomedial working portal should be made under arthroscopic visualization with use of a spinal needle with the knee in the figure-of-4 position to optimize portal location. Attention should be paid toward allowing access of instruments to all parts of the lateral compartment, which often requires a slightly more superior and more medial portal position, compared to that used in other routine arthroscopic knee procedures. Some authors have described use of a 2.7- mm arthroscope for children under 6 years old, but we have found the 3.5-mm arthroscope favorable over the small-joint instruments, even in children as young as 2 to 3 years old, provided extra care is taken to avoid iatrogenic chondral injury through gentle, controlled movements in the smaller child’s joint space. Saucerization is achieved with a combination of different instruments, including low-profile meniscal basket punches, arthroscopic scissors, shavers, and meniscal knives that are used to contour the meniscus. Reshaping of the meniscus may require simple excision of central, redundant discoid tissue or occasionally may require more advanced restructuring and repositioning of the meniscus to fill peripheral deficiencies, which may be referred to as “meniscoplasty.” With particularly thick complete discoid menisci, saucerization may be more easily started with the leg flexed to 90 degrees with some mild varus stress, changing to a figure-of-4 position once enough space has been created to introduce instruments safely into the lateral compartment space. A side-biter or angled basket punch can be helpful for the midbody resection. For the anterior horn, back biters and meniscal knives may be helpful. Arthroscopic shavers can smooth the remaining edges and remove debris. A meniscal remnant of 6 to 8 mm circumferentially is ideal. Increased retear rates have been associated with leaving larger meniscal remnants after saucerizations.