Examples of (a) genu varum and (b) “windswept” limb deformities
Limb bowing can be generalized or focal. The differential diagnosis of the cause of genu varum or genu valgum includes physiologic, posttraumatic (malunion, sequelae of physeal fractures), postinfectious, inflammatory (juvenile arthritis), and systemic diseases (rickets), generalized bone disorders (skeletal dysplasias, osteogenesis imperfect, enchondromatosis, osteochondromatosis, neurofibromatosis), and congenital causes such as limb deficiencies. Tibial deformity can be anterolateral (apex anterior and lateral – associated with congenital pseudarthrosis), anteromedial (apex anterior and medial – associated with fibular hemimelia), and posteromedial (apex posterior and medial – associated with a calcaneovalgus foot deformity).
Recognizing that many deformities are multiplanar and that planning complex limb realignment is beyond the scope of this book, the authors’ goal is to provide a basic understanding of (1) lower limb malalignment, (2) how to identify components of the deformity, and (3) surgical options for achieving correction.
Clinical Evaluation of Limb Deformities
The history should identify previous traumatic injuries or infections and/or medical or nutritional issues, suggesting an underlying metabolic problem. A family history can identify similar limb malalignment in other family members and familial bone diseases. Ask how the patient and family perceive the “problem”: is it purely cosmetic, or is there pain or limitation in activities?
The physical assessment begins with general health and nutrition. Height and weight should be measured and compared with normative data. The lower extremity exam includes observational gait analysis and focuses on limb alignment and leg lengths, both assessed while standing with the patellae facing forward. Hip, knee, and ankle range of motion are measured, as contractures can be sources of apparent limb length discrepancy. Knee joint stability is tested, as ligamentous laxity can contribute to a varus or valgus moment with weight-bearing, often associated with a “thrust” during ambulation. The spine should be examined to rule out associated spinal deformity or pelvic obliquity, which can contribute to apparent limb shortening and gait deviations.
Radiographs are essential when evaluating a limb deformity, ideally as standing full-length AP (patella pointing forward) and lateral radiographs of both lower extremities. If long cassettes are unavailable, consider separate standing AP and lateral films of both the femur and the tibia/fibula, including the proximal and distal joints in each film. When weight-bearing views are unavailable, knee laxity must be inferred from the clinical exam. Look for physeal widening and other abnormalities seen in rickets or certain skeletal dysplasias. Upper extremity and spine x-rays may be necessary to confirm underlying diagnoses and optimize the patient preoperatively.
Preoperative Planning
Identify the mechanical axis deviation (in mm from the center of the knee joint)
Determine the source of malalignment – femur, tibia, joint laxity, or any combination
Define the planes and levels of deformity
For simplicity, we will discuss coronal malalignment at the knee, recognizing that varus or valgus deformities of the proximal femur or the ankle can also play a role.
Analysis of coronal and sagittal alignment
Joint | Measurement | Description | Normal values | Pathologic deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (range) | ||||
Coronal alignment | Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) | Angle between the mechanical axis of the femur (center of hip to center of knee) and a line drawn along the distal femoral condyles | 88° (85–90°) | ↑ = Femoral varus ↓ = Femoral valgus |
Anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) | Angle between the anatomic axis (midshaft) of the femur and a line drawn along the distal femoral condyles | 81° (79–83°) | ↑ = Femoral varus ↓ = Femoral valgus | |
Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) | Angle between tibial mechanical (same as anatomic) axis and a line drawn across the proximal tibial joint surface | 87° (85–90°) | ↑ = Tibial valgus | |
↓ = Tibial varus | ||||
Joint line congruence angle (JLCA) | Angle between a line drawn along the distal femoral condyles and a line drawn along the proximal tibial joint surface | 2° (1–3°) apex medial | ↑ =Varus (wider laterally) | |
↓ =Valgus (wider medially) | ||||
Sagittal alignment | Posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA) | Angle between the mid-diaphyseal line of the distal femur and the sagittal distal femoral joint line (physis or physeal scar) | 83° (79–87°) | ↑ = Recurvatum |
↓ = Procurvatum | ||||
Posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) | Angle between the proximal tibial articular surface and the mid-diaphyseal line of the tibia | 81° (77–84°) | ↑ = Recurvatum (more anterior slope) | |
↓ = Procurvatum (more posterior slope) |