8 Distal and Diaphyseal Humerus Plating



10.1055/b-0040-174131

8 Distal and Diaphyseal Humerus Plating

Martin Skie


Summary


The goal of treatment for fractures of the diaphysis is to restore alignment of the bone and provide fixation stable enough to allow weight bearing for trauma patients. The goals for fractures of the distal humerus are anatomic restoration of the joint surface and fixation stable enough to allow for an early range of motion. Preoperative planning is critical for a successful procedure. The fracture location and type will determine the patient position during surgery, the exposure necessary to provide adequate and safe visualization and fixation, and they type of instrumentation that will need to be available for provisional and definitive stabilization. 1




8.1 Positioning and Approaches




  • Humeral shaft fractures of the middle third are most safely approached from anterior. Fractures of the lateral condyle and capitellum can be approached through a lateral exposure. In both cases, the patient is positioned supine on a radiolucent table. The arm is out on a hand table. A sterile tourniquet may be needed for shaft fractures so that it can be removed for proximal exposure. Check a C-arm image to make sure you can see the proximal extent of anticipated fixation.



  • Fractures of the distal third, split condylar, and most intra-articular fractures are best exposed through one of the posterior approaches. The patient is placed on a radiolucent table in a lateral position with a bean bag, or other positioner. All bony areas should be padded, and an axillary roll may be needed. The arm is suspended over an arm bar (bird perch). A sterile or nonsterile tourniquet can be used. Make sure that adequate C-arm images can be obtained including the expected proximal extent of fixation (▶Fig. 8.1).

Fig. 8.1 Patient in lateral position with a bean bag and elbow placed over an arm holder.


Alternatively, the patient can be positioned prone on chest rolls. An arm board is placed adjacent to the table on the operative side, and folded towels or drapes secured to the arm board so that the operative arm is supported when it is abducted 90 degrees, with the elbow flexed 90 degrees.



8.2 Surgical Approaches



8.2.1 Anterior Approach to the Humerus




  • Patient is supine with the arm on a hand table.



  • A midline longitudinal incision is made.



  • Dissect along the lateral side of the biceps.



  • Using a finger, bluntly develop the plane between the biceps and brachialis muscles and retract the biceps medially.



  • Identify, and protect, the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve on the lateral undersurface off the biceps.



  • Using a periosteal elevator, split the brachialis longitudinally down the midline (lateral brachialis is innervated by the radial nerve, and the medial brachialis is innervated by the musculocutaneous nerve).



  • The entire anterior humeral shaft can be exposed. The placement of hardware is limited distally by the coronoid fossa. Proximally, the exposure can be extended into the deltopectoral interval by moving over to the lateral side of the proximal biceps.



  • Closure is accomplished by loosely approximating the brachialis muscle with 0 or 2–0 absorbable suture. The biceps is laid back in place. The subcutaneous tissue is closed with absorbable 2–0 suture, and the skin per surgeon preference.



8.2.2 Lateral Approach to the Distal Humerus




  • Patient is supine with the arm on a hand table.



  • Mark the lateral epicondyle.



  • The incision begins proximally on the epicondylar ridge, and curves distally at the lateral epicondyle extending along the lateral forearm.



  • For lateral condyle and capitellum fractures, the best exposure is usually through the interval between the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) and the extensor digitorum communis (EDC)—the Kaplan approach. The ECRL and extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), along with the lateral capsule are released from the epicondyle and ridge. If more proximal exposure is needed, be careful and identify the radial nerve at the superior edge of the brachioradialis muscle.



  • If visualization of the ulno-humeral joint and inferior capitellum is needed, or if lateral ligament repair/reconstruction is required, the plane of dissection is between the ECU and anconeus (Kocher approach). This will give wide exposure of the entire lateral side of the elbow.



  • Closure is accomplished by repairing the extensor origin to a cuff of posterior tissue using absorbable or permanent 0 or 2–0 suture. If soft tissues are poor, the origin can be repaired to the bone through drill holes or with a suture anchor. Fascia between muscle groups can be approximated with absorbable 2–0 suture. And the subcutaneous tissue and skin in normal fashion.



8.2.3 Posterior Approaches


Of the described methods of exposing the posterior humerus, the most commonly used are the triceps sparing, triceps splitting, and olecranon osteotomy. All have advantages and disadvantages. The triceps sparing maintains integrity of the extensor mechanism but has the most limited visualization of the joint surface. The triceps splitting gives better exposure but requires repair of the triceps tendon and may result in residual extensor insufficiency. Making an olecranon osteotomy provides the best exposure of the joint, including the anterior joint surface. The osteotomy creates another fracture to fix and heal, and there is frequent irritation from the hardware.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 5, 2020 | Posted by in ORTHOPEDIC | Comments Off on 8 Distal and Diaphyseal Humerus Plating

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access