© Springer-Verlag London 2016
Dominique G. Poitout (ed.)Biomechanics and Biomaterials in Orthopedics10.1007/978-1-84882-664-9_1111. Cement with Antimitotics
(1)
Orthopaedics Department, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
Keywords
Cement with antimitoticsAntimitotic cementOsteosynthesis after surgeryCisplatin use in bone cementBone cement with antimitoticsThere are two causes of failure in the surgical treatment of metastatic tumors : firstly, local recurrence of the tumour is not always prevented, even after extra-tumoral surgical exeresis and systemic chemotherapy, and secondly, failure of osteosynthesis after surgery. For these reasons, we thought that it would be helpful to provide local chemotherapy during and immediately after surgery, for instance, by adding an antimitotic to the acrylic cement used to replace the bone loss or to seal reconstruction prostheses. It was thought that the antimitotic would be likely to be released into the surrounding tissues in the same way as many antibiotics. Diffusion into the surrounding tissues is well established for numerous antibiotics [1–6].
We performed a number of experiments [7–9] to assess acrylic cement as a vehicle for local chemotherapy: (1) Diffusion of antimitotic drugs from acrylic cement was studied in vitro to determine that these drugs were released and were still biologically active after exposure to highly reactive monomer and the exothermic curing reaction. (2) Experiments in vivo were performed on two groups of animals. We tested the effect of such local chemotherapy on experimental osteosarcoma of the rat and on dogs with spontaneous osteosarcoma. General and local tolerance of the antimitotic-loaded cement was assessed.
Finally, we report our preliminary clinical investigations [10–12] with pharmacological data from patients. It was possible to envisage using cement/drug mixtures to treat orthopaedic complaints calling simultaneously for mechanical consolidation of the bone [13] and in-situ release of a drug: one example would be the strengthening of bone with cement after resection of a bone tumour [14] plus the local release of antimitotic drugs from the implant.
Cement was the first vehicle to be studied for the purpose of releasing local chemotherapy. Methyl polymethacrylate (P.M.M.A.) fulfils the two following criteria: it has good biocompatibility, since the system has to remain in situ throughout the rest of the patient’s life; it is not biodegradable, so that it provides mechanical support for bone which has been weakened by the surgical exeresis of a neoplastic site.
Many antimitotic drugs are available; for our first investigations we used methotrexate and cisplatine. Methotrexate was chosen because its concentration is easy to determine by spectrophotometry, and because there is an antidote (citrovorum rescue) for adverse effects. We used the acrylic bone cement currently employed by the authors for clinical arthroplasty.
Study of the Release of Methotrexate (MTX)
The first study investigated the in-vitro release of antimitotics included in acrylic cement. After confirming that this release does actually occur, starts rapidly and is maintained over a prolonged period, two further studies were then carried out in vivo: one in dogs suffering from spontaneous osteosarcoma, in order to investigate the release of the antimitotic from the cement into the plasma, the systemic safety and the local activity of the antimitotic-loaded cement following exeresis of the neoplasm.
The second study was conducted in laboratory rats with implanted osteosarcomas. This type of tumour was used so that a large number of animals with tumours could be studied and divided into uniform groups. Under these experimental conditions, it was possible to monitor the progress of the tumours left in situ as well as the histopathological changes brought about by the local action of antimitotics released from implants.
Kinetic profile of the release of MTX from implants
To investigate the release of MTX from a block of acrylic cement implanted into the tissues, cubic test pieces were placed in 32 ml of physiological saline, which was changed every day. The concentration in the elution fluid was measured before each change. These test pieces were made from a mixture of 500 mg methotrexate powder, 46.5 g of polymer, and 20 ml of monomer, poured into 2 cm cubic moulds. Each cube weighed about 13 g and contained approximately 100 mg of methotrexate. Methotrexate elution was evaluated daily for 15 days and then weekly for 6 months for six specimens, the results being given as an average of the 6.
The release profiles from implants containing 1 % w/w have shown that methotrexate is released more rapidly during the first 2 h and 10 % of the load is released within the first 18 h. The rate of release then slows. Implants immersed in an extraction medium which is changed regularly, continue to release methotrexate for 6 months; the quantities released initially being greater the greater the initial load.
The release of methotrexate from acrylic cement
This has been investigated in vivo in dogs with spontaneous sarcoma. We therefore chose an animal with a weight close to that of man, and a spontaneous tumour with an evolution like that of human osteosarcoma, similarly hypervascular because this may influence the diffusion of cisplatine. In experiments at the National Veterinary School of Maisons-Alfort, we used dogs with spontaneous osteosarcoma. This is a malignant tumour [15, 16] with the same aggressive properties as the human type. It affects the very large breeds of dog such as the Saint Bernard (mean weight 70 kg), the mastiff (55 kg) and the boxer (30 kg). It progresses rapidly in the absence of treatment, and death is the rule in a few months [17, 18]. Simple resection of the tumour rapidly leads to local relapse, and even after amputation 85 % of dogs die within 7 months of diagnosis [15, 19, 20]. The loss of substance resulting from the exeresis of the tumour was compensated using freshly prepared methotrexate-loaded cement. The dose of methotrexate received ranged from 1.6 to 16 mg/kg. Two hours after being implanted, plasma levels of methotrexate ranged from 0.08 to 0.02 μmol/l (1 μmol of methotrexate = 0.455 mg). After 24 h, the plasma levels were between 0.1 and 0.02 μmol/l and by the third day were no longer detectable. Toxic effects were observed on day 4 in the 3 animals which had received a dose of more than 200 mg of methotrexate. The other animals, which had received a dose of between 100 and 150 mg, did not display any signs of toxicity. The survival curve of the animals in this group seemed to be better than that of the animals which underwent surgery without adjuvant treatment, where 85 % of the animals had died within 7 months.
The Efficacy of Methotrexate-Loaded Implants
This was investigated using the experimental model of osteosarcoma in the rat [21, 22]. Using implants equivalent to 1.5 mg of active constituent, tumour growth was temporarily slowed and the survival time of the animals significantly prolonged.
These experiments have shown that the rise in temperature which accompanies the polymerisation of the cement does not destroy MTX and, like antibiotics, MTX can be released from the cement. Migration probably occurs as a result of diffusion; the cement constitutes a network of pores and micro-fissures which makes it accessible to the liquid medium in which it is immersed. This liquid penetrates into the system and dissolves the crystals of MTX which then diffuse into the surrounding medium. This mechanism is certainly the dominant one at work during the early stages of MTX release. It probably accounts for the initial peak which characterises the kinetics of MTX release. It is logical to suppose that the outer layers of the cement are more accessible to the liquid medium than the inner layers.