Adult Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Chapter 30 Adult Lumbar Spinal Fusion



More than 200,000 spinal fusions are performed each year in the United States. Controversy exists as to whether spinal fusion is the treatment of choice for patients with various types of low back pain. Some of the reasons for this controversy are that there is a 10% to 40% pseudarthrosis (failure of fusion) rate; improved function, particularly return to work, does not always occur; and many patients experience continued postoperative pain. Furthermore, in some cases, additional surgery is necessary and adds to health care costs. In the United States alone, total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain reached an estimated 90.7 billion dollars, and, on average, individuals with back pain incurred 60% higher expenditures than individuals without back pain. Careful patient selection and choice of the appropriate surgical procedure seem to generate the best surgical outcomes.


Fusions can be classified into two categories: instrumented and noninstrumented. Noninstrumented fusions do not use any hardware. They are much less commonly performed and are usually done for single-level fusions only. The two most common instrumented lumbar spinal fusion procedures are posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and circumferential fusion. Both procedures have a very good rate of fusion. Bono and Lee showed that PLIF has a fusion rate of 85%, and circumferential yielded 91% fusion. For the purpose of this guideline, only the PLIF will be described. It is important, however, that the physical therapist be aware that there are many spinal fusion techniques. The principles of rehabilitation following lumbar spinal fusion remain the same, regardless of the procedure.


One of the most important concepts for the physical therapist to understand is the concept that the hardware is merely a temporary scaffold until biological healing is complete. Biological healing can be affected by many factors including smoking, poor surgical technique, and mechanical stress across the fusion mass (movement during the phases of healing). It is the mechanical stress with which the physical therapist is to be most concerned when developing a rehabilitation program. Careful consideration must be made of the forces generated by lever arms, such as the upper and lower extremities and their effects on the lumbar spine. Although there is a paucity of research examining the in vivo forces generated across a healing fusion site, Rohlmann et al. did show that lifting both legs in the supine position generated the highest loads on the fixation devices as compared to most other lumbar stabilization exercises.


Osteoporosis is a relative precaution and does not preclude complete healing from occurring. Additional precautions, such as bracing, may be required in patients with osteoporosis.


In summary, the following are generally accepted indications for spinal fusion:










Surgical Overview












Rehabilitation Overview






Jun 22, 2016 | Posted by in PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION | Comments Off on Adult Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access