9 Massive Rotator Cuff Repair: Margin Convergence



10.1055/b-0039-167658

9 Massive Rotator Cuff Repair: Margin Convergence

Robert U. Hartzler, Andrew J. Sheean, and Stephen S. Burkhart


Abstract


Rotator cuff tear patterns vary. Consequently, surgeons should be prepared to employ different repair techniques based on individual tear characteristics. The term margin convergence refers to side-to-side suturing of a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. A margin convergence technique can be the key to an anatomic and biomechanically sound repair in appropriate tear patterns. Longitudinal rotator cuff tears (U, L, or reverse L) have significant anteroposterior mobility and often require side-to-side suturing for reduction without undue tension on the repair. In this fashion, margin convergence can convert a seemingly irreparable tear into an easily reparable one. From a biomechanical perspective, side-to-side suturing of an appropriate rotator tear (classically, the U pattern) carries the advantage of decreasing strain along the free margin of the tear by decreasing the length and increasing the cross-sectional area of the tear. In a traditional margin convergence technique, a series of individual side-to-side sutures is placed from anterior to posterior across the tear. As these are sequentially tied from medial to lateral, the margin of the tear converges toward the greater tuberosity bone bed. The repair can subsequently be completed using anchor-based fixation of the tendon to the greater tuberosity. The newer shoestring-to-bone construct gives the surgeon a knotless option for margin convergence to bone.




9.1 Introduction


Burkhart coined the phrase “margin convergence” and described the biomechanical rationale for this surgical technique 1 ; however, the concept of using side-to-side sutures in rotator cuff repair dates back to Codman 2 and McLaughlin. 3 Knowledge of the principles, indications, techniques, and limitations of margin convergence techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair will greatly aid shoulder surgeons in the care of their patients.



9.2 Goals of Procedure


Margin convergence techniques in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair serve the ultimate purpose of obtaining anatomic tendon-to-bone healing to restore pain-free and functional use of the shoulder.



9.3 Advantages


When used for appropriate rotator cuff tear patterns, margin convergence repair techniques achieve two goals: decreased strain along the free margin of the rotator cuff and increased likelihood of an anatomic repair construct. These advantages have led to excellent clinical results. 4 6 When significant anteroposterior mobility of the cuff tear exists, use of side-to-side suturing will counteract the deforming forces and make the reduction and repair construct more anatomic.


Biomechanical principles concerning the impact of strain and strain reduction on the rotator cuff have been laid out in detail by Burkhart previously 1 , 7 and have also been confirmed with biomechanical testing. 8 10 In short, margin convergence by side-to-side suturing creates a modified tear margin that has reduced strain for a given force from the cuff musculature. The reduced strain results from a smaller tear length at the apex and an increased cross-sectional area at the apex of the tear ( Fig. 9.1 ). Decreased strain is hypothesized to decrease pain, protect a tendon-to-bone repair construct, and prevent tear propagation. 8

Fig. 9.1 (a) Diagram of a rotator cuff tear with a U-shaped tear margin (solid line) having length L1 from apex to greater tuberosity and cross-sectional area A1 at the apex. After side-to-side suturing, the “converged margin” (dotted line) has a much smaller length (L1) from new apex to tuberosity and larger cross-sectional cuff area (A2) at the new apex. For a given force on the cuff (F), the strain will be reduced by a factor of . 1 If L2 is a third of L1 and A2 is twice A1, strain will be reduced at the new apex by a factor of 6. (b) Illustration of a U-shaped rotator cuff tear with apex length L1 and cross-sectional area A1 at the apex. (c) After margin convergence by a running tape suture (shoestring technique), the new margin has apex length L2 and cross-sectional area A2 at the apex, which results in much less strain at new tear margin.


9.4 Indications


In the authors’ opinion, repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears should be attempted for nearly all patients who do not have significant glenohumeral arthrosis (Hamada 11 stages 4 to 5). Margin convergence techniques are then utilized as determined by the tear pattern as assessed intraoperatively. In Davidson and Burkhart’s geometric classification of rotator cuff tears, 12 longitudinal (L-, reverse L-, or U-shaped) tears require some degree of anterior-to-posterior reduction and often require side-to-side suturing for reduction and/or repair. In particular, U-shaped tears, which have roughly equal anterior-to-posterior mobility of the tear leaves ( Fig. 9.2 ), often evolve from seemingly irreparable to easily reparable after side-to-side suturing ( Fig. 9.3 ). Finally, massive, contracted (immobile) tears repaired using interval slides or superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) often require reinforcement using side-to-side suturing after fixation of the tissue to the bone bed. 13

Fig. 9.2 Right shoulder 70-degree posterior viewing portal showing a massive, U-shaped rotator cuff tear. The mediolateral dimension is usually longer than the anteroposterior dimension in a U-shaped tear. The anterior leaf (a) has good posterior mobility (b) upon reduction with a tendon grasper. The posterior leaf (c) has approximately equal anterior mobility (d).
Fig. 9.3 The massive, U-shaped tear seen in Fig. 9.2 will appear to be irreparable (a) if the surgeon only attempts to reduce the apex directly laterally (blue arrow). After side-to-side suturing using the shoestring technique (b), the converged margin of the tear (green line) now sits directly over the bone bed under no tension.


9.5 Contraindications


Margin convergence techniques should not be used for rotator cuff tear patterns for which they are not suited. For example, in a massive, contracted (immobile) tear, the surgeon might be able to “force” a few side-to-side sutures and be quickly done with the case when the best repair construct might instead be a well-done partial repair or SCR after mobilizing the tear fully with interval slides. Margin convergence should not be thought of as a panacea for all large to massive rotator cuff tears.



9.6 Preoperative Preparation/Positioning


Although intraoperative assessment should be the gold standard for assessing tear and repair patterns, preoperative MRI can be helpful for predicting these. 14 When planning for repair of large to massive cuff tears or in the revision setting, we prepare for the possibility of addressing an irreparable tear with arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR. 13


We perform all arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery in the lateral decubitus position with a standard operating room setup that includes a second assistant standing opposite the surgeon to provide adjustments to the arm, such as the posterior lever push. 15 We have found the lateral decubitus position to provide the best arthroscopic visualization, a critical factor for performing complex arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 14, 2020 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on 9 Massive Rotator Cuff Repair: Margin Convergence

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access