, David G. I. Scott2 and Chetan Mukhtyar2
(1)
Department of Rheumatology, Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, UK
(2)
Department of Rheumatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
2.1 Introduction
The classification of vasculitis has been an area of controversy for many years, with specific classification criteria only introduced relatively recently. Kussmaul and Maier [1] provided the first description of “periarteritis nodosa” when they described a patient with a systemic illness characterized by numerous nodules along the course of small muscular arteries.
The most widely accepted classification system reflects dominant vessel size and association with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) (Table 2.1). This classification system also broadly reflects the therapeutic approaches that are applied to the different groups. The medium and small vessel group respond well to immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids, whereas the large vessel group require moderate to high dose steroids and the small vessel group only sometimes require low dose corticosteroids. Also, the small-medium vessel group is the most likely to develop glomerulonephritis and renal failure, is associated with ANCA, and contrast pathogenetically with the small vessel group, which is often associated with immune complexes. This has led to the emergence of the concept of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) which reflects the notion that granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s) (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg–Strauss) (EGPA) share many features in common and they are often included together in clinical trials.
Table 2.1
Classification of systemic vasculitis
Dominant vessel involved | Primary | Secondary |
---|---|---|
Large arteries | Giant cell arteritis (GCA) Takayasu arteritis (TAK) | Aortitis associated with RA Infection (e.g., syphilis, tuberculosis) |
Medium arteries | Kawasaki disease Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) | Hepatitis B virus associated PAN |
Small ANCA associated | Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s) (GPA) Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg–Strauss) (EGPA) Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) | Drugsa |
Small Immune complex | IgA Vasculitis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura) (IgAV) Cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis (non-HCV) Anti-GBM disease Hypocomplementaemic vasculitis | RA, SLE, Sjogren’s syndrome Serum sickness Cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis (HCV associated) Drug inducedb |
Variable | Behçet’s Cogan’s syndrome | Drugsc |
2.2 ACR (1990) Criteria
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR), in 1990, proposed the criteria for the classification of seven different vasculitides (Giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis (TAK), GPA, EGPA, Polyarteritis Nodosa (PAN), IgA vasculitis (Henoch–Schönlein) (IgAV), Hypersensitivity vasculitis (HSV)) with sensitivities varying from 71.0 to 95.3 % and specificities of 78.7–99.7 % [2]. The most sensitive and specific criteria were found in EGPA, GCA, and TAK; hypersensitivity (leukocytoclastic) vasculitis was the least well-defined condition. The ACR criteria have a number of drawbacks. The criteria were developed before the wide spread introduction of ANCA. They do not include MPA, which was a term not in common use during the 1980s. It is important to stress that they were designed as classification criteria and not diagnostic criteria.