Approach to Osteochondral Lesions of the Medial Talus


Osteotomy technique

Exposure/visualization

Advantages

Disadvantages

Transverse

Inadequate

Simple procedure

Talar dome covered by tibial plafond

Inverted U

Inadequate

Simple procedure

Contraindicated for large OCLs, limited range of motion, and narrow joints

Crescentic

No perpendicular access

Conforms to contour of talar dome

Horizontal cut results in no perpendicular access

Step-cut

Excellent

Modified technique provides good access

Difficult to fix the fragment perpendicular to the cut

Oblique

Excellent

Excellent congruity when the cut is made 30° relative to long axis of the tibia

Outcomes vary; fragment migration seen when fixation is not perpendicular to cut; requires precise cut 30° to tibia

Chevron-type

Excellent

Good healing and fixation in short term

May require precise cut 30° to tibia


Amount of exposure, advantages, and disadvantages of medial malleolar osteotomy techniques are outlined for comparison [42]



The Chevron-type medial malleolar osteotomy has been described several times previously [19, 21]. The medial malleolus is exposed using a standard curvilinear medial incision, and a K-wire is then used to establish the apex of the Chevron cut. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the K-wire is advanced to the subchondral plate at the malleolar colliculous (Fig. 8.1). Proper angulation of the guidewire is necessary for exposing the OCL, and angulation can be adjusted based on the location of the lesion but should be around 30° in relation to the long axis of the tibia. Two parallel fixation holes are then drilled in the malleolus for later reduction of the fragment. An oscillating saw is then used to create the osteotomy, with a baby Bennett retractor in place to protect the posterior tibial tendon. Sawing is halted before reaching the articular surface and the osteotomy completed using an osteotome (Fig. 8.2). The procedure is concluded with reduction of the osteotomy fragment. This is achieved by securing predrilled fixation holes using 4.0 mm cannulated screws. A transverse screw is also placed in the malleolus to prevent superior migration (Fig. 8.3). A series of 62 patients undergoing Chevron-type osteotomy demonstrated satisfactory healing and fixation at a median time of 6 weeks. Fibrocartilaginous infill was evident in the superficial half of repair tissue at the osteotomy interface, and MRI indicated restored normal tissue in the deep half [21]. In a separate series, 4 of 19 patients had a slight (<2 mm) displacement at the osteotomy site, but this was attributed to technical error [9].

A321118_1_En_8_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 8.1
A Chevron cut is made in the medial malleolus after predrilling the fixation holes and placing a guidewire for osteotomy direction (Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited)


A321118_1_En_8_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 8.2
The osteotomy cut is terminated just prior to reaching the subchondral bone and completed with an osteotome (Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited)


A321118_1_En_8_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 8.3
The osteotomy is fixed with two parallel screws and a third transverse screw to prevent superior migration of the osteotomy fragment (Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited)

An oblique osteotomy provides adequate visualization of the talus and good congruity when executed properly [21, 37]. Some case series have shown no postoperative complications [27, 31], while others have reported osteoarthritis [17], reduction in plantar flexion [4], reduction in range of motion [4], loss of stability [21, 37], and potential for fragment migration when fixation screws are not applied perpendicular to the osteotomy cut [37]. Failure of the osteotomy to heal in an anatomic position may place higher load on the ankle, potentially leading to arthrosis [25]. Deciding which osteotomy is most appropriate to treat, medial OCLs should be based on the size and location of the lesion and most importantly on the surgeon’s experience with the technique.



8.4 Conclusions


Arthroscopic approaches are well established, minimally invasive, and can provide access to most OCLs. Standard anterior arthroscopy can access about 50 % of the talus without invading the joint space, and 75 % of the talus can be accessed with distraction, debridement, and/or arthroscopic invasion of the joint space. This approach is recommended when preoperative imaging indicates an OCL is in an accessible location and does not require full visualization or open treatment [23, 41]. Posterior/hindfoot arthroscopy is a safe and effective approach and should be used when anterior arthroscopy cannot grant access to a posteriorly located OCL. For this approach, careful regard for hindfoot anatomy is required.

A medial malleolar osteotomy should be avoided when an arthroscopic approach can provide access and allow satisfactory treatment of an OCL. However, when the characteristics of a lesion require the use osteochondral transplantation, an open approach with a malleolar osteotomy is a feasible option. Oblique osteotomy requires precision, and adverse outcomes have been reported. In addition, there is a risk of fragment migration when fixation screws are not applied properly [37], and failure of the osteotomy to heal in an anatomic position may place higher load on the ankle, potentially leading to arthrosis [25]. The Chevron-type osteotomy has shown good outcomes but requires long-term follow-up studies.

Ultimately, lesion size and characteristics will impact the treatment of choice and therefore the approach used. OCL location and characteristics must therefore be considered when planning the surgical approach (Fig. 8.4).

A321118_1_En_8_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 8.4
An algorithm for the approach to osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome. Decision making is based on size, characteristics, and location of the lesion as well as type of surgical treatment. The oval is the starting point, each rectangle is a factor in the decision-making process, and each rhombus is a selected approach and end point


Conflict of Interest

The author has no current conflict of interests with the products presented.


References



1.

Abramowitz Y, Wollstein R, Barzilay Y, et al. Outcome of resection of a symptomatic os trigonum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1051–7.PubMed


2.

Alexander IJ, Watson JT. Step-cut osteotomy of the medial malleolus for exposure of the medial ankle joint space. Foot Ankle. 1991;11:242–3.PubMedCrossRef


3.

Assenmacher JA, Kelikian AS, Gottlob C, Kodros S. Arthroscopically assisted autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: an MRI and clinical follow-up study. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:544–51.PubMed

May 22, 2017 | Posted by in SPORT MEDICINE | Comments Off on Approach to Osteochondral Lesions of the Medial Talus

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access