Conservative Treatment of ACL Tear


Symptoms of instability following phase 1 and 2 of PT

Concomitant meniscus tear or chondral lesion(s)

Persistent flexion contracture secondary to cyclops lesion

Young athlete returning to a competitive pivoting sporta


aRelative contraindication based on literature consensus



The particular injury location within the ligament may be an important consideration in determining treatment of the young athlete [17]. Proximal lesions may have the ability to heal on the femoral condyle without intervention, or they may be amenable to an arthroscopically initiated healing response [18, 19]. Distal lesions, in the form of a tibial spine fracture, can be treated nonoperatively if non-displaced or with reduction and fixation for displaced lesions [2022]. Intra-substance, or mid-substance, complete ACL tears in the young patient require additional considerations prior to treatment recommendations. In this age group, mid-substance tears have the worst reported functional outcomes [6].

In most patients, in the absence of a displaced associated cartilage or meniscus injury, a trial of nonoperative rehabilitation should be considered for the initial 6 weeks following injury [23]. This would allow adequate time for effusion resolution and recovery of motion. Afterward, the patient should be reexamined. Continued instability, recurrent injury, or limited function of the knee may be strong indications for an ACL reconstruction. Special considerations when establishing an instability history in the pediatric patient include evaluating compliance with initial nonoperative rehabilitation [24] and assessing ability to effectively describe true instability episodes [25].

Young patients with concomitant meniscal tear that require operative management may be contraindicated for nonoperative management of their ACL injury [16]. This is particularly true with medial meniscal injuries as the medial meniscus is the secondary stabilizer to anterior tibial translation [17, 26, 27]. Samora et al. [28] reported a relatively high incidence (69.3%) of meniscus tears in the skeletally immature patient with an ACL tear, of which 29% were medial meniscal tears. Another related internal derangement that may be a contraindication to nonoperative management is torn ACL fibers flipped into the notch causing a flexion contracture (i.e., cyclops lesion).

Low-demand patients who have no desire to return to competitive sports may be the ideal candidate for definitive nonoperative treatment of the complete ACL injury [29]. Athletes with partial ACL tears without functional instability by history or evidence of a pivot shift contusion pattern on MRI may also benefit from definitive nonoperative management [24, 30, 31]. As previously stated, most pediatric patients should undergo a round of rehabilitation (4–6 weeks) prior to indicating an ACL reconstruction [32]. This will allow the young athlete to demonstrate their dedication to proper physical therapy prior to a reconstruction, if indicated, or demonstrate them to be a pediatric patient who is able to cope with an ACL-deficient knee.

ACL-deficient copers exist within the population of those incurring ACL injuries. In ACL-deficient patients, approximately one-fifth of athletes may be able to return to their pre-injury level of athletic performance even without a brace and, thus, are labeled a coper [1, 3, 33]. A coper is a patient who can clinically, functionally, and biomechanically tolerate ACL deficiency without instability and return to pivoting sports without treatment. However, identifying these individuals in the pediatric population may be difficult. Pediatric individuals who may be copers may be less likely to display the signs and symptoms of ACL injury and therefore may not present for care: this potentially hidden population of copers may influence our current understanding of the ability to tolerate ACL deficiency in the population overall. The degree of ligamentous laxity or validated patient-reported outcomes cannot detect who can be a coper [34]. Compared to non-copers, copers may be younger and may have lower activity level [3, 35]. Non-copers may have a deficit in quadriceps strength, vastus lateralis atrophy, quadriceps activity deficit, and reduced knee flexion moments with a greater quadriceps and hamstring co-contraction [36].

Several authors have indicated that any patient, regardless of their age, who wants to return to sports, should not be considered for nonoperative treatment of ACL deficiency [29, 31, 37]. Parents and young athletes who choose nonoperative initial management of an acute ACL deficiency should be aware of the potential for future injury [23, 31]. Several authors have demonstrated an increased incidence of meniscal and chondral damage following delayed treatment of an ACL injury [4, 810, 3841].




Nonoperative Treatment of Pediatric ACL Injury


Generally, an adult treatment algorithm for acute ACL injury should not be used for a pediatric patient. Central strategies, such as landing techniques and strengthening programs, have not demonstrated significant neuromuscular changes in the skeletally immature athlete [42, 43]. While strength training is a significant portion of nonoperative rehabilitation in the mature ACL-deficient patient [23, 32, 44], its use in a child has more efficacy when focused on neuromuscular activation and coordination as opposed to muscular hypertrophy [45].

In addition to meeting the physiologic needs of a growing athlete, a nonoperative rehabilitation program must also consider the psychological profile of a young athlete, addressing reduced focus, minimizing boredom, and maximizing compliance [42, 46, 47]. While accounting for these age-related mental factors, less complex proprioception and balance training may be used to address developing neuromuscular control. As proprioception training in isolation has not been shown not to be effective in this age group, spatial orientation, body stability, and appropriate fall techniques are tasks that may complement a pediatric-specific program [43, 48].

Few authors have described pediatric-specific rehabilitation programs for nonoperative ACL treatment [4951]. Moksnes et al. [50] describe a specific four-phase program that is based on functional milestones with impressive outcomes in this age group [2]. This program was adapted from an adult-based protocol for nonoperative treatment of ACL injury [44], with special considerations added for the pediatric athlete. These include a slower progression toward jumping and running to reduce impact loading of the physis, less use of external loads, primarily home-based functional exercises, and a later return to pivoting sports.

Utilization of a clear timeline and functional milestones is appropriate for nonoperative ACL management in this age group. Using a modification of Moksnes protocol [50], a four-phase program, with each addressing specific milestones, should be implemented. The first phase addresses the acute phase of the injury, and the fourth phase transitions into age-appropriate injury prevention and maintenance (see Chap. 17). Phase two and three will address a program to achieve activities of daily living and return to desired athletic activity, respectively. A simple program in each phase will help promote compliance. A successful physical therapy program will focus on proper instructions, compliance, cryotherapy, joint mobility, gait reeducation, muscle strength training, neuromuscular function and balance, and bracing [52].

A rehabilitation program for a pediatric patient with an ACL injury should be followed through at least phase two prior to surgical decision-making. The initial two phases of physical therapy employed 2–3 sessions per week prior to advancement to phase three [23]. At that stage, one session per week or one session once every other week of supervised physical therapy is needed [50].


Early Management (Phase One: 1–3 Weeks)


Early management or phase one of rehabilitation of an ACL injury in a pediatric patient should focus on addressing acute hemarthrosis or effusion, regaining normal range of motion, and initiating reactivation of the quadriceps. Phase one should begin with guidance from a physician and evaluation of an MRI confirmation and specifying the location of the ACL injury and the absence of associated injuries (including a bucket handle meniscus tear, an osteochondral fracture, or a multi-ligamentous knee injury) [53]. A modified protocol may be required with concomitant injuries.

Protected weight bearing is recommended for the first 3–4 weeks, with a range of motion brace without motion restrictions [1, 29, 44, 51]. If limited weight bearing is desired due to the presence of an osteochondral contusion, this may be employed. Although toe-touch weight bearing is acceptable at this stage, a pediatric patient may have difficulty with understanding and appropriate compliance. Developing trust is important in this early stage to ward off inappropriate weight bearing on crutches. Crutch training could prevent patients from leaning on crutches as it can compress the nerve and blood vessels in the armpit. Cryotherapy and compression should be considered to manage any effusion, since this may limit a patient’s recovery.

Flexion and extension exercises are employed without the brace, with severity of the effusion often dictating how fast each patient progresses. The introduction of modalities and anti-inflammatory techniques may be indicated at this time. Therapeutic techniques with anti-inflammatory effects may include electrical stimulation, ice, warm pad modalities, or ultrasound. Early motion recovery is achieved with focused rehabilitation on both flexion and extension. Achieving terminal extension is of paramount importance to reaching pain-free activities of daily living and more advanced functional goals. The focused extension program is initiated supine with an ankle foam roller (Fig. 8.1a). When pain and effusion are minimized, prone knee hangs (Fig. 8.1b) are implemented without weights, with subsequent progression to weighted prone knee hangs by adding a 3-pound cuff weight distally. For flexion motion and early quadriceps eccentric contraction, wall slides and straight leg raises are also initiated (Fig. 8.1c, d). Initially, straight leg raise is performed in a supine position with the patient’s head supported with elbows propped up in order to visualize the extremity during the exercise. Eyes are instructed to focus on the knee for visual feedback to prevent terminal knee extension lag. Initially, the contralateral knee is flexed to provide support and then progressed to extended once the patient is able to perform a straight leg raise without an extension lag. Following this, sitting straight leg raises are initiated. A stationary bike without resistance for 20 min per day can be implemented during this phase. Once the patient demonstrates knee flexion to 100°, adjust the bike seat height to allow slight knee flexion on downstroke and properly position patient to prevent valgus knee alignment during pedaling stroke. Early quadriceps activation may be improved with supine single leg press using elastic band to 20 (Fig. 8.2a).

A420383_1_En_8_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 8.1
Phase 1 exercise to be initiated during acute phase recovery of an acute ACL injury in pediatric patients. (a) Foam roller extension to be performed supine with gradual progression to a 3-pound cuff weight. Exercise is intended to assist with achieving terminal extension. (b) Prone knee hangs to be performed as tolerated when effusion is minimized. (c) Wall slides are performed supine with heel sliding on wall as tolerated. Emphasis must be placed on alignment. (d) Supine straight leg raise (SLR) to be initiated with contralateral leg flexed initially. Emphasis placed on maximal knee extension during each repetition


A420383_1_En_8_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 8.2
Advanced exercises used in phase one and two of nonoperative treatment of youth ACL injuries. (a) Supine leg press with elastic band is initiated utilizing elastic band for closed-chain exercises. Patient should be propped on elbows using elastic band with a preliminary motion of 0–30°. (b) Side-lying clamshell exercises performed on the side with an emphasis on a neutral pelvis. Placing the hand, the iliac crest will help stabilize and neutralize the pelvis. (c) Standing squat to sitting height with progression shown with 5-pound weights. Place a chair or stool behind the patient for support. (d) Single-leg mini-squat with elastic resistance. An emphasis on terminal knee extension should be made

Milestones for phase one include complete resolution of effusion, a straight leg raise without a lag, and full unrestricted motion. Completion of these milestones will allow progression to phase two no sooner than 1 week following the initial injury. Underwater or devices that reduce the effects of gravity provide an environment that allows the treating physical therapist to cue, train, and guide the client to develop a normal gait pattern. Utilizing these unloading modalities improves confidence and reduces joint pain.


Phase Two (1–6 Weeks)


Phase two should be considered and completed for all patients prior to surgical decision-making. The primary goal of this phase is to normalize activities of daily living (ADLs) by restoring muscle strength and early neuromuscular response [49]. This is accomplished with muscle strength training, plyometrics, and neuromuscular exercises. Early phase two programs may be initiated without weight-bearing activities. Strengthening quadriceps and hamstrings with closed chain exercises is started [1, 29, 50]. Progression of the supine single leg press with an increase in repetitions prior to an increase in resistance is recommended. Emphasis is placed on developing hamstring strength due to its role as a dynamic muscular backup to an AC-deficient knee. Recent evidence has supported the importance of gluteus medius and hip external rotators strengthening in prevention of future ACL injuries [50, 54]. Gluteus medius strengthening is accomplished with a lateral decubitus clamshell exercise (Fig. 8.2b). By instructing the patient to put their hand on the iliac crest, they will minimize rotation during this exercise.

When weight-bearing restrictions are removed, early neuromuscular control is progressed with terminal knee extension in single-leg stance: a mirror for visual feedback and assistance for balance may be useful (Fig. 8.2c, d) [50]. A narrow stance with an elastic band (TheraBand, Akron, OH) around the distal thigh for a single-leg hip external rotation exercise will activate hip rotators. Progressing to a shoulder-width squat will add difficulty. Attention is directed to correct a compensatory weight shift that may develop away from the affected lower leg. It is important to clear the joint above and below the knee for full active range of motion. For instance a loss of ankle dorsiflexion will cause a squat dysfunction.

A stationary bike and a swimming program may be emphasized here. Swimming programs are effective initially with a floatation device that allows for walking, such as a kickboard. Frog kicks should be avoided (i.e., kick used in breaststroke). Proprioception and balance training are initiated with single-leg stance, step-ups, and squatting that avoid dynamic valgus loading [12, 31]. Proximal hip strength is an important consideration during this phase.

A repeat examination by a trained healthcare professional should be performed prior to progressing to phase three in order to confirm no mechanical symptoms or effusion. In order to advance to phase three, the young patient should be able to complete normal stair walking and participate in daily activities. Any history of instability, activity-related pain, or signs of a residual effusion should be addressed by a physician.


Phase Three (4–20 Weeks)


Initiation of phase three is intended for those young athletes who are considering nonoperative management of an ACL injury [44]. Moksnes [50] stated that the primary goal of phase three is the ability to run without gait deviation or swelling. The athlete should be able to complete one-mile jog without fear or instability, and, if able to complete, progress to single-leg linear skipping and low-amplitude base hops to single-leg hop. The progression of phase three is primarily determined by the physical therapist.

An emphasis on neuromuscular control, balance, and proprioception is placed during the early stage of phase three. Simple balance routines with uneven surface training using equipment such as a wobble board, Bosu® balance trainer (Bosu, Ashland, Ohio), or an Airex® balance pad (AIREX, Switzerland) will aid in building neuromuscular control prior to single jumps and multi-hop plyometric movements. An Airex® balance pad with a slight knee flexion stance and perturbation with an elastic band will supplement the neuromuscular training. To be performed properly, the young patient will need to be upright with short arc of motion and shoulder in extension (see Fig. 8.3a).

A420383_1_En_8_Fig3_HTML.gif


Fig. 8.3
Phase three program intended to focus on neuromuscular control, balance, and proprioception. This phase is initiated once a nonoperative treatment for an ACL injury is pursued. (a) Single-leg stance on an uneven surface, progression shown with upper extremity elastic resistance perturbations. (b) Plyometric jump from floor to box with an emphasis on coronal knee alignment throughout motion. (c, d) Open kinetic chain hip and knee flexion with elevation of long sitting leg with contralateral static knee extension using elastic bands is initiated. Recommend initiation of exercises with contralateral leg in flexion to provide closed-chain support. Advance to extended contralateral leg when appropriate

Proper landing techniques are required for successful completion of this phase. Regular supervised jumping and landing are necessary in order to ensure symmetry and trunk alignment. Jumping drills should also focus on knee over toe position with quiet landings [44]. Primary jump and landing may be initiated on a level surface, with a hop onto a step or box added later (see Fig. 8.3b). The goal is to take off and land on the box without knee valgus. Gravity is arrested during the floor to box jump. In this stage, the athlete is not prepared to hop off the box. Running may be initiated with an antigravity treadmill, but traditional running should not start until 12 weeks following an injury [1].

Advancement to open-chain knee extension with resistance attached to proximal tibia for combined hamstring and quadriceps muscles may be emphasized within the home exercise program. Swiss ball bridges are effective in strengthening the gluteus maximus and hamstrings. A seated, elevated, resisted pattern triple flexion (hip, knee, ankle) lower extremity row, with opposite leg maintained in 90° knee flexion or knee extension, using a Thera-Band, provides strengthening of both extremities involved (see Fig. 8.3c, d).

Phase three milestones include running for 15 min without pain or effusion, single-leg hop with appropriate landing, and passing a functional test. Completion of phase three will typically demonstrate that an athlete may be functionally ready to return to sports based on their strength, balance, proprioception, and endurance. Some have advocated isokinetic testing in this age group at 60°/s [23, 50]. Isokinetic testing is a reliable form of testing strength in this age group [55, 56]. However, changes in isokinetic testing during development and maturation remain unclear [57]. A factor to consider in a young athlete is entering peak height velocity (PHV) along the developmental principals of Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) [58]. During ACL rehabilitation, a young athlete may demonstrate a large side-to-side deficit due to ongoing physiologic maturation that may occur in the uninjured extremity; making side-to-side differences is difficult to interpret. Another functional test is the series of single-leg hop tests described by Noyes et al. [59]; however, these have not been validated in the pediatric population.

The use of the Y-Balance Test™ (Functional Movement Systems, Chatham, Virginia) has gained popularity due to its ability to quantify strength, balance, proprioception, and a side-to-side difference in young athletes [60, 61]. A patient is tested by performing an excursion movement in three directions with his or her lower extremity, while maintaining a single leg stance with the contralateral extremity. The amount of excursion is compared to the amount of excursion on the contralateral leg and to age-matched normative values.

When interpreting a Y-Balance Test (YBT) , a composite score of less than 90%, a side-to-side difference of 4 cm or greater in the anterior direction, or a side-to-side difference of 6 cm in the posteromedial and posterolateral directions has been correlated with a 2.5–3.5 times increase in lower extremity injury rates [60, 62, 63]. This method was validated by Lehr et al. 2013 in collegiate athletes [64]. Previous injury is a major risk factor and thus included in the composite score calculation. A consideration of the type of primary sport is also used in the composite score. The goal is a composite score of 100% for each lower extremity to minimize risk of injury.

Although not validated in the pediatric population, some providers have begun to use YBT as a functional tool in pediatric patients [48, 65]. Consideration for return to sports following rehabilitation of an ACL injury in a young patient may include a YBT composite score of greater than 90% and a side-to-side anterior difference of less than 4 cm.

At the completion of phase three milestones, athletes should be evaluated by their physician for sport participation clearance. The use of a functional brace during all pivoting activities is recommended for a minimum of 6 months from original injury [66]. Consideration of psychological readiness for return to play is made at this time. Psychosocial factors such as coping resources, emotional distress, social support, athletic identity, and fear of reinjury may have important roles in the recovery process after sport-related injuries [6775]. An athlete’s psychological response to the injury and recovery process has an impact on return to sport and return to their previous level of activity after an ACL injury. Pediatric patients and their parents must be also counseled regarding the importance of reporting any activity-related effusion, mechanical symptom, or episodes of instability, as this may risk deterioration of joint function [49]. An annual YBT is recommended for ACL-deficient athletes [76].


Phase 4 (Maintenance Program)


Emphasis on maintenance program and injury prevention is paramount in this age group. An injury prevention program in the pediatric athlete interested in returning to pivoting sports should be tailored to be to the child’s physical and mental maturation level. Age-specific programs are guided by the principles of LTAD [48, 50, 58, 77]. Chapter 17 will review injury prevention programs for the pediatric athlete.


Functional Brace


Historically, a functional brace was used as the primary treatment, along with activity modification, for an ACL injury in the skeletally immature athlete [24]. Today, the use of a functional brace remains an important adjunct to physical therapy in the nonoperative treatment of an ACL injury in this age group [6, 7, 17, 26, 39, 50, 51, 66, 78].

The use of a functional brace remains controversial in the treatment of the mature athlete with an ACL injury with or without a reconstruction. Half of all athletes with ACL deficiency will not be able to return to sports without a brace [33]. Although a brace may provide symptomatic relief of instability, a randomized trial in patients ages 18–50 years old with and without a brace did not demonstrate a difference in outcomes or conversion to surgery [32]. This may not be true for all sports or nonathletes [33]. Kocher et al. demonstrated a decrease in knee injuries in skiers who used a functional brace as opposed to those who did not while skiing. In this study, braced skiers had a 2% incidence of a new injury, while non-braced skiers had a 13% incidence (p = 0.005) [79].

Biomechanical models have demonstrated improvement in the anterior translation of the tibia with the use of the brace [80]. Rotational stability, particularly anterolateral rotational instability, is not supported by the use of a brace [81]. Regardless of the in vitro justification of the use of a functional ACL brace, a majority of patients with ACL deficiency have symptomatic relief with the use of a brace [33].

The use of a functional brace following an ACL tear in a skeletally immature patient is an important part of the treatment if they intend to return to athletic activity. Standard functional braces used in mature patients will typically not fit a young or prepubescent patient. The lack of physiologic quadriceps and gastrocsoleus muscle hypertrophy in the young ACL-deficient patient may not allow for standard ACL functional bracing that is commonly used in sports medicine practice. Few bracing manufacturers have developed pediatric-specific functional braces (see Table 8.2).
Jan 18, 2018 | Posted by in RHEUMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Conservative Treatment of ACL Tear

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access