Controversy: The Contracture in Dupuytren Disease Is a Passive Process



Fig. 11.1
Active versus passive contracture concepts. Comparison of active and passive contracture concepts. The blue lines represent fascia and connective tissues in two hypothetical models of Dupuytren contracture. The active contraction model continuously shortens these tissues. The passive contraction model only shortens these tissues when they are lax. Top: fascia accommodates full finger flexion and extension by conformational changes similar to folding and unfolding. Fingers rest in flexion. Left: active contracture concept of tissue shortening. The turnbuckle represents tissue contraction independent of the posture of the finger. Right: passive contracture concept of tissue remodeling. At rest, depending on the posture of the finger, shortening conformational changes from tissue slack are made permanent by tissue remodeling which removes posture-related slack in individual collagen strands. Bottom: the end result of each mechanism has the same tethering effect, limiting finger extension




11.2.1 Active Contracture


One example of active contracture is the end result of scar contraction. With one notable exception, scar contraction follows all injuries exceeding a certain threshold of tissue damage (mechanical, burn, radiation, infection, ischemia, or chemical) or in response to spontaneous healing of an open wound. Scar contracture is initiated by cytokines released by cell death and matrix disruption. Products of matrix degradation such as collagen fragments promote myofibroblast differentiation, and tissue stress provokes myofibroblast differentiation and contraction. A full thickness open wound lacks the normal stress shielding of intact dermis, resulting in a uniquely powerful stimulus to myofibroblast differentiation and contraction through a variety of mechanisms, including cell-matrix mechanotransduction, tension-related conformational changes in TGF-β, and others (Hinz 2007; Klingberg et al. 2014). Under maximum stimulation, myofibroblast matrix shortening of an open wound continuously advances the wound edge with velocity as great as one centimeter per month (Castella et al. 2010). Active contraction biology of an open wound continues until the wound is closed, tissue breakdown products are cleared, and matrix tension stabilizes. Although contraction is a cellular process, the matrix plays an important role, as suggested by the fact that freeze injuries, which kill cells with little or no matrix damage, do not contract unless complicated by infection or other injury (Ehrlich and Hembry 1984). Active scar contracture changes the posture or geometry of adjacent tissues.


11.2.2 Passive Contracture


For comparison, an example of passive contracture is post-immobilization proximal interphalangeal joint stiffness in the absence of trauma. In full extension, normal tendons and ligaments of the finger proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints are at full length. PIP immobilization in extension may cause joint stiffness but rarely results in contracture. Stiffness is due to binding of gliding surfaces due to loss of normal synovial fluid movement, but the dimensions of the tendons and ligaments are unchanged. After PIP immobilization in extension, recovery of full range of motion is typical. PIP immobilization in flexion is different. The palmar PIP ligament complex and cruciate pulley segments of the flexor tendon sheath are lax in flexion. During prolonged immobilization in flexion, these areas undergo tissue remodeling which removes this position-related palmar slack. Following immobilization in PIP flexion, these structural changes persist, which can produce permanent flexion contracture. This is a common secondary effect of Dupuytren contracture, persisting after release or removal of shortened Dupuytren tissue. Immobilization contracture maintains the slack posture or geometry of adjacent tissues.



11.3 Evidence for Passive Contracture


Three clinical observations provide evidence for passive contracture in Dupuytren contracture.


11.3.1 Resting Tissue Laxity


Dupuytren Disease contractures follow the location and direction of resting tissue laxity (Table 11.1). Dupuytren nodules are common in the palmar surfaces of the hand and fingers adjacent to flexion creases (palmar Dupuytren nodules), in the tissues dorsal to the finger joints (Garrod pads), and in the medial border of the plantar fascia in the instep of the foot (Ledderhose Disease). These locations suggest that Dupuytren Disease nodules occur in areas of intermittent longitudinal tissue tension. However, only one of these areas commonly progresses to longitudinal tissue shortening: the palmar areas of the hand and fingers. One possible explanation is that this is the only location where the resting posture results in nodular tissue slack. The finger joints rest in flexion, placing slack in the palmar tissues and removing slack from the dorsal finger tissues. Because of this, Garrod pads do not cause PIP extension contractures – it is not the resting posture. Similarly, the toe metatarsophalangeal joints rest in extension, removing slack from the plantar fascia. Because of this, Ledderhose does not cause plantar flexion contractures – it is not the resting posture. A model of tissue change maintaining tissues at their gross resting length explains these regional differences in contracture risk.


Table 11.1
Dupuytren contractures follow the direction of resting tissue laxity
























Nodule location

Resting tension

Contracture?

Palm

Lax

Yes

Dorsal finger (Garrod)

Tight

No

Plantar (Ledderhose)

Tight

No


11.3.2 The Timing Is Wrong for a Model of Active Contracture


If the biology were to actually parallel that of wound contraction, Dupuytren tissues could shorten as rapidly as one centimeter per month. At that rate, Dupuytren Disease could progress from nodule to full contracture with fingertip touching the palm in half a year. Clinically, this is extremely rare, if ever. Most Dupuytren contractures progress over the course of many years.


11.3.3 The End Point of Contracture Is Inconsistent with Active Contracture


Active contracture is driven by tissue conditions and continues without stopping until tissues have reached equilibrium. This process is inconsistent with two clinical aspects of Dupuytren contracture. The first is that progression of Dupuytren contracture is often episodic, separated by long periods of stability. Scar contracture does not behave this way. The second is that in the absence of additional factors such as spasticity or scarring from trauma or surgery, severe Dupuytren contracture does not progress past the normal range of motion of affected joints. Burn scars may pull joints well beyond their normal range, but this is not seen with Dupuytren contracture. One interpretation is that Dupuytren contracture follows rather than leads joint position. Dupuytren contracture deformity mimics the resting posture of the fingers. This is more consistent with passive contraction than active contraction.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 4, 2017 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on Controversy: The Contracture in Dupuytren Disease Is a Passive Process

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access