A six-step process of ethical decision making in arriving at a caring response
Objectives
• Discuss how courage assists you in a caring response.
• Identify two benefits of taking time to reflect on and evaluate the action afterward.
New terms and ideas you will encounter in this chapter
six-step process of ethical decision making
chemical restraints
rounds
Topics in this chapter introduced in earlier chapters
Topic | Introduced in chapter |
Ethics | 1 |
A caring response | 2, 3, 4 |
Moral distress | 3 |
Ethical dilemma | 3 |
Locus of authority problem | 3 |
The importance of story or narrative | 4 |
Paternalism | 4 |
Deontology | 4 |
Teleology | 4 |
Utilitarianism | 4 |
Character traits | 4 |
Introduction
You have come a long way in laying the foundation for identifying prototypes of ethical problems and in identifying the ethical tools available to you for analysis in your search for resolution of conflicts consistent with a caring response. In this chapter, you will have an opportunity to apply what you have learned using a problem-solving method to analyze and move toward resolution of such problems. The story of Anthony Carnavello and Alexia Eliopoulos is a good starting point for this discussion.
As in most actual situations, Alexia’s first encounter with what appears to be an ethical problem has left many questions unanswered. The path from Alexia’s first perception to possible action consistent with a caring response traverses a six-step process of ethical decision making.
The six-step process
Ethical decision making requires your thoughtful reflection and logical judgment (i.e., “ethical reasoning” discussed in Chapter 4) even though the situation usually presents itself in a mumbo jumbo of partial facts and strong reactions. The following steps allow you to take the situation apart and look at it in a more organized, coolheaded way while still acknowledging the intense emotions everyone may be experiencing about the situation and how these feelings factor into addressing the problem.
In Chapter 1, you learned that ethics is reflection on and analysis of morality. This step-by-step process is, overall, a formalized approach to both. In the context of health care, your professional ethics dictates that your reflection is directed toward arriving at a caring response in a particular situation. As a moral agent, your reflection and ensuing judgment are geared toward action.
Step 1: get the story straight—gather relevant information
The first step in informed decision making is to gather as much information as possible. Anyone viewing this situation might ask the following types of questions:
• What tests have been conducted to confirm the type and degree of neurologic involvement?
• What does his “violent” behavior consist of?
• Is he at risk of injuring himself or others?
• What is the recent history of the exchanges between Mr. Carnavello and the staff?
What other information about physical and chemical restraints (i.e., medicines that sedate the patient) in nursing homes should Alexia seek out?
Reflection
Are there other questions you thought of as you read the story?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
The necessity for close attention to details takes you back to Chapter 4, which introduced you to the importance of the story or narrative. Without knowing as much as possible about the story line, it is impossible to ascertain the attitudes, values, and duties embedded in it. As you probably recall, the theories and approaches to ethics have important clues about how each of these is an important consideration if you are going to be able to arrive at a caring response. The fact-finding mission is absolutely essential as a safeguard against setting off on a false course from the beginning.
Some of the benefits of seeking out the facts in the situation described earlier are that you may be able to determine whether Alexia’s perception of Mr. Carnavello’s treatment is accurate and to understand why the various players in this drama are acting as they are. Although Annette Carroll’s comments are difficult to interpret, she may be implying that Alexia’s response would be tempered by more knowledge of the situation. Often, what initially appears to be a “wrong” act is, after all, a right or acceptable one once more of the story is known.
Fact finding also could help Alexia identify the focus of her anger more specifically. What triggered the response? Was it Mr. Carnavello’s apparent helplessness in the situation? The nurse’s actions? What Alexia has read about misuse of chemical restraints?1–3 Why has Mr. Carnavello been labeled as “confused” and “violent” when Alexia believes he showed no signs of being either? Fact finding is an essential step in Alexia’s ethical reasoning process. She must clarify the known facts of the case versus the beliefs. All of the facts are needed to make a judicious and well-reasoned decision.
The following general checklist for data gathering and adding specific questions will help you organize your thoughts around your specific situation. They are adapted from a handbook designed for clinicians.4
a. What is the diagnosis or prognosis?
b. Is the illness or condition reversible?
c. Is life-saving treatment medically futile?
d. What is the present treatment regimen?
e. What is the usual and customary treatment for this type of condition?
f. What is needed to relieve suffering or to provide comfort?
g. Who are the primary caregivers?
h. What can you learn about this patient’s medical and social history?
a. What does he or she want in this situation?
b. Who has communicated the realistic options to the patient?
c. What was the patient actually told?
d. What evidence do you have that what the patient said has been heard by key decision makers?
e. Is he or she competent to make decisions about this situation?
g. If not competent, is another person speaking as a legitimate legal substitute for this patient?
a. What are the patient’s beliefs and values that make up his or her personal value system?
c. Is there any hope for improvement in the patient’s quality of life?
a. What institutional policies may influence what can be done?
b. What are the legal implications (court cases, statutes, and so on) regarding this issue?
c. Are scarce resources an issue?
d. How will these services be paid for?
e. Are there family issues that may influence the plan of care?