Curriculum Design for Physical Therapy Educational Programs

Chapter 1 Curriculum Design for Physical Therapy Educational Programs




Dr. Katherine Shepard shared this story, which has a powerful moral for all educational programs, in previous editions of this text and revisited the story in her McMillan lecture.1 “In 1983, the physical therapy program at Stanford University was suddenly and without warning told by the Stanford Medical School that we were to terminate the program.” The physical therapy program at Stanford University had been associated with the University since the 1920s and had advanced degree programs since 1940. As a young faculty member in the early 1970s, I assumed we belonged at Stanford just as much as any other department in the university. I never realized how changing the philosophy, mission, and expectations in other parts of the university could affect the very existence of our program. In 1982, the School of Medicine changed its mission from developing physicians to developing physician-researchers (MD-PhDs) and covertly designated the land on which the physical therapy building was located as the new center of Molecular Genetic Engineering. Subsequently, an all-physician review committee informed us that we didn’t belong in the School of Medicine because we didn’t have a PhD program and weren’t producing “scholars.” While meeting with the university president on an early spring evening to plead our case, he informed us that if we were to be considered scholars we should be publishing in the Journal of Physiology (his field was physiology) and not Physical Therapy (a technical journal by his standards). It was devastating to belatedly realize how the pieces were being put in place to discontinue our program. Our own mission statement, philosophy, and program goals were essentially ignored because they were now incongruent with the new university-sanctioned “direction” of the medical school. The Stanford University Board of Trustees acted to close the program with the graduating class of 1985.1 The moral of this story is that the philosophy and goals of any physical therapist or physical therapist assistant program must be in concert with the philosophy and goals of the program’s institution or the program will not survive.





Curriculum design


Everything depends on the quality of the experience that is had. The quality of any experience has two aspects. There is an immediate aspect of agreeableness or disagreeableness, and there is its influence on later experiences. The first is obvious and easy to judge. The effect of an experience is not borne on its face. It sets a problem to the educator. It is the educator’s business to arrange for the kind of experiences that, although they do not repel the student, but rather engage the student’s activities are, nevertheless, more than immediately enjoyable because they promote having desirable future experiences. Hence, the central problem of an education based on experience is to select the kind of present experiences that live fruitfully and creatively in subsequent experiences.4


For educational experiences to be coherent and enjoyable to the individual student, as well as relevant to the desired performance of the program graduate, an all-embracing framework for educational experiences—a curriculum design—must be in place. Curriculum design refers to the content and organization of the curricular elements of philosophy, goals, coursework, clinical experiences, and evaluation processes. There is a rational assumption that what drives the curriculum designed for the education of physical therapists and physical therapist assistants is preparation for practice in the health care arena, which involves the development of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values that undergird competent physical therapy practice that can meet societal needs.


A curriculum design reflects input, directly or indirectly, from literally thousands of people. People with health care needs, regulatory bodies, such as regional and professional accreditation groups and state board licensing agencies, members of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) who establish and act on professional standards,5 physical therapy clinicians, faculty and administrators in the college or university in which the program is located, and each generation of students have an impact on curriculum design. A curriculum design must be steadfastly relevant to the current tasks and standards of physical therapy practice and dynamically responsive to rapidly changing practice environments and human health care needs.



Developing a curriculum


Eliot Eisner noted that the word curriculum originally came from the Latin word currere, which means “the course to be run.” He states, “This notion implies a track, a set of obstacles or tasks that an individual is to overcome, something that has a beginning and an end, something that one aims at completing.”6



Tyler’s four fundamental questions


Four fundamental questions identified by Ralph Tyler in 1949 are useful in deciding how to develop a “racecourse.”2 These four questions are rediscovered by each generation of faculty seeking to develop a physical therapy curriculum.



These questions and their answers should be interrelated, with each question and answer building on the preceding questions and answers. The easiest, and often first place, for a group of novice faculty to begin, however, is with the second and third questions. Faculty can confidently produce and organize educational experiences based on their own personal experiences in physical therapy education and practice. However, if curricula are designed in such a way that the answers to questions 2 and 3 are not directly related to question 1, it is like setting sail without plotting a course. That is, despite knowing everything about sailing a ship, sailing with no clear destination may be disastrous. The result of an analogous educational program is haphazard curricular growth, which, at the least, is perplexing to faculty, students, and clinical educators and, at most, can produce graduates who are ill-focused and perplexed about their role in the health care system.


In designing a curriculum, the elements must be logically ordered. This logic can be obtained by thinking about how each level is directly responsive to the levels above and below. As illustrated in the curricular design column in Figure 1-1, the content of a physical therapy educational program (i.e., coursework, learning experiences, and evaluation and assessment processes) is based on meeting program objectives designed to fulfill the program’s goals. The program goals reflect the philosophy of the program and the mission of the institution. Evaluation of the program and assessment of student learning and graduate performance therefore demonstrate the success or lack of success of the program’s ability to build a curriculum that meets its stated goals.




Tyler’s Question 1: Program Philosophy and Goals



Macro Environment


A good strategy for looking at the macro environment is to engage in an environmental scan. This includes a look at trends and issues outside of the discipline of physical therapy as well as other external influences that need to be considered in being responsive and dynamic. Figure 1-2 demonstrates how the philosophy and goals of any physical therapy curriculum are imbedded in a global (macro) environment that includes society, the health care environment, regulatory agencies, the higher education system, the institution in which the program resides, and the knowledge supporting the discipline of physical therapy.



When any component of this macro environment changes, it is necessary to engage in reflective, deliberative discussion and consider potential changes in the physical therapy curriculum. Looking both inside and outside the profession is part of an environmental scan that is important in designing a socially responsive curriculum. Here are some examples to consider. Historical changes outside the profession (e.g., medical discoveries such as the Sabin polio vaccine or the role of the genome) and inside the profession (e.g., the creation of the physical therapist assistant and the continued growth of clinical specialization) and national initiatives (e.g., patient safety or increasing importance of public health) have led to curricular changes.79 More than 20% of the U.S. population will be older than 65 years in 2030.10 Advances in technology and care along with pressures for reduced costs have resulted in decreased patient care stays in acute care and rehabilitation hospital settings. Physical therapy direct-access state laws have spawned curricular changes in entry-level and advanced coursework for physical therapists and physical therapist assistants. Other changes include the federal government support of health and health promotion and prevention activities seen in Healthy People 2020, which outlines a 10-year agenda for improving the health of the nation.7 Social determinants, such as employment, level of education, and living environment, all contribute to health outcomes. There is increased emphasis on preparation of health professionals who are collaboration ready, can work on teams, and understand the need for promoting health in communities as well as with individuals.11,12 The focus on health and wellness rather than disease, interprofessional team competencies, and community health are captured in Chapters 7, 12, and 15. There are many sources for performing environmental scans that range from looking at trends in higher education through the media and other literature to a regular look at health policy changes and new initiatives. The Institute of Medicine issues position papers13 and panel documents on critical health issues, which are excellent sources of information.


An example of important work in professional education is the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching’s comparative study of five professional fields (law, engineering, the clergy, nursing, and medicine).1418 This research was grounded in a shared conceptual framework applicable to all professions that focused on the three major dimensions of professional education: knowledge (habit of mind), both theoretical and practical; practical skills (habit of hand), and professional identity (habit of heart). One of the most critical findings was that, given the lack of public trust in some professions, professional education must be clear about its social contract and engaged in cultivating the life of the mind for the public good (Figure 1-3). What the student is to know (i.e., the language of the discipline and the ways of science) is only part of what people who engage in curriculum design must include. Students must also be prepared to reason, to become sensitive and responsive to cultural diversity and society’s needs, to undergird decisions and actions with empathy, and to begin a quest for knowledge that will last throughout their professional lives.19 Professional education is the portal to professional life and an essential component of laying the groundwork for professional formation.



Health professionals must better organize professional education around what actually happens, as well as what should happen, in clinical practice. For example, students must be taught thinking and insight skills, such as reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action, and intellectual humility as well as social responsibility to prepare them for the complex, unique, uncertain, and challenging health care situations they will face.19,20 Students need to be “collaboration ready” to work on interprofessional teams. Clearly, the knowledge, critical thinking and practical reasoning skills, humanistic skills, and professional responsibility and obligations and the ability to take moral action could be incorporated into the goals of any physical therapist or physical therapist assistant program.



Macro Environment: Body of Knowledge Related to Physical Therapy


The APTA monographs, A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Professional Education: Version 2004,5 which incorporates the document “Professionalism in Physical Therapy; Core Values,” and A Guide to Physical Therapy Practice,21 continue to provide a grounding structure for physical therapy educators. These monographs help educators define the body of knowledge related to physical therapy. In addition, the APTA vision statement for the profession is another foundational element for curriculum consideration.22


One of the main functions of the Normative Model is to “provide a mechanism for existing, developing, and future professional education programs to evaluate and refine curricula and integrate aspects of the profession’s vision for professional education into their vision.”5


The Normative Model is based on 23 practice expectations that define the expected entry level performance of a physical therapist. Educators can use this monograph to review how their coursework in Foundational and Clinical Sciences relates to examples of content, terminal behavioral objectives, and related instructional objectives in academic and clinical settings suggested by content experts. Although certainly not exhaustive, the suggestions can be extremely helpful, especially in guiding novice physical therapy instructors as well as those program faculty who are not physical therapists (Box 1-1).



A Guide to Physical Therapy Practice presents the current practice of physical therapy by outlining common practice roles and defining the types of tests, measures, and treatment interventions commonly used by physical therapists.21 In addition, preferred practice patterns are offered for four body systems: musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, cardiopulmonary, and integumentary. Each of the sections on preferred practice patterns contains the patient/client diagnostic group being considered; International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes23; types of examinations, tests, and measures; anticipated prognosis; expected number of visits per episode of care; patient care goals and related physical therapy interventions and anticipated outcomes; and prevention and risk factor reduction strategies. Thus, the guide is rich with information that can be used by educators teaching and students learning clinical course content. In addition, Vision 2020, the APTA’s official vision statement for the future of physical therapy, provides several key strategic elements for the profession (e.g., educational preparation, direct access, professionalism).22


Another important document is the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).23 The domains in this model are classified from body, individual, and societal perspectives and provide a means to look at an individual’s functioning and disability in a context that includes environmental factors such as social support. The ICF model is the World Health Organization’s framework for measuring health and disability and an important concept for physical therapy.


Together, the Normative Model, Guide to Physical Therapy Practice, and ICF model are extremely useful resources for any physical therapist, clinical, or academic educator who carries the responsibility of transmitting the core knowledge of physical therapy to the next generation. In addition to these APTA-conceived documents, the Journal of Physical Therapy Education presents a steady stream of ideas and special issues directed toward physical therapist and physical therapist assistant educators as well as a growing number of education-specific journals across the health professions (e.g., Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medical Education, Medical Teacher, American Journal of Pharmacy Education, Journal of Nursing Education, Journal of Dental Education).



Micro Environment


Although there are shared expectations and standards for physical therapist and physical therapist assistant education, there is also the unique imprint of the institution and the program faculty that distinguish graduates across programs. Table 1-1 demonstrates two examples of how the mission and values of the institution are seen aligned across all levels (institution, school, and department). In the private institution example, the philosophy of the physical therapy curriculum at Creighton University reflects the “inalienable worth of each individual.” It also shows the emphasis on moral values in mission statements of the university and the school in which the physical therapy program is located. The public institution example reveals the connection that the School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences has as part of the College of Medicine.


Table 1-1 Two Examples Demonstrating Alignment of Missions across Institution, School, and Department















Private, Faith-based Institution Public, Research Institution
From mission statement: Creighton University
Creighton exists for students and learning. Members of the Creighton community are challenged to reflect on transcendent values, including their relationship with God, in an atmosphere of freedom of inquiry, belief, and religious worship. Service to others, the importance of family life, the inalienable worth of each individual and appreciation of ethnic and cultural diversity are core values of Creighton.
From mission statement: University of South Florida
USF is committed to promoting globally competitive undergraduate, graduate and professional programs that support interdisciplinary inquiry, intellectual development, knowledge and skill acquisition, and student success through a diverse, fully-engaged, learner-centered campus environment.
From mission statement: School of Pharmacy and Health Professions at Creighton University
The Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health professions prepares men and women in their professional disciplines with an emphasis on moral values and service to develop competent graduates who demonstrate concern for human health. This mission is fulfilled by providing comprehensive professional instruction, engaging in basic science and clinical research, participating in community and professional service, and fostering a learning environment enhanced by faculty who encourage self-determination, self-respect, and compassion in students.
From mission statement: School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
The mission of the University of South Florida, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, is to prepare doctors of physical therapy who have a strong foundation in the basic and clinical sciences, and who demonstrate excellence in patient/client management, critical thinking and professionalism.
From Creighton’s departmental program philosophy
The faculty of the Department of Physical Therapy affirm the mission and values of Creighton University and the School of Pharmacy and Health with the recognition that each individual has the responsibility for maintaining the quality and dignity of his/her own life and for participating in and enriching the human community.
From statements of educational philosophy of the School
We believe interprofessional experiences enhance the future collegiality of healthcare professionals.
Respect for individual and cultural differences is necessary for professional effectiveness in a global society.

From Department of Physical Therapy, School of Pharmacy and Health, Creighton University, Omaha, NE; University of South Florida, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tampa, FL.


The philosophy, mission, vision, and core values provide a foundation for the explication of educational outcomes for students. Box 1-2 lists the educational outcomes for a Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program that are divided into Professional Core Abilities and Physical Therapy Care Abilities. The Professional Core Abilities are shared across three health professions in the School (physical therapy, occupational therapy, and pharmacy) and reflect many of the core values of a Jesuit institution.



Box 1-2 Example of Educational Outcomes for a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program











Professional Core Abilities Physical Therapy Care Abilities


1. Professional Formation and Critical Self-Reflection. The student shall utilize a process of deliberative self-reflection to enhance understanding of self and engage in continued professional formation. Formation of professional identity is based on the following core values: accountability, altruism, compassion, excellence, integrity, professional duty and social responsibility


2. Communication Skills. The student shall read, write, speak, listen, and use media and technology to communicate effectively. The student shall demonstrate respectful, positive and culturally appropriate interpersonal behaviors in the counsel and education of patients and families, and in communication with other health care professionals.


3. Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment. The student shall acquire, comprehend, apply, synthesize, and evaluate information. The student shall integrate these abilities to identify, resolve, and prevent problems and make appropriate decisions. The student shall demonstrate the behaviors of the scholarly clinician by developing and utilizing the process of critical thinking and systematic inquiry for the purpose of clinical reasoning, decision making, and exercising sound critical judgment.


4. Learning and Professional Development. The student shall consistently strive to expand his/her knowledge and skills to maintain professional competence and contribute to the body of professional knowledge. The student shall demonstrate the ability to gather, interpret, and evaluate data for the purpose of assessing the suitability, accuracy, and reliability of information from reference sources.


5. Ethical Foundation and Moral Agency. The student shall practice in an ethical manner, fulfilling an obligation for moral responsibility and social justice. The student shall identify, analyze, and resolve ethical problems.


6. Social Awareness, Leadership, and Advocacy. The student shall provide service to the community and to the profession. The student will assume responsibility for proactive collaboration with other health care professionals in addressing patient needs. The student will be prepared to influence the development of ethical and humane health care regulations and policies that are consistent with the needs of the patient and society.



1. Patient Examination. The student shall perform: (a) thorough patient interview with appropriate medical history and review of systems; (b) physical examination utilizing appropriate tests and measures.


2. Patient Evaluation and Physical Therapy Diagnosis. The student shall: (a) interpret results of the physical therapy examination and other diagnostic procedures; (b) synthesize pertinent data; (c) formulate an accurate physical therapy diagnosis. The process of evaluation also may identify the need for consultation with or referral to other health care providers.


3. Patient Prognosis. The student shall predict the patient’s level of optimal improvement that may be attained through intervention within a given period of time.


4. Patient Intervention. The student shall design an appropriate plan of care to produce changes consistent with the physical therapy diagnosis and prognosis. The student shall develop a customized plan of care in collaboration with the patient’s/family’s expectations and goals. The student shall also assume responsibility for delegation and supervision of appropriate human resources engaged in patient care activities.


5. Patient Re-examination/Re-evaluation. The student shall perform an accurate re-examination and re-evaluation to determine changes in patient status and to modify or redirect physical therapy intervention. The process of re-examination and re-evaluation also may identify the need for consultation with or referral to other health care providers. Patient re-examination and re-evaluation may also necessitate modification of delegation and supervision of appropriate human resources engaged in patient care activities.


6. Patient Outcomes. The student shall track the results of physical therapy management, which may include the following domains: pathology; impairments; functional limitations; participation; risk reduction/prevention; wellness; community and societal resources; and patient satisfaction.


7. Systems Management. The student shall identify the specific contribution of physical therapy management within the health care system and the influence of health care policy on that system. In addition, the student shall demonstrate knowledge and be able to effectively interact within the independent framework of the health care team in a complex society. The student shall extend his/her responsibility for physical therapy care beyond individual patients to include care of communities and populations.


From Creighton University, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Omaha, NE.


Faculty time spent considering macro-level and micro-level philosophy and goals is time well spent. Developing program goals and outcomes and related curricular themes together encourages academic and clinical faculty members to reflect on and explicate their own philosophy and goals and come to a common shared understanding of their profession’s and college’s or university’s philosophy and goals. Such an activity unifies and grounds academic and clinical faculty as a community in their work as educators.



Tyler’s Question 2: Educational Experiences


Once goals and philosophy are understood, the next question to be answered is what educational experiences (classroom, laboratory, and clinical) are needed to achieve these purposes. Coursework in physical therapist and physical therapist assistant programs consists of foundation sciences, including both basic and applied across biological, physical, and behavioral sciences; and clinical sciences, including knowledge, skills, and abilities across body systems to understand diseases that require the direct intervention of physical therapists for management as well diseases that affect conditions managed by physical therapists and clinical education. The actual coursework designed and offered depends on the program’s practice expectations and the type and depth of prerequisite coursework. Matrices or tables can be very effective tools for mapping out the integration and implementation of courses and course sequences linked to the curriculum model.24 Box 1-3 provides an example of an integrative curriculum model designed to address future practice that matches curricular threads with specific content.25


Sep 29, 2016 | Posted by in MANUAL THERAPIST | Comments Off on Curriculum Design for Physical Therapy Educational Programs

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access